skip to main content
10.1145/3173574.3173881acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

"Genderfluid" or "Attack Helicopter": Responsible HCI Research Practice with Non-binary Gender Variation in Online Communities

Published:21 April 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

As non-binary genders become increasingly prevalent, researchers face decisions in how to collect, analyze and interpret research participants' genders. We present two case studies on surveys with thousands of respondents, of which hundreds reported gender as something other than simply women or men. First, Tumblr, a blogging platform, resulted in a rich set of gender identities with very few aggressive or resistive responses; the second case study, online Fantasy Football, yielded opposite proportions. By focusing on variation rather than dismissing non-binary responses as noise, we suggest that researchers can better capture gender in a way that 1) addresses gender variation without othering or erasing non-binary respondents; and 2) minimizes "trolls'" opportunity to use surveys as a mischief platform. The analyses of these two distinct case studies find significant gender differences in community dimensions of participation in both networked spaces as well as offering a model for inclusive mixed-methods HCI research.

References

  1. Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a feminist HCI methodology: social science, feminism, and HCI. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1979041 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Greta Bauer. 2012. Making Sure Everyone Counts: Considerations for Inclusion, Identification and Analysis of Transgender and Transsexual Participants in Health Surveys/Pour s'. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://open.library.ubc.ca/cIRcle/collections/facult yresearchandpublications/52383/items/1.0132676Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Greta Bauer, J Braimoh, AI Scheim, and C Dharma. 2017. Transgender-inclusive measures of sex/gender for population surveys: Mixed-methods evaluation and recommendations. PloS one. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/j ournal.pone.0178043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Greta Bauer, R Hammond, R Travers, and M Kaay. 2009. "I don't think this is theoretical; this is our lives": how erasure impacts health care for transgender people. Journal of the. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1 055329009001071Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bo Bernhard and Vince Eade. 2005. Gambling in a Fantasy World: An Exploratory Study of Rotisserie Baseball Games. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal 9, 1: 29--43.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrew Billings, B. J. Ruihley, and Y. Yang. 2016. Fantasy Gaming on Steroids? Contrasting Fantasy Sport Participation by Daily Fantasy Sport Participation. Communication & Sport.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrew C Billings and Brody J Ruihley. 2013. Why We Watch, Why We Play: The Relationship Between Fantasy Sport and Fanship Motivations. Mass Communication and Society 16, 1: 5--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rena Bivens. 2017. The gender binary will not be deprogrammed: Ten years of coding gender on Facebook. New Media & Society. Retrieved September 15, 2017 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Rena Bivens and OL Haimson. 2016. Baking Gender Into Social Media Design: How Platforms Shape Categories for Users and Advertisers. Social Media+ Society. Retrieved September 15, 2017 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Karen Blair. Ethical Research With Sexual and Gender Minorities. The SAGE Encyclopedia of LGBTQ Studies.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting things out?: classification and its consequences. MIT Press. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://bibdata.princeton.edu/bibliographic/2702762 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Geoffrey C. Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Invisible Mediators of Action: Classification and the Ubiquity of Standards. Mind, Culture, and Activity 7, 1--2: 147--163.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Samantha Breslin and B Wadhwa. 2014. Exploring Nuanced Gender Perspectives within the HCI Community. Proceedings of the India HCI 2014 Conference. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2676709 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Judith Butler. 2011. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=gT bbCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Judith+Butl er.+1999.+Gender+Trouble.+Taylor+%26+Francis. &ots=h-PHGSTOr5&sig=Aah2uU-SKjGeDu85byuTZsxQCYGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Benjamin Cerf Harris, Lee Badgett, Kitt Carpenter, Richard Gabryszewski, and Sonya Rastogi. 2015. Likely Transgender Individuals in U.S. Federal Administrative Records and the 2010 Census. Retrieved September 16, 2017 from https://www.census.gov/content/dam/Census/librar y/working-papers/2015/adrm/carra-wp-2015-03.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Alexander Cho. 2015. Queer reverb: Tumblr, affect, time. Networked affect. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=fw hgBwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA43&dq=Alexander +Cho.+2015.+Queer+Reverb:+Tumblr,+Affect,+Ti me.+In+Networked+Affect.+MIT+Press.&ots=R0a I3toq6O&sig=eDMkM-tjUr04i4y0ZUnOybNywLUGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Avery Dame. 2016. Making a name for yourself: tagging as transgender ontological practice on Tumblr. Critical Studies in Media Communication. Retrieved September 15, 2017 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Emma Dargie, KL Blair, and CF Pukall. 2014. Somewhere under the rainbow: Exploring the identities and experiences of trans persons. The Canadian Journal of. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://www.utpjournals.press/doi/abs/10.3138/cjhs.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Heath Fogg Davis. 2014. Sex-classification policies as transgender discrimination: An intersectional critique. Perspectives on Politics. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectiv es-on-politics/article/sex-classification-policies-astransgender-discrimination-an-intersectionalcritique/8DB5FEB0A5FE6BCA6F27480604C9680 BGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Nickolas W. Davis and Margaret Carlisle Duncan. 2006. Sports Knowledge is Power. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 30, 3: 244--264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Petra L Doan. 2016. To Count or Not to Count: Queering Measurement and the Transgender Community. WSQ: Women's Studies Quarterly. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://muse.jhu.edu/article/632148/summaryGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Brendan Dwyer. 2011. Segmenting motivation: an analysis of fantasy baseball motives and mediated sport consumption. 20, 1: 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Brendan Dwyer, Sl Shapiro, and Joris Drayer. 2011. Segmenting motivation: An analysis of fantasy baseball motives and mediated sport consumption. Sport Marketing Quarterly 20, 3: 129--137. Retrieved from http://sportleadership.vcu.edu/people/dwyer/Segme ntingSMQ.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Xitao Fan, Brent C. Miller, Kyung-Eun Park, Bryan W. Winward, Mathew Christensen, Harold D. Grotevant, and Robert H. Tai. 2006. An Exploratory Study about Inaccuracy and Invalidity in Adolescent Self-Report Surveys. Field Methods 18, 3: 223--244.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Lee K. Farquhar and Robert Meeds. 2007. Types of fantasy sports users and their motivations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, 4: 1208--1228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Marty Fink and Quinn Miller. 2014. Trans media moments: Tumblr, 2011--2013. Television & New Media. Retrieved September 15, 2017 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Andrew R Flores, Jody L Herman, Gary J Gates, and Taylor N T Brown. 2016. HOW MANY ADULTS IDENTIFY AS TRANSGENDER IN THE UNITED STATES? INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY. Retrieved September 16, 2017 from https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wpcontent/uploads/How-Many-Adults-Identify-asTransgender-in-the-United-States.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Oliver L Haimson, JR Brubaker, and L Dombrowski. 2015. Disclosure, stress, and support during gender transition on Facebook. Proceedings of the 18th. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2675152 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Oliver L Haimson, JR Brubaker, and L Dombrowski. 2016. Digital footprints and changing networks during online identity transitions. Proceedings of the 2016. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2858136 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Oliver L Haimson and GR Hayes. 2017. Changes in Social Media Affect, Disclosure, and Sociality for a Sample of Transgender Americans in 2016's Political Climate. ICWSM. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://www.oliverhaimson.com/PDFs/HaimsonCha ngesSocialMediaAffect.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Oliver L Haimson and Gillian R Hayes. 2015. Toward Trans Inclusion in Feminist HCI. February: 8--11. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://oliverhaimson.com/PDFs/HaimsonTowardTr ansInclusion.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Jean Hardy and S Lindtner. 2017. Constructing a Desiring User: Discourse, Rurality, and Design in Location-Based Social Networks. CSCW. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://www.silvialindtner.com/s/ConstructingADesi ringUser_CameraReady.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Eszter Hargittai and Christian Sandvig. 2015. Digital research confidential?: the secrets of studying behavior online. London, England: The MIT Press. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from https://bibdata.princeton.edu/bibliographic/9234036 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jack Harrison, Jaime Grant, and Jody L Herman. 2012. A gender not listed here: Genderqueers, gender rebels, and otherwise in the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. LGBTQ Public Policy Journal at. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/2zj46213.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Susan Herring, K Job-Sluder, and R Scheckler. 2002. Searching for safety online: Managing trolling; in a feminist forum. The Information. Retrieved September 15, 2017 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Anna Lauren Hoffman. 2017. Data, Technology, and Gender: Thinking About (And From) Trans Lives. In Spaces for the Future: A Companion to Philosophy of Technology. 3--13. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view _citation&hl=en&user=ZjpHidXCGwQC&citation _for_view=ZjpHidXCGwQC:0EnyYjriUFMCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Luke Howie and Perri Campbell. 2015. Fantasy Sports: Socialization and Gender Relations. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 39, 1, SI: 61--77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Sandy E. James, Jody L. Herman, Susan Rankin, Mara Keisling, Lisa Mottet, and Ma'ayan Anafi. 2016. The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Surey. Washington, DC. Retrieved September 16, 2017 from http://www.transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs /usts/Executive Summary - FINAL 1.6.17.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Adam N Joinson. 2008. Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people?: motives and use of facebook. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1357213 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Gopinaath Kannabiran. 2011. Themself?: Critical Analysis of Gender in Facebook. 1--6. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://feministhciworkshop.files.wordpress.com/20 10/11/gkannabiran_feministhci2011.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Amanda M Kimbrough, RE Guadagno, and NL Muscanell. 2013. Gender differences in mediated communication: Women connect more than do men. Computers in Human. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0 747563212003342 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Rebecca Joyce Kissane and Sarah Winslow. 2016. "You're Underestimating Me and You Shouldn't." Gender & Society 30, 5: 819--841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Yong Ming Kow and Timothy Young. 2013. Media technologies and learning in the starcraft esport community. Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '13: 387. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Catherine Kreatsoulas, Mary Crea-Arsenio, Harry S Shannon, James L Velianou, and Mita Giacomini. 2016. Interpreting angina: symptoms along a gender continuum. Open Heart 3, 1: e000376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Michèle Lamont and Virág Molnár. 2002. The Study of Boundaries in the Social Sciences. Annual Review of Sociology 28, 1: 167--195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Seunghwan Lee, Won Jae Seo, and B. Christine Green. 2013. Understanding why people play fantasy sport: development of the Fantasy Sport Motivation Inventory (FanSMI). European Sport Management Quarterly 13, 2: 166--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. Woo Young Lee, Dae Hee Kwak, Choonghoon Lim, Paul M. Pedersen, and Kimberly S. Miloch. 2011. Effects of Personality and Gender on Fantasy Sports Game Participation: The Moderating Role of Perceived Knowledge. Journal of Gambling Studies 27, 3: 427--441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Susan Leigh Star. 2010. This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values 35, 5: 601-- 617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Emilia Lombardi and Swagata Banik. The Utility of the Two-Step Gender Measure Within Trans and Cis Populations. Sexuality Research and Social Policy 13, 3: 288--296.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Danielle Lottridge, Frank Bentley, Matt Wheeler, Jason Lee, Janet Cheung, Katherine Ong, and Cristy Rowley. 2017. Third-Wave Livestreaming: Teens' Long Form Selfie. In MobileHCI. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. A Massanari. 2017. # Gamergate and The Fappening: How Reddit's algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society. Retrieved September 15, 2017 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Wendy Moncur and Wendy. 2013. The emotional wellbeing of researchers. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '13, 1883. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Viviane K. Namaste. 2000. Invisible lives?: the erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Clifford Ivar. Nass and Corina. Yen. 2010. The man who lied to his laptop?: what machines teach us about human relationships. Current. Retrieved September 17, 2017 from https://bibdata.princeton.edu/bibliographic/6509233Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Abigail Oakley. 2016. Disturbing Hegemonic Discourse: Nonbinary Gender and Sexual Orientation Labeling on Tumblr.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Anthony Daniel Perez and Charles Hirschman. 2009. Emerging American Identities. Source: Population and Development Review 35112, 1. Retrieved January 2, 2018 from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25487641Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Whitney Phillips. 2015. This is why we can't have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=pj YhBwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR7&dq=3.+Whitne y+Phillips.+2015.+This+Is+Why+We+Can't+Have +Nice+Things:+Mapping+the+Relationship+Betwe en+Online+Trolling+and+Mainstream+Culture.+M IT+Press.&ots=TFJ0bMscA&sig=pJYk97lSnrdNZlaLF4DNMk19NFU Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Stephanie Poon, Shaun G. Goodman, Raymond T. Yan, Raffaele Bugiardini, Arlene S. Bierman, Kim A. Eagle, Nina Johnston, Thao Huynh, Francois R. Grondin, Karin Schenck-Gustafsson, and Andrew T. Yan. 2012. Bridging the gender gap: Insights from a contemporary analysis of sex-related differences in the treatment and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes. American Heart Journal 163, 1: 66--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Sari L. Reisner, Kerith J. Conron, Scout, Kellan Baker, Jody L. Herman, Emilia Lombardi, Emily A. Greytak, Alison M. Gill, Alicia K. Matthews, and The GenIUSS Group. 2015. "Counting" Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Adults in Health Research. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly 2, 1: 34--57.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Sari L Reisner, Kerith J Conron, Laura Anatale Tardiff, Stephanie Jarvi, Allegra R Gordon, S Bryn Austin, J Horm, and MJ Mimiaga. 2014. Monitoring the health of transgender and other gender minority populations: Validity of natal sex and gender identity survey items in a U.S. national cohort of young adults. BMC Public Health 2014 14:1 49, 2--3: 59--67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Bryce J Renninger. 2014. "Where I can be myself " where I can speak my mind"": Networked counterpublics in a polymedia environment.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. B. J. Ruihley and A. C. Billings. 2012. Infiltrating the boys' club: Motivations for women's fantasy sport participation. International Review for the Sociology of Sport 48, 4: 435--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Brody J Ruihley, Andrew C Billings, and Coral Rae. 2014. As Time Goes By: Deciphering the Fantasy Sport Playing Teenager. Sport Marketing Quarterly 23, 4: 187--197. Retrieved from https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true &db=bth&AN=100121385&site=ehost-liveGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Ritch C. Savin-Williams and Kara Joyner. 2014. The Dubious Assessment of Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Adolescents of Add Health. Archives of Sexual Behavior 43, 3: 413--422.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Ari Schlesinger, W Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E Grinter. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. P Shachaf and N Hara. 2010. Beyond vandalism: Wikipedia trolls. Journal of Information Science. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Frank M Shipman. 2009. Blending the real and virtual in games: the model of fantasy sports. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games 23: 169--174. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Susan Leigh Star. 1999. The Ethnography of Infrastructure. American Behavioral Scientist 43, 3: 377--391.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Sandy Stone. The Empire Strikes Back: A Posttranssexual Manifesto. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from sandystone.com/empire-strikesback.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Susan. Stryker. 2008. Transgender history. Seal Press. Retrieved January 5, 2018 from https://bibdata.princeton.edu/bibliographic/5493967Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. JE Sumerau, Lain AB Mathers, Alexandra CH Nowakowski, and Ryan T Cragun. 2016. Helping quantitative sociology come out of the closet.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. 1979. The Belmont Report. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-andpolicy/belmont-report/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Los Angeles CA The Williams Institute. Best Practices for Asking Questions to Identify Transgender and Other Gender Minority Respondents on Population-Based Surveys. The GenIUSS Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Son Vivienne. 2017. "I will not hate myself because you cannot accept me ": Problematizing empowerment and gender-diverse selfies. Popular Communication 15, 2: 126--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. L Westbrook and A Saperstein. 2015. New categories are not enough: Rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys. Gender & Society. Retrieved September 15, 2017 fromGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  76. Rhys H. Williams. 1999. Visions of the Good Society and the Religious Roots of American Political Culture. Sociology of Religion 60, 1: 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. Langdon Winner. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics?? Author ( s ): Langdon Winner Do Artifacts Have Politics?? Modern Technology: Problem or Opportunity (Winter, 1980) 109, 1: 121--136.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Documenting Gender - Williams InstituteWilliams Institute. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/research/trans gender-issues/documenting-gender/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. About Tumblr. Retrieved January 5, 2018 from www.tumblr.com/aboutGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. FSTA | Catch The Fantasy Momentum. Retrieved September 20, 2016 from http://fsta.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. FSTA. Fantasy Sport Trade Association, Research. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://fsta.org/research/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. I Sexually Identify as an Attack Helicopter. Know Your Meme. Retrieved September 15, 2017 from http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/i-sexuallyidentify-as-an-attack-helicopterGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. "Genderfluid" or "Attack Helicopter": Responsible HCI Research Practice with Non-binary Gender Variation in Online Communities

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2018
      8489 pages
      ISBN:9781450356206
      DOI:10.1145/3173574

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 21 April 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '18 Paper Acceptance Rate666of2,590submissions,26%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader