Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Puruṣavāda: A Pre-Śaṅkara Monistic Philosophy as Critiqued by Mallavādin

  • Published:
Journal of Indian Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Advaita literature prior to the time of Gauḍapāda and Śaṅkara is scarce. Relying on the citations of proponents and their opponents, the picture we glean of this early monism differs in many aspects from that of Śaṅkara. While Bhavya’s criticism of this monistic thought has received scholarly attention, the chapter Puruṣavāda in Dvādaśāranayacakra (DNC) has rarely been studied. Broadly, this conversation will help ground classical Advaita in light of the contemporary discourse on naturalism. In particular, this examination will help contextualize the early Advaita that lacks clear imprint of Mahayana Buddhism. The doctrine of Puruṣa, central to this paper, sidelines the role of avidyā or ignorance, and provides a realistic picture of the world. I have relied on the commentary Vṛtti upon the Vākyapadīya as has been substantially cited in DNC in order to advance the arguments. As a consequence, the examination on Puruṣa also paves the path for advancing arguments on linguistic monism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Biardeau, M. (1964). Vākyapadīya Brahmakāṇḍa: Avec la Vṛtti de Harivṛṣabha. Paris: Ēditions E. De Boccard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brahmasūtra. Brahmasūtra with the Bhāṣya of Śaṅkara. With the commentaries Bhāmatī, Kalpataru and Parimala (Vols. 1–2). In K. Joshi (Ed.). Delhi: Parimal Publications, 1981.

  • Darling, G. J. (1987). An evaluation of the Vedāntic critique of Buddhism. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvādaśāranayacakra. The Dvādasaraṃ Nayacakram of Ācārya Śrī Mallavādi Kṣamāśramaṇa. With the commentary Nyayāgamānusāriṇi of Śrī Simhasūri Gaṇi Vādi Kṣamāśramaṇa. (Ed.) with Critical Notes by Muni Jambūvijayajī. Pt. I (1-4 Aras). Bhāvnagar 1966 (Śrī Ātmānand Jain Granthamālā No. 92).

  • Fort, A. (1980). The concept of Suṣupta in Advaita vedanta. Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, 61(1/4), 221–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fort, A. (1985). Dreaming in Advaita vedanta. Philosophy East and West, 35(4), 377–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P. (1953). Vivarta: Studien zur Geschichte der illusionistischen Kosmologie und Erkenntnistheorie der Inder. Mainz: Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, P. (1995). Being and spirit in vedanta. See Halbfass, Wilhelm, 1995, 187–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbfass, W. (1995). Philology and confrontation: Paul Hacker on traditional and modern vedanta. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houben, J. E. M. (1995). The Sambandha-Samuddesa (chapter on relation) and Bhartṛhari’s philosophy of language. Groningen: Egbert Forsten.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houben, J. E. M. (1999). On Syntactic and stylistic evidence regarding the authorship of the Vākyapadīya-Vṛtti (Bhartṛhari’s Vākyapadīya and the Ancient Vṛtti 3)”. Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde südasiens und Archiv für indische Philosophie, 43, 167–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, K. A. S. (1966). Vākyapadīya of Bhartṛhari. With the Vṛtti and the Paddhati of Vṛṣabhadeva. Pune: Deccan College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, K. A. S. (1992). Bhartṛhari: A study of the Vākyapadīya in the light of the ancient commentaries. Pune: Deccan College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobi, H.G. (1884–1885). Jaina Sūtras. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  • Kane, P. V. (1930). Vedanta commentators before Śaṅkarācārya. In Proceedings and Transactions of the fifth Indian Oriental Conference, II, pp. 937–953. Lahore: University of Punjab.

  • Lacombe, O. (1937). L’Absolu selon le Védânta: Les notions de Brahman et d’Atman dans les systèmes de Çankara et Râmânoudja. Paris: P. Geuthner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahābhāṣya. The Mahābhāṣya of Patañjali. With the commentaries Pradīpa and Uddyota. (Vols. 1–6). In S. Bhargava (Ed.). Delhi: Chaukhamba Sanskrit Pratisthan, 1987.

  • Modi, P. M. (1956–1957). Bādarāyaṇa and Śaṅkara: A fresh study. The Journal of the Ganganatha Jha Research Institute, Vol. XIV, parts 1–4, pp. 23–36.

  • Mṛgendratantra. With the Commentary of Nārāyaṇakaṇṭha. In K. Shastri (Ed.) Madhusūdana. Bombay: Nirnaya Sagara Press, 1930.

  • Nakamura, H. (1983). A History of early vedanta philosophy (part one). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura, H. (2004). A history of early vedanta philosophy (part two). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogawa, H. (2005). Process and language: A study of the Mahābhāṣya ad A I.3.1 Bhūvādayo Dhātavaḥ. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pind, O. H. (2003). Did Dignāga and Mallavādin know the old Vākyapadīyavṛtti attributed to Bhartṛhari? Journal of Indian Philosophy, 31, 257–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, K. (2003). The encyclopedia of Indian philosophies: Buddhist philosophy from 350 to 600 (Vol. 9). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qvarnström, O. (1989). Hindu philosophy in Buddhist perspective: The Vedāntatattva-viniścaya chapter of Bhavya’s Madhyamakahṛdayakārikā. Lund: Plus Ultra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastri, K. S. (1924). Bodhāyana and Dramiḍācārya: Two old Vedāntins presupposed by Rāmānuja. Proceedings of the All Indian Oriental Conference, 3, 465–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satkhandāgama, Six Volume Canon. By Puṣpadanta and Bhūtabali. With Dhavalā commentary by Ācharya Śrī Vīrasena. Trans. Nand Lal Jain. Ed. Ashok Kumar Jain. Roorkee: Pandit Phool Chandra Shastri Foundation; Varanasi: Sri Ganesh Varni Digambar Jain Sansthan, 2004.

  • Schrader, O. (1902). Über den Stand der indischen philosophie zur zeit Mahāvīras und Buddhas. Strassburg: K.J. Trübner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vākyapadīya. see Iyer 1966.

  • Madhyamakahṛdaya. See Nakamura 1983, pp. 184–206.

  • Sharma, R. K. (2001). Dreamless sleep and some related philosophical issues. Philosophy East and West, 51(2), 210–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaje, W. (2001). Water and salt (I): Yājñavaklya’s Saindhava Dṛṣṭānta (BĀU II 4.12). Indo-Iranian Journal, 44, 25–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaje, W. (2002). Water and salt (III): An analysis and new translation of the Yājñāvalkya-Maitreyī Dialogue. Indo-Iranian Journal, 45, 205–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timalsina, S. (2009). Consciousness in Indian philosophy: The Advaita doctrine of awareness only. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unebe, T. (2000). “Jñānaśrībhadra’s Interpretation of Bhartṛhari as Found in the “Laṅkāvatāravṛtti” (PHAGS PA LANGKAR GSHEGS PA’I ’GERLA PA). Journal of Indian Philosophy., 28(4), 329–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezler, A. (1981). “Studien zum Dvādaśāranayacakra des Śvetāṃbara Mallavādin: der Sarvasarvātmakatvavāda”, Studien zum Jainismus und Buddhismus. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA

    Sthaneshwar Timalsina

Authors
  1. Sthaneshwar Timalsina
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sthaneshwar Timalsina.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Timalsina, S. Puruṣavāda: A Pre-Śaṅkara Monistic Philosophy as Critiqued by Mallavādin. J Indian Philos 45, 939–959 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-017-9329-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10781-017-9329-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation