Volume 83, Issue 9 p. 1039-1044

The expression of PAX5 in human transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: relationship with de-differentiation

Adshead

Adshead

Academic Unit of Medical and Community Genetics, Imperial College School of Medicine, Kennedy-Galton Centre ,

Department of Urology, Northwick Park and St Mark’s NHS Trust, Harrow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Ogden

Ogden

Department of Urology, Northwick Park and St Mark’s NHS Trust, Harrow, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Penny

Penny

Academic Unit of Medical and Community Genetics, Imperial College School of Medicine, Kennedy-Galton Centre ,

Search for more papers by this author
Stuart

Stuart

Academic Unit of Medical and Community Genetics, Imperial College School of Medicine, Kennedy-Galton Centre ,

Search for more papers by this author
Kessling

Kessling

Academic Unit of Medical and Community Genetics, Imperial College School of Medicine, Kennedy-Galton Centre ,

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 December 2001
Citations: 19
Mr Ogden Northwick Park and St Mark’s NHS Trust, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK.

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the expression of PAX genes, a family of developmental control genes (which encode nine nuclear transcription factors essential for embryogenesis and are proto-oncogenes in mice) in human transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder.

Materials and methods

PAX gene expression was assessed in three established bladder cancer cell lines and 29 primary tumours using the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction and Southern analysis.

Results

All three established TCC cell lines and 79% of primary TCCs expressed PAX5 mRNA. There was a significantly higher proportion of PAX5 expression in malignant than in benign urothelium (P=0.02, Fisher’s exact test); nine of 12 pTa tumours (mucosa-confined), seven of eight pT1 (invading lamina propria) and eight of nine pT2 (invading muscle) expressed PAX5. A higher proportion of tumours with increasing de-differentiation expressed PAX5, which correlates well with the expression pattern of PAX5 in development. In well-differentiated tumours (grade 1), half expressed PAX5, compared with 84% of moderately to poorly differentiated tumours (grades 2/3). The odds ratio for PAX5 expression in malignancy suggests that it increases the risk of malignancy four-fold.

Conclusion

These data support a role for the PAX family in oncogenesis, by identifying another human neoplasm in which they are inappropriately expressed. PAX5 expression in undifferentiated TCC cells may contribute to pathogenesis by supporting cellular proliferation in the de-differentiated state. Furthermore, the high incidence of PAX5 expression suggests its potential use as a diagnostic tool and therapeutic target in TCC.