Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supports printed too slowly. #984

Closed
mkbel opened this issue Jun 19, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Supports printed too slowly. #984

mkbel opened this issue Jun 19, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@mkbel
Copy link

Version

1.40.0 linux64

Operating system type + version

debian testing amd64

Behavior

As supports have different layer height, it is considered different layer and minimum layer duration is applied on support separately, even though two layers of support are not printed one after another, but are interlaced with object layers.

  • Steps needed to reproduce the problem
    Object with small support volume per layer.
  • Expected Results
    Slowing down is not applied on support layer separately, if it is followed by object layer.
  • Actual Results
    Slowing down of print move to honour minimum layer print time, even though next layer to be printed is not support layer again.

Is this a new feature request?
It's more like a bug in algorithm.

STL/Config (.ZIP) where problem occurs

default config.

@top-gun
Copy link
Contributor

An addition: The printable object in the same laser height is printed slower than necessary, too. On complex objects, this issue costs a lot of time as smart cooling slows down entire layers down to the configured minimum speed.

When support and Object have the same height, they should be counted together for minimum laxer time.

bubnikv added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 16, 2021
Processing of CoolingBuffer is newly staggered for support layers
until the 1st object layer above supports is received by CoolingBuffer.
@bubnikv
Copy link
Collaborator

Fixed with 6ea5781

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants