The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110719023627/http://asteroidi.uai.it/family/
New Clusters for highly inclined Main Belt Asteroids
Sergio Foglia
Osservatorio Astronomico Serafino Zani, Lumezzane
F. Bisleri 11, I-20148 Milano, Italy
and
Gianluca Masi
University of Tor Vergata, Roma, Italy
Madonna de Loco 47, I-03023 Ceccano FR, Italy
Abstract:
This paper describes the search of new, high-inclination clusters in the main belt
asteroid population, using the D-criterion. We find three possible new clusters:
(31) Euphrosyne; (702) Alauda and(945) Barcelona.
We provide simple ephemerides for the next oppositions in the time interval
2004-2008, in order to motivate physical observations of these objects, to check
their reliability as families.
Introduction
Thanks to the availability of Synthetic proper elements (Knezevic and Milani, 2000)
it was possible to apply the D-criterion (Lindblad and Southworth, 1994) to find new
clusters in the highly inclined main belt asteroid population.
Synthetic proper elements (Knezevic and Milani, 2000) have better accuracy respect to
the previously available ones by more than a factor 3; in terms of the relative
velocities at breakup this means that the typical accuracy is the order of ~5 m/s.
Analytical proper elements were usually involved in asteroid families identification
but they are computed with the limitation of (sin i) < 0.3 so we do not have any
family for orbital inclination greater than 17.5. Figures 1 to 3 give the
distributions of minor planets in the Main Belt having (sin I) greater than 0.3.
Figure 1: Main Belt asteroids: (a, sin i) distribution with (sin i) > 0.3
Figure 2: Main Belt asteroids: (a, e) distribution with (sin i) > 0.3
Figure 3: Main Belt asteroids: (e, sin i) distribution with (sin i) > 0.3
Phocaea region is clearly visible in the inner part of the Main Belt, with proper
elements 2.2 < a < 2.5 AU and sin i > 0.3. Condensation of objects should not
necessarily be interpreted as a family, with a common origin from a single parent
body; it might be instead a stability island, which means that the group might be
separated from the other asteroids by gaps resulting from the destabilizing effect
of some resonances.
Identification Method
The D-criterion method for identifying dynamical families was introduced by Lindblad
and Southworth (1971) and modified by Lindblad (1994) and may be written in the
following form:
(1)
where m and n represent two orbits to be compared, e and i are eccentricity and
inclination and q = a · (1 - e) the perihelion distance, a is the semi-major axis;
D is a generalised distance in proper elements space: D=0 thus indicates two orbits
identical in proper (q, e, i) space.
The D-criterion search method may be described as a cluster analysis program based on
a neighbour linking technique. The program computes a distance D(m,n) for all possible
pairs in proper elements space; if for a given pair the discriminant D(m,n) is less
than a priori stipulated distance Ds the program accepts these two orbits as neighbours,
i.e. as belonging to a cluster. A problem in any cluster analysis based on the neighbour
searching technique is how to specify the rejection level, i.e. the appropriate cut-off
distance Ds. The rejection level Ds = 0.011 was adopted and to study the statistical
significance of the obtained clusters several rejection levels were adopted and the
robustness factor R is defined as follow:
(2)
where N0.011 is the number of members in a given family at the adopted rejection level
Ds = 0.011 and N0.009 is the number of members in the same family at the next stricter
rejection level Ds = 0.009. R is a degree of persistance or stability of a family to
changes in the rejection level.
Results
Found clusters are shown in figures 4 to 6 with the (a, sin i), (a, e) and (e, sin i)
distributions; numbers is the catalogue number of the first member of clusters.
* (2) Pallas family (a ~2.771 AU, e ~0.281, sin i ~0.548, i ~33.2) is well known and
it was found by Hirayama and using proper elements computed by semianalytic method
(Lemaitre, Morbidelli, 1994); finally it was confirmed by Bus with spectroscopic
observation.
* (480) Hansa family (a ~2.644 AU, e ~0.009, sin i ~0.375, i ~22.1) is proposed by
Hergenrother , Larson and Spahr (1996) and also by Knezevic and Milani (2000)
but no results are currently available.
For the first time we suggest the following clusters:
* (31) Euphrosyne cluster (a ~3.155 AU, e ~0.208, sin i ~0.447, i ~26.5)
* (702) Alauda cluster (a ~3.194 AU, e ~0.021, sin i ~0.369, i ~21.7)
* (945) Barcelona cluster (a ~2.637 AU, e ~0.251, sin i ~0.513, i ~30.8)
Figure 4: Main Belt asteroids: (a, sin i) distribution with (sin i) > 0.3
Figure 5: Main Belt asteroids: (a, e) distribution with (sin i) > 0.3
Figure 6: Main Belt asteroids: (e, sin i) distribution with (sin i) > 0.3
Table 1 shows the obtained results, where MPC is the catalogue number of the minor planet
representative of cluster; N0.050, N0.020, N0.011 and N0.009 give the number of members
in a given family at the adopted rejection levels Ds = 0.050,0.020, 0.011, 0.009
respectively; R is the robustness factor, a is the proper semi-major axis, e is the proper
eccentricity, sin i is the sine of the proper inclination, i is the proper inclination.
Table 2 shows the catalogue number of members of found clusters respect to the different
rejection level Ds.
Table 1: obtained clusters
Table 2: members of obtained clusters
Spectroscopic campaign: from clusters to families?
The first step in the process leading to the discovery of a family consist in identifying
it as a statistically significant clustering of objects in the space of proper elements.
The second step is to compare the physical properties of the supposed members with what
is known about the outcomes of catastrophic impacts, and with the mineralogical properties
of asteroidal bodies. As a first step we call these groups of asteroids "clusters";
the term "families" should be used only when both the statistical and physical definitions
are coincident.
In order to investigate the physical properties of these objects, we have calculated basic
ephemeredes for the incoming oppositions, lying in the time interval 2004-2008.
Table 3 reports the current knowledge about physical parameters of involved minor planets,
MPC is the catalogue number, family is the suggested cluster, taxonomy class from Tholen
and SMASSII, absolute magnitude, diameter, albedo and photometric parameters are reported.
Table 3: physical parameters of involved minor planets
(31) Euphrosyne cluster (a ~3.155 AU, e ~0.208, sin i ~0.447, i ~26.5)
Figure 7 shows orbit and position at 2005 Jan 1of members of this cluster with the major
planets from Mercury to Jupiter.
Table 4 gives the observational's opportunities of members fro the years 2004-2008:
MPC is the catalogue number, Year Mo Day is the opposition date, Phase is the phase angle
(Sun-asteroid-Earth), RA is the J2000.0 Right Ascension in hours, Dec is the J2000.0
Declination in degrees, Mag is the visual magnitude.
Figure 7: orbits of (31) Euphrosyne cluster
Table 4: observational's opportunities of (31) Euphrosyne cluster
(480) Hansa family (a ~2.644 AU, e ~0.009, sin i ~0.375, i ~22.1)
Figure 8 shows orbit and position at 2005 Jan 1of members of this cluster with the major
planets from Mercury to Jupiter.
Table 5 gives the observational's opportunities of members fro the years 2004-2008:
MPC is the catalogue number, Year Mo Day is the opposition date, Phase is the phase angle
(Sun-asteroid-Earth), RA is the J2000.0 Right Ascension in hours, Dec is the J2000.0
Declination in degrees, Mag is the visual magnitude.
Figure 8: orbits of (480) Hansa family
Table 5: observational's opportunities of (480) Hansa family
(702) Alauda cluster (a ~3.194 AU, e ~0.021, sin i ~0.369, i ~21.7)
Figure 9 shows orbit and position at 2005 Jan 1of members of this cluster with the major
planets from Mercury to Jupiter.
Table 6 gives the observational's opportunities of members fro the years 2004-2008:
MPC is the catalogue number, Year Mo Day is the opposition date, Phase is the phase angle
(Sun-asteroid-Earth), RA is the J2000.0 Right Ascension in hours, Dec is the J2000.0
Declination in degrees, Mag is the visual magnitude.
Figure 9: orbits of (702) Alauda cluster
Table 6: observational's opportunities of (702) Alauda cluster
(945) Barcelona cluster (a ~2.637 AU, e ~0.251, sin i ~0.513, i ~30.8)
Figure 10 shows orbit and position at 2005 Jan 1of members of this cluster with the major
planets from Mercury to Jupiter.
Table 7 gives the observational's opportunities of members fro the years 2004-2008:
MPC is the catalogue number, Year Mo Day is the opposition date, Phase is the phase angle
(Sun-asteroid-Earth), RA is the J2000.0 Right Ascension in hours, Dec is the J2000.0
Declination in degrees, Mag is the visual magnitude.
Figure 10: orbits of (945) Barcelona cluster
Table 7: observational's opportunities of (945) Barcelona cluster
Bibliography
Bendjoya Ph., Zappalà V.
Asteroid Family Identification
2002, Asteroids III
Binzel R. P.,
Physical studies of Hirayama families: recent results and future prospects
Seventy-Five Years of Hirayama Families
ASP Conference Series, vol. 63, 1994
Y. Kozai, R. P. Binzel and T. Hirayama eds.
Bottke W. F., Vokrouhlicky D., Broz M., Nesvorny D., Morbidelli A.
Dynamical Spreading of Asteroid Families via the Yarkowsky Effect
2001, Science vol. 294, 1693
Bus S. J., Binzel R. P.,
Phase II of Small Main-Belt Asteroid Spectroscopic Survey - A Feature-Based Taxonomy
2002, Icaurs 158, 146-177
Cellino A., Bus S. J., Doressoundiram A., Lazzaro D.
Spectroscopic properieties of asteroid families
2002, Asteroids III
Cellino A.
Asteroid families
2003, CD VI, Cannes
Chapman C. R., Paolicchi P., Zappalá V., Binzel R. P., Bell J. F.
Asteroid families: physical properties and evolution
1989, in Binzel R. P., Gehrels T., Matthews M. S. Ed., Asteroids II, 387-415
Unviersity of Arizona Press
Farinella P., Davis D. R., Cellino A., Zappalà V.,
From asteroid clusters to families: a proposal for new nomenclature
Asteroids, Comets, Meteors 1991, 165-166
Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, 1992
Farinella P., Davis D. R., Marzari F.
Asteroid families, old and young
Completing the inventory of solar system
ASP conference series, vol. 107, 1996
Rettig T. W., Hahn J. M. ed.
Farinella P.,
How many families are there and how old are they?
Seventy-Five Years of Hirayama Families
ASP Conference Series, vol. 63, 1994
Y. Kozai, R. P. Binzel and T. Hirayama eds.
Foglia S.,
Minor Planet Software
2003, http://www.uai.it/sez_ast/
Gradie J. C., Chapman C. R., Williams J. G.
Families of minor planets
1979, in Gehrels T.Ed., Asteroids, 359-390
Unviersity of Arizona Press
Hergenrother C. W., Larson S. M., Spahr T. B.,
The Hansa family: a new high inclination asteroid family
1996, Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, vol. 28, 1097
Kozai Y.
The dynamical evolution of the Hirayama family
1979, in Gehrels T.Ed., Asteroids, 334-357
Unviersity of Arizona Press
Knezevic Z., Milani A.,
Asteroid proper elements: the big picture
1993, Asteroid Comets Meteors, 143-158
Knezevic Z., Milani A.,
Synthetic proper elements for outer main belt asteroids
2000,
Knezevic Z., Milani A.,
Proper elements catalogs and asteroid families
2003, Astronomy & Astrophysics
Knezevic Z., Milani A.,
The determination of asteroid proper elements
2003, Asteroids III
Jopek T. J., Froeschlé Cl.
A stream search among 502 TV meteor orbits. An objective approach
Astron. Astrophys. 320, 631-641 (1997)
Lemaitre A., Morbidelli A.,
proper elements for highly inclined asteroidal orbits
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, no. 60, 29-56, 1994
Lindblad B. A.,
a study of asteroid dynamical families
Seventy-Five Years of Hirayama Families
ASP Conference Series, vol. 63, 1994
Y. Kozai, R. P. Binzel and T. Hirayama eds.
Lindblad B. A.,
the statistical significance of small asteroid dynamical families
Seventy-Five Years of Hirayama Families
ASP Conference Series, vol. 63, 1994
Y. Kozai, R. P. Binzel and T. Hirayama eds.
Morbidelli A., Zappalá V., Moons M., Cellino A., Gonzi R.
Asteroid families close to mean motion resonances: dynamical effect and physical implications
1995, Icarus 188, 132-154
Morbidelli A., Nesvorny D., Bottke W. F., Michel P., Vokrouhlicky D., Tanga P.
The shallow magnitude distribution of asteroid families
CDS VI, 2003, Cannes
Roig F., Nesvorny D., Ferraz-Mello S.
Asteroids in the 2:1 resonance with Jupiter: dynamics and size distribution
2002, Mon. Not. R.Astron.Soc., 335, 417-431
Valsecchi G. B., Carusi A., Knezevic Z., Kresak L., Williams J. G.
Isentification of asteroid dynamical families
1989, in Binzel R. P., Gehrels T., Matthews M. S. Ed., Asteroids II, 368-385
Unviersity of Arizona Press
Zappalà V., Cellino A., Farinella P.,
Hierarchical Clustering: how to identify asteroid families and assess their reliability
ACM 1990
Zappalà V., Cellino A., Farinella P., Knezevic Z.
Asteroid Families. I. Identification by Hierarchical Clustering and Reliability Assessment
The Astronomical Journal, vol. 100, no. 6, 2030 (1990)
Zappalà V., Cellino A., Dell'Oro A., Paolicchi P.
Physical and dynamical properties of asteroid families
Asteroids III
Zappalà V., Cellino A.,
asteroid families
1993, Asteroid Comets Meteors, 395-414
Family Data Set Catalog File
PDS Catalog File
http://pdssbn.astro.umd.edu/