Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does diet breadth control herbivorous insect distribution size? Life history and resource outlets for specialist butterflies

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although butterfly distributions are known to be positively correlated with the number of larval hostplants used it is not known to what extent larval hostplant number uniquely influences butterfly distributions and to what extent effects are indirect through other variables. This issue is central to understanding the part generalism and specialism in host use play in organism persistence and conservation. Here, we have modelled the links between larval hostplant number and butterfly distributions using data from the UK. The model identifies the key variables that connect number of hostplants used by butterflies and the size of butterfly distributions. Significant correlations between variables give support to the model. Access to more hostplants is shown to affect a number of resource and life history variables impinging on butterfly population abundances and butterfly distributions. Butterfly distributions are largely accounted for (R2>81%) by a set of resource and life history variables linked to numbers of hostplants: biotope occupancy, nectar sources used, utilities (the number of structures used by each life-cycle stage) and hostplant abundance. Application of partial regression demonstrates that the unique contribution of hostplant number to butterfly distributions is relatively small (R2 = 14% to 33%), indicating that host use generalism has a limited direct impact on distributions. The modest correlations linking variables within the model illustrates that specialist phytophage feeders have a number of potential, distinct outlets, via resource and life history variables, to compensate for lack of supplementary larval hosts within their geographical ranges and enabling them to persist. Variables in the model each have considerable independence of action; without this, specialist feeders would have difficulty in expanding their distributions and acquiring new hosts, functionally-linked processes affecting evolutionary dynamics and persistence. We also question the nature of a direct functional link between local population abundance and distributions. Our model suggests a more complex functional relationship with implications for conserving insect herbivores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Asher M. Warren R. Fox P. Harding G. Jeffcoate S. Jeffcoate (2001) The Millennium Atlas of Butterflies in Britain and Ireland Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  2. J.S. Bale G.J. Masters I.D. Hodkinson C. Awmack T.M. Bezemer V.K. Brown J. Butterfield A. Buse J.C. Coulson J. Farrar J.E.G. Good R. Harrington S. Hartley T.H. Jones R.L. Lindroth M.C. Press I. Symrnioudis A.D. Watt J.B. Whittaker (2002) ArticleTitleHerbivory in global climate change research: direct efefcts of rising temperature on insect herbivores Global Change Biol 8 1–16 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. F.A. Bink (1992) Ecologische Atlas van de Dagvlinders van Noordwest-Europa Schuyt and Co Haarlem

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Brooks C. Knight (1982) A Complete Guide to British Butterflies Jonathan Cape London

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Caughley (1994) ArticleTitleDirections in conservation biology J. Anim. Ecol 63 215–244

    Google Scholar 

  6. M.J.R. Cowley C.D. Thomas D.B. Roy R.J. Wilson J.L. León-Cortés D. Gutiérrez C.R. Bulman R.M. Quinn D. Moss K.J. Gaston (2001) ArticleTitleDensity-distribution relationships in British butterflies. I. The effect of mobility and spatial scale J. Anim. Ecol 70 410–425 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2656.2001.00508.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J.P. Dempster M.L. King K.H. Lakhani (1976) ArticleTitleThe status of the swallowtail butterfly in Britain Ecol. Entomol 1 71–84

    Google Scholar 

  8. R.L.H. Dennis (1977) The British Butterflies. Their Origin and Establishment E. W. Classey Faringdon, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  9. R.L.H. Dennis (Eds) (1992) The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.L.H. Dennis (1993) Butterflies and Climate Change Manchester University Press Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.L.H. Dennis T.G. Shreeve W.R. Williams (1995) ArticleTitleTaxonomic differentiation in species diversity gradients among European butterflies: contribution of macroevolutionary dynamics Ecography 18 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.L.H. Dennis B. Donato T.H. Sparks E. Pollard (2000) ArticleTitleEcological correlates of island incidence and geographical range among British butterflies Biodiv. Conserv 9 343–359 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008924329854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. R.L.H. Dennis T.G. Shreeve H. Van Dyck (2003) ArticleTitleTowards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: a butterfly biology viewpoint Oikos 102 417–426 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12387.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R.L.H. Dennis J.G. Hodgson R. Grenyer T.G. Shreeve D.B. Roy (2004) ArticleTitleHost plants and butterfly biology. Do host plant strategies drive butterfly status? Ecol. Entomol 29 1–16 Occurrence Handle10.1111/j.0307-6946.2004.00571.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K.J. Gaston (1994) Rarity Chapman and Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  16. K.J. Gaston T.M. Blackburn J.H. Lawton (1997) ArticleTitleInterspecific abundance-range size relationships: an appraisal of mechanisms J. Anim. Ecol 66 579–601

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.P. Grime J.G. Hodgson R. Hunt (1988) Comparative Plant Ecology. A Functional Approach to Common British Species Unwin Hyman London

    Google Scholar 

  18. I.A. Hanski M.E. Gilpin (1997) Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution Academic Press London

    Google Scholar 

  19. I. Hanski J. Kouki A. Halkka (1993) Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species R. Ricklefs D. Schluter (Eds) Historical and Geographical Determinants of Community Diversity University of Chicago Press Chicago 108–116

    Google Scholar 

  20. J.K. Thomas C.D. Hill B. Huntley (2003) Modelling present and potential future ranges of European butterflies using climate response surfaces C.L. Boggs W.B. Watt P.R. Ehrlich (Eds) Butterflies: Ecology and Evolution Taking Flight University of Chicago Press Chicago 149–167

    Google Scholar 

  21. M.E. Hochberg R.T. Clarke G.W. Elmes J.A. Thomas (1994) ArticleTitlePopulation dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red ant hosts J. Anim. Ecol 63 375–391

    Google Scholar 

  22. M.E. Hochberg G.W. Elmes J.A. Thomas R.T. Clarke (1996) ArticleTitleMechanisms of local persistence in coupled host-parasitoid associations: the case model of Maculinea rebeliIchneumon eumerus Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 351 1713–1724

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.E. Hochberg J.A. Thomas G.W. Elmes (1992) ArticleTitleA modelling study of the population dynamics of a large blue butterfly, M. rebelia parasite of red ant nests J. Anim. Ecol 61 397–409

    Google Scholar 

  24. G.W. Hopkins J.I. Thacker A.F.G. Dixon P. Waring M.G. Telfer (2002) ArticleTitleIdentifying rarity in insects: the importance of host plant range Biol. Conserv 105 293–307 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(01)00203-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. O. Kudrna (2001) ArticleTitleThe distribution atlas of European butterflies Oedippus 20 1–342

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Kuussaari M. Nieminen I. Hanski (1996) ArticleTitleExperimental study of migration in the Glanville fritillary butterfly, Melitaea cinxia J. Anim. Ecol 65 797–801

    Google Scholar 

  27. S.R. Leather (1991) ArticleTitleFeeding specialisation and host distribution of British and Finnish Prunus feeding macrolepidoptera Oikos 60 40–48

    Google Scholar 

  28. J.L. Léon-Cortes J.J. Lennon C.D. Thomas (2003) ArticleTitleEcological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks. 2. The role of host plant dynamics Oikos 102 465–477 Occurrence Handle10.1034/j.1600-0706.2003.12130.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. P.R. May (2003) Larval Foodplants of the Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland The Amateur Entomologists ’ Society Orpington, Kent

    Google Scholar 

  30. T. Merckx H. Dyck ParticleVan (2002) ArticleTitleInterrelations among habitat usebehaviorand flight-related morphology in two co-occurring satyrine butterflies, Maniola jurtinaPyronia tithonus J. Insect Behav 15 541–561 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1016385301634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R. Parker (2003) ArticleTitleSuffolk grassland as a butterfly habitat Trans. Suffolk Nat. Hist. Soc 39 4–21

    Google Scholar 

  32. E. Pollard (1988) ArticleTitleTemperaturerainfall and butterfly numbers J. Anim. Ecol 25 819–812

    Google Scholar 

  33. E. Pollard D. Moss (1995) ArticleTitleHistorical records of the occurrence of butterflies in Britain: examples showing associations between annual number of records and weather Global Change Biol 1 107–113

    Google Scholar 

  34. E. Pollard T.J. Yates (1993) Monitoring Butterflies for Ecology and Conservation Chapman and Hall London

    Google Scholar 

  35. Porter K., Steel C.A. and Thomas J.A. 1992. Butterflies and communities. In: Dennis R.L.H. (eds), The Ecology of Butterflies in Britain. Oxford University Press, pp.139–177.

  36. C.D. Preston D.A. Pearman T. Dines (Eds) (2002) New Atlas of the British and Irish Flora Oxford Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  37. R.M. Quinn K.J. Gaston D.B. Roy (1997) ArticleTitleCoincidence between consumer and host occurrence: macrolepidoptera in Britain Ecol. Entomol 22 197–208 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1365-2311.1997.00050.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. R.M. Quinn K.J. Gaston D.B. Roy (1998) ArticleTitleThe distribution of butterflies and their foodplants Ecography 21 279–288

    Google Scholar 

  39. O. Rackham (1986) The History of the Countryside J.M. Dent and Sons London

    Google Scholar 

  40. J.S. Rodwell (1991) et seq. British Plant Communities, Vols, 1–5 Cambridge University Press Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  41. A.M. Shapiro (1975) The temporal component of butterfly species diversity M.L. Cody J.M. Diamond (Eds) Ecology and Evolution of Communities Harvard University Press CambridgeMass 181–195

    Google Scholar 

  42. T.G. Shreeve R.L.H. Dennis D.B. Roy D. Moss (2001) ArticleTitleAn ecological classification of British butterflies: ecological attributes and biotope occupancy J. Insect Conserv 5 145–161 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1017556113534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. A.D. Simmons C.D. Thomas (2004) ArticleTitleChanges in dispersal during species range expansions Am. Nat 164 378–395 Occurrence Handle10.1086/423430 Occurrence Handle15478092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. T.R.E. Southwood (1961) ArticleTitleThe number of species of insect associated with various trees J. Anim. Ecol 30 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  45. InstitutionalAuthorNameStatsoft. (1999) STATISTICA for Windows 95/98/NT Tulsa Oklahoma

    Google Scholar 

  46. D.R. Strong J.H. Lawton R. Southwood (1984) Insects on Plants: Community Patterns and Mechanisms Blackwell Scientific Publications Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  47. T. Tolman R. Lewington (1997) Butterflies of Britain and Europe HarperCollins London

    Google Scholar 

  48. C.D. Thomas E.J. Bodsworth R.J. Wilson A.D. Simmons Z.G. Davies M. Musche L. Conradt (2001) ArticleTitleEcological and evolutionary processes at expanding range margins Nature 411 577–581 Occurrence Handle11385570

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. J.A. Thomas R.T. Clarke G.W. Elmes M.E. Hochberg (1998) Population dynamics in the genus Maculinea (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae J.P. Dempster I.F.G. McLean (Eds) Insect Population Dynamics: Theory and Practice Chapman and Hall London 261–290

    Google Scholar 

  50. O. Tudor R.L.H. Dennis J.N. Greatorex-Davies T.H. Sparks (2004) ArticleTitleFlower preferences of woodland butterflies in the UK: nectaring specialists are species of conservation concern Biol. Conserv 119 397–403 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.biocon.2004.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. J.R.G. Turner C.M. Gatehouse C.A. Corey (1987) ArticleTitleDoes solar energy control organic diversity? Butterflies, moths and the British climate Oikos 48 195–205

    Google Scholar 

  52. M.S. Warren (1985) ArticleTitleThe influence of shade on butterfly numbers in woodland rides, with special reference to the wood white Leptidea sinapis Biol. Conserv 33 147–164 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0006-3207(85)90101-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. M.S. Warren L.K. Barnett D.W. Gibbons M.I. Avery (1997) ArticleTitleAssessing national conservation priorities: an improved red list of British butterflies Biol. Conserv 82 317–328 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0006-3207(97)00037-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roger L. H. Dennis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dennis, R.L.H., Shreeve, T.G., Arnold, H.R. et al. Does diet breadth control herbivorous insect distribution size? Life history and resource outlets for specialist butterflies. J Insect Conserv 9, 187–200 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-005-5660-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10841-005-5660-x

Keywords

Navigation