New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Supports on the build plate should have a solid bottom interface for better adhesion #1165
Comments
+1 |
sort of duplicate of #1156 |
+1 |
The need for support with solid first layer depends on the used filament. A better solution would be to specify a first layer support density in percent, where 100% is solid. |
@Area5142 When you print pretty much any object the first layer is always solid anyway, how printing supports in any different that this? If you have difficulty removing supports from the build plate when you print in PETG then you should have the same problem with removing the object itself. |
+1 That would help very much for my cheep Asian PEI sheet ;) |
@magkopian a one layer high print is difficult to remove as it flexes with the steel sheet and only can be removed with a scraper. Taller models will have something to grip on, be more stiff and easier to remove just bending the steel sheet (MK2.5/MK3). A filament parameter, specifying the layer density for the first one/two support layers will solve the issue for a range of filaments. There could be other solutions, like a minimum support contact area/first layer area. When support footprint gets small they are easily overthrown, even in PETG. |
@Area5142 Isn't that the case for a non-solid interface layer as well? From my personal experience, I think that if a support breaks and only thing that remains behind is the interface layer in both cases you need a scraper. By the way, if you use a sheath around your supports it minimizes the chances of that happening. |
@magkopian my experience with PETG is that the non-solid support releases the build plate with the model. If the bond gets stronger the support will break before releasing the PEI surface and leave the solid layer behind. |
I would have liked a 100% solid bottom for a case I encounter. I printed a part made of ABS. It was very difficult to remove the remaining support from the textured PEI sheet. With a smooth sticked PEI sheet, I never had an issue because as I could remove small residues of support with a scrapper. I can't do it on a textured sheet as the scrapper can't go well under the support. I had to solve all the remaining support with acetone to remove it. If I had a 100% solid bottom, I could remove it as a whole thin sheet of ABS. |
+1 for % first layer support density |
+1 |
God, please yes. I just can't print with the current supports at all. |
Give SuperSlicer a go, its built on Prusa Slicer so will be familiar to you and it can do that. Under Support Material > Solid First Layer. |
Awesome, thank you so much
…
On Wed, 24 Jun 2020, 20:37 neophyl, ***@***.***> wrote: Give SuperSlicer a go, its built on Prusa Slicer so will be familiar to you and it can do that. Under Support Material > Solid First Layer. https://github.com/supermerill/SuperSlicer/releases — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1165 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AD7ERA3TTTFKUNU74AUHLPTRYJIYBANCNFSM4FSAXPYQ> .
|
I would also like this option. I print PETG on smooth sheet and the zigzag pattern is very hard to remove. If it was a solid layer or ideally zigzagged thick trace, it would be possible to peel it without having to scrape off tiny stuck particles. |
The problem still exists and makes the PE Slic3r unusable for serious printing with ABS. |
Fixes [Request] Add optional perimeter to raft #756 Fixes First support layer does not stick to bed #2101 New parameters raft_first_layer_density and raft_first_layer_expansion to influence the 1st layer of raft or support. Fixes Allow to disable raft under support structures. #3772 Fixes raft is larger than necessary #2568 Fixes Supports on the build plate should have a solid bottom interface for better adhesion #1165 Changed the 1st layer infill to rectilinear even for soluble materials. Fixes first layer of support for multi filament support oddly spaced #1445 Fixes Full Soluble Materials interfacing into Models + Soluble material noise on Bed #684
Implemented with fcb714c New parameters raft_first_layer_density and raft_first_layer_expansion |
Version
1.41.0-beta
Operating system type + version
Debian Stretch
Behavior
When Slic3r generates supports on the build plate it doesn't use a solid bottom interface. This results to poor adhesion to the build plate, which often causes the supports to detach during a print.
As a workaround I often use a brim when I have to print something with a lot of supports. But this is not ideal because the brim touches only the support interface instead of the support itself. Additionally, it puts a brim around the object which is often unnecessary.
In my opinion, the bottom support interface for any supports that are in contact with the build plate should always be solid like a brim, or at least have an option to enable that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: