The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20120502043027/http://www.pcgameshardware.com:80/aid,687738/Big-browser-comparison-test-Internet-Explorer-vs-Firefox-Opera-Safari-and-Chrome-Update-Firefox-35-Final/Practice/
Big browser comparison test: Internet Explorer vs. Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome - Update: Firefox 3.5 Final - Browser, Test, Internet Explorer, Firefox, Opera, Safari, Chrome - PC Games Hardware
Username:
Password:
Remember Me?
   Lost your password?
Search



Internet browser tested with Peacekeeper, Sunspider and Acid

Big browser comparison test: Internet Explorer vs. Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome - Update: Firefox 3.5 Final

PC Games Hardware tested the speed of the internet browsers Internet Explorer 6, 7 and 8, Mozilla Firefox 2.0, 3.0.11 and 3.5b99, Opera 9.6 and 10, Safari 3.1.1 and 4.0, Chrome 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0 with the benchmarks Peacekeeper and Sunspider and checked them with the Acid tests as well.
Browser test: Internet Explorer vs. Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome
 
Browser test: Internet Explorer vs. Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome [Source: view picture gallery]


Websites become more and more complex and therefore requirements on good internet browsers constantly increase. Certainly a high level of usability and security are important as well but we focus on the pure speed of websites. We therefore use the benchmarks Futuremark Peacekeeper and Sunspider. For evaluating the performance both benchmark programs mainly use Java scripts. In order to stay abreast of current changes we compiled a new comparison test of different versions and manufacturers.

Browser test: System and browser selection
For the comparison test we used the Internet Explorer in version 6,7 and 8. Most of our readers use Firefox in the current version 3.0.11 - for comparison reasons we also included the old version 2.0 and the new beta version 3.5b99. of course Opera 9.6 and Opera 10 Beta were tested, too. We also tested the newcomers in the Windows browser segment delivered by Apple and Google: Safari 3.22 and 4 as well as Chrome 1.0 and 2.0. We run the browsers on a Windows XP x86 SP3 system with a Core 2 Duo E8500 (4 GHz), 6 GiByte RAM and a Geforce GTX 280 OC.

All results are summed up in clearly arranged benchmark tables - overall results of Sunspider and Peacekeeper as well as the stand-alone tests which considerably differ in parts.

Click to select overall results

Those are the overall results of Sunspider and Peacekeeper which present a considerable difference between the individual versions but also between the browsers of different manufacturers.
Below you can also see the benchmark results for the individual stand-alone tests.

Click to select stand-alone tests

The test Complex Graphics of Peacekeeper is based upon Canvas, an element of the markup language HTML which regrettably is not supported by the Internet Explorer - therefore 0 points for all three versions.

Click to select stand-alone tests

Click to select stand-alone tests

Click to select stand-alone tests


At the end of our tests we added the Acid tests 1 to 3. The table shows if the different browsers passed the rendering tests - only the Acid Test 3 delivers a point value.

  Acid Test 1 Acid Test 2 Acid Test 3 Acid Test 3
  Passed Passed Passed Points
Firefox 2.0.0.20 yes nein no 52/100
Firefox 3.0.11 yes yes no 72/100
Firefox 3.5b99 yes yes no 93/100
Firefox 3.5 Final yes yes no 93/100
Google Chrome 1.0.154.48 yes yes no 79/100
Google Chrome 2.0.177.1 yes yes no 100/100
Google Chrome 3.0.187.1 yes yes no 99/100
Internet Explorer 6.0.299.331 yes no no 12/100
Internet Explorer 7.0.5730.13 yes no no 11/100
Internet Explorer 8.0.6001.18702 yes yes no 12/100
Opera 10.00 Beta Build 1551 yes yes yes 100/100
Opera 9.64 Build 10487 yes yes no 85/100
Safari 3.1.1 Build 525.17 yes yes no 75/100
Safari 4.0 Build 530.17 yes yes yes 100/100


Update: July 3, 2009
Since Mozilla has recently released to final version of Firefox 3.5, we have updated our comparison with results for the new browser: All in all the 3.5 final was able to reach slightly better results than the 3.5b99 Beta. But as the Acid tests are regarded, everything stays the same.

Conclusion: Internet browser test
In his blog Daniel Melanchthon (Technical Evangelist Microsoft) points out that "Mikrobenchmarks” such as Sunspider are not suitable for a general evaluation of webbrowser performances. We basically agree. However, our test is not a "general evaluation”. In fact our comparison test is supposed to show the performance discrepancies concerning the benchmarks Futuremark Peacekeeper and Sunspider. And both benchmarks reveal considerable weaknesses of Internet Explorer 6 and 7. Though Internet Explorer 8 has caught up, it is still on the lower positions. The new Firefox 3.5, here in the beta version 3.5b99, is doing pleasantly well.

How fast is your current internet browser? Please run the tests Futuremark Peacekeeper, Sunspider and Acid and tell us your results.

More interesting articles about browsers:
Firefox: Version 3.0.11 fixes several security vulnerabilities
Internet Explorer 8 ready for download
Google's Browser Chrome 2.0 now available for download
Opera 9.5 is ready to go



Picture gallery  (enlarge to view source)

--
Author: Link, Riemann (Jul 03, 2009)






Advertisement

Comments (9)

Comments 6 to 9  Read all comments here!
ruyven_macaran Re: Big browser comparison test: Internet Explorer vs. Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome - Update: Firefox 3.5 Final
Super Moderator
03.07.2010 20:15
IE more customizable as e.g. Opera?
Thats a statement that needs explanation.
Ar.Pi Re: Big browser comparison test: Internet Explorer vs. Firefox, Opera, Safari and Chrome - Update: Firefox 3.5 Final
Senior Member
21.06.2009 18:08
Well, i definitely can see a big speed difference when using Chrome to my Firefox. As soon as Chrome will come out of its Beta phase and add more features and all necessarily stuff (thats why i'm still on FF) i will move to chrome.
natr0n browser comparison test: Internet Explorer vs. Fir...
Senior Member
19.06.2009 17:29
I still love firefox, since I can block ads and such.Also it's not as prone to viruses and malwares.

Copyright © 2012 by Computec Media AG      About/Imprint  •  Terms/Conditions