Corellium Responds to Apple Lawsuit, Claims its iOS Virtualization Software Helps Apple

Apple in August filed a lawsuit against Corellium, a mobile device virtualization company that supports iOS, with Apple accusing Corellium of copyright infringement for replicating the operating system that runs on the iPhone and iPad.

As noted by Motherboard, Corellium today filed its response to Apple's lawsuit, accusing the Cupertino company of owing $300,000 and claiming that its software helps Apple by making it easier for security researchers to track down iOS bugs.

corellium

A virtual ‌iPhone‌ on Corellium's website used as evidence in Apple's lawsuit against the company

According to Apple, Corellium's product infringes on its copyrights by creating digital replicas of iOS, iTunes, and other apps and software. "Corellium has simply copied everything: the code, the graphical user interface, the icons - all of it, in exacting detail," reads Apple's lawsuit.

Corellium designed its software to create virtual iOS devices able to run iOS, and has encouraged researchers and hackers to use it to find and test vulnerabilities.

According to Corellium, Apple's code in its product is "fair use" and the software makes the world better by allowing security researchers to look into iOS, find flaws, and inform Apple so the bugs can be fixed.

Corellium argues it's easier for researchers to find and test bugs in iOS using virtual instances of iOS rather than physical devices. With this lawsuit, says Corellium, Apple is aiming to control who is allowed to find vulnerabilities in its software. This is a position that is also supported within the security community, according to Motherboard, and many security researchers were surprised by Apple's initial lawsuit.

Through its invitation-only research device program and this lawsuit, Apple is trying to control who is permitted to identify vulnerabilities, if and how Apple will address identified vulnerabilities, and if Apple will disclose identified vulnerabilities to the public at all.

One of Corellium's key arguments is that its customers are seeking bugs with the intention of alerting Apple of their existence, which Motherboard points out is just an assumption and, based on evidence, not true. One customer highlighted in Corellium's legal response, for example, is Azimuth, a company that does not report bugs to Apple.

Instead, Azimuth sells hacking tools based on those bugs to law enforcement and intelligence agencies in countries like the United States and Canada.

Corellium also argues that Apple has known about the company for years and has been friendly to Chris Wade, one of Corellium's founders. Corellium says that Wade was invited to join Apple's bug bounty program. Wade has since reported seven bugs to Apple without receiving payment, which is why Corellium argues that Apple owes $300,000.

Apple declined to provide Motherboard with a comment on Corellium's legal response. Apple is continuing to seek a permanent injunction to prevent Corellium from offering a product that replicates iOS. Apple also wants Corellium to destroy all infringing materials that it's collected, and pay Apple damages, lost profits, and attorney fees.

Popular Stories

ATT Banner

Some AT&T, T-Mobile and Verizon Customers Report Issues With Calls [Update: Fixed]

Tuesday June 4, 2024 10:51 am PDT by
There appears to be an outage with at least one U.S. cellular carrier, with customers unable to place or receive calls. AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon customers have been complaining about the issue on social networks, and there are also reports of outages on the Down Detector website. According to a statement from AT&T, the outage is affecting calls between carriers in the United States. All...
apple tv 4k yellow bg feature

Gurman: No Hardware at WWDC, Next Apple TV No Longer Coming Soon

Sunday June 2, 2024 6:59 am PDT by
Bloomberg's Mark Gurman does not expect Apple to announce any new hardware during its WWDC 2024 keynote on June 10. "There's no hardware slated to be announced at WWDC, unless Apple unexpectedly previews a new device launching later (to be clear: I don't expect that)," said Gurman, in his Power On newsletter today. Notably, Gurman now says a new Apple TV model "isn't imminent," despite...
maxresdefault

Sonos Ace Headphones vs. AirPods Max

Monday June 3, 2024 6:01 am PDT by
Sonos in May decided to get into the headphone market with the launch of the Sonos Ace headphones. The $449 Sonos Ace headphones have some enticing design elements and features you won't see in Apple's headphones, so we thought we'd compare them to the $549 AirPods Max to see which is ultimately better. Subscribe to the MacRumors YouTube channel for more videos. In terms of design, both the...
iOS 18 Siri Integrated Feature

iOS 18: These iPhones Likely Won't Support Some AI Features

Tuesday June 4, 2024 5:04 am PDT by
Apple is planning a major AI overhaul in iOS 18, but some new features are unlikely to work on older iPhones, even if they do appear on the new operating system's device compatibility list. Apple's initial AI roadmap for iOS 18 is said to come in two parts: Basic AI features that will be processed on-device, and more advanced capabilities that will require communication with Apple's servers. ...
iPhone 16 Pro Front Feature

iPhone 16 Pro Could Break Record for Thinnest Bezels on a Smartphone

Monday June 3, 2024 2:23 am PDT by
Apple's upcoming iPhone 16 Pro models will have the thinnest bezels of any smartphone, beating the screen border thinness of even its latest iPhone 15 Pro devices. That's according to the leaker known as "Ice Universe," who has divulged accurate information about Apple's plans in the past. According to multiple sources, despite minimal design changes, both iPhone 16 Pro models will increase...

Top Rated Comments

chucker23n1 Avatar
60 months ago
Regardless of where you stand, this argument doesn't hold water.


According to Corellium, Apple's code in its product is "fair use" and the software makes the world better by allowing security researchers to look into iOS, find flaws, and inform Apple so the bugs can be fixed.

Corellium argues it's easier for researchers to find and test bugs in iOS using virtual instances of iOS rather than physical devices.
Really? Your product is for security purposes? That's weird, because your anemic website makes the completely different case that it's for mobile development.

That’s no simulator.
Mobile Device Virtualization:
The Future of Mobile Development
Guess the legal team needs to quickly tell the marketing team what the product is allegedly for?

And secondly, suppose it is secondarily intended for security purposes. Why does this matter? I can't just declare something "fair use" just because I personally find my use case noble. That's not remotely how copyright works.

If you agree with Corellium's point of view, then at best, Apple is being grossly negligent by not letting third parties use Corellium to discover potential security issues. And if you feel that way, you should alert Apple's customers about that. But from a copyright point of view, that's still for Apple to decide.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
bbeagle Avatar
60 months ago
So, according to Corellium, I could break into people's homes if I'm there for the purpose of helping them out.

I'll break into people's homes, open their refrigerators, check the expiration dates on their eggs and milk. And if they're expired, I'll write the home-owner a note on the kitchen table letting them know.
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
markgpearse Avatar
60 months ago
Seems like a slam dunk for Apple.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
chucker23n1 Avatar
60 months ago

Bud, I don't care how lawyers argue intellectual property rights or EULA.
And yet you literally joined a thread about a lawsuit about intellectual property rights. Weird.
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Peace Avatar
60 months ago
They can do this because they think they are helping Apple..

Priceless..

Say..I'm helping Apple so I'm gonna make copies of Mac O/S..
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Kabeyun Avatar
60 months ago

Too many here are not getting the use case for this, equating it to plain 'thievery'. This seems like a pretty neat research tool, that does what vmware/vbox/parallels do for desktop virtualization.

Regardless of the turn out for this, Apple really just wants to control how people are able to do security research on their devices. Considering how things went this past summer for webkit security and their response and the mess that has been the current 13/15 releases, they probably should do a better job opening up the system for security research. (yes I know about the recent changes to the bug bounty program)
I’m so relieved that Corellium has explained this for Apple’s lawyers. Once Apple realizes they were actually incorrect to sue them, I’m sure they’ll drop the lawsuit.
Score: 3 Votes (Like | Disagree)