Students Left Behind: Measuring 10th to 12th Grade Student Persistence Rates in Texas High Schools
Abstract
The No Child Left Behind Act requires states to publish high school graduation rates for public schools; the U.S. Department of Education is currently considering a mandate to standardize high school graduation rate reporting. However, no consensus exists among researchers or policymakers about how to measure high school graduation rates. We use longitudinal data tracking a cohort of students at 82 Texas public high schools to assess the precision of three widely used high school graduation rate measures: Texas’s official graduation rates and two competing estimates based on publicly available enrollment data from the Common Core of Data. Our analyses show that these widely used approaches yield highly imprecise estimates of high school graduation and persistence rates. We propose several guidelines for using existing graduation and persistence rate data and argue that a national effort to track students as they progress through high school is essential to reconcile conflicting estimates.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Adelman C. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/pubs/toolbocrevisit/index.html
Archer J. (2003, September 24). Houston case offers lesson on dropouts. Education Week. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.teachermag.net/ew/ew_printstory.cfm?slug=04Houston.h23
Black D., Sanders S., Taylor L. (2003). Measurement of higher education in the census and Current Population Survey. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(463), 545–554.
Cameron S. V., Heckman J. J. (1993). The non-equivalence of high school equivalents. Journal of Labor Economics, 11(1), 1–47.
Collins L. M., Schafer J. L., Kam C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6(4), 330–351.
Commission on No Child Left Behind. (2007). Beyond NCLB: Fulfilling the promise to our nation’s children. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
Crocker L., Algina J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Dillon S. (2008, April 1). U.S. to require states to use a single school dropout formula. New York Times. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/01/education/01child.html
Finn J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.
Fry R. (2005). The higher dropout rate of foreign-born teens: The role of schooling abroad. Washington, DC: Pew Hispanic Center. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://pewhispanic.org/files/reports/55.pdf
Government Accountability Office. (2005). No Child Left Behind Act: Education could do more to help state better define graduation rates and improve knowledge about intervention strategies (GAO-05-879). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-05-879
Greene J. P., Forster G. (2003). Public high school graduation and college-readiness rates in the United States (Manhattan Institute: Education Working Paper 3). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/pdf/ewp_03.pdf
Greene J. P., Winters M. (2005). Public high school graduation and college-readiness rates: 1991-2002. New York: Manhattan Institute for Policy Research. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/ewp_08.htm
Haney W., Madaus G., Abrams L., Wheelock A., Miao J., Gruia I. (2004). The education pipeline in the United States, 1970–2000. Boston: National Board on Educational Testing and Public Policy. Retrieved August 27, 2009, from http://www.bc.edu/research/nbetpp/statements/nbr3.pdf
Heckman J. J., LaFontaine P. A. (2007). The American high school graduation rate: Trends and levels (IZA Discussion Paper No. 3216). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from ftp://repec.iza.org/RePEc/Discussionpaper/dp3216.pdf
Kalsbeek W. D., Yang J., Agans R. P. (2002). Predictors of nonresponse in a longitudinal survey of adolescents. Joint Statistical Meetings—Section on Survey Research Methods. Retrieved August 25, 2009, from http://www.amstat.org/sections/SRMS/Proceedings/y2002/Files/JSM2002-000627.pdf
Kennedy E., Spellings M. (2007). National epidemic, economic necessity. Retrieved June 30, 2008, from http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0507/3951.html
Laird J., Kienzl G., DeBell M., Chapman C. (2007). Dropout rates in the United States: 2005 compendium report. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2007/2007059.pdf
Lee V. E., Burkham D. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization. American Education Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393.
Library of Congress, S. 1185 Graduation Promise Act of 2007. (2007).
Losen D. (2005). Graduation rate accountability under the No Child Left Behind Act. In Sunderman G.L., Kim J.S., Orfield G. (Eds.), NCLB meets school realities: Lessons from the field (pp. 105–120). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Miao J., Haney W. (2004). High school graduation rates: Alternative methods and implications. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(55). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/v12n55/
Mishel L., Roy J. (2006). Rethinking high school graduation rates and trends. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.epi.org/books/rethinking_hs_grad_rates/rethinking_hs_grad_rates-FULL_TEXT.pdf
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). National Institute of Statistics Sciences/Education Statistics Services Institute Task Force on Graduation, Completion, and Dropout Indicators: Final report (NCES 2005-105). Washington, DC: Author.
Niu S. X., Sullivan T., Tienda M. (2008). Minority talent loss and the Texas Top 10 Percent Law. Social Science Quarterly, 89(4), 831–845.
Raghunathan T. E., Lepkowski J. M., Van Hoewyk J., Solenberger P. (2001). A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology, 27(1), 85–95.
Raghunathan T. E., Solenberger P. W., Van Hoewyk J. (2002). IVEware: Imputation and variance estimation software. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research.
Roy J., Mishel L. (2008). Using administrative data to estimate graduation rates: Challenges, proposed solutions and their pitfalls. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16(11). Retrieved July 1, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v16n11/
Rumberger R. W. (2004). Why students drop out of school. In Orfield G. (Ed.), Dropouts in America: Confronting the graduation rate crisis (pp. 131–156). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
Schafer J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. London: Chapman and Hall.
Schemo D. J. (2003, July). Questions on data cloud luster of Houston schools. New York Times, p. A1.
Seastrom M., Hoffman L., Chapman C., Stillwell R. (2007). The averaged freshman graduation rate for public high schools from the Common Core of Data: School years 2002–03 and 2003–04. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006606rev.pdf
Swanson C. (2003a). Keeping count and losing count: Calculating graduation rates for all students under NCLB accountability. Washington, DC: Education Policy Center, The Urban Institute. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410843_keeping_count.pdf
Swanson C. (2003b). NCLB implementation report: State approaches for calculating high school graduation rates. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Education Policy Center.
Swanson C. (2004). Who graduates? Who doesn’t? A statistical portrait of public high school graduation, class of 2001. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://www.urban.org/UploadedPDF/410934_WhoGraduates.pdf
Texas Education Agency. (2007). Secondary school completion and dropouts in Texas Public Schools 2005–06. Austin: Texas Education Agency. Retrieved June 26, 2008, from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/research/pdfs/dropcomp_2005-06.pdf#xml=http://www.tea.state.tx.us/cgi/texis/webinator/search/xml.txt?query=secondary+school+completion+and+dropout&db=db&id=38396a4338a03a2a
Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project. (2005). Texas Higher Education Opportunity Project (THEOP) Wave 2 “stayer/leaver” survey methodology report. Retrieved July 31, 2008, from http://www.texastop10.princeton.edu/surveys/soph_w2/soph_w2_methods_pu.pdf
Tyler J. H. (2003). Economic benefits of the GED: Lessons from recent research. Review of Educational Research, 73(3), 369–403.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). The condition of education 2006 (NCES 2006-071). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2006/2006071.pdf
Warren J. R. (2005). State-level high school completion rates: Concepts, measures, and trends. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(51). Retrieved April 29, 2008, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v13n51
Warren J. R., Halpern-Manners A. (2007). Is the glass emptying or filling up? Reconciling divergent trends in high school completion and dropout. Educational Researcher, 36(6), 335–343.
Winglee M., Marker D., Henderson A., Young B. A., Hoffman L. (2000). A recommended approach to providing high school dropout and completion rates at the state level. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
- ds_10.3102_0162373710367515.pdf
- 30.50 KB
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: June 1, 2010
Issue published: June 2010
Keywords
PubMed: 23077375
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 260
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 3 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
-
Examining teachers' judgment of students' 21 st ...
-
Examining Organizational Practices that Predict Persistence among High...
-
Paving the Way...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
AERA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
AERA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
