Where does the Liberal promise to address harmful online content stand?
With considerable attention on an increase in hate and harassment online, questions are being raised over where the federal government’s promises stand, related to advancing legislative and regulatory changes aimed at tamping down harmful content.
After receiving heaps of largely-critical feedback, and going back to the drawing board with the help of experts over the last several months, sources close to the file tell CTVNews.ca that the government is still contemplating how to approach the complex "online safety" legislation in a way that responds to critics’ concerns while addressing the state of discourse online.
The pledge originated with the intention of forcing “online communication service providers,” such as Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, Instagram, and TikTok, to be more accountable and transparent in handling five kinds of harmful content on their platforms: hate speech, child exploitation, the sharing of non-consensual images, incitements to violence, and terrorism.
The Liberals' intention was to ensure the kinds of behaviours that are illegal in-person are also illegal online, with a focus on public content, not private communication.
"Online platforms are increasingly central to participation in democratic, cultural and public life. However, such platforms can also be used to threaten and intimidate Canadians and to promote views that target communities, put people’s safety at risk, and undermine Canada’s social cohesion or democracy," reads the government's landing page for this initiative.
"Now, more than ever, online services must be held responsible for addressing harmful content on their platforms and creating a safe online space that protects all Canadians," it continues.
Beyond seeking expert advice, this summer Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez and top officials from his department have travelled across the country holding panel discussions with stakeholders and representatives from minority groups.
Public hearings intended to capture the concerns of Canadians — particularly those in marginalized communities —are set to continue into the fall, sources said, adding that this continuing outreach is meant to help inform the scope of the legislation.
PAST PROMISED DEADLINE, FOCUS ON GETTING ‘RIGHT’
The Liberals have already blown past their campaign commitment to move on a "balanced and targeted" online harms bill within the first 100 days of their post-2021 election mandate.
Amid this heightened attention and considerable work left before the bill is completed, CTVNews.ca asked when Canadians might expect to see a bill introduced in Parliament and, in an emailed response, Rodriguez's office wouldn't commit to a timeframe, saying the government's priority is getting the legislation right.
"The minister is now engaging directly with Canadians across the country on the insights provided by the experts," said the heritage minister's press secretary Laura Scaffidi. "Canadians should be able to express themselves freely and openly without fear of harm online… We’re committed to getting this right and to engaging Canadians in a thorough, open, and transparent manner every step of the way."
Despite reluctance to put a timeline on seeing the bill tabled, sources told CTVNews.ca that it is unlikely this fall, with early 2023 appearing to be the most realistic timeframe.
Sources said that the government remains committed to putting forward legislation that will give Canadians more tools to address harms online, but there are some factors adding pressure to Rodriguez' desire to "get it right."
Mindful of the pushback from opposition parties and some platforms during the government's push to pass Broadcasting Act updates — including accusations of attacking free speech — sources said the Liberals are bracing for an even bigger fight over this bill.
Given this, some consideration has been made about waiting until there is more space on the legislative agenda to allow the Liberals to dedicate greater attention to this bill once it is tabled. Rodriguez currently has two pieces of outstanding legislation; Bill C-11, the revived Broadcasting Act bill is before the Senate, and Bill C-18 regarding online news remuneration is before a House committee.
Speaking about recent examples of politicians and journalists facing threats, Public Safety Minister Marco Mendicino said on Monday that in addition to engaging law enforcement, "Minister Rodriguez is very eager to bring forward his legislation, so that legislatively the tools are there as well."
However, sources CTVNews.ca spoke with cautioned that while there are elements of the legislation that will likely help—particularly when it comes to platforms taking more accountability for content posted— it is not going to be the "panacea" for rectifying increasingly toxic online discourse. Rather, the coming legislation is being seen as one piece of a bigger puzzle.
For example, an element of the initial proposal from the government that may be unlikely to change given Charter and privacy considerations, is that it’s meant to focus on public content and not private communications such as text messages or emails. Hate-filled and harassing emails have been a central focus of what some journalism advocacy groups are considering a co-ordinated campaign.
