Three methodological approaches to studying singlehood
Corresponding Author
Yoobin Park
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
Correspondence
Yoobin Park.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYuthika U. Girme
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorGeoff MacDonald
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yoobin Park
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
Correspondence
Yoobin Park.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYuthika U. Girme
Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorGeoff MacDonald
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
As the number of single (unpartnered) individuals continues to rise, researchers across various disciplines have started to pay more attention to single individuals' lives. Yet, compared to the accumulated knowledge about experiences within romantic relationships, there is far less known about various experiences within singlehood. For singlehood research to grow in both quantity and quality, it is essential that research findings are critically evaluated both in terms of robustness of the evidence and validity of the inferences. In this paper, we review three broad approaches researchers have taken to understand singlehood that centered on (a) between-group status (i.e., single vs. in a relationship) differences, (b) within-person status differences, and (c) within-group variability among singles. With a focus on well-being as an outcome, we illustrate how each approach provides unique insights into singlehood and what caveats there are in interpreting results derived from each approach. Finally, we identify questions or methods that have not been extensively explored within each approach and offer suggestions for future research directions.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
REFERENCES
- Adamczyk, K. (2017). Voluntary and involuntary singlehood and young adults’ mental health: An investigation of mediating role of romantic loneliness. Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 36(4), 888–904. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-016-9478-3
10.1007/s12144?016?9478?3 Google Scholar
- Adamczyk, K., Barr, A. B., & Segrin, C. (2021). Relationship status and mental and physical health among Polish and American young adults: The role of relationship satisfaction and satisfaction with relationship status. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 13(3), 620–652. https://doi.org/10.1111/aphw.12248
- Adamczyk, K., Watkins, N., Dębek, A., Kaczmarek, D., & Łazarów, N. (2023). Relationship (in) congruency may differently impact mental health. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 23(3), 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100376
- Anusic, I., Yap, S. C., & Lucas, R. E. (2014). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Analysis of life satisfaction and affect in an Australian national sample. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 69–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2014.04.009
- Apostolou, M., Birkás, B., da Silva, C. S. A., Esposito, G., Hsu, R. M. C. S., Jonason, P. K., Karamanidis, K., O, J., Ohtsubo, Y., Putz, Á., Sznycer, D., Thomas, A. G., Valentova, J. V., Varella, M. A. C., Kleisner, K., Flegr, J., & Wang, Y. (2021). Reasons of singles for being single: Evidence from Brazil, China, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, India, Japan and the UK. Cross-Cultural Research, 55(4), 319–350. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971211021816
- Baumbusch, J. L. (2004). Unclaimed treasures: Older women’s reflections on lifelong singlehood. Journal of Women & Aging, 16(1–2), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1300/J074v16n01_08
- Beckmeyer, J. J., & Jamison, T. B. (2023). Empowering, pragmatic, or disappointing: Appraisals of singlehood during emerging and established adulthood. Emerging Adulthood, 11(1), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/21676968221099123
- Blekesaune, M. (2018). Is cohabitation as good as marriage for people’s subjective well-being? Longitudinal evidence on happiness and life satisfaction in the British household panel survey. Journal of Happiness Studies, 19, 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9834-x
- Böger, A., & Huxhold, O. (2020). The changing relationship between partnership status and loneliness: Effects related to aging and historical time. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 75(7), 1423–1432. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gby153
- Braithwaite, S., & Holt-Lunstad, J. (2017). Romantic relationships and mental health. Current Opinion in Psychology, 13, 120–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.001
- Brzozowska, Z. (2021). Attitudinal and behavioural indices of the second demographic transition. Demographic Research, 44, 1115–1132. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2021.44.46
- Bulloch, A. G., Williams, J. V., Lavorato, D. H., & Patten, S. B. (2017). The depression and marital status relationship is modified by both age and gender. Journal of Affective Disorders, 223, 65–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.06.007
- Cassidy, J. (2000). Adult romantic attachments: A developmental perspective on individual differences. Review of General Psychology, 4(2), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.111
10.1037/1089-2680.4.2.111 Google Scholar
- Chasteen, A. L. (1994). The world around me”: The environment and single women. Sex Roles: Journal of Research, 31(5–6), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01544591
- Choi, I., Milne, D. N., Glozier, N., Peters, D., Harvey, S. B., & Calvo, R. A. (2017). Using different Facebook advertisements to recruit men for an online mental health study: Engagement and selection bias. Internet Interventions, 8, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2017.02.002
- Chopik, W. J., Chartier, C. R., Campbell, L., & Donnellan, M. B. (2020). Relationship science and the credibility revolution: An introduction to the first part of the special issue. Personal Relationships, 27(1), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12312
- Chopik, W. J., Moors, A. C., Litman, D. J., Shuck, M. S., Stapleton, A. R., Abrom, M. C., Stevenson, K. A., Oh, J., & Purol, M. F. (2023). Individual difference predictors of starting a new romantic relationship during the COVID-19 pandemic. Personality and Individual Differences, 201, 111919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111919
- Darling, N., & Burns, I. R. (2023). How does cross sectional sampling bias our understanding of adolescent romantic relationships? An agent based simulation. Journal of Adolescence, 95(2), 296–310. https://doi.org/10.1002/jad.12114
- Day, M. V. (2016). Why people defend relationship ideology. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 33(3), 348–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407515613164
- Delgado-Rodriguez, M., & Llorca, J. (2004). Bias. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(8), 635–641. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.008466
- Dennett, B., & Girme, Y. (2023). “Do I need to be in a relationship?”: Single peoples’ endorsement of relationship beliefs exacerbates fears of being single and undermines well-being. Manuscript submitted for publication.
- DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2005). Singles in society and in science. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2–3), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli162&3_01
- DePaulo, B. M., & Morris, W. L. (2006). The unrecognized stereotyping and discrimination against singles. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00446.x
- Diener, E., Gohm, C. L., Suh, E., & Oishi, S. (2000). Similarity of the relations between marital status and subjective well-being across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 31(4), 419–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022100031004001
- S. Duck, D. F. Hay, S. E. Hobfoll, W. Ickes, & B. M. Montgomery (Eds.) (1988). Handbook of personal relationships: Theory, research and interventions. John Wiley & Sons.
- Dutton, D. G., & Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(4), 510–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037031
- Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455
- Feld, S. L., & Meyer, J. A. (2018). Evidence required to know whether marriage promotion increases other social benefits. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 10(4), 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12297
- Ferri-García, R., & Rueda, M. D. M. (2020). Propensity score adjustment using machine learning classification algorithms to control selection bias in online surveys. PLoS One, 15(4), e0231500. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231500
- Finkel, E. J., Simpson, J. A., & Eastwick, P. W. (2017). The psychology of close relationships: Fourteen core principles. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044038
- Fraley, R. C., Brumbaugh, C. C., & Marks, M. J. (2005). The evolution and function of adult attachment: A comparative and phylogenetic analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(5), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.751
- Frantal, S., Pernicka, E., Hiesmayr, M., Schindler, K., & Bauer, P. (2016). Length bias correction in one-day cross-sectional assessments–The nutritionDay study. Clinical Nutrition, 35(2), 522–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2015.03.019
- Gelles-Watnick, R. (2023). For valentine’s day, 5 facts about single Americans. Pew Research Center. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/
- Girme, Y. U., Overall, N. C., Faingataa, S., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Happily single: The link between relationship status and well-being depends on avoidance and approach social goals. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(2), 122–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550615599828
- Girme, Y. U., Park, Y., & MacDonald, G. (2023). Coping or thriving? Reviewing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and societal factors associated with well-being in singlehood from a within-group perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(5), 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221136119
- Girme, Y. U., Sibley, C. G., Hadden, B. W., Schmitt, M. T., & Hunger, J. M. (2022). Unsupported and stigmatized? The association between relationship status and well-being is mediated by social support and social discrimination. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211030
- Golombok, S. (2017). Parenting in new family forms. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 76–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.02.004
- Goode, W. J. (1959). The theoretical importance of love. American Sociological Review, 24(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089581
- Greitemeyer, T. (2009). Stereotypes of singles: Are singles what we think? European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(3), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.542
- Gumà, J., Cámara, A. D., & Treviño, R. (2015). The relationship between health and partnership history in adulthood: Insights through retrospective information from Europeans aged 50 and over. European Journal of Ageing, 12(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-014-0316-x
- Hagger, M. S. (2019). Embracing open science and transparency in health psychology. Health Psychology Review, 13(2), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2019.1605614
- Haring-Hidore, M., Stock, W., Okun, M., & Witter, R. (1985). Marital status and subjective well-being: A research synthesis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 47(4), 947–953. https://doi.org/10.2307/352338
- Harris, L. E. (2023). Older adults on the dating market: The role of family caregiving responsibilities. Journal of Marriage and Family, 85(3), 739–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12904
- Hill, M. E. (2020). You can have it all, just not at the same time”: Why doctoral students are actively choosing singlehood. Gender Issues, 37(4), 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-020-09249-0
- Hofferth, S. L. (2005). Secondary data analysis in family research. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(4), 891–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2005.00182.x
- Holt-Lunstad, J., Birmingham, W., & Jones, B. Q. (2008). Is there something unique about marriage? The relative impact of marital status, relationship quality, and network social support on ambulatory blood pressure and mental health. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 35(2), 239–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-008-9018-y
- Kislev, E. (2021). Reduced relationship desire is associated with better life satisfaction for singles in Germany: An analysis of pairfam data. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 38(7), 2073–2083. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211005024
- Kislev, E., & Marsh, K. (2023). Intersectionality in studying and theorizing singlehood. Journal of Family Theory & Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12522
- Ko, A., Pick, C. M., Kwon, J. Y., Barlev, M., Krems, J. A., Varnum, M. E. W., Neel, R., Peysha, M., Boonyasiriwat, W., Brandstätter, E., Crispim, A. C., Cruz, J. E., David, D., David, O. A., de Felipe, R. P., Fetvadjiev, V. H., Fischer, R., Galdi, S., Galindo, O., & Kenrick, D. T. (2020). Family matters: Rethinking the psychology of human social motivation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(1), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619872986
- Lavender Stott, E. S. (in press). Queering singlehood: Examining the intersection of sexuality and relationship status from a queer lens. Journal of Family Theory & Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12521
- Lavender Stott, E. S., Guzzo, K. B., Brown, S. L., & Manning, W. D. (Eds.) (in press). Kaleidoscopic perspectives on theorizing singlehood. Journal of Family Theory & Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12532
- Lee, Y. (2019). Cohort differences in changing attitudes toward marriage in South Korea, 1998–2014: An age-period-cohort-detrended model. Asian Population Studies, 15(3), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730.2019.1647976
- Lewis, K. G., & Moon, S. (1997). Always single and single again women: A qualitative study. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 23(2), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00238.x
- Loving, T. J., & Slatcher, R. B. (2013). Romantic relationships and health. In J. A. Simpson & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of close relationships (pp. 617–637). Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195398694.013.0028 Google Scholar
- Luhmann, M., Hofmann, W., Eid, M., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Subjective well-being and adaptation to life events: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(3), 592–615. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025948
- Luke, N., Clark, S., & Zulu, E. M. (2011). The relationship history calendar: Improving the scope and quality of data on youth sexual behavior. Demography, 48(3), 1151–1176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0051-2
- McGorray, E. L., Emery, L. F., Garr-Schultz, A., & Finkel, E. J. (2023). Mostly White, heterosexual couples”: Examining demographic diversity and reporting practices in relationship science research samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(2), 316–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000417
- Mikucka, M., Arránz Becker, O., & Wolf, C. (2021). Revisiting marital health protection: Intraindividual health dynamics around transition to legal marriage. Journal of Marriage and Family, 83(5), 1439–1459. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12784
- Mirowsky, J. (2013). Analyzing associations between mental health and social circumstances. In C. S. Aneshensel, A. Bierman, & J. C. Phelan (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of mental health. Handbooks of sociology and social research (pp. 143–165). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_8
10.1007/978-94-007-4276-5_8 Google Scholar
- Mudrazija, S., Angel, J. L., Cipin, I., & Smolic, S. (2020). Living alone in the United States and Europe: The impact of public support on the independence of older adults. Research on Aging, 42(5–6), 150–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0164027520907332
- Oh, J., Chopik, W. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2022). Happiness singled out: Bidirectional associations between singlehood and life satisfaction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 48(11), 1597–1613. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672211049049
- Oswald, R. F., Blume, L. B., & Marks, S. R. (2005). Decentering heteronormativity: A model for family studies. In V. L. Bengtson, A. C. Acock, K. R. Allen, P. Dilworth-Anderson, & D. M. Klein (Eds.), Sourcebook of family theory & research (pp. 143–165). Sage Publications, Inc.
10.4135/9781412990172.d32 Google Scholar
- Park, Y., Impett, E. A., & MacDonald, G. (2021). Singles’ sexual satisfaction is associated with more satisfaction with singlehood and less interest in marriage. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(5), 741–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220942361
- Park, Y., & MacDonald, G. (2022). Single and partnered individuals’ sexual satisfaction as a function of sexual desire and activities: Results using a sexual satisfaction scale demonstrating measurement invariance across partnership status. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 51(1), 547–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02153-y
- Park, Y., & MacDonald, G. (2023). Necessities and luxuries in satisfying single lives. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 40(3), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075221122887
- Park, Y., MacDonald, G., & Impett, E. A. (2023). Partnership status and satisfaction with work–life balance. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 32(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2104717
- Park, Y., MacDonald, G., Impett, E. A., & Neel, R. (2023). What social lives do single people want? A person-centered approach to identifying profiles of social motives among singles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(1), 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000455
- Park, Y., Page-Gould, E., & MacDonald, G. (2022). Satisfying singlehood as a function of age and cohort: Satisfaction with being single increases with age after midlife. Psychology and Aging, 37(5), 626–636. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000695
- Pepping, C. A., MacDonald, G., & Davis, P. J. (2018). Toward a psychology of singlehood: An attachment-theory perspective on long-term singlehood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(5), 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417752106
- Perlman, D., Duck, S., & Hengstebeck, N. D. (2018). The seven seas of the study of personal relationships research: Historical and recent currents. In A. L. Vangelisti & D. Perlman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personal relationships (pp. 9–27). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316417867.003
- Pessin, L. (2018). Changing gender norms and marriage dynamics in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(1), 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.12444
- Purol, M. F., Keller, V. N., Oh, J., Chopik, W. J., & Lucas, R. E. (2021). Loved and lost or never loved at all? Lifelong marital histories and their links with subjective well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 16(5), 651–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2020.1791946
- Rauer, A. J., Pettit, G. S., Lansford, J. E., Bates, J. E., & Dodge, K. A. (2013). Romantic relationship patterns in young adulthood and their developmental antecedents. Developmental Psychology, 49(11), 2159–2171. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031845
- Reis, H. T., Aron, A., Clark, M. S., & Finkel, E. J. (2013). Ellen berscheid, elaine hatfield, and the emergence of relationship science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497966
- Reis, H. T., & Rusbult, C. E. (2004). Close relationships: Key readings. Psychology Press.
10.4324/9780203311851 Google Scholar
- Rohrer, J. M., & Murayama, K. (2023). These are not the effects you are looking for: Causality and the within-/between-persons distinction in longitudinal data analysis. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 6(1), 25152459221140842. https://doi.org/10.1177/25152459221140842
10.1177/25152459221140842 Google Scholar
- Sarason, B. R., Sarason, I. G., & Gurung, R. A. R. (2001). Close personal relationships and health outcomes: A key to the role of social support. In B. R. Sarason & S. Duck (Eds.), Personal relationships: Implications for clinical and community psychology (pp. 15–41). John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Schmidt, S. C., & Woll, A. (2017). Longitudinal drop-out and weighting against its bias. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 17(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0446-x
- Schoenborn, C. (2004). Marital status and health: United States, 1999 – 2002. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics.
- Sharp, E. A., & Ganong, L. (2007). Living in the gray: Women’s experiences of missing the marital transition. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(3), 831–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2007.00408.x
- Sprecher, S., & Felmlee, D. (2021). Social network pressure on women and men to enter a romantic relationship and fear of being single. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 15(2), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.6139
10.5964/ijpr.6139 Google Scholar
- Stein, P. J. (1975). Singlehood: An alternative to marriage. Family Coordinator, 24(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.2307/583033
10.2307/583033 Google Scholar
- Swartz, T. T. (2009). Intergenerational family relations in adulthood: Patterns, variations, and implications in the contemporary United States. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.34.040507.134615
- Ta, V. P., Gesselman, A. N., Perry, B. L., Fisher, H. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2017). Stress of singlehood: Marital status, domain-specific stress, and anxiety in a national US sample. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 36(6), 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2017.36.6.461
- Tackett, J. L., & Miller, J. D. (2019). Introduction to the special section on increasing replicability, transparency, and openness in clinical psychology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 128(6), 487–492. https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000455
- Thorne, S. R., Hegarty, P., & Hepper, E. G. (2019). Equality in theory: From a heteronormative to an inclusive psychology of romantic love. Theory & Psychology, 29(2), 240–257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354319826725
- K. H. Trzesniewski, M. B. Donnellan, & R. E. Lucas (Eds.) (2011)., Secondary data analysis: An introduction for psychologists. American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/12350-000
10.1037/12350-000 Google Scholar
- Vanassche, S., Swicegood, G., & Matthijs, K. (2013). Marriage and children as a key to happiness? Cross-National differences in the effects of marital status and children on well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 14(2), 501–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9340-8
10.1007/s10902?012?9340?8 Google Scholar
- van Scheppingen, M. A., & Leopold, T. (2020). Trajectories of life satisfaction before, upon, and after divorce: Evidence from a new matching approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(6), 1444–1458. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000270
- Vera-Toscano, E., & Meroni, E. C. (2021). An age–period–cohort approach to disentangling generational differences in family values and religious beliefs. Demographic Research, 45, 653–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48247-2_2
- Verbakel, E. (2012). Subjective well-being by partnership status and its dependence on the normative climate. European Journal of Population, 28(2), 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-012-9257-2
- Walster, E., Aronson, V., Abrahams, D., & Rottman, L. (1966). Importance of physical attractiveness in dating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(5), 508–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021188
- Wang, X., & Cheng, Z. (2020). Cross-sectional studies: Strengths, weaknesses, and recommendations. Chest, 158(1), S65–S71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.03.012
- Wieczorek, L. L., Tata, C. S., Penke, L., & Gerlach, T. M. (2020). Online implementation of an event history calendar with formr: A tutorial. Personal Relationships, 27(1), 176–208. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/h8cs9
- Wiederman, M. W. (1999). Volunteer bias in sexuality research using college student participants. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(1), 59–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499909551968
- Yap, S. C., Anusic, I., & Lucas, R. E. (2012). Does personality moderate reaction and adaptation to major life events? Evidence from the British household panel survey. Journal of Research in Personality, 46(5), 477–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.05.005
- Zinn, S., & Gnambs, T. (2018). Modeling competence development in the presence of selection bias. Behavior Research Methods, 50(6), 2426–2441. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1021-z