skip to main content
10.1145/3491101.3519762acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster
Open Access

Opportunities in Designing HCI Tools for Lactation Consulting Professionals

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 April 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Long-term breastfeeding has been shown to exhibit several environmental benefits and health benefits for both the mother and baby. Despite the known advantages, several mothers choose not to maintain breastfeeding long-term. How long a mother breastfeeds is heavily influenced by lactation and latching, and so the mother’s critical point of support is the lactation consultant (LC), who guides and provides instruction for creating a more positive breastfeeding experience. Empowering lactation consultants with methods to deliver instruction and support remotely is essential for advancing telehealth and wide-scale adoption. This paper presents findings from a need-finding study of 6 LC’s that sheds light on ways to address some of the challenges faced by the LC community when providing remote lactation support. Based on the interviews, a number of potential technologies were identified around wearable sensing, annotation tools, and digital repository for virtual education.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

3491101.3519762-talk-video.mp4

mp4

19.2 MB

References

  1. Madeline Balaam, Rob Comber, Ed Jenkins, Selina Sutton, and Andrew Garbett. 2015. Feedfinder. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702328Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Catherine R. Brown, Linda Dodds, Alexandra Legge, Janet Bryanton, and Sonia Semenic. 2014. Factors influencing the reasons why mothers stop breastfeeding. Canadian Journal of Public Health 105, 3 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17269/cjph.105.4244Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. CDC. 2020. Breastfeeding Report Card. https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/data/reportcard.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. CDC. 2020. National Results Report, CDC Survey of Maternity Care Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care. https://www.cdc.gov/breastfeeding/pdf/mpinc/states/2020/mPINC-national-report-2020-508.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Liesbeth Duijts, Made K. Ramadhani, and Henriëtte A. Moll. 2009. Breastfeeding protects against infectious diseases during infancy in industrialized countries. A systematic review. Maternal and Child Nutrition 5, 3 (2009), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2008.00176.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Eugene C. Goldfield, Peter H. Wolff, and Richard C. Schmidt. 1999. Dynamics of Oralrespiratory Coordination in full‐term and preterm infants: I. Comparisons at 38‐40 Weeks postconceptional age. Developmental Science 2, 3 (1999), 363–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7687.00081Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Trisha Gura. 2014. Nature’s first functional food. Science 345, 6198 (2014), 747–749. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.345.6198.747Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Katriina Heikkilä, Yvonne Kelly, Mary J. Renfrew, Amanda Sacker, and Maria A. Quigley. 2012. Breastfeeding and educational achievement at age 5. Maternal and Child Nutrition 10, 1 (2012), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8709.2012.00402.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Ritsuko Kakuma. 2012. Optimal duration of exclusive breastfeeding. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, 8 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd003517.pub2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Michael S Kramer, Tong Guo, Robert W Platt, Zinaida Sevkovskaya, Irina Dzikovich, Jean-Paul Collet, Stanley Shapiro, Beverley Chalmers, Ellen Hodnett, Irina Vanilovich, and et al.2003. Infant growth and health outcomes associated with 3 compared with 6 mo of Exclusive Breastfeeding. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 78, 2 (2003), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/78.2.291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Diana Kuh and Yoav Ben-Shlomo. 2004. A life course approach to chronic disease epidemiology (2 ed.). Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Arnold Lohaus, Heidi Keller, and Susanne Voelker. 2001. Relationships between eye contact, maternal sensitivity, and infant crying. International Journal of Behavioral Development 25, 6(2001), 542–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000528Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Katríona E. Lyons, C. Anthony Ryan, Eugene M. Dempsey, R. Paul Ross, and Catherine Stanton. 2020. Breast Milk, a source of beneficial microbes and associated benefits for infant health. Nutrients 12, 4 (2020), 1039. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12041039Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Shahla Meedya, Kathleen Fahy, and Ashley Kable. 2010. Factors that positively influence breastfeeding duration to 6 months: A literature review. Women and Birth 23, 4 (2010), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2010.02.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Alan Stein, Peter J. Cooper, Ann Day, and Alison Bond. 1987. Social and psychiatric factors associated with the intention to breastfeed. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 5, 3 (1987), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838708403488Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Kymeng Tang, Kathrin Gerling, Luc Geurts, and Katta Spiel. 2021. Understanding the role of technology to support breastfeeding. Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445247Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Diane Thulier and Judith Mercer. 2009. Variables associated with breastfeeding duration. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing 38, 3(2009), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2009.01021.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. UFRJ. 2021. Breastfeeding: Prevalence and practices of breastfeeding in Brazilian children under 2 years of age. Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019). Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. https://enani.nutricao.ufrj.br/index.php/relatorio-4-aleitamento-materno/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. UNICEF and WHO. 2015. Breastfeeding Advocacy Initiative: For the best start in life., 9 pages. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/152891/who_nmh_nhd_15.1_eng.pdf?sequence=1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Chelsea-Joy Wardle, Mitchell Green, Christine Wanjiru Mburu, and Melissa Densmore. 2018. Exploring co-design with breastfeeding mothers. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174056Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Stephen Franklin Weng, Sarah A Redsell, Judy A Swift, Min Yang, and Cristine P Glazebrook. 2012. Systematic review and meta-analyses of risk factors for childhood overweight identifiable during infancy. Archives of Disease in Childhood 97, 12 (2012), 1019–1026. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2012-302263Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)121
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)25

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format