Skip to main content
Log in

Graphene/Al2O3/Si Schottky diode with integrated waveguide on a silicon-on-insulator wafer

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Waveguide-integrated graphene photodiodes are on-chip optoelectronic devices with promising applications in telecommunications. Here, we present the electrical properties of a heterostructure consisting of multilayer graphene (MLGr) over a Si waveguide covered by an ultrathin Al2O3 layer. The waveguide is fabricated by etching a silicon-on-insulator (SOI) substrate with 220 nm Si and 1.5 μm buried oxide. The 5 nm-thick Al2O3 film is deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD), while graphene, synthesized on copper by chemical vapor deposition (CVD), is transferred onto the Al2O3/Si rib by a wet transfer method. The MLGr/Al2O3/Si rib forms a Schottky structure with rectifying current–voltage characteristics, which are examined using the thermionic emission theory and Norde’s method. A Schottky barrier height \({\Phi }_{{\text{B}}} = 0.79\mathrm{ eV}\), an ideality factor n = 26, and a series resistance \({{\text{R}}}_{{\text{S}}} = 11.6\mathrm{ M\Omega }\) are obtained. The device is promising for operation at the optical fiber communication wavelength of 1550 nm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding authors.

References

  1. Q Xu and V R Almeida Lett. 29 1626 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. G T Reed, G Mashanovich, F Y Gardes, and D J Thomson Nat. Photonics 4 518 (2010)

  3. H Rong, A Liu, R Jones, O Cohen, D Hak, R Nicolaescu, A Fang and M Paniccia Nature 433 292 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. S M Sze K N Kwok Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd edn. (New York: Wiley) (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. D Liang, G Roelkens, R Baets, and J Bowers Materials 3 1782 (2010)

  6. J Michel, J Liu, and L C Kimerling Nat. Photonics 4 527 (2010)

  7. M Saeed, A Ghaffar, S Rehman, M Y Naz, S Shukrullah and Q A Naqvi Plasmonics 17 901 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K S Novoselov, A K Geim, S V Morozov, D Jiang, M I Katsnelson, I V Grigorieva, S V Dubonos and A A Firsov Nature 438 197 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. M Y Han, B Özyilmaz, Y Zhang and P Kim Physical review letters 98 206805 (2007)

  10. K I Bolotin, K J Sikes, Z Jiang, M Klima, G Fudenberg, J Hone and H L Stormer Solid State Communications 146 351 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. A K Geim and K S Novoselov Nat. Mater. 6 183 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. X Li, Y Zhu, W Cai, M Borysiak, B Han, D Chen, R D Piner, L Colombo, and R S Ruoff Nano letters 9 4359 (2009)

  13. C Lee, X Wei, J W Kysar, and J Hone Science 321 385 (2008)

  14. M U Shahid, A Ghaffar, M Y Naz and H N Bhatt Plasmonics 1 (2023)

  15. M Azam, M Umair, A Ghaffar, M A Alkanhal, A H Alqahtani and Y Khan Waves in Random and Complex Media 1 (2021)

  16. L Chen, N Li, X Yu, S Zhang, C Liu, Y Song and Z Wang Chemical Engineering Journal 462 142139 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. M Umair, M Azam, M A Alkanhal, A Ghaffar, Y T Aladadi and Y Khan Journal of Nanoelectronics and Optoelectronics 15 574 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. F Urban, G Lupina, A Grillo, N Martucciello and A Di Bartolomeo Nano Express 1 010001 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. M Casalino, L Sirleto, M Iodice, N Saffioti and M Gioffré Phys. Lett. 96 241112 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. D W Proc IEEE 55 704 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. F H L Koppens, T Mueller, P Avouris and A C Ferrari Nanotechnol. 9 780 (2014)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. A C Ferrari, F Bonaccorso, V Fal’Ko, K S Novoselov, S Roche, P Bøggild and J Kinaret Nanoscale 7 4598 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. F Bonaccorso, Z Sun, T Hasan, and A C Ferrari Nat. Photonics 4 611 (2010)

  24. B W H Baugher, H O H Churchill, Y Yang, and P Jarillo Nat. Nanotechnol. 9 262 (2014)

  25. K S Kim, Y Zhao, H Jang, S Y Lee, J M Kim, K S Kim, J H Ahn, P Kim, J Y Choi and B H Hong Nature 457 706 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Z Sun, T Hasan, F Torrisi, D Popa, G Privitera, F Wang, F Bonaccorso, D Basko and A C Ferrari ACS Nano 4 803 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Y Ding, X Zhu, S Xiao, H Hu, L H Frandsen, N A Mortensen and K Yvind Nano Lett. 15 4393 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A Pelella, A Grillo, E Faella, G Luongo and M B Askari Mater. Interfaces 13 47895 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. A Di Bartolomeo Physics Reports 606 1 (2016)

  30. H Selvi, N Unsuree, E Whittaker, M P Halsall, E W Hill, A Thomas, P Parkinson and T J Echtermeyer Nanoscale 10 3399 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. E Efil, N Kaymak, E Seven, E O Orhan, O Bayram, S B Ocak and A Tataroglu Vacuum 181 109654 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. S Shivaraman, L H Herman, F Rana, J Park and M G Spencer Applied Physics Letters 100 183112 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. S Tongay, M Lemaitre, T Schumann, K Berke, B R Appleton, B Gila and A F Hebard Applied physics letters 99 102102 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. D Tomer, S Rajput, L J Hudy, C H Li and L Li Nanotechnology 26 215702 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. H Yang, J Heo, S Park, H J Song, D H Seo, K E Byun and K Kim Science 336 1140 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. M A Rehman, S B Roy, I Akhtar, M F Bhopal, W Choi, G Nazir and Y Seo Carbon 148 187 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Y Wang, S Yang, D R Lambada and S Shafique Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 314 112232 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. A Di Bartolomeo, G Luongo, L Iemmo, F Urban, and F Giubileo IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology 17 1133 (2018)

  39. X An, F Liu, Y J Jung, and S Kar Nano letters 13 909 (2013)

  40. G Luongo, A Grillo, F Giubileo, L Iemmo, M Lukosius, C Alvarado Chavarin and A Di Bartolomeo Nanomaterials 9 659 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. H Y Kim, K Lee, N McEvoy, C Yim, and G S Duesberg Nano letters 13 2182 (2013)

  42. G K Celler and S Cristoloveanu Journal of Applied Physics 93 4955 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. D V Dao, K Nakamura, T T Bui and S Sugiyama Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 1 013001 (2010)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. N Kaymak, E Efil, E Seven, A Tataroğlu, S B Ocak and E Orhan Physica B: Condensed Matter 576 411721 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. G Luongo, A Di Bartolomeo, F Giubileo, C A Chavarin and C Wenger Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 51 255305 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. P Durmuş and M Yıldırım Surfaces, and Films 32 061512 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. M Sharma and S K Tripathi Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing 41 155 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. G D Wilk, R M Wallace and J Anthony Journal of applied physics 89 5243 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. W Liang, K J Weber, D Suh, S P Phang, J Yu, A K McAuley, and B R Legg JPHOTOV 3 678 (2013)

  50. A Richter and J Benick Status Solidi Rapid Res. Lett. 5 202 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  51. Y Song, X Li, C Mackin, X Zhang, W Fang, T Palacios, H Zhu and J Kong Nano letters 15 2104 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. B Hoex, J Schmidt, P Pohl, M C M Van de Sanden and W M M Kessels Journal of Applied Physics 104 044903 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. A C Ferrari, J C Meyer, V Scardaci, C Casiraghi, M Lazzeri, F Mauri, S Piscanec, D Jiang, S Roth and A K Geim Physical Review Letters 97 187401 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. M Algarra, V Moreno, J M Lázaro-Martínez, E Rodríguez-Castellón, J Soto, J Morales and A Benítez Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 561 678 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  55. A Kovtun, D Jones, S Dell’Elce, E Treossi, A Liscio and V Palermo Carbon 143 268 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. A Di Bartolomeo, G Luongo, F Giubileo, N Funicello, G Niu, Th Schroeder, M Lisker and G Lupina 2D Mater 4 025075 (2017)

  57. E Seven, E Ö Orhan, and S B Ocak Physica Scripta 96 125852 (2021)

  58. A Di Bartolomeo, F Giubileo, G Luongo, A Di Bartolomeo, L Iemmo, N Martucciello, G Niu, M Fraschke, O Skibitzki, Th Schroeder, G Lupina 2D Mater. 4 015024 (2017)

  59. E H Rhoderick, R H Williams Oxford: Clarendon Press 129 (1988)

  60. C Nuhoğlu, S Aydoğan and A Türüt Semicond Sci. Technol. 18 642 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. O Bayram, E Igman, H Guney, Z Demir, M T Yurtcan, C Cirak and U C O HasarSimsek Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics 31 10288 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  62. E Kutluoğlu Efil, E Orhan, A Tataroğlu and Ö Bayram Physica Scripta 96 125836 (2021)

  63. H Norde Journal of Applied Physics 50 5052 (1979)

  64. O Ya Olikh Journal of Applied Physics 118 024502 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Gazi University Electro-optic Research Laboratory, Sabancı University Nanotechnology Research and Application Center, and Gazi University Photonics Application and Research Center.

Funding

This research was funded by the Scientific Research Council (BAP) of Gazi University, grant number 18/2015–03, and the University of Salerno, grant number ORSA218189. The APC was funded by A.D.B. and E.O.O.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, EOO; methodology, EOO, and ADB; software, ME, and NA; validation, EOO, and ADB; formal analysis, ES, EOO, and ADB; investigation, ES, ME, and NA; resources, EOO, ME, and NA; data curation, ES, ME, and NA; writing—original draft preparation, ES; writing—review and editing, ADB.; visualization, ES; supervision, ADB, and EOO; project administration, EOO; funding acquisition, EOO All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Seven.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix – Fabrication and experimental details

Appendix – Fabrication and experimental details

First, the SOI wafers were cleaned with standard cleaning methods; the cleaning process consisted of ultrasonic cleaning in acetone and isopropyl alcohol (IPA), and the substrates were then dried with a nitrogen gun. After that, oxygen plasma was applied in a reactive ion etching (RIE) for 10 s to remove organic residue on the surfaces. Oxygen plasma parameters were: O2 flow, 20 sccm; RF power, 50 W; chamber pressure, 37.5 mTorr; and room temperature, 20 °C. Considering the structures of the devices with narrow optical waveguides, a negative resist (ma-N 2401) was used for the photolithography processes, in which the exposed regions become insoluble and resistant to developers. The resist was spun at 2000 rpm for 30 s by a spin coater and baked on a hot plate for 90 s at 90 °C. The resist thickness was obtained as 50 nm. The same process is repeated on top of the first resist and a total e-beam resist thickness of ~ 100 nm was obtained. The resist was exposed using an e-beam lithography system with an intensity of 500 μC/cm2. The pattern was developed directly by a TMAH-based developer (726 MIF) for 10 s. The pattern after development is shown in Fig. 3. Before etching, for the cleaning of resist residues that may be caused by the developed process, oxygen plasma was applied for 5 s with the oxygen plasma parameters given above. The gas mixture of C4F8/SF6/Ar (50/25/20 sccm) was used in the silicon etching with RIE (ICP power, 1300 W; RF power, 50 W; temperature, 20 °C; pressure, 12 mTorr). With this recipe, approximately 240 nm silicon per minute is etched anisotropically, while the beam that acts as a mask and the resist that determines the frame is etched at the rate of ~ 90 nm per minute. After the etching process, the residue of 10 nm is cleaned in hot acetone. Figure 3 a shows the rib pattern after the resist development while the SEM images of Figs. 3b and c show that the rib waveguide is 400 nm wide and has smooth and perpendicular walls, resulting from the successful anisotropic etch. The slab height of the SOI wafer was measured with the profilometer and resulted in 220 nm (Fig. 3d), confirming that Si was etched down to the buffer oxide. Since charging occurs (due to oxide) while taking the SEM image, the best image was tried to be taken by carbon coating. A few nm of carbon coating was erased again with oxygen plasma.

After the SOI waveguide was created, a 5 nm thick aluminum oxide (Al2O3) layer was deposited on top of the waveguide by ALD (Okyay Tech ALD Atomry T8) at 200 °C which is a low substrate temperature. Trimethylaluminum [TMA, Al (CH3)3] was used as a precursor material of Al2O3. The growth per cycle (GPC) was 1.28 A/cycle.

For reflectance/transmittance measurements, the Bentham PVE300 photovoltaic characterization system was used to determine the spectral responsivity, reflectance, and transmittance of the device. A dual Xenon/quartz halogen light source with a wavelength of 300–1800 nm was coupled to a monochromator.

After the transfer of Gr, in the final step, 50 nm thick Al metal (purity 99.99%) and 50 nm thick Ag metal (purity 99.99%) were used for ohmic contacts to graphene and silicon, respectively. The contacts were deposited by Thermal Evaporation (Bestec Thermal Evaporation System) technique by a 1.5 × 1.5 mm2 metal mask. The contacts were annealed in a vacuum under 4.1 × 10−5 mbar pressure at 350 °C for 3 min.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seven, E., Orhan, E., Di Bartolomeo, A. et al. Graphene/Al2O3/Si Schottky diode with integrated waveguide on a silicon-on-insulator wafer. Indian J Phys (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-03062-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-03062-7

Keywords

Navigation