<iframe src="https://www.googletagmanager.com/ns.html?id=GTM-KCV32QR" height="0" width="0" style="display:none;visibility:hidden">

Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation

Edited by Marcus E. Raichle, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, and approved September 7, 2006
October 17, 2006
103 (42) 15623-15628

Abstract

Humans often sacrifice material benefits to endorse or to oppose societal causes based on moral beliefs. Charitable donation behavior, which has been the target of recent experimental economics studies, is an outstanding contemporary manifestation of this ability. Yet the neural bases of this unique aspect of human altruism, which extends beyond interpersonal interactions, remain obscure. In this article, we use functional magnetic resonance imaging while participants anonymously donated to or opposed real charitable organizations related to major societal causes. We show that the mesolimbic reward system is engaged by donations in the same way as when monetary rewards are obtained. Furthermore, medial orbitofrontal–subgenual and lateral orbitofrontal areas, which also play key roles in more primitive mechanisms of social attachment and aversion, specifically mediate decisions to donate or to oppose societal causes. Remarkably, more anterior sectors of the prefrontal cortex are distinctively recruited when altruistic choices prevail over selfish material interests.

Continue Reading

Data Availability

Data deposition: The neuroimaging data have been deposited with the fMRI Data Center, www.fmridc.org (accession no. 2–2006–122A7).

Acknowledgments

We thank Jerzy Bodurka for helping with optimization of fMRI data acquisition; Eric Wassermann for performing the neurological exams; and Marilia Duffles, Mirella Lopez Paiva, Edward Huey, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong for their insightful comments on the manuscript. We are also thankful to Nicolas Lizop, Devon Shook, and Theron Pummer for their help with data collection. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Cognitive Neuroscience Section and by LABS–D’Or Hospital Network and Programa de Apoio a Núcleos de Excelência–Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Technológico (J.M.).

Supporting Information

04475Fig5.jpg
04475Fig6.jpg
04475Fig7.jpg
04475Fig8.jpg
04475Fig9.jpg

References

1
MA Nowak, K Sigmund Nature 437, 1291–1298 (2005).
2
E Fehr, U Fischbacher Nature 425, 785–791 (2003).
3
AG Sanfey, JK Rilling, JA Aronson, LE Nystrom, JD Cohen Science 300, 1755–1758 (2003).
4
B King-Casas, D Tomlin, C Anen, CF Camerer, SR Quartz, PR Montague Science 308, 78–83 (2005).
5
DJ de Quervain, U Fischbacher, V Treyer, M Schellhammer, U Schnyder, A Buck, E Fehr Science 305, 1254–1258 (2004).
6
G Vogel Science 303, 1128–1131 (2004).
7
GW Allport The Nature of Prejudice (Beacon Press, Boston, 1954).
8
J Andreoni Econ J 100, 464–477 (1990).
9
M Milinski, D Semmann, HJ Krambeck 269, 881–883 (2002).
10
S Mithen The Prehistory of the Mind: The Cognitive Origins of Art, Religion, and Science (Thames and Hudson, London, 1996).
11
J Moll, R Zahn, R de Oliveira-Souza, F Krueger, J Grafman Nat Rev Neurosci 6, 799–809 (2005).
12
RF Weiss, W Buchanan, L Altstatt, JP Lombardo Science 171, 1262–1263 (1971).
13
ML Kringelbach Nat Rev Neurosci 6, 691–702 (2005).
14
SC Tanaka, K Doya, G Okada, K Ueda, Y Okamoto, S Yamawaki Nat Neurosci 7, 887–893 (2004).
15
JN Wood, J Grafman Nat Rev Neurosci 4, 139–147 (2003).
16
JD Greene, LE Nystrom, AD Engell, JM Darley, JD Cohen Neuron 44, 389–400 (2004).
17
N Eisenberg Annu Rev Psychol 51, 665–697 (2000).
18
W Schultz, P Dayan, PR Montague Science 275, 1593–1599 (1997).
19
JP O’Doherty, TW Buchanan, B Seymour, RJ Dolan Neuron 49, 157–166 (2006).
20
A Bartels, S Zeki NeuroImage 21, 1155–1166 (2004).
21
A Aron, H Fisher, DJ Mashek, G Strong, H Li, LL Brown J Neurophysiol 94, 327–337 (2005).
22
LJ Young, Z Wang Nat Neurosci 7, 1048–1054 (2004).
23
RJ Blair, JS Morris, CD Frith, DI Perrett, RJ Dolan Brain 122, 883–893 (1999).
24
PJ Eslinger, CV Flaherty-Craig, AL Benton Brain Cognit 55, 84–103 (2004).
25
G Coricelli, HD Critchley, M Joffily, JP O’Doherty, A Sirigu, RJ Dolan Nat Neurosci 8, 1255–1262 (2005).
26
J Rilling, D Gutman, T Zeh, G Pagnoni, G Berns, C Kilts Neuron 35, 395–405 (2002).
27
T Singer, SJ Kiebel, JS Winston, RJ Dolan, CD Frith Neuron 41, 653–662 (2004).
28
J Moll, R de Oliveira-Souza, PJ Eslinger, IE Bramati, J Mourao-Miranda, PA Andreiuolo, L Pessoa J Neurosci 22, 2730–2736 (2002).
29
M Botvinick, LE Nystrom, K Fissell, CS Carter, JD Cohen Nature 402, 179–181 (1999).
30
MR Delgado, RH Frank, EA Phelps Nat Neurosci 8, 1611–1618 (2005).
31
LJ Freedman, TR Insel, Y Smith J Comp Neurol 421, 172–188 (2000).
32
RA Depue, JV Morrone-Strupinsky Behav Brain Sci 28, 313–350, discussion 350–395. (2005).
33
M Kosfeld, M Heinrichs, PJ Zak, U Fischbacher, E Fehr Nature 435, 673–676 (2005).
34
L Tremblay, W Schultz Nature 398, 704–708 (1999).
35
R Boyd, H Gintis, S Bowles, PJ Richerson Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100, 3531–3535 (2003).
36
A Bechara, D Tranel, H Damasio Brain 123, 2189–2202 (2000).

