Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Tumor features associated with aggressive cancers may affect cognition prior to systemic therapy. We evaluated associations of cognition prior to adjuvant therapy and tumor aggressivity in older breast cancer patients.

Methods

Women diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer (n = 705) ages 60–98 were enrolled from August 2010-March 2020. Cognition was measured post-surgery, pre-systemic therapy using self-reported (FACT-Cog Perceived Cognitive Impairment [PCI]) and objective tests of attention, processing speed, and executive function (APE domain) and learning and memory [LM domain]. Linear regression tested associations of pre-treatment tumor features and cognition, adjusting for age, race, and study site. HER2 positivity and higher stage (II/III vs. 0/I) were a priori predictors of cognition; in secondary analyses we explored associations of other tumor features and cognitive impairment (i.e., PCI score < 54 or having 2 tests < 1.5 SD or 1 test < 2 SD from the mean APE or LM domain score).

Results

HER2 positivity and the hormone receptor negative/HER2 + molecular subtype were associated with lower adjusted mean self-reported cognition scores and higher impairment rates (p values < .05). Higher stage of disease was associated with lower objective performance in APE. Other tumor features were associated with cognition in unadjusted and adjusted models, including larger tumor size and lower PCI scores (p = 0.02). Tumor features were not related to LM.

Conclusions

Pre-adjuvant therapy cognition was associated with HER2 positivity and higher stage of disease and other features of aggressive tumors. Additional research is needed to confirm these results and assess potential mechanisms and clinical management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data collected for the Thinking and Living with Cancer (TLC) Study used in this publication were supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health. The data are available for sharing under NIH-compliant TLC Study agreements. Please contact the corresponding author for requests.

References

  1. Janelsins MC, Heckler CE, Peppone LJ, Mohile SG, Mustian KM, Ahles T et al (2017) Longitudinal assessment of cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) up to six-months post-chemotherapy with multiple cognitive testing methods in 943 breast cancer (BC) patients and controls. J Clin Oncol 35(15_suppl):10014. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.10014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mandelblatt JS, Small BJ, Luta G, Hurria A, Jim H, McDonald BC et al (2018) Cancer-related cognitive outcomes among older breast cancer survivors in the thinking and living with cancer study. J Clin Oncol 36:3211–3222. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.18.00140

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Selamat MH, Loh SY, Mackenzie L, Vardy J (2014) Chemobrain experienced by breast cancer survivors: a meta-ethnography study investigating research and care implications. PLoS ONE 9(9):e108002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Von Ah D, Habermann B, Carpenter JS, Schneider BL (2013) Impact of perceived cognitive impairment in breast cancer survivors. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(2):236–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2012.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahles TA, Root JC (2018) Cognitive effects of cancer and cancer treatments. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 14:425–451. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084903

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Wefel JS, Vardy J, Ahles T, Schagen SB (2011) International Cognition and Cancer Task Force recommendations to harmonise studies of cognitive function in patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol 12(7):703–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70294-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahles TA, Saykin AJ, McDonald BC, Furstenberg CT, Cole BF, Hanscom BS et al (2008) Cognitive function in breast cancer patients prior to adjuvant treatment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110(1):143–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mandelblatt JS, Stern RA, Luta G, McGuckin M, Clapp JD, Hurria A et al (2014) Cognitive impairment in older patients with breast cancer before systemic therapy: is there an interaction between cancer and comorbidity? J Clin Oncol 32(18):1909–1918. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.2050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wefel JS, Vidrine DJ, Veramonti TL, Meyers CA, Marani SK, Hoekstra HJ et al (2011) Cognitive impairment in men with testicular cancer prior to adjuvant therapy. Cancer 117(1):190–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandelblatt JS, Zhou X, Small BJ, Ahn J, Zhai W, Ahles T et al (2021) Deficit accumulation frailty trajectories of older breast cancer survivors and non-cancer controls: the thinking and living with cancer study. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djab003

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Hermelink K, Voigt V, Kaste J, Neufeld F, Wuerstlein R, Buhner M et al (2015) Elucidating pretreatment cognitive impairment in breast cancer patients: the impact of cancer-related post-traumatic stress. J Natl Cancer Inst 107(7):djv099. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv099

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Andreotti C, Root J, Ahles T, McEwen B, Compas B (2014) Cancer, coping, and cognition: a model for the role of stress reactivity in cancer-related cognitive decline. Psycho-Oncology 24:617–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahles TA, Saykin AJ (2007) Candidate mechanisms for chemotherapy-induced cognitive changes. Nat Rev Cancer 7(3):192–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lange M, Giffard B, Noal S, Rigal O, Kurtz JE, Heutte N et al (2014) Baseline cognitive functions among elderly patients with localised breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 50(13):2181–2189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.05.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mampay M, Flint MS, Sheridan GK (2021) Tumour brain: pretreatment cognitive and affective disorders caused by peripheral cancers. Br J Pharmacol. https://doi.org/10.1111/bph.15571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim J, Chuang HC, Wolf NK, Nicolai CJ, Raulet DH, Saijo K et al (2021) Tumor-induced disruption of the blood-brain barrier promotes host death. Dev Cell 56(19):2712-2721.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2021.08.010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen SL, Cai GX, Ding HG, Liu XQ, Wang ZH, Jing YW et al (2020) JAK/STAT signaling pathway-mediated microRNA-181b promoted blood-brain barrier impairment by targeting sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 in septic rats. Ann Transl Med 8(21):1458. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-7024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker AK, Chang A, Ziegler AI, Dhillon HM, Vardy JL, Sloan EK (2018) Low dose aspirin blocks breast cancer-induced cognitive impairment in mice. PLoS ONE 13(12):e0208593. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208593

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Koleck TA, Bender CM, Sereika SM, Ryan CM, Ghotkar P, Brufsky AM et al (2017) Associations between pathologic tumor features and preadjuvant therapy cognitive performance in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Cancer Med 6(2):339–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.964

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kobayashi LC, Cohen HJ, Zhai W, Zhou X, Small BJ, Luta G et al (2020) Cognitive function prior to systemic therapy and subsequent well-being in older breast cancer survivors: longitudinal findings from the Thinking and Living with Cancer Study. Psychooncology 29(6):1051–1059. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5376

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Mandelblatt JS, Small BJ, Luta G, Hurria A, Jim H, McDonald BC et al (2018) Cancer-related cognitive outcomes among older breast cancer survivors in the thinking and living with cancer study. J Clin Oncol 36(32):Jco1800140. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.18.00140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandelblatt JS, Zhai W, Ahn J, Small BJ, Ahles TA, Carroll JE et al (2020) Symptom burden among older breast cancer survivors: the thinking and living with cancer (TLC) study. Cancer 126(6):1183–1192. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Dyk K, Zhou X, Small BJ, Ahn J, Zhai W, Ahles T et al (2021) Protective effects of APOE ε2 genotype on cognition in older breast cancer survivors: the thinking and living with cancer study. JNCI Cancer Spectr 5(2):pkab013. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkab013

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatric Res 12(3):189–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wilkinson GS, Robertson GJ (2006) WRAT4: wide range achievement test. Psychological Assessment Resources, Lutz, FL

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wagner LI, Lai JS, Cella D, Sweet J, Forrestal S (2004) Chemotherapy-related cognitive deficits: development of the FACT-Cog instrument. Ann Behav Med 27:S10

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dyk KV, Crespi CM, Petersen L, Ganz PA (2020) Identifying cancer-related cognitive impairment using the FACT-Cog perceived cognitive impairment. JNCI Cancer Spectr 4(1):pkz099. https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkz099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE (1970) Manual for the stait-trait anxiety inventory. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA

    Google Scholar 

  29. Radloff LS (1977) The CES-D scale a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas 1(3):385–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Banin Hirata BK, Oda JM, Losi Guembarovski R, Ariza CB, de Oliveira CE, Watanabe MA (2014) Molecular markers for breast cancer: prediction on tumor behavior. Dis Markers 2014:513158. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/513158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Sankowski R, Mader S, Valdes-Ferrer SI (2015) Systemic inflammation and the brain: novel roles of genetic, molecular, and environmental cues as drivers of neurodegeneration. Front Cell Neurosci 9:28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2015.00028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Chae JW, Ng T, Yeo HL, Shwe M, Gan YX, Ho HK et al (2016) Impact of TNF-alpha (rs1800629) and IL-6 (rs1800795) polymorphisms on cognitive impairment in Asian breast cancer patients. PLoS ONE 11(10):e0164204. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164204

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Jehn CF, Kuhnhardt D, Bartholomae A, Pfeiffer S, Schmid P, Possinger K et al (2010) Association of IL-6, hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis function, and depression in patients with cancer. Integr Cancer Ther 9(3):270–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534735410370036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bagnall-Moreau C, Chaudhry S, Salas-Ramirez K, Ahles T, Hubbard K (2019) Chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment is associated with increased inflammation and oxidative damage in the hippocampus. Mol Neurobiol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12035-019-1589-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Meyers CA, Albitar M, Estey E (2005) Cognitive impairment, fatigue, and cytokine levels in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome. Cancer 104(4):788–793. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Belcher EK, Culakova E, Gilmore NJ, Hardy SJ, Kleckner AS, Kleckner IR et al (2022) Inflammation, attention, and processing speed in patients with breast cancer before and after chemotherapy. J Natl Cancer Inst. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djac022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Williams AM, Shah R, Shayne M, Huston AJ, Krebs M, Murray N et al (2018) Associations between inflammatory markers and cognitive function in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. J Neuroimmunol 314:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.10.005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Birchmeier C (2009) ErbB receptors and the development of the nervous system. Exp Cell Res 315(4):611–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2008.10.035

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hovens IB, Schoemaker RG, van der Zee EA, Heineman E, Izaks GJ, van Leeuwen BL (2012) Thinking through postoperative cognitive dysfunction: How to bridge the gap between clinical and pre-clinical perspectives. Brain Behav Immun 26(7):1169–1179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2012.06.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Belrose JC, Noppens RR (2019) Anesthesiology and cognitive impairment: a narrative review of current clinical literature. BMC Anesthesiol 19(1):241. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-019-0903-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Li W, Zhang Q, Cai Y, Chen T, Cheng H (2022) The COMT genetic factor regulates chemotherapy-related prospective memory impairment in survivors with HER2-/+ breast cancer. Front Oncol 12:816923. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.816923

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Alam A, Hana Z, Jin Z, Suen KC, Ma D (2018) Surgery, neuroinflammation and cognitive impairment. EBioMedicine 37:547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.10.021

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Li Z, Liu F, Ma H, White PF, Yumul R, Jiang Y et al (2017) Age exacerbates surgery-induced cognitive impairment and neuroinflammation in Sprague-Dawley rats: the role of IL-4. Brain Res 1665:65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2017.04.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Pergolotti M, Battisti NML, Padgett L, Sleight AG, Abdallah M, Newman R et al (2020) Embracing the complexity: older adults with cancer-related cognitive decline-A Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology position paper. J Geriatr Oncol 11(2):237–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgo.2019.09.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of Paul Jacobsen was done while he was at Moffitt Cancer Center. We would like to thank the participants in the TLC study for their sharing of their time and experiences; without their generosity this study would not have been possible. We are also indebted to Sherri Stahl, Naomi Greenwood, Margery London, and Sue Winarsky who serve as patient advocates from the Georgetown Breast Cancer Advocates for their insights and suggestions on study design and methods to recruit and retain participants. We thank the TLC study staff who contributed by ascertaining, enrolling and interviewing participants.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health Grants R01CA129769 and R35CA197289 to JM. This study was also supported in part by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health Grant P30CA51008 to Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center for support of the Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Resource and the Non-Therapeutic Shared Resource. The work of AJS and BCM was supported in part by the National Institute on Aging, National Library of Medicine, and National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health Grants P30AG10133, R01AG19771, R01LM01136, and R01CA244673. TAA and JCR were supported in part by National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health Grants R01 CA218496, R01CA172119, R03CA249548, and P30CA008748. The work of JC was supported in part by the American Cancer Society Research Scholars Grant 128660-RSG-15–187-01-PCSM and the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health grant R01CA237535. HJC was supported in part by the National Institute of Aging at the National Institutes of Health Grant P30AG028716 for the Duke Pepper Center. SKP was supported in part by the American Cancer Society Research Scholars Grant RSG-17–023-01-CPPB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JCR was responsible for investigation, supervision, and writing. XZ was responsible for formal analysis, data curation, and writing. JA was responsible for supervision, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, and writing. BJ Small was responsible for supervision, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, and writing. WZ was responsible for formal analysis, data curation, and writing. TB was responsible for conceptualization and writing. JC was responsible for conceptualization and writing. HJC was responsible for conceptualization and writing and editing. AD was responsible for conceptualization and writing. ME was responsible for conceptualization and writing. DG was responsible for investigation, resources, and writing. PBJ was responsible for investigation and writing. Heather Jim was responsible for investigation, resources, writing, project administration, and funding acquisition. CI was responsible for conceptualization and writing. BCM was responsible for investigation and writing. ZN was responsible for conceptualization and writing. SKP was responsible for investigation, resources, writing, and project administration. KR was responsible for conceptualization and writing. AJS was responsible for investigation, resources, writing, project administration, and funding acquisition. KvD was responsible for conceptualization and writing. JSM was responsible for conceptualization, investigation, resources, writing and editing, supervision, project administration, and funding acquisition. TA was responsible for conceptualization, investigation, resources, writing, project administration, and funding acquisition.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James C. Root.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

Asma Dilawari has served on the Cardinal Health oncology summit advisor board, 2019. Claudine Isaacs has served as a consultant for Genentech, Seattle Genetics, PUMA, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Sanofi, and Pfizer, and received support for research (to institution) from Pfizer and Tesaro/GSK. Heather Jim has consulted for RedHill BioPharma, Janssen Scientific Affairs, and Merck, and has received grant funding from Kite Pharma. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent to publish

The authors affirm that human research participants provided informed consent for publication.

Disclaimer

The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Ethical approval

This Institutional Review Board-approved study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03451383) has been reported previously [2, 8] and was conducted at six US sites in Los Angeles, New York City, New Jersey, the DC metropolitan area, Indianapolis, and Tampa.

Role of the funders

The funders had no role in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; the writing of the manuscript; and the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 95 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Root, J.C., Zhou, X., Ahn, J. et al. Association of markers of tumor aggressivity and cognition in women with breast cancer before adjuvant treatment: The Thinking and Living with Cancer Study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 194, 413–422 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06623-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06623-2

Keywords

Navigation