Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online June 13, 2021

Challenging humanist leadership: Toward an embodied, ethical, and effective neo-humanist, enlightenment approach

Abstract

It can be argued that a humanistic enlightenment approach to leadership emerged as a counter to the historical prevalence of totalitarian elitism where leaders were often autocratic and authoritarian, demanding obedience through command and control. Although beginning with the ancient Greeks, this kind of leadership has continued through classical periods from early medieval times up until the industrial revolution, and also into our modern era. Since the 18th century, philosophies of enlightened humanism have been the face of leadership thinking if not always what might be seen as its embodied practice. Beneath the surface, there lurks a controlling and demanding imposition of self-discipline that can be seen as equally if not more, repressive than the elitism it replaces. This article is concerned to challenge such repression by developing a neo-humanist enlightenment approach to leadership and its development. It departs from those studies that reflect and thereby reproduce individualized preoccupations with, and attachments to, identity on the part of leaders and the so-called followers. The focus, instead, is on an embodied leadership that encourages an ethical engagement with the community, institutions, organizations, and society.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Alvesson A, Blom M, Sveningsson S (2017) Reflexive Leadership. London: Sage.
Alvesson M, Einola K (2019) Warning for excessive positivity: authentic leadership and other traps in leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly 30: 383–395.
Alvesson M, Spicer A (2012) Critical leadership studies: the case for critical performativity. Human Relations 65(3): 367–390.
Austin JL (1962) How to do Things With Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Avolio B (2004) Leadership Development in Balance : MADE/Born, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Avolio BJ, Gardner WL (2005) Authentic leadership development: getting to the root of positive forms of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 16(3): 315–338.
Barad K (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bearn GCF (2019) Political philosophy without human content. Dialogue and Universalism 1: 105–116.
Ben-Ghiat R (2020) Strongmen: How They Rise, Why They Succeed, How They Fall. New York: Profile Books.
Bernauer JW (1993) Michel Foucault’s Force of Flight: Toward an Ethics of Thought. London: Humanities Press.
Braidotti R (1991) Patterns of Dissonance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Braidotti R (2011) Nomadic Theory: The Portable Rosi Braidotti. Kindle edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
Braidotti R (2013) The Posthuman. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Butler J (2011) Performance contrasted with performativity. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bo7o2LYATDc 6th July 2011 consulted 5.10.18.
Butler J (1993) Bodies That Matter. New York: Routledge.
Butler J (2015) Notes Toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Cabantous L, Gond JP, Harding N, et al. (2016) Critical essay: reconsidering critical performativity. Human Relations 69(2): 197–213.
Carroll B, Ford J, Taylor S (2019a) Leadership: Contemporary Critical Perspectives. London: Sage.
Carroll B, Firth J, Wilson S (2019b) After Leadership. New York and London: Routledge.
Carroll J (1993) Humanism: The Wreck of Western Culture. London: Fontana Press.
Caza A, Jackson B (2011) Authentic leadership. In: Bryman D, Collinson K, Grint B, et al. (eds) Sage Handbook of Leadership: 350-362. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ciulla J, Knights D, Mabey C, et al. (2018) Guest editors’ philosophical approaches to leadership ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 28(1): 1–118.
Ciulla JB (1995) Leadership ethics: mapping the territory. Business Ethics Quarterly 5: 5–24.
Ciulla JB (2005) The state of leadership ethics and the work that lies before us. Business Ethics: A European Review 14(4): 323–335.
Clarke C, Knights D (2015) Careering through academia: identity and ethical subjectivity in UK business schools. Human Relations 68(12): 1865–1888.
Clarke C, Knights D (2020) The killing fields of identity politics. In: Brown A (ed) The Oxford Handbook of Identity. Oxford: OUP, 801–816.
Clarke C, Knights D (2021) Milking it for all its worth? Unpalatable practices, dairy cows and veterinary work. Journal of Business Ethics. First online Published 29 March 2021.
Clough PT (1992) The End(s) of Ethnography: From Realism to Social Criticism. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Collinson DL (2014) Dichotomies, dialectics and dilemmas: new directions for critical leadership studies? Leadership 10(1): 36–55.
Costea B, Amiridis K, Crump N (2012) Graduate employability and the principle of potentiality: an aspect of the ethics of HRM. Journal of Business Ethics 111(1):25–36.
Cowper D (2016) The truth about human potential that top leaders know. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/truth-human-potential-top-leaders-know-donald-cowper consulted 15 October 2020.
Crevani L (2018) Is there leadership in a fluid world? Exploring the ongoing production of direction in organizing. Leadership 14(1): 83–109.
Crevani L, Linggren M, Packendorff J (2010) Leadership, not leaders: on the study of leadership as practices and interactions. Scandinavian Journal of Management 26(1): 77–86.
Delaney H, Spoelstra S (2019) Transformational leadership: secularized theology? In: Carroll B, Ford J, Taylor S (eds) Leadership: Contemporary Critical Perspectives. London: Sage.
Deleuze G, Guattari F (1988) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Trans. Brian Massumi. London: The Athlone Press.
Derrida J (1992) The Gift of Death. Trans. by David Wills. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Di Stefano G, Gaudiino M (2019) Workaholism and work engagement: how are they similar? How are they different? A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 28(3): 329–347.
Dinh J, Lord R, Gardner W, et al. (2014) Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadership Quarterly 25(1): 36–62.
Drath WH, McCauley CD, Palus CJ, et al. (2008) Direction, alignment, commitment: toward a more integrative ontology of leadership. The Leadership Quarterly 19: 635–653.
Ekman S (2012) Fantasies about work as limitless potential − how managers and employees seduce each other through dynamics of mutual recognition. Human Relations 66(9): 1159–1181.
Fairhurst GT, Connaughton SL (2014) Leadership: a communicative perspective. Leadership 10(1): 7–35.
Fiedler FE (1967) A Theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Foucault M (1961 [2001]) Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the age of Reason. New York, London: Taylor & Francis Group.
Foucault M (1973) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage Books
Foucault M (1982) Afterword: the subject and power. In: Dreyfus HF, Rainbow P (eds) Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Brighton, England: Harvester Press, 208–226.
Foucault M (1984) Michel Foucault: interview with Allesandro Fontano. In: Kritzman L (ed) Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings. New York: Routledge.
Foucault M (1988) The Care of the Self: The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage Books, Vol. 3.
Foucault M (1991a) What is enlightenment? In: Rabinow P (ed) The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Foucault M (1991b) Politics and the study of discourse In: Burchell GD, Gordon C, Miller P (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault M (1997) Ethics: Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Foucault M (2005) The Hermeneutics of the Subject: Lectures at the College De France, 1981-2. Trans. G. Burchell. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fournier V, Grey C (2000) At the critical moment: conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Human Relations 53(1): 7–32.
Fowler JD (1999) Humanism: Beliefs and Practices. Brighton: Sussex Academic Press.
Game A (1990) Undoing the Social. London: Routledge.
Gardner WL, Lowe KB, Moss TW, et al. (2010) Scholarly leadership of the study of leadership: a review of the leadership quarterly’s second decade. The Leadership Quarterly 21(6): 922–958.
Gatens M (1996) Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality. London: Routledge.
Geller L (1982) The failure of self-actualization theory: a critique of Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. Journal of Humanistic Psychology 22(2): 56–73.
Glynos J (2008) Ideological fantasy at work. Journal of Political Ideologies 13(3): 275–296.
Gray J (2002) Straw Dogs: Thoughts on Humans and Other Animals. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Grint K (2000) The Arts of Leadership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grosz E (1994) Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Grosz E (2005) From ‘intensities and flows’ In: Atkinson T (ed) The Body: Readers in Cultural Criticism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 142–155.
Haraway D (1991) Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Women. London and New York: Routledge.
Haraway D (2008) When Species Meet. University of Minnesota Press.
Hawkins B (2015) Ship-shape: materializing leadership in the British Royal Navy. Human Relations 68(6): 951–971.
Hyde MJ (2010) Perfection. New York, Boston: Baylor University Press.
Joiner WB, Josephs SA (2008) Leadership agility: five levels of mastery. Strategic Direction 24(10): 95–109.
Jones S (2014) Distributed leadership, a critical analysis. Leadership 10(2): 129–141.
Kelly S (2014). Towards a negative ontology of leadership. Human Relations 67(8): 905–922.
Kendall G, Wickham G (1999) Using Foucault’s Methods. London: Sage.
Kernis MH, Goldman BM (2006) A multicomponent conceptualization of authenticity: theory and research In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. San Diego: Academic Press, 283–357.
Knights D (2015) Binaries need to shatter for bodies to matter: do disembodied masculinities undermine organizational ethics? Organization 22(2): 200–216.
Knights D (2021) Leadership, Gender and Ethics: Embodied Reason in Challenging Masculinities. New York and London: Routledge.
Knights D, Clarke C (2017) Pushing the boundaries of amnesia and myopia: a critical review of the literature on identity in management and organization studies. International Journal of Management Reviews 19(3): 337–356.
Knights D, O’Leary M (2006) Leadership, ethics and responsibility to the other. Journal of Business Ethics 67(2): 125–137.
Ladkin D (2018) Self-constitution as the foundation for leading ethically: a Foucauldian possibility. Business Ethics Quarterly 28(3), 301–323.
Langley A, Smallman C, Tsoukas H (2013) Process studies of change in organization and management: unveiling temporality, activity, and flow. Academy of Management Journal 56(1): 1–13.
Lasch C (1979) The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: W. W. Norton.
Learmonth M, Morrell K (2019) Critical Perspectives on Leadership: The Language of Corporate Power. New York: Routledge.
Leder D (1990) The Absent Body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Leonard G (1969) Education and Ecstasy. New York: North Atlantic Books.
Levinas E (1998) Entre-nous: On thinking of the other. New York: Columbia University Press.
Levine MP, Boaks J (2014) What does ethics have to do with leadership? Journal of Business Ethics 124(2): 1–18.
Llopis G (2014) Leadership is about enabling the full potential in others. https://www.forbes.com/sites/glennllopis/2014/07/29/leadership-is-about-enabling-the-full-potential-in-others/#69e6a1d26698 consulted 14 October 2020.
Lyotard F (1979) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
McCabe D, Knights D (2016) Learning to listen? Exploring discourses and images of masculine leadership through corporate videos. Management Learning 47(2): 179–198.
Martin GP, Waring J (2018) Realising governmentality: pastoral power, governmental discourse and the (re)constitution of subjectivities. The Sociological Review 66(6): 1292–1308.
Maslow AH (1943) A theory of motivation. Psychological Review 50(4): 370–396.
Mayo E (1933) The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization. New York: Macmillan.
Munro I, Thanem T (2018) The ethics of affective leadership: organizing good encounters without leaders. Business Ethics Quarterly 28(1): 51–69.
Opdebeeck H (2017) The challenge of Transhumanism in business. Contributions to Conflict Management, Peace Economics and Development 26: 251–260.
Pullen A, Rhodes C (2008) ‘It’s all about me!’ gendered narcissism and leaders’ identity work. Leadership 4(1): 5–25.
Pullen A, Rhodes C (2014) Corporeal ethics and the politics of resistance in organizations. Organization 21(6): 782–796.
Pullen A, Rhodes C (2015) Ethics, embodiment and organizations. Organization 22(2): 159–165.
Puttick E (2004) Human potential movemen. In: Hugh C (ed) Encyclopedia of New Religions. Oxford: Lion.
Raelin J (2016a) Imagine there are no leaders: reframing leadership as collaborative agency. Leadership 12(2): 131–158.
Raelin JA (2016b) Leadership as Practice: Theory and Application. New York: Routledge.
Ropo A, Salovaara P (2018) Spacing leadership as an embodied and performative process. Leadership 15(4): 461–479.
Sheldrake M (2020) Entangled Life. London: Bodley Head.
Silva A (2016) What is leadership? Journal of Business Studies Quarterly 8(1): 1–5.
Sinclair A (2005a [1998]) Doing Leadership Differently: Gender, Power and Sexuality in Changing Business Culture. Carlton South, VIC: University of Melbourne Press.
Sinclair A (2005b) Body possibilities in leadership. Leadership 1(4): 387–406.
Spector B (2019) Moral leadership? Be careful what you wish for. Leadership 15(1): 123–131.
Spicer A, Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2009) Critical performativity: the unfinished business of critical management studies. Human Relations 62(4): 537–560.
Stodgill RM (1974) Handbook of Leadership. New York, NY: Free Press.
Taylor C (2003) The Ethics of Authenticity. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Tourish D (2013) The Dark Side of Transformational Leadership: A Critical Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.
Tourish D (2015) Some announcements, reaffirming the critical ethos of Leadership, and what we look for in submissions. Leadership 11(2): 135–141.
Tourish D (2020) Special issue on leadership and the coronavirus. Leadership 16(3): 261–384.
Tourish D, Vatcha N (2005) Charismatic leadership and corporate cultism at enron. Leadership 1(4): 455–480.
Uhl-Bien M (2006) relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. The Leadership Quarterly 17: 654–676.
Wilson SE (2016) Thinking Differently About Leadership: A Critical History of Leadership Studies. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Wilson SE, Cummings S, Jackson B, et al. (2018) Revitalising Leadership: Putting Theory and Practice Into Context. London and New York: Routledge.
Wolfe C (2012) What Is Posthmanism? Minneapolis, MN and London: University of Minnesota Press.
Wood M (2005) The fallacy of misplaced leadership. Journal of Management Studies 42(6): 1101–1121.
Wray-Bliss E (2013) A crisis of leadership: towards an anti‐sovereign ethics of organisation. Business Ethics: A European Review 22(1): 86–101.
Yukl GA (1989 [2006]) Leadership in Organizations. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Ziarek EP (2001) An Ethics of Dissensus: Postmodernity, Feminism and the Politics of Radical Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Biographies

David Knights is an emeritus professor at Lancaster University Management School and a professor at Oxford Brookes Business School but has held professorships in the universities of Manchester, Nottingham, Keele, Exeter, UWE, Swansea, and the OU in the UK and internationally in Dublin, Gothenburg, Stockholm, and Tampa. He was the cofounder and editor of Gender, Work and Organization from 1994 to 2016. His most recent publication is Leadership, Gender and Ethics: Embodied Reason in challenging Masculinities, New York and London: Routledge, 2021.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Pages: 674 - 692
Article first published online: June 13, 2021
Issue published: December 2021

Keywords

  1. Leadership
  2. humanism
  3. enlightenment
  4. identity
  5. ethics

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2021.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David Knights
Lancaster University Management School and Oxford Brookes Business School, UK

Notes

David Knights, Lancaster University Management School and Oxford Brookes Business School, UK. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Leadership.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1226

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 3 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 3

  1. “We are not selling soap here, you know”: Eight humanistic leadership ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Update of leadership-as-practice “practice theory”: Featuring Joe Rael...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Disrupting masculinities within leadership: Problems of embodiment, et...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text