ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Ice Nucleation Properties of Oxidized Carbon Nanomaterials

View Author Information
Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom
Cite this: J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015, 6, 15, 3012–3016
Publication Date (Web):July 13, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01096

Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society. This publication is licensed under CC-BY.

  • Open Access

Article Views

2828

Altmetric

-

Citations

59
LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
PDF (3 MB)
Supporting Info (1)»

Abstract

Heterogeneous ice nucleation is an important process in many fields, particularly atmospheric science, but is still poorly understood. All known inorganic ice nucleating particles are relatively large in size and tend to be hydrophilic. Hence it is not obvious that carbon nanomaterials should nucleate ice. However, in this paper we show that four different readily water-dispersible carbon nanomaterials are capable of nucleating ice. The tested materials were carboxylated graphene nanoflakes, graphene oxide, oxidized single walled carbon nanotubes and oxidized multiwalled carbon nanotubes. The carboxylated graphene nanoflakes have a diameter of ∼30 nm and are among the smallest entities observed so far to nucleate ice. Overall, carbon nanotubes were found to nucleate ice more efficiently than flat graphene species, and less oxidized materials nucleated ice more efficiently than more oxidized species. These well-defined carbon nanomaterials may pave the way to bridging the gap between experimental and computational studies of ice nucleation.

Freezing of liquid water to ice must be initiated by an ice nucleation event. In many situations this event is induced by a heterogeneous ice nucleating particle (INP). Ice nucleation is an important process for understanding of atmospheric processes (1-3) and also has relevance in other fields such as the cryopreservation of biological samples, (4) freeze-drying of pharmaceuticals (5) and other substances, (6) and freezing of foodstuffs. (7) Much effort has been devoted to the quantification of the efficiencies of heterogeneous ice nucleants of potential atmospheric relevance. As such, the ice nucleating efficiencies of various mineral dusts, biological entities, volcanic ashes and carbonaceous combustion aerosols (8, 9) have been measured using a wide range of techniques. (1, 2)

It is often assumed that INPs tend to be relatively “large” in size. (3) Indeed, the concentration of atmospheric INPs is correlated with the concentration of particles larger than 0.5 μm in diameter. (10) However, it has been found that nanoscale, readily dispersible biological particles that are shed from both pollen particles and fungi in water can also nucleate ice efficiently, (11-13) and that small particles of poly(vinyl alcohol) can nucleate ice. (14) Of late, there has been a great deal of interest in the synthesis and characterization of carbon nanomaterials. Yet, the ice nucleation activities of these species have not been examined to date.

Here, we have synthesized four different carbon nanomaterials and determined their ice nucleating efficiencies. These are carboxylated graphene nanoflakes (cx-GNFs) and graphene oxide (GO) as well as oxidized multiwall (o-MWCNTs) and single-wall carbon nanotubes (o-SWCNTs). Representative structures for these species are shown in Figure 1. The oxygen/carbon ratios for these materials were determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). The cx-GNFs are small graphene sheets with an average lateral diameter of ∼30 nm. (15) The edges of the flakes are decorated with carboxylic acid groups. They contain 66.3% carbon and 33.7% oxygen. GO consists of much larger sheets of carbon, average diameter ∼1 μm. The structure has a wider range of functional groups than that of the cx-GNFs with alcohol and epoxide groups present as well as carboxylic acids. (16) The face of the GO sheets is oxidized as well as the edges. The GO sample contains 72.0% carbon and 28.0% oxygen. MWCNTs are needle-like tubes of carbon and consist of multiple single layers of carbon wrapped concentrically. Our oxidized material contains 82.2% carbon and 17.8% oxygen. SWCNTs are structurally similar but consist of a single layer of carbon only. After chemical oxidation of the SWCNTs, we find 86.2% carbon and 13.8% oxygen according to XPS. We also present freezing data for a solution of mellitic acid, a molecular species structurally analogous to cx-GNFs, consisting of a single benzene ring with six carboxylic acid groups.

Figure 1

Figure 1. Chemical structures of the various of carbon nanomaterials tested for their ice nucleation activity: (a) small carboxylated graphene nanoflake (cx-GNF), (b) mellitic acid, (c) graphene oxide (GO), (d) multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT), and (e) single walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT). GO sheets have an average lateral diameter of ∼1 μm, while the GNFs have an average lateral diameter of ∼30 nm. (15)

These materials were chosen for this study because their oxidized nature allows them to readily disperse in water. Attempts to conduct experiments with carbonized cx-GNFs, for example, proved impossible, as they did not disperse in water. The oxidized carbon nanomaterials, apart from the o-SWCNTs, all disperse readily in water with stirring. No more than 0.07 wt % of the o-SWCNTs could be dispersed. The 1 and 0.1 wt % dispersions of cx-GNFs are very stable and were not observed to settle even after several months. Suspensions of GO, o-MWCNTs, and o-SWCNTs were less stable, and settled over the course of hours. Dispersions of carbon nanomaterials were tested for the ice nucleating activity immediately after the preparation.

Ice nucleation experiments were conducted using the μL-Nucleation by Immersed Particles Instrument (μL-NIPI). (17) This instrument allows determination of the freezing temperatures of around 50 μL droplets of water under constant cooling. Here, a cooling rate of 1 °C min–1 has been used. The freezing curve for pure water in Figure 2a consists of 737 separate freezing events from 17 experiments and has been reported previously by Umo et al. (18) The freezing observed in the pure water is unlikely to be induced by homogeneous nucleation, which is predicted by classical nucleation theory to occur at temperatures colder than −30 °C in 1 μL droplets. (19, 20) Instead it is likely that the freezing observed is caused by a combination of impurities in the water and on the silanized glass slides used to support the droplets.

Figure 2

Figure 2. (a) Droplet fraction frozen against temperature for 1 and 0.1 wt % dispersions of GO and cx-GNFs, a 1 wt % dispersion of o-MWCNTs, a 0.07 wt % dispersion of o-SWCNTs, a 1 wt % solution of mellitic acid, and pure water. (b) ns values for all tested carbon nanomaterials. The ns values reported for the o-MWCNTs assume that they have nine layers, the average number of the starting material for their synthesis. The shaded area shows the area encompassed by calculating ns for the minimum and maximum wall numbers of the starting material. Experimental uncertainty in ns was calculated by propagation of uncertainty from weighing, droplet size, and background subtraction. In many cases, uncertainties are too small to show on the plot. Temperature uncertainty is ±0.4 °C in panels a and b.

Droplets containing cx-GNFs, GO, o-MWCNTs, and o-SWCNTs all nucleate ice at temperatures higher than the pure water droplets, as shown in Figure 2a. This constitutes the first observations of ice nucleation by these types of materials. In contrast, it can be seen in Figure 2a that mellitic acid does not nucleate ice within the sensitivity of the experimental setup used, with recorded freezing temperatures indistinguishable to those of pure water. This is entirely expected as mellitic acid is a dissolved molecular species so there is no reason to suppose it would interact with water in a way that would encourage ice formation. It is interesting to note that the structurally analogous cx-GNFs do nucleate ice well, showing that the increase in size allows interactions with water suitable for encouraging ice nucleation to occur.

To allow comparison between the carbon nanomaterial nucleants, these values have been normalized to surface area according to a time-independent description of ice nucleation. (21, 22) To calculate theoretical ns values for the graphene species presented in Figure 2b, the total surface area of the cx-GNFs and GO was calculated by assuming that all graphene sheets were completely dissociated from each other and using

n ( T ) N = 1 exp ( n s ( T ) σ )
(1)
where ns is the cumulative number of surface sites per unit surface area of nucleant that become active on cooling from 273.15 K to a temperature T, σ is the surface area of nucleant per droplet, and n(T)/N is the cumulative fraction of droplets frozen.

It can be seen in Figure 2a that GO nucleates ice more efficiently than the cx-GNFs per mass of material, and that the o-MWCNTs and o-SWCNTs nucleate ice more efficiently than the flat species. The carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are similar to each other. The shapes of the ns curves for the two CNT species are different, however. The curve for the o-MWCNTs flattens at lower temperature, meaning that the number of effective INPs increases less quickly with increasing supersaturation than for the o-SWCNTs. There has been interest in the ordering of water in CNT cavities. (23) It is intriguing to suggest that the interior cavities of the CNTs interact with water in a way that promotes ice nucleation and that this is responsible for the strong nucleation we have observed. Both kinds of CNTs are rather less oxidized than the graphene species. The overall trend is therefore that the less oxidized species nucleate ice more efficiently. The 1 wt % dispersion of cx-GNFs has a median nucleation temperature of −21.3 °C and an oxygen content of 33.7%, while the 1 wt % dispersion of o-MWCNTs has a median nucleation temperature of −12.2 °C and an oxygen content of 17.8%. We note in this context that XPS is a surface-sensitive technique, and the determined atom percentages may therefore not necessarily reflect the bulk composition of the samples but more the composition of the sample at the interface with water.

The cx-GNFs in particular are light compared to most other INPs. Their average mass is approximately 325 kDa. In their recent paper, Pummer et al. (24) reviewed a range of small INPs. The cx-GNFs are comparable in mass to the Birch pollen-derived ice nucleating macromolecules discovered by Pummer et al. (11) and the fungal proteins sized by O’Sullivan et al., (13) and somewhat larger than certain poly(vinyl alcohol)s discovered by Ogawa et al., (14) which were shown to nucleate ice at molecular weights as low as 1.7 kDa. All other known INPs are heavier than the cx-GNFs.

The approach we have used to calculate ns assumes that all possible surface area is in contact with water. It is hard to evaluate how realistic this is for the carbon nanomaterials, hence, the ns values reported are most likely lower limits in the case of these nanomaterials. This also means that comparison with existing measurements of other carbon materials such as soots (8, 9) is difficult. It can be seen in Figure 2b that ns derived from lower concentrations dispersions of GO and cx-GNF fall on the same line as higher concentrations suggesting that similar surface areas of material are available per mass of material in both concentrations. This indicates that the materials are not aggregated in dispersion since aggregation is concentration dependent. Calculating ns for the o-MWCNTs was less straightforward, as the precise number of layers in the MWCNTs from which the o-MWCNTs were synthesized is unknown. Manufacturer specifications for the starting material includes the maximum and minimum numbers of walls; ns values have been calculated using these to provide upper and lower limits as seen in Figure 2b. We have assumed that the exterior surface area of the o-MWCNTs is solely responsible for nucleation observed and calculated surface area exposed to water on this basis. The interior surfaces may well play a role, even a dominant one, in the nucleation observed, but the assumptions made seem reasonable for comparative purposes.

While it is difficult to infer details about the specific mechanism of ice nucleation from droplet freezing experiments, some insight into the nature of ice nucleation observed can be derived from its time dependence. The Framework for Reconciling Observable Stochastic Time-dependence (FROST) condenses the key information about time dependence of ice nucleation into a single parameter, λ, which is a nucleant-specific parameter that describes the time dependence of the ice nucleation properties (further details are given in the Supporting Information (SI)). (22) FROST facilitates comparison of different materials through calculation of λ using

T = T 1 λ ( ln 1 r )
(2)
where, for a given experiment, T′ is the modified temperature, the freezing temperature that would be expected if an experiment were conducted at a standard rate of 1 °C min–1, T is the measured freezing temperature, and r is the cooling rate in °C min–1. To calculate λ from multiple fraction frozen curves, the difference between calculated T′ values is minimized by varying λ iteratively.

We have cooled cx-GNFs at rates from 0.2 °C min–1 to 5 °C min–1, the results of which are shown in Figure 3a, and analyzed the resulting data using FROST. (22) A λ value of 3.3 °C–1 has been determined, and Figure 3b shows the normalized data. This λ value is higher than those of the majority of nucleants evaluated by Herbert et al. (22) and might be regarded as a “large” λ value, indicating that ice nucleation by cx-GNFs is relatively insensitive to changes in cooling rate.

Figure 3

Figure 3. (a) Droplet fraction frozen against temperature for 1 wt % cx-GNFs at 5 different cooling rates. (b) Droplet fraction frozen against modified temperature as defined in eq 2 for the same experiments. Temperature uncertainty is ±0.4 °C in panels a and b.

The FROST analysis also reveals whether there is a strong particle-to-particle variability in ice nucleating ability. If the value d ln(ns)/dT, termed ω, is equal to λ, then all surfaces of the nucleant have the same potential to nucleate ice. In contrast, if ω < λ then some parts of the surface have a greater potential to nucleate ice. For cx-GNFs cooled at 1 °C min–1 we have determined ω to be 0.83 °C–1, which is clearly much smaller than λ. This suggests that the nucleation observed may be site specific, meaning that there may be specific sites on the cx-GNFs that are responsible for the ice nucleation. (21, 22) The precise nature of these sites and the reason for their apparent nucleating activity is unclear. It is known that small molecules such as the water molecule can interact with carboxylic acid groups such as those present on cx-GNFs. (25-27) It may be that such site-specific interactions are related to the observed ice nucleation.

At present, there is no case where the mechanism of heterogeneous ice nucleation is well understood. Even the longstanding and elegant lattice matching hypothesis to which the ice nucleating activity of silver iodide is attributed has been questioned. (28, 29) Various molecular dynamics simulations have been conducted by a few different groups in order to address this issue. (30-35) This includes several studies looking specifically at carbon species. (36-39) Currently, there is a gap between experimental and computational work into ice nucleation that has proved very difficult to bridge, due to the vast differences in spatial scale and time scale of the systems that can be examined experimentally and computationally.

Recent work by Lupi et al. (38, 39) using molecular dynamics simulations to study ice nucleation on carbon surfaces has provided certain qualitative predictions that it might be experimentally accessible. Specifically, they found that flat carbon surfaces without any oxidation or roughness nucleated ice most efficiently. Any oxidation, (38) roughness or curvature (39) was found to decrease the nucleation temperatures observed in the simulations. The result that oxidized carbon surfaces nucleate ice less well than pristine ones is somewhat counterintuitive and in contrast to the commonly stated “chemical bonding” requirement for ice nucleation, (3) as it might be expected that oxidation will offer greater opportunity for water to bond to a surface and so promote water structuring and ice nucleation. Our work here is consistent with the alternative hypothesis that a lower degree of oxidation leads to enhanced ice nucleation efficiency, although more species would need to be investigated to establish a statistically significant trend. Also, there are differences in structure and size between the nanomaterials investigated here, as well as extent of oxidation. These differences would need to be closely controlled to generate a firm experimental conclusion as to the effect of oxidation of carbon nanomaterials on ice nucleation efficiency. By thoroughly characterizing relatively simple ice nucleating species, it might be possible to conduct practical experiments that can be meaningfully related to computational studies. In general, by investigating closely related nucleants and observing differences in their ice nucleating efficiency, it may be possible to infer information about the causes of ice nucleating activity in these samples. Work here might be regarded as a first step in this direction and, now that their capacity to nucleate ice is known, carbon nanomaterials may prove to be a good candidate for further work on building a fundamental understanding of ice nucleation.

Supporting Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

Details of the synthesis of the carbon nanomaterials used, XPS analysis of the nanomaterials, the μL-NIPI ice nucleation instrument, and the FROST method for analysis of ice nucleation data are available in the Supporting Information. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01096.

Terms & Conditions

Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Author Information

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

  • Corresponding Author
    • Thomas F. Whale - Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom Email: [email protected]
  • Authors
    • Martin Rosillo-Lopez - Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom
    • Benjamin J. Murray - Institute for Climate and Atmospheric Science, School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom
    • Christoph G. Salzmann - Department of Chemistry, University College London, 20 Gordon Street, London WC1H 0AJ, United Kingdom
  • Notes
    The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Acknowledgment

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

We would like to thank Dr. D. O’Sullivan, Dr. R. J. Herbert, Dr. H. C. Price and Dr. T. W. Wilson for useful discussions. B.J.M. and T.F.W. thank the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC, NE/I013466/1; NE/I020059/1; NE/I019057/1) the European Research Council (ERC, 240449 ICE; 632272 IceControl), and the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC, EP/M003027/1) for funding. C.G.S. thanks the Royal Society for a University Research Fellowship (UF100144) and the Leverhulme Trust for a Research Grant (RPG-2014-04).

References

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article references 39 other publications.

  1. 1
    Murray, B. J.; O’Sullivan, D.; Atkinson, J. D.; Webb, M. E. Ice Nucleation by Particles Immersed in Supercooled Cloud Droplets Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6519 6554 DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35200a
  2. 2
    Hoose, C.; Möhler, O. Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation on Atmospheric Aerosols: a Review of Results From Laboratory Experiments Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 9817 9854 DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012
  3. 3
    Pruppacher, H. R.; Klett, J. D. Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, 2nd ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997.
  4. 4
    Morris, G. J.; Acton, E. Controlled Ice Nucleation in Cryopreservation - a Review Cryobiology 2013, 66, 85 92 DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.11.007
  5. 5
    Searles, J. A.; Carpenter, J. F.; Randolph, T. W. The Ice Nucleation Temperature Determines the Primary Drying Rate of Lyophilization for Samples Frozen on a Temperature-Controlled Shelf J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 90, 860 871 DOI: 10.1002/jps.1039
  6. 6
    Aksan, A.; Ragoonanan, V.; Hirschmugl, C. Freezing- and Drying-Induced Micro- and Nano-Heterogeneity in Biological Solutions. In Biophysical Methods for Biotherapeutics; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2014.
  7. 7
    Kiani, H.; Sun, D. W. Water Crystallization and its Importance to Freezing of Foods: A Review Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 407 426 DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.04.011
  8. 8
    Diehl, K.; Mitra, S. K. A Laboratory Study of the Effects of a Kerosene-Burner Exhaust on Ice Nucleation and the Evaporation Rate of Ice Crystals Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 3145 3151 DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00467-6
  9. 9
    Demott, P. J. An Exploratory-Study of Ice Nucleation by Soot Aerosols J. Appl. Meteorol. 1990, 29, 1072 1079 DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<1072:AESOIN>2.0.CO;2
  10. 10
    DeMott, P. J.; Prenni, A. J.; Liu, X.; Kreidenweis, S. M.; Petters, M. D.; Twohy, C. H.; Richardson, M. S.; Eidhammer, T.; Rogers, D. C. Predicting Global Atmospheric Ice Nuclei Distributions and Their Impacts on Climate Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 11217 11222 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910818107
  11. 11
    Pummer, B. G.; Bauer, H.; Bernardi, J.; Bleicher, S.; Grothe, H. Suspendable Macromolecules are Responsible for Ice Nucleation Activity of Birch and Conifer Pollen Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 2541 2550 DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-2541-2012
  12. 12
    Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.; Hill, T. C. J.; Pummer, B. G.; Franc, G. D.; Pöschl, U. Ice Nucleation Activity in the Widespread Soil Fungus Mortierella alpina Biogeosciences Discuss. 2014, 11, 12697 12731 DOI: 10.5194/bgd-11-12697-2014
  13. 13
    O′Sullivan, D.; Murray, B. J.; Ross, J. F.; Whale, T. F.; Price, H. C.; Atkinson, J. D.; Umo, N. S.; Webb, M. E. The Relevance of Nanoscale Biological Fragments for Ice Nucleation in Clouds Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8082 DOI: 10.1038/srep08082
  14. 14
    Ogawa, S.; Koga, M.; Osanai, S. Anomalous Ice Nucleation Behavior in Aqueous Polyvinyl Alcohol Solutions Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 480, 86 89 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.08.046
  15. 15
    Salzmann, C. G.; Nicolosi, V.; Green, M. L. Edge-carboxylated Graphene Nanoflakes from Nitric Acid Oxidised Arc-discharge Material J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 314 319 DOI: 10.1039/B914288F
  16. 16
    He, H.; Riedl, T.; Lerf, A.; Klinowski, J. Solid-State NMR Studies of the Structure of Graphite Oxide J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 19954 19958 DOI: 10.1021/jp961563t
  17. 17
    Whale, T. F.; Murray, B. J.; O’Sullivan, D.; Wilson, T. W.; Umo, N. S.; Baustian, K. J.; Atkinson, J. D.; Workneh, D. A.; Morris, G. J. A Technique for Quantifying Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation in Microlitre Supercooled Water Droplets Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 2437 2447 DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-2437-2015
  18. 18
    Umo, N. S.; Murray, B. J.; Baeza-Romero, M. T.; Jones, J. M.; Lea-Langton, A. R.; Malkin, T. L.; O’Sullivan, D.; Neve, L.; Plane, J. M. C.; Williams, A. Ice Nucleation by Combustion Ash Particles at Conditions Relevant to Mixed-phase Clouds Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 5195 5210 DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-5195-2015
  19. 19
    Riechers, B.; Wittbracht, F.; Hütten, A.; Koop, T. The Homogeneous Ice Nucleation Rate of Water Droplets Produced in a Microfluidic Device and the Role of Temperature Uncertainty Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 5873 5887 DOI: 10.1039/c3cp42437e
  20. 20
    Murray, B. J.; Broadley, S. L.; Wilson, T. W.; Bull, S. J.; Wills, R. H.; Christenson, H. K.; Murray, E. J. Kinetics of the Homogeneous Freezing of Water Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 10380 7 DOI: 10.1039/c003297b
  21. 21
    Vali, G. Interpretation of Freezing Nucleation Experiments: Singular and Stochastic; Sites and Surfaces Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 5271 5294 DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014
  22. 22
    Herbert, R. J.; Murray, B. J.; Whale, T. F.; Dobbie, S. J.; Atkinson, J. D. Representing Time-Dependent Freezing Behaviour in Immersion Mode Ice Nucleation Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 8501 8520 DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-8501-2014
  23. 23
    Koga, K.; Gao, G. T.; Tanaka, H.; Zeng, X. C. Formation of Ordered Ice Nanotubes Inside Carbon Nanotubes Nature 2001, 412, 802 805 DOI: 10.1038/35090532
  24. 24
    Pummer, B. G.; Budke, C.; Augustin-Bauditz, S.; Niedermeier, D.; Felgitsch, L.; Kampf, C. J.; Huber, R. G.; Liedl, K. R.; Loerting, T.; Moschen, T.; Schauperl, M. Ice Nucleation by Water-Soluble Macromolecules Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 4077 4091 DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015
  25. 25
    Cheng, J.; Soetjipto, C.; Hoffmann, M. R.; Colussi, A. J. Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy of the Morphology and Composition of Interstitial Fluids in Freezing Electrolyte Solutions J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 374 378 DOI: 10.1021/jz9000888
  26. 26
    Guzmán, M. I.; Hildebrandt, L.; Colussi, A. J.; Hoffmann, M. R. Cooperative Hydration of Pyruvic Acid in Ice J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10621 10624 DOI: 10.1021/ja062039v
  27. 27
    Guzmán, M. I.; Colussi, A. J.; Hoffmann, M. R. Photogeneration of Distant Radical Pairs in Aqueous Pyruvic Acid Glasses J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 931 935 DOI: 10.1021/jp053449t
  28. 28
    Finnegan, W. G.; Chai, S. K. A New Hypothesis for the Mechanism of ice Nucleation on Wetted AgI and AgI Center Dot AgCl Particulate Aerosols J. Atmos. Sci. 2003, 60, 1723 1731 DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1723:ANHFTM>2.0.CO;2
  29. 29
    Massey, A.; McBride, F.; Darling, G. R.; Nakamura, M.; Hodgson, A. The Role of Lattice Parameter in Water Adsorption and Wetting of a Solid Surface Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 24018 24025 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03164D
  30. 30
    Hu, X. L.; Michaelides, A. Ice Formation on Kaolinite: Lattice Match or Amphoterism? Surf. Sci. 2007, 601, 5378 5381 DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.09.012
  31. 31
    Fraux, G.; Doye, J. P. K. Note: Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation on Silver-Iodide-Like Surfaces J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 216101 DOI: 10.1063/1.4902382
  32. 32
    Reinhardt, A.; Doye, J. P. K. Effects of Surface Interactions on Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation for a Monatomic Water Model J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 084501 DOI: 10.1063/1.4892804
  33. 33
    Cox, S. J.; Raza, Z.; Kathmann, S. M.; Slater, B.; Michaelides, A. The Microscopic Features of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation May Affect the Macroscopic Morphology of Atmospheric Ice Crystals Faraday Discuss. 2013, 167, 389 403 DOI: 10.1039/c3fd00059a
  34. 34
    Cox, S. J.; Kathmann, S. M.; Purton, J. A.; Gillan, M. J.; Michaelides, A. Non-hexagonal Ice at Hexagonal Surfaces: the Role of Lattice Mismatch Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 7944 7949 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp23438f
  35. 35
    Cox, S. J.; Kathmann, S. M.; Slater, B.; Michaelides, A. Molecular Simulations of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation. I. Controlling Ice Nucleation Through Surface Hydrophilicity J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 184704 DOI: 10.1063/1.4919714
  36. 36
    Cox, S. J.; Kathmann, S. M.; Slater, B.; Michaelides, A. Molecular Simulations of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation. II. Peeling Back the Layers J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 184705 DOI: 10.1063/1.4919715
  37. 37
    Cabriolu, R.; Li, T. Ice Nucleation on Carbon Surface Supports the Classical Theory for Heterogeneous Nucleation Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids 2015, 91, 052402 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.052402
  38. 38
    Lupi, L.; Molinero, V. Does Hydrophilicity of Carbon Particles Improve Their Ice Nucleation Ability? J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 7330 7337 DOI: 10.1021/jp4118375
  39. 39
    Lupi, L.; Hudait, A.; Molinero, V. Heterogeneous Nucleation of Ice on Carbon Surfaces J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 3156 3164 DOI: 10.1021/ja411507a

Cited By

ARTICLE SECTIONS
Jump To

This article is cited by 59 publications.

  1. Yong Duk Kim, Woo Hyuk Jung, Dong June Ahn, Dong-Kwon Lim. Self-Assembled Nanostructures of Homo-Oligopeptide as a Potent Ice Growth Inhibitor. Nano Letters 2023, 23 (20) , 9500-9507. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c03059
  2. Panagiotis G. Georgiou, Nina L. H. Kinney, Ioanna Kontopoulou, Alexander N. Baker, Steven A. Hindmarsh, Akalabya Bissoyi, Thomas R. Congdon, Thomas F. Whale, Matthew I. Gibson. Poly(vinyl alcohol) Molecular Bottlebrushes Nucleate Ice. Biomacromolecules 2022, 23 (12) , 5285-5296. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.2c01097
  3. Katherine E. Marak, Jilian H. Roebuck, Esther Chong, Haley Poitras, Miriam Arak Freedman. Silica as a Model Ice-Nucleating Particle to Study the Effects of Crystallinity, Porosity, and Low-Density Surface Functional Groups on Immersion Freezing. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2022, 126 (35) , 5965-5973. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.2c03063
  4. Chuanbiao Zhang, Yanting Wang, Jianjun Wang, Xin Zhou. Size of Nanoscale Domains in Inhomogeneous Surfaces Determines Ice Nucleation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2022, 126 (31) , 13373-13380. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c02647
  5. Guoying Bai, Haiyan Zhang. Influences of Oxidation Degree and Size on the Ice Nucleation Efficiency of Graphene Oxide. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2022, 13 (13) , 2950-2955. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00247
  6. Quanming Xu, Hao Wang, Jianyang Wu, Zhisen Zhang. How Does the Step on Graphite Surface Impact Ice Nucleation?. Crystal Growth & Design 2021, 21 (8) , 4354-4361. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.1c00253
  7. Panagiotis G. Georgiou, Huba L. Marton, Alexander N. Baker, Thomas R. Congdon, Thomas F. Whale, Matthew I. Gibson. Polymer Self-Assembly Induced Enhancement of Ice Recrystallization Inhibition. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2021, 143 (19) , 7449-7461. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c01963
  8. Junda Huang, Jimin Guo, Liang Zhou, Guansheng Zheng, Jiangfan Cao, Zeyu Li, Zhuang Zhou, Qi Lei, C. Jeffrey Brinker, Wei Zhu. Advanced Nanomaterials-Assisted Cell Cryopreservation: A Mini Review. ACS Applied Bio Materials 2021, 4 (4) , 2996-3014. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.1c00105
  9. Zhi Huang, Sumanjeet Kaur, Musahid Ahmed, Ravi Prasher. Water Freezes at Near-Zero Temperatures Using Carbon Nanotube-Based Electrodes under Static Electric Fields. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2020, 12 (40) , 45525-45532. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c11694
  10. Raouf Ikhenazene, Claire Pirim, Jennifer A. Noble, Cornelia Irimiea, Yvain Carpentier, Ismael K. Ortega, François-Xavier Ouf, Cristian Focsa, Bertrand Chazallon. Ice Nucleation Activities of Carbon-Bearing Materials in Deposition Mode: From Graphite to Airplane Soot Surrogates. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2020, 124 (1) , 489-503. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08715
  11. Han Xue, Youhua Lu, Hongya Geng, Bin Dong, Shuwang Wu, Qingrui Fan, Zhen Zhang, Xiaojun Li, Xin Zhou, Jianjun Wang. Hydroxyl Groups on the Graphene Surfaces Facilitate Ice Nucleation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters 2019, 10 (10) , 2458-2462. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01033
  12. Thomas Häusler, Paul Gebhardt, Daniel Iglesias, Christoph Rameshan, Silvia Marchesan, Dominik Eder, Hinrich Grothe. Ice Nucleation Activity of Graphene and Graphene Oxides. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 2018, 122 (15) , 8182-8190. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10675
  13. Mainak Ganguly, Simon Dib, and Parisa A. Ariya . Purely Inorganic Highly Efficient Ice Nucleating Particle. ACS Omega 2018, 3 (3) , 3384-3395. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01830
  14. Valerie J. Alstadt, Joseph Nelson Dawson, Delanie J. Losey, Sarah K. Sihvonen, and Miriam Arak Freedman . Heterogeneous Freezing of Carbon Nanotubes: A Model System for Pore Condensation and Freezing in the Atmosphere. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2017, 121 (42) , 8166-8175. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.7b06359
  15. Zhiyuan He, Liuchun Zheng, Zhenqi Liu, Shenglin Jin, Chuncheng Li, and Jianjun Wang . Inhibition of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation by Bioinspired Coatings of Polyampholytes. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 2017, 9 (35) , 30092-30099. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b10014
  16. Gabriele C. Sosso, Ji Chen, Stephen J. Cox, Martin Fitzner, Philipp Pedevilla, Andrea Zen, and Angelos Michaelides . Crystal Nucleation in Liquids: Open Questions and Future Challenges in Molecular Dynamics Simulations. Chemical Reviews 2016, 116 (12) , 7078-7116. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00744
  17. Martin Fitzner, Gabriele C. Sosso, Stephen J. Cox, and Angelos Michaelides . The Many Faces of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation: Interplay Between Surface Morphology and Hydrophobicity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 2015, 137 (42) , 13658-13669. https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b08748
  18. M. Camarillo, J. Oller-Iscar, M. M. Conde, J. Ramírez, E. Sanz. Effect of substrate mismatch, orientation, and flexibility on heterogeneous ice nucleation. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2024, 160 (13) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0188929
  19. Hengxin Han, Taijie Zhan, Ning Guo, Mengdong Cui, Yi Xu. Cryopreservation of organoids: Strategies, innovation, and future prospects. Biotechnology Journal 2024, 19 (2) https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.202300543
  20. Lingfeng Zhao, Yizhou Shen, Weilan Liu, Jie Tao, Senyun Liu. Solid-liquid-ice interfaces for anti-icing materials. Surfaces and Interfaces 2023, 42 , 103510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103510
  21. Nishaka William, Sophia Mangan, Rob N. Ben, Jason P. Acker. Engineered Compounds to Control Ice Nucleation and Recrystallization. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 2023, 25 (1) , 333-362. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082222-015243
  22. Xuanhao Fu, Xin Zhou. Different roles of surfaces’ interaction on lattice mismatched/matched surfaces in facilitating ice nucleation. Chinese Physics B 2023, 32 (2) , 028202. https://doi.org/10.1088/1674-1056/aca202
  23. Kunfeng Gao, Hans-Christian Koch, Chong-Wen Zhou, Zamin A. Kanji. The dependence of soot particle ice nucleation ability on its volatile content. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 2022, 24 (11) , 2043-2069. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EM00158F
  24. Assem Elzaabalawy, Shaker A. Meguid. Advances in the development of superhydrophobic and icephobic surfaces. International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design 2022, 18 (3) , 509-547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10999-022-09593-x
  25. Ioanna Kontopoulou, Thomas R. Congdon, Simon Bassett, Ben Mair, Matthew I. Gibson. Synthesis of poly(vinyl alcohol) by blue light bismuth oxide photocatalysed RAFT. Evaluation of the impact of freeze/thaw cycling on ice recrystallisation inhibition. Polymer Chemistry 2022, 13 (32) , 4692-4700. https://doi.org/10.1039/D2PY00852A
  26. Kathryn A. Murray, Matthew I. Gibson. Chemical approaches to cryopreservation. Nature Reviews Chemistry 2022, 6 (8) , 579-593. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00407-4
  27. Wei Huang, Jinxia Huang, Zhiguang Guo, Weimin Liu. Icephobic/anti-icing properties of superhydrophobic surfaces. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science 2022, 304 , 102658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2022.102658
  28. Gabriele C. Sosso, Prerna Sudera, Anna T. Backes, Thomas F. Whale, Janine Fröhlich-Nowoisky, Mischa Bonn, Angelos Michaelides, Ellen H. G. Backus. The role of structural order in heterogeneous ice nucleation. Chemical Science 2022, 13 (17) , 5014-5026. https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SC06338C
  29. Kunfeng Gao, Chong-Wen Zhou, Eszter J. Barthazy Meier, Zamin A. Kanji. Laboratory studies of ice nucleation onto bare and internally mixed soot–sulfuric acid particles. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2022, 22 (8) , 5331-5364. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-5331-2022
  30. Chuanbao Zheng, Hao Lu, Quanming Xu, Tianyi Liu, Aniruddha Patil, Jianyang Wu, Renko de Vries, Han Zuilhof, Zhisen Zhang. Effect of Graphene on Ice Polymorph. Crystals 2021, 11 (9) , 1134. https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst11091134
  31. Tie Chang, Gang Zhao. Ice Inhibition for Cryopreservation: Materials, Strategies, and Challenges. Advanced Science 2021, 8 (6) https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202002425
  32. Mohammad Joghataei, Fatemeh Ostovari, Samira Atabakhsh, Nafiseh Tobeiha. Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation by Graphene Nanoparticles. Scientific Reports 2020, 10 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66714-2
  33. M. P. Adams, M. D. Tarn, A. Sanchez‐Marroquin, G. C. E. Porter, D. O'Sullivan, A. D. Harrison, Z. Cui, J. Vergara‐Temprado, F. Carotenuto, M. A. Holden, M. I. Daily, T. F. Whale, S. N. F. Sikora, I. T. Burke, J.‐U. Shim, J. B. McQuaid, B. J. Murray. A Major Combustion Aerosol Event Had a Negligible Impact on the Atmospheric Ice‐Nucleating Particle Population. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2020, 125 (22) https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD032938
  34. Panagiotis G. Georgiou, Ioanna Kontopoulou, Thomas R. Congdon, Matthew I. Gibson. Ice recrystallisation inhibiting polymer nano-objects via saline-tolerant polymerisation-induced self-assembly. Materials Horizons 2020, 7 (7) , 1883-1887. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MH00354A
  35. Ning Guo, Yi Xu, Miaomiao Luo. Effects of graphene oxide on the crystallization behavior of VS55 during cooling and warming. Chemical Physics 2020, 534 , 110735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphys.2020.110735
  36. Shahadev Rabha, Binoy K. Saikia. An environmental evaluation of carbonaceous aerosols in PM10 at micro- and nano-scale levels reveals the formation of carbon nanodots. Chemosphere 2020, 244 , 125519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125519
  37. Guoying Bai, Dong Gao, Zhang Liu, Xin Zhou, Jianjun Wang. Probing the critical nucleus size for ice formation with graphene oxide nanosheets. Nature 2019, 576 (7787) , 437-441. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1827-6
  38. Prerna, Rohit Goswami, Atanu K. Metya, S. V. Shevkunov, Jayant K. Singh. Study of ice nucleation on silver iodide surface with defects. Molecular Physics 2019, 117 (23-24) , 3651-3663. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268976.2019.1657599
  39. Yizhou Shen, Xinyu Xie, Yuehan Xie, Jie Tao, Jiawei Jiang, Haifeng Chen, Yang Lu, Yangjiangshan Xu. Statistically understanding the roles of nanostructure features in interfacial ice nucleation for enhancing icing delay performance. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2019, 21 (36) , 19785-19794. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP04103F
  40. Thomas Sayer, Stephen J. Cox. Stabilization of AgI's polar surfaces by the aqueous environment, and its implications for ice formation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2019, 21 (27) , 14546-14555. https://doi.org/10.1039/C9CP02193K
  41. Caroline I. Biggs, Christopher Stubbs, Ben Graham, Alice E. R. Fayter, Muhammad Hasan, Matthew I. Gibson. Mimicking the Ice Recrystallization Activity of Biological Antifreezes. When is a New Polymer “Active”?. Macromolecular Bioscience 2019, 19 (7) https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201900082
  42. Yizhou Shen, Xinghua Wu, Jie Tao, Chunling Zhu, Yuekun Lai, Zhong Chen. Icephobic materials: Fundamentals, performance evaluation, and applications. Progress in Materials Science 2019, 103 , 509-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2019.03.004
  43. Fu Jing, Liu Yixin, Miao Pengjv, Gao Yongkun, Geng Shichao, Chen Bing, Tan Junkun, Liu Yudong. Supercooling and heterogeneous nucleation in acoustically levitated deionized water and graphene oxide nanofluids droplets. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 2019, 103 , 143-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2019.01.016
  44. V. A. Shestakov, V. I. Kosyakov, A. Yu. Manakov, A. S. Stoporev, E. V. Grachev. Heterogeneous Nucleation of Ice in Dispersed Phase of Water-in-Decane Emulsion. Colloid Journal 2019, 81 (2) , 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061933X19010113
  45. Leonid Nichman, Martin Wolf, Paul Davidovits, Timothy B. Onasch, Yue Zhang, Doug R. Worsnop, Janarjan Bhandari, Claudio Mazzoleni, Daniel J. Cziczo. Laboratory study of the heterogeneous ice nucleation on black-carbon-containing aerosol. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2019, 19 (19) , 12175-12194. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12175-2019
  46. Feng Li, Zhijie Chen, Hongsheng Dong, Changrui Shi, Bohao Wang, Lei Yang, Zheng Ling. Promotion effect of graphite on cyclopentane hydrate based desalination. Desalination 2018, 445 , 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2018.08.011
  47. Gabriele C. Sosso, Thomas F. Whale, Mark A. Holden, Philipp Pedevilla, Benjamin J. Murray, Angelos Michaelides. Unravelling the origins of ice nucleation on organic crystals. Chemical Science 2018, 9 (42) , 8077-8088. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SC02753F
  48. Hugo Desnos, Anne Baudot, Magda Teixeira, Gérard Louis, Loris Commin, Samuel Buff, Pierre Bruyère. Ice induction in DSC experiments with Snomax®. Thermochimica Acta 2018, 667 , 193-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2018.07.022
  49. Rongpei Shi, Chen Shen, Suliman A. Dregia, Yunzhi Wang. Form of critical nuclei at homo-phase boundaries. Scripta Materialia 2018, 146 , 276-280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.12.002
  50. Thomas F. Whale, Mark A. Holden, Theodore W. Wilson, Daniel O'Sullivan, Benjamin J. Murray. The enhancement and suppression of immersion mode heterogeneous ice-nucleation by solutes. Chemical Science 2018, 9 (17) , 4142-4151. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7SC05421A
  51. Caroline I. Biggs, Trisha L. Bailey, Ben Graham, Christopher Stubbs, Alice Fayter, Matthew I. Gibson. Polymer mimics of biomacromolecular antifreezes. Nature Communications 2017, 8 (1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01421-7
  52. Guoying Bai, Dong Gao, Jianjun Wang. Control of ice growth and recrystallization by sulphur-doped oxidized quasi-carbon nitride quantum dots. Carbon 2017, 124 , 415-421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2017.08.074
  53. Philipp Pedevilla, Martin Fitzner, Angelos Michaelides. What makes a good descriptor for heterogeneous ice nucleation on OH-patterned surfaces. Physical Review B 2017, 96 (11) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.115441
  54. Lindong Weng, Shannon N. Tessier, Anisa Swei, Shannon L. Stott, Mehmet Toner. Controlled ice nucleation using freeze-dried Pseudomonas syringae encapsulated in alginate beads. Cryobiology 2017, 75 , 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cryobiol.2017.03.006
  55. Hongya Geng, Xing Liu, Guosheng Shi, Guoying Bai, Ji Ma, Jingbo Chen, Zhuangyuan Wu, Yanlin Song, Haiping Fang, Jianjun Wang. Graphene Oxide Restricts Growth and Recrystallization of Ice Crystals. Angewandte Chemie 2017, 129 (4) , 1017-1021. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201609230
  56. Hongya Geng, Xing Liu, Guosheng Shi, Guoying Bai, Ji Ma, Jingbo Chen, Zhuangyuan Wu, Yanlin Song, Haiping Fang, Jianjun Wang. Graphene Oxide Restricts Growth and Recrystallization of Ice Crystals. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 2017, 56 (4) , 997-1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201609230
  57. Caroline I. Biggs, Christopher Packer, Steven Hindmarsh, Marc Walker, Neil R. Wilson, Jonathan P. Rourke, Matthew I. Gibson. Impact of sequential surface-modification of graphene oxide on ice nucleation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 2017, 19 (33) , 21929-21932. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP03219F
  58. Gabriele C. Sosso, Gareth A. Tribello, Andrea Zen, Philipp Pedevilla, Angelos Michaelides. Ice formation on kaolinite: Insights from molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics 2016, 145 (21) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4968796
  59. Andreas Peckhaus, Alexei Kiselev, Thibault Hiron, Martin Ebert, Thomas Leisner. A comparative study of K-rich and Na/Ca-rich feldspar ice-nucleating particles in a nanoliter droplet freezing assay. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2016, 16 (18) , 11477-11496. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11477-2016
  • Abstract

    Figure 1

    Figure 1. Chemical structures of the various of carbon nanomaterials tested for their ice nucleation activity: (a) small carboxylated graphene nanoflake (cx-GNF), (b) mellitic acid, (c) graphene oxide (GO), (d) multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT), and (e) single walled carbon nanotube (SWCNT). GO sheets have an average lateral diameter of ∼1 μm, while the GNFs have an average lateral diameter of ∼30 nm. (15)

    Figure 2

    Figure 2. (a) Droplet fraction frozen against temperature for 1 and 0.1 wt % dispersions of GO and cx-GNFs, a 1 wt % dispersion of o-MWCNTs, a 0.07 wt % dispersion of o-SWCNTs, a 1 wt % solution of mellitic acid, and pure water. (b) ns values for all tested carbon nanomaterials. The ns values reported for the o-MWCNTs assume that they have nine layers, the average number of the starting material for their synthesis. The shaded area shows the area encompassed by calculating ns for the minimum and maximum wall numbers of the starting material. Experimental uncertainty in ns was calculated by propagation of uncertainty from weighing, droplet size, and background subtraction. In many cases, uncertainties are too small to show on the plot. Temperature uncertainty is ±0.4 °C in panels a and b.

    Figure 3

    Figure 3. (a) Droplet fraction frozen against temperature for 1 wt % cx-GNFs at 5 different cooling rates. (b) Droplet fraction frozen against modified temperature as defined in eq 2 for the same experiments. Temperature uncertainty is ±0.4 °C in panels a and b.

  • References

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    This article references 39 other publications.

    1. 1
      Murray, B. J.; O’Sullivan, D.; Atkinson, J. D.; Webb, M. E. Ice Nucleation by Particles Immersed in Supercooled Cloud Droplets Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6519 6554 DOI: 10.1039/c2cs35200a
    2. 2
      Hoose, C.; Möhler, O. Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation on Atmospheric Aerosols: a Review of Results From Laboratory Experiments Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 9817 9854 DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012
    3. 3
      Pruppacher, H. R.; Klett, J. D. Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation, 2nd ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1997.
    4. 4
      Morris, G. J.; Acton, E. Controlled Ice Nucleation in Cryopreservation - a Review Cryobiology 2013, 66, 85 92 DOI: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2012.11.007
    5. 5
      Searles, J. A.; Carpenter, J. F.; Randolph, T. W. The Ice Nucleation Temperature Determines the Primary Drying Rate of Lyophilization for Samples Frozen on a Temperature-Controlled Shelf J. Pharm. Sci. 2001, 90, 860 871 DOI: 10.1002/jps.1039
    6. 6
      Aksan, A.; Ragoonanan, V.; Hirschmugl, C. Freezing- and Drying-Induced Micro- and Nano-Heterogeneity in Biological Solutions. In Biophysical Methods for Biotherapeutics; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2014.
    7. 7
      Kiani, H.; Sun, D. W. Water Crystallization and its Importance to Freezing of Foods: A Review Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, 407 426 DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.04.011
    8. 8
      Diehl, K.; Mitra, S. K. A Laboratory Study of the Effects of a Kerosene-Burner Exhaust on Ice Nucleation and the Evaporation Rate of Ice Crystals Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 3145 3151 DOI: 10.1016/S1352-2310(97)00467-6
    9. 9
      Demott, P. J. An Exploratory-Study of Ice Nucleation by Soot Aerosols J. Appl. Meteorol. 1990, 29, 1072 1079 DOI: 10.1175/1520-0450(1990)029<1072:AESOIN>2.0.CO;2
    10. 10
      DeMott, P. J.; Prenni, A. J.; Liu, X.; Kreidenweis, S. M.; Petters, M. D.; Twohy, C. H.; Richardson, M. S.; Eidhammer, T.; Rogers, D. C. Predicting Global Atmospheric Ice Nuclei Distributions and Their Impacts on Climate Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107, 11217 11222 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0910818107
    11. 11
      Pummer, B. G.; Bauer, H.; Bernardi, J.; Bleicher, S.; Grothe, H. Suspendable Macromolecules are Responsible for Ice Nucleation Activity of Birch and Conifer Pollen Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12, 2541 2550 DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-2541-2012
    12. 12
      Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.; Hill, T. C. J.; Pummer, B. G.; Franc, G. D.; Pöschl, U. Ice Nucleation Activity in the Widespread Soil Fungus Mortierella alpina Biogeosciences Discuss. 2014, 11, 12697 12731 DOI: 10.5194/bgd-11-12697-2014
    13. 13
      O′Sullivan, D.; Murray, B. J.; Ross, J. F.; Whale, T. F.; Price, H. C.; Atkinson, J. D.; Umo, N. S.; Webb, M. E. The Relevance of Nanoscale Biological Fragments for Ice Nucleation in Clouds Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 8082 DOI: 10.1038/srep08082
    14. 14
      Ogawa, S.; Koga, M.; Osanai, S. Anomalous Ice Nucleation Behavior in Aqueous Polyvinyl Alcohol Solutions Chem. Phys. Lett. 2009, 480, 86 89 DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.08.046
    15. 15
      Salzmann, C. G.; Nicolosi, V.; Green, M. L. Edge-carboxylated Graphene Nanoflakes from Nitric Acid Oxidised Arc-discharge Material J. Mater. Chem. 2010, 20, 314 319 DOI: 10.1039/B914288F
    16. 16
      He, H.; Riedl, T.; Lerf, A.; Klinowski, J. Solid-State NMR Studies of the Structure of Graphite Oxide J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 19954 19958 DOI: 10.1021/jp961563t
    17. 17
      Whale, T. F.; Murray, B. J.; O’Sullivan, D.; Wilson, T. W.; Umo, N. S.; Baustian, K. J.; Atkinson, J. D.; Workneh, D. A.; Morris, G. J. A Technique for Quantifying Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation in Microlitre Supercooled Water Droplets Atmos. Meas. Tech. 2015, 8, 2437 2447 DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-2437-2015
    18. 18
      Umo, N. S.; Murray, B. J.; Baeza-Romero, M. T.; Jones, J. M.; Lea-Langton, A. R.; Malkin, T. L.; O’Sullivan, D.; Neve, L.; Plane, J. M. C.; Williams, A. Ice Nucleation by Combustion Ash Particles at Conditions Relevant to Mixed-phase Clouds Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 5195 5210 DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-5195-2015
    19. 19
      Riechers, B.; Wittbracht, F.; Hütten, A.; Koop, T. The Homogeneous Ice Nucleation Rate of Water Droplets Produced in a Microfluidic Device and the Role of Temperature Uncertainty Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 5873 5887 DOI: 10.1039/c3cp42437e
    20. 20
      Murray, B. J.; Broadley, S. L.; Wilson, T. W.; Bull, S. J.; Wills, R. H.; Christenson, H. K.; Murray, E. J. Kinetics of the Homogeneous Freezing of Water Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 10380 7 DOI: 10.1039/c003297b
    21. 21
      Vali, G. Interpretation of Freezing Nucleation Experiments: Singular and Stochastic; Sites and Surfaces Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 5271 5294 DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-5271-2014
    22. 22
      Herbert, R. J.; Murray, B. J.; Whale, T. F.; Dobbie, S. J.; Atkinson, J. D. Representing Time-Dependent Freezing Behaviour in Immersion Mode Ice Nucleation Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 8501 8520 DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-8501-2014
    23. 23
      Koga, K.; Gao, G. T.; Tanaka, H.; Zeng, X. C. Formation of Ordered Ice Nanotubes Inside Carbon Nanotubes Nature 2001, 412, 802 805 DOI: 10.1038/35090532
    24. 24
      Pummer, B. G.; Budke, C.; Augustin-Bauditz, S.; Niedermeier, D.; Felgitsch, L.; Kampf, C. J.; Huber, R. G.; Liedl, K. R.; Loerting, T.; Moschen, T.; Schauperl, M. Ice Nucleation by Water-Soluble Macromolecules Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 4077 4091 DOI: 10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015
    25. 25
      Cheng, J.; Soetjipto, C.; Hoffmann, M. R.; Colussi, A. J. Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy of the Morphology and Composition of Interstitial Fluids in Freezing Electrolyte Solutions J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 374 378 DOI: 10.1021/jz9000888
    26. 26
      Guzmán, M. I.; Hildebrandt, L.; Colussi, A. J.; Hoffmann, M. R. Cooperative Hydration of Pyruvic Acid in Ice J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10621 10624 DOI: 10.1021/ja062039v
    27. 27
      Guzmán, M. I.; Colussi, A. J.; Hoffmann, M. R. Photogeneration of Distant Radical Pairs in Aqueous Pyruvic Acid Glasses J. Phys. Chem. A 2006, 110, 931 935 DOI: 10.1021/jp053449t
    28. 28
      Finnegan, W. G.; Chai, S. K. A New Hypothesis for the Mechanism of ice Nucleation on Wetted AgI and AgI Center Dot AgCl Particulate Aerosols J. Atmos. Sci. 2003, 60, 1723 1731 DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(2003)060<1723:ANHFTM>2.0.CO;2
    29. 29
      Massey, A.; McBride, F.; Darling, G. R.; Nakamura, M.; Hodgson, A. The Role of Lattice Parameter in Water Adsorption and Wetting of a Solid Surface Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014, 16, 24018 24025 DOI: 10.1039/C4CP03164D
    30. 30
      Hu, X. L.; Michaelides, A. Ice Formation on Kaolinite: Lattice Match or Amphoterism? Surf. Sci. 2007, 601, 5378 5381 DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2007.09.012
    31. 31
      Fraux, G.; Doye, J. P. K. Note: Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation on Silver-Iodide-Like Surfaces J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 216101 DOI: 10.1063/1.4902382
    32. 32
      Reinhardt, A.; Doye, J. P. K. Effects of Surface Interactions on Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation for a Monatomic Water Model J. Chem. Phys. 2014, 141, 084501 DOI: 10.1063/1.4892804
    33. 33
      Cox, S. J.; Raza, Z.; Kathmann, S. M.; Slater, B.; Michaelides, A. The Microscopic Features of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation May Affect the Macroscopic Morphology of Atmospheric Ice Crystals Faraday Discuss. 2013, 167, 389 403 DOI: 10.1039/c3fd00059a
    34. 34
      Cox, S. J.; Kathmann, S. M.; Purton, J. A.; Gillan, M. J.; Michaelides, A. Non-hexagonal Ice at Hexagonal Surfaces: the Role of Lattice Mismatch Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2012, 14, 7944 7949 DOI: 10.1039/c2cp23438f
    35. 35
      Cox, S. J.; Kathmann, S. M.; Slater, B.; Michaelides, A. Molecular Simulations of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation. I. Controlling Ice Nucleation Through Surface Hydrophilicity J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 184704 DOI: 10.1063/1.4919714
    36. 36
      Cox, S. J.; Kathmann, S. M.; Slater, B.; Michaelides, A. Molecular Simulations of Heterogeneous Ice Nucleation. II. Peeling Back the Layers J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 184705 DOI: 10.1063/1.4919715
    37. 37
      Cabriolu, R.; Li, T. Ice Nucleation on Carbon Surface Supports the Classical Theory for Heterogeneous Nucleation Phys. Rev. E: Stat. Phys., Plasmas, Fluids 2015, 91, 052402 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.052402
    38. 38
      Lupi, L.; Molinero, V. Does Hydrophilicity of Carbon Particles Improve Their Ice Nucleation Ability? J. Phys. Chem. A 2014, 118, 7330 7337 DOI: 10.1021/jp4118375
    39. 39
      Lupi, L.; Hudait, A.; Molinero, V. Heterogeneous Nucleation of Ice on Carbon Surfaces J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 3156 3164 DOI: 10.1021/ja411507a
  • Supporting Information

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Details of the synthesis of the carbon nanomaterials used, XPS analysis of the nanomaterials, the μL-NIPI ice nucleation instrument, and the FROST method for analysis of ice nucleation data are available in the Supporting Information. The Supporting Information is available free of charge on the ACS Publications website at DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01096.


    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

Pair your accounts.

Export articles to Mendeley

Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

STEP 1:
Click to create an ACS ID

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect