Volume 28, Issue 1 p. 113-122
Environmental Toxicology

Subchronic exposure of honeybees to sublethal doses of pesticides: Effects on behavior

Yassine Aliouane

Yassine Aliouane

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale—UMR CNRS 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse cedex France

Search for more papers by this author
Adessalam K. el Hassani

Adessalam K. el Hassani

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale—UMR CNRS 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse cedex France

Search for more papers by this author
Vincent Gary

Vincent Gary

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale—UMR CNRS 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse cedex France

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine Armengaud

Catherine Armengaud

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale—UMR CNRS 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse cedex France

Search for more papers by this author
Michel Lambin

Michel Lambin

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale—UMR CNRS 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse cedex France

Search for more papers by this author
Monique Gauthier

Corresponding Author

Monique Gauthier

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale—UMR CNRS 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse cedex France

Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale—UMR CNRS 5169, Université Paul Sabatier, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulouse cedex FranceSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 09 December 2009
Citations: 233

Published on the Web 8/13/2008.

Abstract

Laboratory bioassays were conducted to evaluate the effects on honeybee behavior of sublethal doses of insecticides chronically administered orally or by contact. Emergent honeybees received a daily dose of insecticide ranging from one-fifth to one-five-hundredth of the median lethal dose (LD50) during 11 d. After exposure to fipronil (0.1 and 0.01 ng/bee), acetamiprid (1 and 0.1 μg/bee), or thiamethoxam (1 and 0.1 ng/bee), behavioral functions of honeybees were tested on day 12. Fipronil, used at the dose of 0.1 ng/bee, induced mortality of all honeybees after one week of treatment. As a result of contact treatment at 0.01 ng/bee, honeybees spent significantly more time immobile in an open-field apparatus and ingested significantly more water. In the olfactory conditioning paradigm, fipronil-treated honeybees failed to discriminate between a known and an unknown odorant. Thiamethoxam by contact induced either a significant decrease of olfactory memory 24 h after learning at 0.1 ng/bee or a significant impairment of learning performance with no effect on memory at 1 ng/bee. Responsiveness to antennal sucrose stimulation was significantly decreased for high sucrose concentrations in honeybees treated orally with thiamethoxam (1 ng/bee). The only significant effect of acetamiprid (administered orally, 0.1 μg/bee) was an increase in responsiveness to water. The neonicotinoids acetamiprid and thiamethoxam tested at the highest dose (one-tenth and one-fifth of their oral LD50, respectively) and fipronil at one-five-hundredth of LD50 have limited effects on the motor, sensory, and cognitive functions of the honeybee. Our data on the intrinsic toxicity of the compounds after chronic exposure have to be taken into account for evaluation of risk to honeybees in field conditions.