Sources said there’s some hope that recent attention, spurred by more federal political figures from across the political spectrum speaking out, will help galvanize support and allow for a serious conversation about tackling the issue.
Ahead of the government presenting the online harms legislation, here's what you need to know about what's transpired on this file so far, and how it may ultimately shape the bill.
CONCERNS WITH WHAT WAS INITIALLY PROPOSED
Two weeks before Prime Minister Justin Trudeau called the 2021 federal election, the government presented a “technical discussion paper” and rolled out a summer-long consultation process on a proposed online harms legislative framework, promising that responses would inform the new laws and regulations.
That proposal included implementing a 24-hour takedown requirement for content deemed harmful, as well as creating federal “last resort” powers to block online platforms that repeatedly refuse to take down harmful content.
The Liberals' initial proposal also floated:
- Compelling platforms to provide data on their algorithms and other systems that scour for and flag potentially harmful content and provide a rationale for when action is taken on flagged posts;
- Obligations for sites to preserve content and identifying information for potential future legal action and new options to alert authorities to potentially illegal content and content of national security concern if an imminent risk of harm is suspected;
- Outlining potential new ways for CSIS and RCMP to play a role when it comes to combating online threats to national security and child exploitation content; and
- Installing a new system for Canadians to appeal platforms’ decisions around content moderation.
The regime proposed a series of severe new sanctions for companies deemed to be repeatedly non-compliant, including fines of up to five per cent of the company’s annual global revenue or $25 million, whichever is higher.
In order to operate and adjudicate this new system, the government suggested creating a new “Digital Safety Commission of Canada” that would be able to issue binding decisions for platforms to remove harmful content, ordering them to do so when they “get it wrong.”
During the 2021 summer feedback period, the government got an earful from stakeholders expressing concerns with then-Canadian heritage minister Steven Guilbeault’s proposals, as well as what was described as a “massively inadequate” consultation process.
From concerns the proposal didn't strike an appropriate balance between addressing online harms and safeguarding freedom of expression, to questioning why the range of harms are being treated as equivalent, experts called for some significant changes.
Facing concerted pressure from stakeholders that the government would ideally want onside as it pushes ahead with this conversation, after Rodriguez was re-appointed as heritage minister, he announced plans to go back to the drawing board.
The decision to rework the plan was announced in February, alongside the release of a "What We Heard" report based on its assessment of the feedback from the consultation process.
It concluded that, while the majority of respondents felt there is a need for the government to take action to crack down on harmful content online, given the complexity of the issue, the coming legislation needed to be thoughtful in its approach to guard against “unintended consequences.”
Minister of Canadian Heritage, Pablo Rodriguez announces a new expert advisory group on online safety as a next step in developing legislation to address harmful online content during a press conference in Ottawa on Wednesday, March 30, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
Minister of Canadian Heritage, Pablo Rodriguez announces a new expert advisory group on online safety as a next step in developing legislation to address harmful online content during a press conference in Ottawa on Wednesday, March 30, 2022. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Sean Kilpatrick
This online harms framework is separate from a piece of government legislation tabled at the eleventh hour of the 43rd Parliament.
Called Bill C-36, it focused on amendments to the Code and the Canadian Human Rights Act to address hate propaganda, hate crimes and hate speech, but after dying when the 2021 election was called, the legislation has not been revisited by the Liberals.
The bill was mentioned in the latest Liberal campaign platform as part of their promise to "more effectively combat online hate," so remains to be seen whether it could be folded into the coming legislation.
HOW THE COMING PLAN COULD LOOK
In late March, the government tasked experts and specialists in platform governance, content regulation, civil liberties, tech regulation, and national security to help guide the government on what the bill should and shouldn’t include. Among the panelists were stakeholders who were publicly critical of the initial proposal.
Over the course of eight sessions — each focusing on different elements of the framework, from the regulatory powers and law enforcement's role, to freedom of expression — the panel deliberated over the proposal and discussed their concerns.
The panel held its concluding workshop in June, and in early July a high-level summary was published online.
It included some key advice that may help shed light on the ways the coming approach will look different from the initial outline.
Among the panel's suggestions to the government were:
- That any regulatory regime should put an equal emphasis on managing risk and protecting human rights, with any legislative obligations needing to be flexible and adaptable as to not become quickly outdated;
- That public education needs to be a "fundamental component" of any framework, suggesting the plan come alongside programs to improve media literacy;
- That "particularly egregious" content like child sexual exploitation material may require its own solution unique from what other forms of harm may require, with some questioning whether not each of the five forms of harm set out in 2021 require tailored approaches;
- That the proposed regulator should be well-resourced and equipped with audit and enforcement powers because it shouldn't be left up to the platforms who need to take responsibility for their role;
- That clear consequences should be set for regulated services that do not fulfill their obligations under the regime, alongside a "content review and appeal process" at the platform level; and
- Separate from the Digital Safety Commissioner there should be an independent ombudsperson for victim support who could play a "useful intermediary role between users and the regulator."
It was clear from the summaries of each session that there were some sticky areas of disagreement among panellists as well, including whether the legislation should compel services to remove content.
While some experts said a 24-hour takedown requirement should be avoided, except for instances of content that explicitly calls for violence and child sexual exploitation content, others suggested it would be preferable to "err on the side of caution."
Others raised concerns that content removal could disproportionately affect marginalized groups.
The experts also emphasized that "something must be done about disinformation," as it has grown to become one of the more troubling forms of harmful online behaviour. However, the experts cautioned against defining disinformation in legislation.
"Doing so would put the government in a position to distinguish between what is true and false – which it simply cannot do," read the summary, instead suggesting the possibility of focusing on the co-ordinated amplification of misinformation through bots and bot networks.
IN DEPTH
Budget 2024 prioritizes housing while taxing highest earners, deficit projected at $39.8B
In an effort to level the playing field for young people, in the 2024 federal budget, the government is targeting Canada's highest earners with new taxes in order to help offset billions in new spending to enhance the country's housing supply and social supports.
'One of the greatest': Former prime minister Brian Mulroney commemorated at state funeral
Prominent Canadians, political leaders, and family members remembered former prime minister and Progressive Conservative titan Brian Mulroney as an ambitious and compassionate nation-builder at his state funeral on Saturday.
'Democracy requires constant vigilance' Trudeau testifies at inquiry into foreign election interference in Canada
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau testified Wednesday before the national public inquiry into foreign interference in Canada's electoral processes, following a day of testimony from top cabinet ministers about allegations of meddling in the 2019 and 2021 federal elections. Recap all the prime minister had to say.
As Poilievre sides with Smith on trans restrictions, former Conservative candidate says he's 'playing with fire'
Siding with Alberta Premier Danielle Smith on her proposed restrictions on transgender youth, Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre confirmed Wednesday that he is against trans and non-binary minors using puberty blockers.
Supports for passengers, farmers, artists: 7 bills from MPs and Senators to watch in 2024
When parliamentarians return to Ottawa in a few weeks to kick off the 2024 sitting, there are a few bills from MPs and senators that will be worth keeping an eye on, from a 'gutted' proposal to offer a carbon tax break to farmers, to an initiative aimed at improving Canada's DNA data bank.
Opinion
opinion Don Martin: Gusher of Liberal spending won't put out the fire in this dumpster
A Hail Mary rehash of the greatest hits from the Trudeau government’s three-week travelling pony-show, the 2024 federal budget takes aim at reversing the party’s popularity plunge in the under-40 set, writes political columnist Don Martin. But will it work before the next election?
opinion Don Martin: The doctor Trudeau dumped has a prescription for better health care
Political columnist Don Martin sat down with former federal health minister Jane Philpott, who's on a crusade to help fix Canada's broken health care system, and who declined to take any shots at the prime minister who dumped her from caucus.
opinion Don Martin: Trudeau's seeking shelter from the housing storm he helped create
While Justin Trudeau's recent housing announcements are generally drawing praise from experts, political columnist Don Martin argues there shouldn’t be any standing ovations for a prime minister who helped caused the problem in the first place.
opinion Don Martin: Poilievre has the field to himself as he races across the country to big crowds
It came to pass on Thursday evening that the confidentially predictable failure of the Official Opposition non-confidence motion went down with 204 Liberal, BQ and NDP nays to 116 Conservative yeas. But forcing Canada into a federal election campaign was never the point.
opinion Don Martin: How a beer break may have doomed the carbon tax hike
When the Liberal government chopped a planned beer excise tax hike to two per cent from 4.5 per cent and froze future increases until after the next election, says political columnist Don Martin, it almost guaranteed a similar carbon tax move in the offing.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Quebec nurse had to clean up after husband's death in Montreal hospital
On a night she should have been mourning, a nurse from Quebec's Laurentians region says she was forced to clean up her husband after he died at a hospital in Montreal.
Northern Ont. lawyer who abandoned clients in child protection cases disbarred
A North Bay, Ont., lawyer who abandoned 15 clients – many of them child protection cases – has lost his licence to practise law.
Bank of Canada officials split on when to start cutting interest rates
Members of the Bank of Canada's governing council were split on how long the central bank should wait before it starts cutting interest rates when they met earlier this month.
Maple Leafs fall to Bruins in Game 3, trail series 2-1
Brad Marchand scored twice, including the winner in the third period, and added an assist as the Boston Bruins downed the Toronto Maple Leafs 4-2 to take a 2-1 lead in their first-round playoff series Wednesday
Cuban government apologizes to Montreal-area family after delivering wrong body
Cuba's foreign affairs minister has apologized to a Montreal-area family after they were sent the wrong body following the death of a loved one.
'It was instant karma': Viral video captures failed theft attempt in Nanaimo, B.C.
Mounties in Nanaimo, B.C., say two late-night revellers are lucky their allegedly drunken antics weren't reported to police after security cameras captured the men trying to steal a heavy sign from a downtown business.
What is changing about Canada's capital gains tax and how does it impact me?
The federal government's proposed change to capital gains taxation is expected to increase taxes on investments and mainly affect wealthy Canadians and businesses. Here's what you need to know about the move.
New Indigenous loan guarantee program a 'really big deal,' Freeland says at Toronto conference
Canada's Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland was among the 1,700 delegates attending the two-day First Nations Major Projects Coalition (FNMPC) conference that concluded Tuesday in Toronto.
'Life was not fair to him': Daughter of N.B. man exonerated of murder remembers him as a kind soul
The daughter of a New Brunswick man recently exonerated from murder, is remembering her father as somebody who, despite a wrongful conviction, never became bitter or angry.
Local Spotlight
Fergus, Ont. man feels nickel-and-dimed for $0.05 property tax bill
A property tax bill is perplexing a small townhouse community in Fergus, Ont.
Twins from Toronto were Canada's top two female finishers at this year's Boston Marathon
When identical twin sisters Kim and Michelle Krezonoski were invited to compete against some of the world’s most elite female runners at last week’s Boston Marathon, they were in disbelief.
Mystery surrounds giant custom Canucks jerseys worn by Lions Gate Bridge statues
The giant stone statues guarding the Lions Gate Bridge have been dressed in custom Vancouver Canucks jerseys as the NHL playoffs get underway.
'I'm committed': Oilers fan won't cut hair until Stanley Cup comes to Edmonton
A local Oilers fan is hoping to see his team cut through the postseason, so he can cut his hair.
'It's not my father's body!' Wrong man sent home after death on family vacation in Cuba
A family from Laval, Que. is looking for answers... and their father's body. He died on vacation in Cuba and authorities sent someone else's body back to Canada.
'Once is too many times': Education assistants facing rising violence in classrooms
A former educational assistant is calling attention to the rising violence in Alberta's classrooms.
What is capital gains tax? How is it going to affect the economy and the younger generations?
The federal government says its plan to increase taxes on capital gains is aimed at wealthy Canadians to achieve “tax fairness.”
UBC football star turning heads in lead up to NFL draft
At 6'8" and 350 pounds, there is nothing typical about UBC offensive lineman Giovanni Manu, who was born in Tonga and went to high school in Pitt Meadows.
Cat found at Pearson airport 3 days after going missing
Kevin the cat has been reunited with his family after enduring a harrowing three-day ordeal while lost at Toronto Pearson International Airport earlier this week.