Commentary: the law, unproven CAM and the two-hats fallacy
Timothy Caulfield,
Timothy Caulfield
University of Alberta, Faculty of Law and School of Public Health
Search for more papers by this author
Timothy Caulfield,
Timothy Caulfield
University of Alberta, Faculty of Law and School of Public Health
Search for more papers by this author
References
- 1 Boon H, Olatunde F, Zick SM. Trends in complementary/alternative medicine use by breast cancer survivors: comparing survey data from 1998 and 2005. BMC Women's Health 2007; 7: 4.
- 2 Fries CJ. Classification of complementary and alternative medical practices: family physicians' ratings of effectiveness. Can Fam Physician 2008; 54: 1570–1. e7.
- 3 Rhode JM, Patel DA, Sen A et al. Perception and use of complementary and alternative medicine among gynaecologic oncology care providers. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2008; 103: 111–15.
- 4 Maha N, Shaw A. Academic doctors' views of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and its role within the NHS: an exploratory qualitative study. BMC Complement Altern Med 2007; 7: 17.
- 5 Pirotta M, Kotsirilos V, Brown J et al. Complementary medicine in general practice: a national survey of GP attitudes and knowledge. Aust Fam Physician 2010; 39: 946–50.
- 6 Golnik AE, Ireland M. Complementary alternative medicine for children with autism: a physician survey. J Autism Dev Disord 2009; 39: 996–1005.
- 7 Hirschkorn KA, Andersen R, Bourgeault IL. Canadian family physicians and complementary/alternative medicine: the role of practice setting, medical training, and province of practice. Can Rev Sociol 2009; 46: 143–59.
- 8 College of Physicians and Surgeons of Alberta (CPSA). Complementary and alternative medicine [website]. Edmonton, AL: CPSA, 2011. <http://www.cpsa.ab.ca/Resources/Complementary_Therapy.aspx>, accessed September 20, 2011.
- 9 Cohen MH, Eisenberg DM. Potential physician malpractice liability associated with complementary and integrative medical therapies. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136: 596–603.
- 10 Studdert DM, Eisenberg DM, Miller FH et al. Medical malpractice implications of alternative medicine. JAMA 1998; 280: 1610–5.
- 11 Ernst E. Informed consent: a potential dilemma for complementary medicine. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004; 27: 428–9.
- 12 Caulfield T, Feasby C. Potions, promises and paradoxes: complementary medicine and alternative medicine and malpractice law in Canada. Health Law J 2001; 9: 183–203.
- 13 College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario (CPSO). 2008 Practice Guide [publication]. Toronto, ON: CPSO, 2008. <http://www.cpso.on.ca/uploadedFiles/policies/guides/PracticeGuideExtract_08.pdf>, accessed 20 May 2011.
- 14 House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy. Fourth Report of Session 2009-10 [publication]. London: The Stationery Office Limited, 2010. <http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/45/45.pdf>, accessed 20 May 2011.
- 15 American Cancer Society (ACS). Chelation therapy [website]. Atlanta, GA: ACS, 2008. <http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/ComplementaryandAlternativeMedicine/PharmacologicalandBiologicalTreatment/chelation-therapy>, accessed 20 May 2011.
- 16 Ernst E. Chelation therapy for coronary heart disease: an overview of all clinical investigations. Am Heart J 2000; 140: 139–41.
- 17 Peppin P. Informed consent. In: JG Downie, T Caulfield, CM Flood (Eds). Canadian Health Law and Policy, 4th edn. Markham, ON: LexisNexis Canada, 2011. pp. 153–91.
- 18 Kaptchuk TJ, Friedlander E, Kelley JM et al. Placebos without deception: a randomized controlled trial in irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS One 2010; 5: e15591.
- 19 Colquhoun D. Alternative medicine in UK universities. In: E Ernst (Ed). Healing, Hype or Harm? A Critical Analysis of Complementary or Alternative Medicine. Exeter: Societas, 2008. pp. 40–67.
- 20 McInerney v. MacDonald, 1992 2 S.C.R. 138.
- 21 Meyer Estate v. Rogers, 1991 78 D.L.R. (4th) 307 (Ont. Gen. Div.).
- 22 Reibl v. Hughes, (1980) 114 D.L.R. (3rd) 1.
- 23 Frenkel M, Ben-Arye E, Cohen L. Communication in cancer care: discussing complementary and alternative medicine. Integr Cancer Ther 2010; 9: 177–85.
- 24 Verhoef MJ, Boon HS, Page SA. Talking to cancer patients about complementary therapies: is it the physician's responsibility? Curr Oncol 2008; 15: S88–S93.
- 25 Kerridge IH, McPhee JR. Ethical and legal issues at the interface of complementary and conventional medicine. Med J Aust 2004; 181: 164–6.
- 26 Shelley BM, Sussman AL, Williams RL et al. ‘They don't ask me so I don't tell them’: patient-clinician communication about traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7: 139–47.
- 27 Smith KR. Why homeopathy is unethical. Focus Altern Complement Ther 2011; 16: 208–11.
10.1111/j.2042-7166.2011.01109.x Google Scholar
- 28 Appleyard C. Letter: broadening the scope of family medicine. Can Fam Physician 2010; 56: 222–3.
- 29 ter Neuzen v. Korn, 1995 127 D.L.R. (4th) 577 (S.C.C.).
- 30 Williams CL. Evidence-based medicine in the law beyond clinical practice guidelines: what effect will EBM have on the standard of care? Wash Lee Law Rev 2004; 61: 479–533.
- 31 McMurtrie L. Setting the legal standard of care for treatment and evidence-based medicine: a case study of antenatal corticosteroids. J Law Med 2006; 14: 220–7.
- 32 Foucar E, Wick MR. Evidence-based medicine and tort law. Semin Diagn Pathol 2005; 22: 167–76.
- 33 Dickens BM. Malpractice liability implications of pacemaker and defibrillator guidelines in Canada. Card Electrophysiol Rev 2003; 7: 36–9.
- 34 Picard EI, Robertson GB. Legal Liability of Doctors and Hospitals in Canada, 4th edn. Toronto, ON: Thomson Carswell, 2007.
- 35 Cohen MH. Legal and ethical issues relating to use of complementary therapies in pediatric hematology/oncology. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2006; 28: 190–3.
- 36 Vogel L. ‘Hodge-podge’ regulation of alternative medicine in Canada. Can Med J Assoc 2010; 182: E569–E570.
- 37 Kalauokalani D, Cherkin DC, Sherman KJ. A comparison of physician and nonphysician acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain. Clin J Pain 2005; 21: 406–11.
