<img src="https://sb.scorecardresearch.com/p?c1=2&amp;c2=6035250&amp;cv=2.0&amp;cj=1&amp;cs_ucfr=0&amp;comscorekw=Anglicanism%2CChristianity%2CReligion%2CUK+news"> Skip to main contentSkip to navigation Skip to navigation
Clergy member of Canterbury Catherdral
Services such as holy communion and morning and evening prayer require clergy to wear a surplice or an alb under current rules. Photograph: Toby Melville/Reuters
Services such as holy communion and morning and evening prayer require clergy to wear a surplice or an alb under current rules. Photograph: Toby Melville/Reuters

Anglican clergy could drop traditional dress in favour of casual clothing

This article is more than 8 years old

Church synod debating whether traditional robes could become optional in effort to reflect changing nature of some services

Church of England clergy may be allowed to wear casual clothes during services so long as they are “seemly”, in a move which would sweep away centuries of tradition.

Members of the church’s synod, or ruling body, are being consulted by bishops on a change to church law which requires clergy to wear certain robes at specific services, including holy communion, weddings and funerals.

Among the proposals being considered is making traditional vestments optional, as long as such a move “would benefit the mission of the church”. For weddings and funerals, the agreement of the bride and groom or deceased’s family would need to be obtained.

A consultation paper being circulated to synod members said: “Where the minister departed from the normal requirements as to vesture, the dress adopted by the minister should be seemly.”

The rules governing clergy dress at holy communion, morning and evening prayer on Sundays and at “occasional offices” – weddings, funerals and baptisms – require the minister to wear a surplice or alb with scarf or stole. A surplice is a loose, white knee-length vestment worn over a cassock. An alb is similar, but ankle-length. A stole is coloured; a scarf is black.

London vicar Christopher Hobbs proposed the changes to church law at last July’s synod, which resulted in the current consultation. The move was not “a charter for shell-suits”, he said at the time, but a reflection of the changing nature of some church services.

“For holy communion there is no flexibility. It makes no difference if it is café-style in a pub, outside in a field, in a hotel lounge or lobby. Surplice and alb is required, with scarf or stole,” he said.

Some synod members spoke in favour of retaining traditional robes even though the rules are regularly disregarded. Philip McDonough said vestments gave ministers authority and were a bulwark against “slovenly dress”. Victoria Roberts said she had witnessed “inappropriate dress – in one case, jogging bottoms and trainers”.

According to the consultation paper, the wearing of vestments “mark out worship as an activity commanding reverence, stillness and attention to God”. Traditional robes are also intended to “put aside considerations of fashion and style, often in these days the subject of intense interest and discussion. Distinctive vesture aims at focusing attention on the high purpose of worship.”

Paul Bayes, bishop of Liverpool, said the church was engaged in conversation on the issue of robes. Some believed that a relaxation of the rules would make “the church more relevant to modern society, and they believe that passionately. Others say that if that were to happen the church would lose some of its distinctiveness.”

The consultation period ends in mid-April.

Most viewed

Most viewed