Information & Authors

Information

Published in

Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Go to Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Vol. 103 | No. 42
October 17, 2006
PubMed: 17030808

Classifications

Data Availability

Data deposition: The neuroimaging data have been deposited with the fMRI Data Center, www.fmridc.org (accession no. 2–2006–122A7).

Submission history

Received: May 31, 2006
Published online: October 17, 2006
Published in issue: October 17, 2006

Keywords

  1. altruism
  2. brain
  3. moral
  4. reward
  5. social

Acknowledgments

We thank Jerzy Bodurka for helping with optimization of fMRI data acquisition; Eric Wassermann for performing the neurological exams; and Marilia Duffles, Mirella Lopez Paiva, Edward Huey, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong for their insightful comments on the manuscript. We are also thankful to Nicolas Lizop, Devon Shook, and Theron Pummer for their help with data collection. This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Cognitive Neuroscience Section and by LABS–D’Or Hospital Network and Programa de Apoio a Núcleos de Excelência–Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Technológico (J.M.).

Notes

This article is a PNAS direct submission.

Authors

Affiliations

Jorge Moll
Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440;
Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience Unit, LABS–D’Or Hospital Network, 2228–080, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
Frank Krueger
Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440;
Roland Zahn
Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440;
Matteo Pardini
Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440;
University of Genoa Medical School, 16132 Genoa, Italy; and
Ricardo de Oliveira-Souza
Cognitive and Behavioral Neuroscience Unit, LABS–D’Or Hospital Network, 2228–080, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil;
Gaffrée and Guinle University Hospital and Philippe Pinel Institute, 20270–004 Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Jordan Grafman [email protected]
Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440;

Notes

To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 5C205, MSC 1440, Bethesda, MD 20892-1440. E-mail: [email protected]
Author contributions: J.M. and J.G. designed research; J.M. and M.P. performed research; J.M., F.K., and R.Z. analyzed data; and J.M., F.K., R.Z., R.d.O.-S., and J.G. wrote the paper.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Note: The article usage is presented with a three- to four-day delay and will update daily once available. Due to ths delay, usage data will not appear immediately following publication. Citation information is sourced from Crossref Cited-by service.


Citation statements

Altmetrics

Citations

If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.

Cited by

    Loading...

    View Options

    View options

    PDF format

    Download this article as a PDF file

    DOWNLOAD PDF

    Get Access

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Personal login Institutional Login

    Recommend to a librarian

    Recommend PNAS to a Librarian

    Purchase options

    Purchase this article to get full access to it.

    Single Article Purchase

    Human fronto–mesolimbic networks guide decisions about charitable donation
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
    • Vol. 103
    • No. 42
    • pp. 15275-15722

    Media

    Figures

    Tables

    Other

    Share

    Share

    Share article link

    Share on social media