Skip main navigation

Platelets Provide a Bounty of Potential Targets for Therapy in Multiple Sclerosis

Originally publishedhttps://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.112.269050Circulation Research. 2012;110:1157–1158

    Multiple sclerosis (MS) and related demyelinating conditions like neuromyelitis optica are mediated via migration of leukocytes and monocytes from the peripheral circulation. This is particularly relevant in the initial phases of disease that manifests clinically with relapses and remission and dominates the pace of the evolution of these chronic diseases in the first decade. The most effective approved therapeutic approach for relapsing remitting MS, Natalizumab, blocks lymphocyte migration into the brain by targeting a4 integrin.1 Scant attention has been given to platelets in the pathophysiology of these diseases. And yet there have been hints that platelets play an important role in MS. For instance, an early study of MS lesions using gene microarrays indicated that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa was highly expressed in MS lesions and, surprisingly, particularly in the more chronic stages of the disease.2 Leukocyte–platelet interactions are mediated by α4 integrin, although α2, α5, and α6 are the primary integrins on platelets themselves.3

    Article, see p 1202

    The coagulation cascade itself plays a major role in the development of an inflammatory response in MS. Proteomic studies of laser-captured microdissected lesions reported in the transcriptional profiling in MS2 illuminated a key role for the thrombin cascade in the development of inflammation in MS.4 In vivo administration of hirudin or recombinant activated protein C reduced paralytic disease and inflammation in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Key Th1 and Th17 cytokines were suppressed in the immune system and in the nervous system.4 Administration of recombinant activated protein C showed that both its anticoagulant properties and its downstream signal functions were critical in demyelinating disease.4

    Langer et al5 break new ground in describing a key role for platelets in the pathogenesis of demeylinating disease. They show that platelets are present in chronic active lesions of MS and in the related collection of animal models referred to as EAE (Figure). They were also able to show that blockade of key receptors on platelets like glycoprotein IIb/IIIa ameliorates paralysis and reduces experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. This, of course, opens an opportunity to consider glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers like Abciximab in MS and other demyelinating diseases.

    Figure.

    Figure. Platelets play a role in the vascular pathophysiology at the blood–brain barrier. Modified with permission from Steinman.1

    The platelet also may be participating in pathways that intersect with key pathophysiological mechanisms at play in demyelinating disease. Platelets are a major component of neutrophil traps that are found in conditions like neuromyelitis optica.6 Modulation of platelet function may help prevent the release of active proteases such as elastase in exacerbations of neuromylelitis optica.6

    The platelets are more than a plug for haulting hemorrhage in the physiology of coagulation cascade. They are a storehouse of potent mediators, such as the most aptly named platelet-derived growth factor. Remarkably, modulation of platelet-derived growth factor with drugs like imatinib has strong effects in the EAE model to reverse paralytic disease.7 Modulation of the blood–brain barrier by inhibition of platelet-derived growth factor with drugs like imatinib has been shown to impair transendothelial migration of small and large molecules across the blood–brain barrier.8 The platelets themselves may provide a key switch for modulation of the blood–brain barrier to restore homeostasis or for promoting drug delivery.

    As the pathophysiology of demyelinating disease is unraveled, an unexpected role of platelets emerges. Understanding platelet physiology in the pathobiological processes associated with venules in the inflamed brain will provide new targets for therapy in MS. Platelet-activating factor and platelet-derived growth factor are certainly two molecules that merit consideration as targets for therapy.7,9 Some of these targets already have available drugs that could be merely repurposed for use in demyelinating diseases. Finally, there is evidence that platelets themselves are highly activated in some patients with MS,10 again emphasizing that modulating platelet activity may be beneficial. The work by Langer et al has now opened a new frontier for research on platelets and their role in multiple sclerosis.

    Disclosures

    None.

    Footnotes

    The opinions expressed in this article are not necessarily those of the editors or of the American Heart Association.

    Correspondence to Lawrence Steinman,
    George A. Zimmermann Professor of Neurology and Neurological Sciences and Pediatrics, Beckman Center for Molecular Medicine, B002, 279 Campus Drive, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305
    . E-mail

    References

    • 1. Steinman L . Blocking adhesion molecules as therapy for multiple sclerosis: Natalizumab. Nat Rev Drug Discovery. 2005; 4:510–518.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 2. Lock C, Hermans G, Pedotti R , et al . Gene-microarray analysis of multiple sclerosis lesions yields new targets validated in autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Nat Med. 2002; 8:500–508.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 3. Hemler ME, Crouse C, Takada Y, Sonnenberg A . Multiple very late antigen (VLA) heterodimers on platelets. Evidence for distinct VLA-2, VLA-5 (fibronectin receptor), and VLA-6 structures. J Biol Chem. 1988; 263:7660–7665.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 4. Han MH, Hwang SI, Roy DB, Lundgren DH, Price JV, Ousman SS, Fernald GH, Gerlitz B, Robinson WH, Baranzini SE, Grinnell BW, Raine CS, Sobel RA, Han DK, Steinman L . Proteomic analysis of active multiple sclerosis lesions reveals therapeutic targets. Nature. 2008; 451:1076–1081.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 5. Langer HF, Choi EY , et al . Platelets contribute to the pathogenesis of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Circ Res. 2012; 110:1202–1210.LinkGoogle Scholar
    • 6. Herges K, de Jong BA, Kolkowitz I, Dunn C, Mandelbaum G, Ko RM, Maini A, Han MH, Killestein J, Polman C, Goodyear AL, Dunn J, Steinman L, Axtell RC . Protective effect of an elastase inhibitor in a neuromyelitis optica-like disease driven by a peptide of myelin oligodendroglial glycoprotein. Mult Scler. 2012Feb16[Epub ahead of print].CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 7. Crespo O, Kang SC, Daneman R, Lindstrom TM, Ho PP, Sobel RA, Steinman L, Robinson WH . Tyrosine kinase inhibitors ameliorate autoimmune encephalomyelitis in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis. J Clin Immunol. 2011; 231:1010–1020.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
    • 8. Armulik A, Genové G, Mäe M, Nisancioglu MH, Wallgard E, Niaudet C, He L, Norlin J, Lindblom P, Strittmatter K, Johansson BR, Betsholtz C . Pericytes regulate the blood-brain barrier. Nature. 2010; 468:557–561.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 9. Pedotti R, DeVoss J, Youssef S, Mitchell D, Wedemeyer J, Madanat R, Garren H, Fontoura P, Tsai M, Galli SJ, Sobel RA, Steinman L . Multiple elements of the allergic arm of the immune response modulate autoimmune demyelination. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003; 100:1867–1872.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar
    • 10. Sheremata WA, Jy W, Horstman LL, Ahn YS, Alexander JS, Minagar A . Evidence of platelet activation in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroinflammation. 2008; 5:27.CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar

    eLetters(0)

    eLetters should relate to an article recently published in the journal and are not a forum for providing unpublished data. Comments are reviewed for appropriate use of tone and language. Comments are not peer-reviewed. Acceptable comments are posted to the journal website only. Comments are not published in an issue and are not indexed in PubMed. Comments should be no longer than 500 words and will only be posted online. References are limited to 10. Authors of the article cited in the comment will be invited to reply, as appropriate.

    Comments and feedback on AHA/ASA Scientific Statements and Guidelines should be directed to the AHA/ASA Manuscript Oversight Committee via its Correspondence page.