Agra Lok Sabha Constituency in Uttar Pradesh is a political powerhouse renowned for its significant influence in Indian politics. Agra reflects a diverse demographic and remains a crucial constituency of Uttar Pradesh.. Now in 2024, the electorate is even more enthusiastic to show the power of their vote. Keep watching this page to get the latest updates about the Agra Lok Sabha elections.
In the 2019 General Assembly Elections, Agra witnessed a fiercely contested battle. This constituency witnessed a 59.18% voter turnout in the year 2019. BJP candidate Satyapal Singh Baghel won the 2019 General Election with a victory margin of 2,11,546 votes, securing 6,46,875 votes. Satyapal Singh Baghel defeated Manoj Kumar Soni of the BSP, who got 4,35,329 votes. Let's have a look on to the detalils of Agra Lok Sabha Seat.
Constituency | Winner | Vots |
---|---|---|
Agra Cantt
|
Dr. G.s. DharmeshBJP |
11779646.78% Vote Share
|
Agra North
|
Purushottam KhandelwalBJP |
15381763.89% Vote Share
|
Etmadpur
|
Dr. Dharampal SinghBJP |
14660348.77% Vote Share
|
Jalesar
|
Sanjeev Kumar DiwakarBJP |
9133945.10% Vote Share
|
Agra South
|
Yogendra UpadhyayaBJP |
10926252.39% Vote Share
|
Year | Candidate's Name | Votes | Vote Share |
---|---|---|---|
2019 | Satyapal Singh Baghel Bharatiya Janata Party | 646875211546 lead | 56.00% vote share |
Manoj Kumar Soni Bahujan Samaj Party | 435329 | 38.00% vote share | |
2014 | Dr. Ram Shankar Katheria Bharatiya Janata Party | 583716300263 lead | 55.00% vote share |
Narayan Singh Suman Bahujan Samaj Party | 283453 | 27.00% vote share | |
2009 | Dr. Ramshankar Bharatiya Janata Party | 2036979715 lead | 31.00% vote share |
Kunwar Chand (vakil) Bahujan Samaj Party | 193982 | 30.00% vote share | |
2004 | Raj Babbar Samajwadi Party | 24309457342 lead | 38.00% vote share |
Murari Lal Mittal Fatehpuria Bharatiya Janata Party | 185752 | 29.00% vote share | |
1999 | Raj Babbar Samajwadi Party | 288558112982 lead | 45.00% vote share |
Bhagwan Shankar Rawat Bharatiya Janata Party | 175576 | 27.00% vote share | |
1998 | Bhagwan Shankar Rawat Bharatiya Janata Party | 24017248423 lead | 37.00% vote share |
Rameshwar Singh Independent | 191749 | 30.00% vote share | |
1996 | Bhagwan Shankar Rawat Bharatiya Janata Party | 22493584568 lead | 44.00% vote share |
A.k.maurya Bahujan Samaj Party | 140367 | 28.00% vote share | |
1991 | Bhagwan Shanker Rawat Bharatiya Janata Party | 18732863126 lead | 46.00% vote share |
Ajay Singh /o Bhagwan Singh Janata Dal | 124202 | 31.00% vote share | |
1989 | Ajay Singh Janata Dal | 20097576469 lead | 55.00% vote share |
Nihal Singh Indian National Congress | 124506 | 34.00% vote share | |
1984 | Nihal Singh Indian National Congress | 14747339677 lead | 43.00% vote share |
Udayan Sharma Lok Dal | 107796 | 32.00% vote share | |
1980 | Nihal Singh Indian National Congress (i) | 11794216415 lead | 35.00% vote share |
Adi Ram Singhal Janta Party | 101527 | 30.00% vote share | |
1977 | Shambhu Nath Chaturvedi Bharatiya Lok Dal | 257472160552 lead | 70.00% vote share |
Achal Singh Indian National Congress | 96920 | 26.00% vote share | |
1971 | Achal Singh Indian National Congress | 160242113061 lead | 59.00% vote share |
Babu Lal Singhal Bharatiya Kranti Dal | 47181 | 17.00% vote share | |
1967 | S.a. Singh Indian National Congress | 9582827733 lead | 34.00% vote share |
H. Rani Bhartiya Jan Sangh | 68095 | 24.00% vote share | |
1962 | Seth Achal Singh Indian National Congress | 12884954351 lead | 48.00% vote share |
Haider Bux Republican Party | 74498 | 28.00% vote share | |
1957 | Seth Achal Singh Indian National Congress | 11071029715 lead | 50.00% vote share |
Sri Krishna Dutt Paliwal Independent | 80995 | 37.00% vote share |
Disclaimer:The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.