Volume 20, Issue 6 p. 3019-3043
Research Article
Free Access

Noble Gas and Carbon Isotope Systematics at the Seemingly Inactive Ciomadul Volcano (Eastern-Central Europe, Romania): Evidence for Volcanic Degassing

B. M. Kis

Corresponding Author

B. M. Kis

MTA-ELTE Volcanology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary

Faculty of Biology and Geology, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre, Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Debrecen, Hungary

Correspondence to: B. M. Kis,

[email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
A. Caracausi

A. Caracausi

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Palermo, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
L. Palcsu

L. Palcsu

Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre, Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Debrecen, Hungary

Search for more papers by this author
C. Baciu

C. Baciu

Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Search for more papers by this author
A. Ionescu

A. Ionescu

MTA-ELTE Volcanology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary

Faculty of Environmental Science and Engineering, Babes-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Department of Physics and Geology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
I. Futó

I. Futó

Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre, Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Debrecen, Hungary

Search for more papers by this author
A. Sciarra

A. Sciarra

Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Sz. Harangi

Sz. Harangi

MTA-ELTE Volcanology Research Group, Budapest, Hungary

Department of Petrology and Geochemistry, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 May 2019
Citations: 18

Abstract

Ciomadul is the youngest volcano in the Carpathian-Pannonian Region, Eastern-Central Europe, which last erupted 30 ka. This volcano is considered to be inactive, however, combined evidence from petrologic and magnetotelluric data, as well as seismic tomography studies, suggests the existence of a subvolcanic crystal mush with variable melt content. The volcanic area is characterized by high CO2 gas output rate, with a minimum of 8.7 × 103 t/year. We investigated 31 gas emissions at Ciomadul to constrain the origin of the volatiles. The δ13C–CO2 and 3He/4He compositions suggest the outgassing of a significant component of mantle-derived fluids. The He isotope signature in the outgassing fluids (up to 3.10 Ra) is lower than the values in the peridotite xenoliths of the nearby alkaline basalt volcanic field (R/Ra 5.95 Ra ± 0.01), which are representative of a continental lithospheric mantle and significantly lower than MORB values. Considering the chemical characteristics of the Ciomadul dacite, including trace element and Sr–Nd and O isotope compositions, an upper crustal contamination is less probable, whereas the primary magmas could have been derived from an enriched mantle source. The low He isotopic ratios could indicate a strongly metasomatized mantle lithosphere. This could be due to infiltration of subduction-related fluids and postmetasomatic ingrowth of radiogenic He. The metasomatic fluids are inferred to have contained subducted carbonate material resulting in a heavier carbon isotope composition (δ13C is in the range of −1.4‰ to −4.6‰) and an increase of CO2/3He ratio. Our study shows the magmatic contribution to the emitted gases.

Key Points

  • CO2 emissions at Ciomadul, Eastern-Central Europe, suggest a still-active plumbing system beneath the volcano in spite of long dormancy
  • The CO2 and He isotope compositions provide evidence for significant contribution of magma-derived volatiles, up to 80%
  • Isotopic signatures of gases indicate that primary magmas could have derived from a mantle source modified by subduction-related fluids

Plain Language Summary

Determining the fluxes and composition of gases in active and dormant volcanoes could help to constrain their origin. Ciomadul is the youngest volcano of the Carpathian-Pannonian Region, Eastern-Central Europe, where the last eruption occurred 30 ka. Its eruption chronology is punctuated by long quiescence periods (even >100 kyr) separating the active phases; therefore, the long dormancy since the last eruption (30 ka) does not unambiguously indicate inactivity. Knowing if melt-bearing magma resides in the crust is fundamental to evaluate the nature of the volcano. Isotopic compositions of helium (3He/4He) and carbon (δ13CCO2) are important tools for the study of the origin of the gases. We show that the isotope variation of the emitted gases suggests a metasomatized lithospheric mantle origin for the primary magmas. This is consistent with a degassing deep magma body existing beneath Ciomadul, and this long-dormant volcano cannot be considered as extinct.

1 Introduction

Gas emissions are often associated with active or dormant volcanic areas and regions affected by extensional tectonics (e.g., O'Nions & Oxburgh, 1988; Oppenheimer et al., 2014). Monitoring of fluids (chemical and isotopic compositions and physical properties) in volcanic regions provides important information concerning the processes occurring at depth (e.g., Agusto et al., 2013; Barry et al., 2013, 2014; Caliro et al., 2015; Christopher et al., 2010; Edmonds, 2008; Fischer, 2008; Mazot et al., 2011; Roulleau et al., 2016; Ruzié et al., 2012; Tassi et al., 2010, 2011, 2016; Wei et al., 2016). The chemical and isotopic composition of the emitted fluids in active volcanoes is primarily controlled by magmatic processes, such as the injection of new magma into the plumbing system or degassing of deep mafic magma in the lower crust, or interaction with the volcanic hydrothermal systems, among others (e.g., Caracausi et al., 2003, 2013; Christopher et al., 2010; Edmonds, 2008; Paonita et al., 2012, 2016; Sano et al., 2015). Furthermore, compositional change of the fluids may also correlate with the seismicity at regional scale (e.g., Bräuer et al., 2008, 2018; Cardellini et al., 2017; Chiodini et al., 2004; Melián et al., 2012).

There has been major progress in understanding the factors controlling gas emissions in active and dormant volcanic areas during the last two decades (Aiuppa et al., 2007; Edmonds, 2008; Lee et al., 2016; Moussallam et al., 2018; Oppenheimer et al., 2014); however, much less attention has been given to seemingly inactive volcanic areas (Roulleau et al., 2015). These are volcanoes that last erupted more than 10 ka, and at the surface, there are no signs of reawakening. The Tatun volcanic complex in Taiwan is an example of such a volcanic system. Although the last eruption occurred 20 ka, geophysical data indicate a still-active magma storage. The composition of emitted gases is consistent with this interpretation, as they contain significant magmatic components (Roulleau et al., 2015). The importance and the potential hazard of such volcanoes are shown by the case of the Ontake volcano in Japan. There were no proven records of historical and even Holocene eruptions before the phreatic eruptive event in 1979, and therefore, there were no detailed studies and monitoring on this volcano. In 2014, another phreatic eruption occurred, causing serious fatalities (Kato et al., 2015) and pointed to the requirement to better understand such long-dormant volcanoes. Sano et al., 2015 demonstrated that regular monitoring of volcanic gases is fundamental to understand the behavior of these apparently inactive volcanoes. In this regard, detection of a magmatic chamber containing some melt fraction could mean the potential for reactivation even after several tens of kiloyears dormancy. Emission of gases with isotopic signatures in the range of magmatic values can be evidence of magma intrusions at depth (Bräuer et al., 2008, 2018; Caracausi et al., 2013, 2015; Carapezza et al., 2003, 2012; Carapezza & Tarchini, 2007; Farrar et al., 1995; Fischer et al., 2014; Pizzino et al., 2002; Rouwet et al., 2014, 2017; Sano et al., 2015; Sorey et al., 1998), in addition to recognition of geophysical anomalies reflecting melt pockets at depth (Comeau et al., 2015, 2016; Harangi, Novák, et al., 2015).

Ciomadul is the youngest volcano within the Carpathian-Pannonian Region, Eastern-Central Europe, where the last eruption occurred 30 ka (Harangi et al., 2010; Harangi, Lukács, et al., 2015; Molnár et al., 2019). Thus, it is usually considered as an inactive volcano. In spite of its long dormancy, combined evidence from petrologic and magnetotelluric data (Harangi, Novák, et al., 2015; Kiss et al., 2014), as well as seismic tomography (Popa et al., 2012), suggest the presence of a melt-bearing crystal mush beneath the volcano. This is consistent with the local high heat flow (85–120 mW/m2) compared to the Carpathian Range where this value decreases to 40–60 mW/m2 (Demetrescu & Andreescu, 1994; Horváth et al., 2006), the high flux of carbon dioxide of 8.7 × 103 t/year (Kis et al., 2017) the presence of mineral and thermal waters up to 78 °C (Jánosi, 1980; Rădulescu et al., 1981) and the geodynamically active region (Ismail-Zadeh et al., 2012; Wenzel et al., 1999). The eruption chronology of the Ciomadul lava dome field (Molnár et al., 2018) is characterized by prolonged quiescence periods between the active phases, often exceeding 100 kyr.

There are a number of sites at Ciomadul, where significant amount of CO2 gases are emitted (Kis et al., 2017). Althaus et al. (2000), Vaselli et al. (2002), Frunzeti (2013), and Sarbu et al. (2018) studied the composition of gases collected from a few locations and concluded that they could indicate a deep-seated magma body below the volcano. Here we present a comprehensive helium isotope signature (hereafter 3He/4He) and carbon isotope (hereafter δ13CCO2) systematics of the volatile degassing from Ciomadul based on a detailed sampling of all the main known locations of gas emissions to constrain the origin of fluids and to characterize the nature of a seemingly inactive volcano.

2 Geological Setting

2.1 Ciomadul Volcanic Dome Field

Ciomadul volcano is located at the southeastern edge of the Carpathian-Pannonian Region, at the southern end of the Călimani-Gurghiu-Harghita volcanic chain (Szakács et al., 1993; Szakács & Seghedi, 1995; Pécskay et al., 2006; Figure 1). It is part of a postcollisional volcanic belt, which comprises a series of andesitic to dacitic volcanoes, developed parallel with the Carpathian orogeny. The volcanism occurred well after the continent-continent collision between the Tisza-Dacia microplate and the western margin of the Eurasian plate (Cloetingh et al., 2004; Csontos et al., 1992; Mațenco et al., 2007; Mațenco & Bertotti, 2000; Seghedi et al., 2004, 2005, 2011). Ciomadul is part of a lava dome field and this central volcanic complex involves 8–14 km3 of high-K dacitic lavas (Karátson & Timár, 2005; Molnár et al., 2019; Szakács et al., 2015). The volcano developed on the Early Cretaceous clastic flysch sedimentary unit of the Eastern Carpathians that forms several nappes. It consists of binary alternation of sandstones, calcareous sandstones, limestones, and clays/marls from the Sinaia Formation of the Ceahlau nappe and the Bodoc flysch (Băncilă, 1958; Grasu et al., 1996; Ianovici & Rădulescu, 1968; Nicolaescu, 1973). The flysch unit has a thickness up to 2,500 m.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Location of Ciomadul and Persani volcanoes in the southeastern Carpathian area of the Carpathian-Pannonian Region (after Harangi et al., 2013). (b) Geotectonic model of the Persani and Ciomadul volcanic areas. PVF = Persani Volcanic Field; CIO = Ciomadul (after Harangi et al., 2013). (c) Location of Ciomadul and Persani volcanoes in the volcanic range of the Eastern Carpathians (modified after Szakács & Seghedi, 1995).

The Ciomadul volcanic complex is made up by amalgamation of several lava domes truncated by two explosion craters called Mohos and Saint Anna (Szakács et al., 2015). This central volcano is surrounded by further isolated lava domes (Baba Laposa, Haramul Mic, Dealul Mare, Büdös-Puturosul and Bálványos; Molnár et al., 2018, Figure 2). Volcanism at the Ciomadul volcanic dome field started around 1 Ma, while the most voluminous Ciomadul volcanic structure has developed over the last approximately 160 kyr (Molnár et al., 2018, 2019). During the first volcanic stage, the intermittent lava dome extrusions were separated by relatively long dormant periods even exceeding 100 kyr. The second volcanic stage was characterized by initial lava dome effusion and then, after approximately 40 kyr of quiescence, a more explosive volcanic activity occurred (from 57 to 30 ka, Harangi et al., 2010; Harangi, Lukács, et al., 2015; Karátson et al., 2016; Molnár et al., 2018, 2019; Moriya et al., 1995, 1996; Vinkler et al., 2007). This stage involved lava-dome collapse events, vulcanian and subplinian to plinian explosive eruptions (Harangi, Lukács, et al., 2015; Karátson et al., 2016; Vinkler et al., 2007). The eruptive products are relatively homogeneous K-rich dacites (Molnár et al., 2018, 2019; Szakács et al., 1993; Szakács & Seghedi, 1987; Vinkler et al., 2007). Petrogenetic and thermobarometric studies on amphiboles as well as combined U-Th/He and U/Th zircon dating suggest the presence of a long-lasting (up to 350 kyr) crystal mush body in the crust. This appears to be mostly at relatively low-temperature just above the solidus (700–750 °C) and is periodically partly remobilized by injections of fresh basaltic magmas that could rapidly trigger volcanic eruptions (Harangi, Lukács, et al., 2015; Harangi, Novák, et al., 2015; Kiss et al., 2014).

Details are in the caption following the image
Geological sketch map of the study area. The red, black, and blue dots indicate the type of the sampling points: mofette, drilling, and bubbling pool, respectively. The numbers on the sampling sites are the same as in Table 1. (Geological map is modified after Ianovici & Rădulescu, 1968).

The Ciomadul volcano is located near (~50 km) the Vrancea seismic region (Ismail-Zadeh et al., 2012; Wenzel et al., 1999) located at the arc bend between the Eastern and the Southern Carpathians. Frequently occurring earthquakes have deep hypocentres (70–170 km) delineating a narrow, vertical region. This is consistent with a high-velocity seismic anomaly interpreted as a cold lithosphere slab descending slowly into the asthenospheric mantle (Wortel & Spakman, 2000). Further crustal and subcrustal earthquakes (M < 4) occur occasionally around the Perșani basalt volcanic field and the Ciomadul volcano (Popa et al., 2012). The seismic tomographic model indicates a vertically extended low-velocity anomaly beneath Ciomadul. This can be interpreted as transcrustal magma storage with an upper melt-dominated magma chamber (Popa et al., 2012). The seismic tomographic model is supported by the result of combined petrologic and magnetotelluric studies that demonstrated the existence of a low-resistivity anomaly and the depth of 5–20 km beneath the volcanic centers of Ciomadul, inferred to be a melt-bearing crystal mush (Harangi, Novák, et al., 2015). In addition, a deeper low-resistivity anomaly was also detected at a depth of 30–40 km, possibly related to a deeper magma accumulation zone at the crust-mantle boundary.

Another Pleistocene monogenetic basalt volcanic field is approximately 40 km from the Ciomadul, at the southeastern part of the Carpathian-Pannonian Region (Figure 1), at the boundary between the Perşani Mountains and the Transylvanian basin (Downes et al., 1995; Harangi et al., 2013; Seghedi et al., 2016; Seghedi & Szakács, 1994). Basaltic volcanism occurred here between 1.14 Ma and 683 ka (Panaiotu et al., 2004, 2013) and formed several volcanic centers accompanied by maars, scoriacones, and lava flows. The erupted basaltic magma carried significant amount of ultramafic xenoliths from the lithospheric mantle (peridotites and amphibole pyroxenites) revealing the nature of the uppermost mantle of this region (Falus et al., 2008; Vaselli et al., 1995).

2.2 Gas Emissions and Mineral Water Springs at Ciomadul Volcanic Area

Gas emanations in the form of bubbling pools and low-temperature (T ~ 8–10 °C) dry mofettes are characteristic of the Ciomadul volcano. CO2-bubbling peat bogs can be also found, mainly at the northeastern (Buffogó peat bog) and southern parts of the Puturosul Mountains (Zsombor-Valley, Jánosi et al., 2011). The minimum total CO2 flux was estimated to be 8.7 × 103 t/year (Kis et al., 2017). The aquifers of this area are represented by CO2-rich sparkling mineral water, with temperature up to 22.5 °C (Berszán et al., 2009; Italiano et al., 2017; Jánosi et al., 2011).

3 Sampling and Analytical Methods

A total of 31sites were selected for this study, including bubbling pools, dry gas emissions (mofettes), and one drilling (Figure 2 and Table 1). We collected fluids during two field campaigns carried out in the spring and autumn of 2016, respectively. In the first field campaign, gas samples were collected for δ13C–CO2 and 3He/4He composition in 1-L evacuated Pyrex glass tubes with a vacuum stopcock, while for chemical composition, gas samples were collected in 150-ml glass tubes with two vacuum stopcocks. Chemical compositions were analyzed at the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Rome, Italy, whereas chemical and isotopic composition of water, noble gas compositions (He and Ne) and δ13C–CO2 of gas samples were measured at the Isotope Climatology and Environmental Research Centre (ICER), Institute for Nuclear Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Debrecen, Hungary. During the second field campaign, the samples were collected in glass and steel samplers equipped with two valves. These samples were analyzed for their elemental composition (He, Ne, Ar, H2, O2, N2, CO, CH4, and CO2), δ13C (CO2), 3He/4He ratios, and 20Ne abundances at the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Palermo, Italy (INGV-Palermo).

Table 1. List of the Sites Investigated Including Location Names, Geographical Position (Geographical Coordinates in WGS84), Type of Manifestation (Mofetta, Bubbling Pool, and Drilling), Type of Sample (Free Gas), and Field Data (Temperature, pH, and EC Expressed in Microsiemens per Centimeter) Where Available
No. Site N E Type of manifestation Sample type T (°C) pH EC (μS/cm)
1 Torjai Stinky Cave 46.1198 25.9488 Mofetta Free gas nd nd nd
2 Timsós Cave 46.1191 25.9495 Mofetta Free gas nd nd nd
3 Gyilkos Cave 46.1218 25.9494 Mofetta Free gas nd nd nd
4 Buffogó peat bog pool 46.1279 25.9504 Bubbling pool Free gas 1 3 472
5 Buffogó peat bog 46.1283 25.9504 Bubbling pool Free gas nd nd nd
6 Várpad-Ibolya pool 46.1134 25.9600 Bubbling pool Free gas 7.1 6.46 3,220
7a Bálványos mofetta 46.1118 25.9579 Bubbling pool Free gas 9.7 4.99 3,722
7b Bálványos mofetta 46.1118 25.9579 Bubbling pool Free gas 9.7 4.99 3,722
8 Bálványos pool 46.1095 25.9590 Bubbling pool Free gas 5 6.54 9,360
9 Csiszárfürdő-Iker pool white 46.1063 25.9514 Bubbling pool Free gas 1.2 5.12 741
10 Csiszárfürdő-Hammas pool 46.1065 25.9504 Bubbling pool Free gas 3.6 5.29 2,040
11 Csiszárfürdő-Timsós pool 46.1063 25.9504 Bubbling pool Free gas 4.7 5.9 1,274
12 Csiszárfürdő-Csokoládés pool 46.1059 25.9508 Bubbling pool Free gas 2.7 4.2 837
13 Mikesfürdő-Vallató pool 46.1170 25.9281 Bubbling pool Free gas 5 6.16 2,300
14 Mikesfürdő-Vallató mofetta 46.1180 25.9283 Mofetta Free gas 5 2.72 1,620
15 Mikesfürdő-Hammas pool 46.1168 25.9340 Bubbling pool Free gas 1.9 2.96 968
16 Mikesfürdő-Bükkös pool 46.1161 25.9349 Bubbling pool Free gas 2.3 3.6 584
17 Apor lányok feredeje-Small pool 46.1150 25.9496 Bubbling pool Free gas 4.8 1.71 3,620
18 Apor lányok feredeje-spring on fault 2 46.1148 25.9496 Bubbling pool Free gas 6.9 2.2 7,100
19 Apor lányok feredeje-Szemvíz 4 46.1148 25.9496 Bubbling pool Free gas 4.2 2.6 2,080
20 Gyógyvizek 46.1133 25.9504 Bubbling pool Free gas 3.7 1.85 2,780
21 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 1 46.1159 25.9424 Drilling Free gas nd nd nd
22 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 2 46.1159 25.9424 Drilling Free gas nd nd nd
23 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 3 46.1159 25.9424 Drilling Free gas nd nd nd
24 St Anna crater rim 46.1310 25.8936 mofetta Free gas nd nd nd
25 Jajdon pool 46.0701 25.9538 Bubbling pool Free gas 4.6 7.3 1,489
26 Jajdon mofetta 46.0699 25.9538 Mofetta Free gas nd nd nd
27 Băile Tușnad mofetta 46.1421 25.8518 Mofetta Free gas nd nd nd
28 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő mofetta 46.1831 25.9520 Mofetta Free gas nd nd nd
29 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool 46.1831 25.9518 Bubbling pool Free gas 6.6 5.96 768
30 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool 2 46.1829 25.9519 Bubbling pool Free gas nd nd nd
31 Ciucsângeorgiu mofetta 46.3363 25.9642 Mofetta Free gas nd nd nd
  • Note. EC = electrical conductivity; nd = not determined.

We also separated clinopyroxene mineral grains (>3 g in weight) from one of the lherzolite xenoliths collected at the foot of the Gruiu scoria cone, in the Perșani volcanic field. The noble gas composition of the fluid inclusions was analyzed at INGV-Palermo.

3.1 Chemical and Isotopic Composition of Gases

The chemical composition of the samples from the first campaign was analyzed with a Portable Varian CP4900 Micro Gas Chromatograph (GC). This Micro GC is configured for the analysis of He, Ne, H2, O2, and N2 by means of a molecular sieve 5A (20 m unheated) column and CO2, CH4, and H2S by means of a PoraPlot (PPQ 10 m heated) column. The instrument is equipped with a microthermal conductivity detector responding to the difference in thermal conductivity between the carrier gas (argon) and the sample composition. The detection limit is 1 ppm, operating range is from 1 ppm to 100% level concentrations, and repeatability is <0.5% relative standard deviation in peak area at constant temperature and pressure.

For the analysis of δ13CCO2, carbon dioxide was cryogenically removed from the gas samples by liquid nitrogen and measured by Thermo Finnigan Delta PLUS XP isotope ratio mass spectrometer. Isotope ratios are given in the standard δ notation in permil (‰) versus VPDB (Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite). Errors for δ13C are 0.5‰.

Noble gas isotopic ratios (3He/4He and 4He/20Ne) were measured from each gas sample that was inserted into the preparation line of the VG5400 noble gas mass spectrometer. The argon and the other chemically active gases (N2, CO2, etc.) were separated in a cryogenic cold system consisting of two cold traps and were adsorbed in an empty trap at 25 K. The Ne and He were adsorbed in a charcoal trap at 10 K. He was desorbed at 42 K and neon at 90 K and measured sequentially. The measurement procedure was calibrated with known air aliquots. The analytical uncertainties are 1% for He concentrations and 5% for Ne concentrations and 2.5% for 3He/4He. 3He/4He ratio is expressed as R/Ra (being Ra the He isotope ratio of air and equal to 1.384·10−6. He isotopic composition was corrected for the atmospheric He contamination (R/Rac) considering the 4He/20Ne ratio; R/Rac = [R/Ra * (X − 1)]/(X − 1), where X is the air-normalized 4He/20Ne ratio taken as 0.318 (Sano & Wakita, 1985).

For the samples of the second analysis campaign, the chemical and isotopic composition of He-Ne and 13CCO2 was determined in the laboratories of INGV-Palermo.

The concentrations of CO2, CH4, O2, and N2 were analyzed using an Agilent 7890B gas chromatograph with Ar as carrier and equipped with a 4-m Carbosieve S II and PoraPlot–U columns. A thermal conductivity detector was used to measure the concentrations of He, O2, N2, and CO2 and a flame ionization detector for CO and CH4. The analytical errors were 10% for He and 5% for O2, N2, CO, CH4, and CO2. More details on the analytical procedures used during this analysis are given in Liotta and Martelli (2012).

The carbon isotopic composition of CO213CCO2) was determined using a Thermo Delta XP isotope ratio mass spectrometer equipped with a Thermo Scientific™ TRACE™ Ultra GC, and a 30-m Q-plot column (i.e., of 0.32 mm). The resulting δ13CCO2 values are expressed in permil with respect to the international VPDB standard and analytical uncertainties are ±0.15‰. The method for the δ13C determination of total dissolved carbon is based on chemical and physical CO2 stripping (Capasso et al., 2005). Isotopic ratios were measured using a Finnigan Delta Plus Mass Spectrometer. The results are expressed in permil of the international VPDB standard. The standard deviations of the 13C/12C ratios are ±0.2‰.

3He, 4He, and 20Ne and the 4He/20Ne ratios were determined by separately inserting He and Ne into a split flight tube mass spectrometer (GVI-Helix SFT, for He analysis) and into a multicollector mass spectrometer (Thermo-Helix MC plus, for Ne analysis), after standard purification procedures (Rizzo et al., 2015). The analytical reproducibility was <0.1% for 4He and 20Ne. However, the estimation of He and Ne concentration agrees within 10% uncertainty respect to GC measurements. In this study, the time from sampling to analysis was lower than 2 weeks and results are fully reliable. The analytical error for He and Ne concentration measurements is generally below 0.3%.

3.2 Noble Gas Isotope Data for the Perşani Clinopyroxene

The chosen xenolith is a fresh spinel lherzolite with about 12% clinopyroxene content. Here we performed new noble gas analyses. The preparation, single-step crushing and analysis of fluid inclusions was the same as described by Correale et al. (2012) and references therein. Helium (3He and 4He) isotopes were measured separately by two different split-flight-tube mass spectrometers (Helix SFT-Thermo). The analytical uncertainty of the determination of the TGC (thermal conductivity detector) and the He and Ne abundances was ~10%. Error in the 3He/4He ratios is reported at the 1σ level.

4 Results

The site, sample names, and geographical locations with their GPS coordinates (WGS84, geographical coordinates), source type (mofettes or bubbling pools), temperature, pH, and electrical conductivity for bubbling pool samples are presented in Table 1, chemical and isotopic composition are listed in Tables 2 and 3. Noble gas isotopic compositions of clinopyroxenes from mantle xenoliths are shown in Table 4.

Table 2. Chemical Composition of the Different Gas Samples, Expressed in Percent
No. Site Campaign Laboratory H2S He Ne H2 CO CH4 N2 O2 CO2 Source
1 Torjai Stinky Cave 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 6.3 × 10−4 3.5 × 10−5 nd nd nd nd nd nd This work
Torjai Stinky Cave Rome 5.2 × 10−2 7.0 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−4 2.0 × 10−5 8.4 × 10−1 1.6 × 101 4.9E+00 78.09 This work
Torjai Stinky Cave 2nd Campaign Palermo 1.8 × 10−2 6.1 × 10−4 6.4 × 10−7 nd 5.0 × 10−4 8.9 × 10−1 1.2 × 101 2.9E+00 82.68 This work
2 Timsós Cave 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 6.9 × 10−4 2.9 × 10−5 nd nd nd nd nd nd This work
Timsós Cave Rome 6.8 × 10−2 7.0 × 10−4 3.0 × 10−4 3.0 × 10−5 8.4 × 10−1 1.2 × 101 3.8E+00 83.05 This work
Timsós Cave 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 6.3 × 10−4 4.8 × 10−5 nd 1.0 × 10−4 9.3 × 10−1 2.1E+00 7.3 × 10−2 95.24 This work
3 Gyilkos Cave 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 5.6 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd nd This work
Gyilkos Cave Rome nd 6.0 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−3 4.0 × 10−5 nd 1.1 × 10−1 3.8 × 101 9.5E+00 52.54 This work
4 Buffogó peat bog pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 6.7 × 10−4 8.8 × 10−7 nd nd nd nd nd 64.98 This work
Buffogó peat bog pool Rome nd 8.0 × 10−4 5.0 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−5 nd 9.7 × 10−1 2.6 × 101 7.6E+00 64.98 This work
Buffogó peat bog pool 2nd Campaign Palermo 5.0 × 10−4 7.1 × 10−4 7.9 × 10−4 nd nd 1.3E+00 1.9E+00 1.5 × 10−1 95.50 This work
5 Buffogó peat bog 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 9.4 × 10−4 2.0 × 10−6 nd nd nd nd nd nd This work
6 Várpad-Ibolya pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 5.9 × 10−5 1.4 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 75.97 This work
Várpad-Ibolya pool Rome nd 2.0 × 10−4 5.0 × 10−4 2.0 × 10−5 nd 2.2 × 10−1 1.8 × 101 5.7E+00 75.97 This work
7a Bálványos mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 8.3 × 10−4 1.8 × 10−6 nd nd nd nd nd nd This work
7b Bálványos mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 4.6 × 10−4 1.8 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 94.87 This work
Bálványos mofetta Rome nd 5.9 × 10−3 4.1 × 10−3 3.4 × 10−2 nd 6.4 × 10−1 3.7E+00 8.2 × 10−1 94.87 This work
Bálványos mofetta 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 1.0 × 10−3 2.5 × 10−4 1.4 × 10−3 nd 1.3E+00 2.2 × 101 6.1E+00 68.25 This work
8 Bálványos pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.7 × 10−3 1.7 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 63.84 This work
Bálványos pool Rome nd 1.7 × 10−2 5.8 × 10−3 2.3 × 10−1 nd 1.7E+00 2.6 × 101 8.4E+00 63.84 This work
9 Csiszárfürdő-Iker pool white 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.3 × 10−3 1.0 × 10−5 nd nd nd nd nd nd This work
Csiszárfürdő-Iker pool white 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 9.5 × 10−4 1.1 × 10−5 nd nd 1.7E+00 1.8E+00 1.7 × 10−1 94.73 This work
10 Csiszárfürdő-Hammas pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.1 × 10−3 6.4 × 10−7 nd nd nd nd nd 96.72 This work
Rome 1.1 × 10−1 1.0 × 10−2 2.3 × 10−3 9.0 × 10−4 nd 1.2E+00 9.8 × 10−1 3.5 × 10−1 96.72 this work
Csiszárfürdő-Hammas pool 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 6.9 × 10−4 5.5 × 10−6 nd nd 1.2E+00 8.8 × 10−1 3.0 × 10−2 94.81 This work
11 Csiszárfürdő-Timsós pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.1 × 10−3 1.2 × 10−3 nd nd nd nd nd 11.23 This work
Csiszárfürdő-Timsós pool Rome nd 6.0 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−3 4.0 × 10−5 nd 1.7 × 10−1 7.0 × 101 1.9 × 101 11.23 This work
12 Csiszárfürdő-Csokoládés pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 9.4 × 10−4 7.8 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 89.49 This work
Csiszárfürdő-Csokoládés pool Rome 1.7 × 10−2 1.3 × 10−2 4.6 × 10−3 2.3 × 10−3 nd 1.5E+00 7.4 1.6E+00 89.49 This work
Csiszárfürdő-Csokoládés pool 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 8.7 × 10−4 1.6 × 10−5 nd 9.0 × 10−5 1.5E+00 1.5E+00 1.4 × 10−1 94.51 This work
13 Mikesfürdő-Vallató pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 4.5 × 10−4 8.5 × 10−6 nd nd nd nd nd 41.34 This work
Mikesfürdő-Vallató pool Rome nd 5.9 × 10−3 nd 6.0 × 10−4 nd 5.5E-01 4.6 × 101 1.3 × 101 41.34 This work
Mikesfürdő-Vallató pool 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 4.3 × 10−4 1.4 × 10−5 nd nd 1.2E+00 1.8E+00 1.8 × 10−1 93.95 This work
14 Mikesfürdő-Vallató mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 3.0 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−5 nd nd nd nd nd 91.86 This work
Mikesfürdő-Vallató mofetta Rome 2.7 × 10−2 3.0 × 10−4 2.0 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−5 nd 9.6 × 10−1 5.2E+00 1.9E+00 91.86 This work
15 Mikesfürdő-Hammas pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 7.2 × 10−4 2.7 × 10−6 nd nd nd nd nd 87.67 This work
Mikesfürdő-Hammas pool Rome nd 7.0 × 10−4 2.0 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−5 nd 9.9 × 10−1 8.5E+00 2.9E+00 87.67 This work
Mikesfürdő-Hammas pool 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 5.9 × 10−4 7.9 × 10−6 nd nd 1.1E+00 1.1E+00 2.0 × 10−3 94.83 This work
16 Mikesfürdő-Bükkös pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 8.0 × 10−4 6.7 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 82.58 This work
Mikesfürdő-Bükkös pool Rome nd 7.0 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−4 2.0 × 10−5 nd 9.0 × 10−1 1.3 × 101 4.0E+00 82.58 This work
Mikesfürdő-Bükkös pool 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 7.7 × 10−4 3.9 × 10−4 nd 1.0 × 10−4 1.1E+00 9.9E+00 2.4E+00 84.33 This work
17 Apor lányok feredeje-Small pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.2 × 10−3 5.0 × 10−6 nd nd nd nd nd 58.09 This work
Apor lányok feredeje-Small pool Rome nd 8.0 × 10−4 7.0 × 10−4 3.0 × 10−5 nd 7.7 × 10−1 3.2 × 101 9.4E+00 58.09 This work
17 Apor lányok feredeje-Small pool 2nd Campaign Palermo 2.7 × 10−4 8.3 × 10−4 6.5 × 10−5 nd 9.0 × 10−5 1.2E+00 1.1E+00 2.8 × 10−3 97.15 This work
18 Apor lányok feredeje-spring on fault 2 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 7.8 × 10−4 6.6 × 10−5 nd nd nd nd nd 98.36 This work
Apor lányok feredeje-spring on fault 2 Rome 1.7 × 10−1 9.7 × 10−3 2.2 × 10−3 3.2 × 10−3 nd 1.2E+00 1.5 × 10−1 1.2 × 10−1 98.36 This work
Apor lányok feredeje-spring on fault 2 2nd Campaign Palermo 3.5 × 10−4 6.5 × 10−4 7.8 × 10−7 nd nd 1.2E+00 8.6 × 10−1 nd 96.38 This work
19 Apor lányok feredeje-Szemvíz 4 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.2 × 10−3 2.8 × 10−6 nd nd nd nd nd 36.24 This work
Apor lányok feredeje-Szemvíz 4 Rome 2.0 × 10−2 7.0 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−3 2.0 × 10−4 nd 4.4 × 10−1 5.0E+01 1.4 × 101 36.24 This work
Apor lányok feredeje-Szemvíz 4 2nd Campaign Palermo nd nd nd nd 6.0 × 10−5 9.2 × 10−1 2.0E+01 5.0E+00 74.99 This work
20 Gyógyvizek 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 8.1 × 10−4 1.6 × 10−6 nd nd nd nd nd 97.62 This work
Gyógyvizek Rome 1.1 × 10−1 1.1 × 10−2 2.6 × 10−3 9.0 × 10−4 nd 1.3E+00 5.3 × 10−1 4.9 × 10−1 97.62 This work
Gyógyvizek 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 7.5 × 10−4 8.6 × 10−4 2.0 × 10−3 1.5 × 10−4 8.9 × 10−1 1.4 × 101 3.5E+00 78.42 This work
21 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 1 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 2.6 × 10−4 6.4 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 79.78 This work
Bálványos Sósmező drilling 1 Rome nd 2.0 × 10−4 5.0 × 10−4 3.0 × 10−5 nd 3.5 × 10−2 1.5 × 101 4.9E+00 79.78 This work
22 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 2 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 4.4 × 10−4 5.4 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 80.62 This work
Bálványos Sósmező drilling 2 Rome nd 2.0 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−4 3.0 × 10−5 nd 8.9 × 10−2 1.5 × 101 4.6E+00 80.62 This work
23 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 3 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 6.2 × 10−4 4.7 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd nd This work
24 St Anna crater rim 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 8.2 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−3 nd nd nd nd nd 22.74 This work
St Anna crater rim Rome nd 6.0 × 10−4 1.0 × 10−3 4.0 × 10−5 nd 1.1 × 10−1 6.1 × 101 1.6 × 101 22.74 This work
25 Jajdon pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.0 × 10−3 1.1 × 10−3 nd nd nd nd nd 20.50 This work
Jajdon pool Rome 4.1 × 10−2 8.6 × 10−3 nd 4.0 × 10−4 nd 4.0 × 10−1 6.2 × 101 1.7 × 101 20.50 This work
26 Jajdon mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 5.9 × 10−4 1.7 × 10−3 nd nd nd nd nd 12.11 This work
Jajdon mofetta Rome nd 5.8 × 10−3 nd 5.0 × 10−4 nd 1.3 × 10−1 6.9 × 101 1.9 × 101 12.11 This work
27 Băile Tușnad mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 4.1 × 10−4 3.2 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 97.97 This work
Băile Tușnad mofetta Rome nd 4.1 × 10−3 2.7 × 10−3 7.0 × 10−4 nd 5.9 × 10−1 9.2 × 10−1 5.2 × 10−1 97.97 This work
28 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.3 × 10−4 2.0 × 10−5 nd nd nd nd nd 97.99 This work
Lăzărești Nyírfürdő mofetta Rome 8.4 × 10−2 2.2 × 10−3 2.4 × 10−3 2.0 × 10−4 nd 7.8 × 10−1 7.1 × 10−1 4.3 × 10−1 97.99 This work
29 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 3.7 × 10−4 9.7 × 10−4 nd nd nd nd nd 93.14 This work
Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool Rome 5.0 × 10−3 3.7 × 10−3 4.0 × 10−3 1.4 × 10−3 nd 1.3E+00 4.8E+00 7.3 × 10−1 93.14 This work
Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool 2nd Campaign Palermo nd 1.1 × 10−4 2.7 × 10−6 nd nd 8.1 × 10−1 1.7E+00 5.0 × 10−2 96.71 This work
30 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool 2 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 1.3 × 10−4 2.7 × 10−5 nd nd nd nd nd 97.66 This work
Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool 2 Rome 5.9 × 10−2 1.9 × 10−3 2.9 × 10−3 9.0 × 10−4 nd 7.9 × 10−1 8.6 × 10−1 6.2 × 10−1 97.66 This work
31 Ciucsângeorgiu mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen nd 5.9 × 10−4 1.5 × 10−3 nd nd nd nd nd 6.40 This work
Ciucsângeorgiu mofetta Rome nd 5.4 × 10−3 nd 5.0 × 10−4 nd 6.4 × 10−2 7.5 × 101 1.9 × 101 6.40 This work
32 Csiszárfürdő Băile Reci nd 2.3 × 10−3 2.3 × 10−3 nd nd 8.0 × 10−3 nd nd 99.99 Frunzeti, 2013
33 Gyógyvizek Izvoarele Tămăduitoare nd 3.5 × 10−3 4.6 × 10−6 nd nd 1.3E+00 1.4E+00 nd 97.24 Frunzeti, 2013
34 Apor lányok feredeje nd 3.5 × 10−3 1.3 × 10−6 nd nd 1.3E+00 1.9E+00 nd 96.76 Frunzeti, 2013
35 Torjai Büdös Cave (Stinky Cave) nd 2.7 × 10−3 4.6 × 10−6 nd nd 1.2E+00 2.1E+00 nd 96.80 Frunzeti, 2013
36 Mikesfürdő-Hammas nd 3.3 × 10−3 5.0 × 10−6 nd nd 1.3E+00 1.5E+00 nd 97.17 Frunzeti, 2013
37 Buffogó peat bog nd 3.7 × 10−3 1.4 × 10−6 nd nd 1.6E+00 1.6E+00 nd 96.80 Frunzeti, 2013
38 Tusnad nd 5.3 × 10−5 7.3 × 10−6 nd nd 3.0 × 10−3 4.4E+00 nd 95.70 Frunzeti, 2013
39 Tusnad Nadas nd 6.0 × 10−6 nd 3.4 × 10−5 nd 3.8 × 10−3 3.2 × 10−1 1.1 × 10−1 99.56 Vaselli et al., 2002
40 Lăzărești Nyir 5.0 × 10−3 7.8 × 10−4 nd 4.0 × 10−5 2.2 × 10−5 3.4E+00 7.4E+00 1.4 × 10−2 89.11 Vaselli et al., 2002
41 Sf Ana nd 6.9 × 10−4 nd 5.0 × 10−6 7.0 × 10−6 6.5 × 10−1 1.6E+00 4.2 × 10−2 97.69 Vaselli et al., 2002
42 Puturosul 1.2 × 10−2 4.1 × 10−4 nd 3.7 × 10−5 nd 7.8 × 10−1 9.0 × 10−1 4.2 × 10−2 98.26 Vaselli et al., 2002
43 Puturosul Sud nd 1.4 × 10−3 nd 9.0 × 10−6 9.0 × 10−6 2.4E+00 2.0E+00 3.0 × 10−2 95.63 Vaselli et al., 2002
44 Bálványos 6.0 × 10−3 6.3 × 10−4 nd 1.5 × 10−4 4.0 × 10−6 1.1E+00 8.9 × 10−1 4.4 × 10−2 97.97 Vaselli et al., 2002
45 Torjai Büdös Cave (Stinky Cave) nd 1.1 × 10−3 nd nd nd 8.0 × 10−1 9.7 × 10−1 6.0 × 10−2 98.20 Althaus et al., 2000
46 Apor lányok feredeje-Upper pool nd 1.3 × 10−3 nd nd nd 1.2E+00 1.5E+00 1.8 × 10−1 97.75 Althaus et al., 2000
47 Apor lányok feredeje-Lower pool nd 1.3 × 10−3 nd nd nd 9.4 × 10−1 7.3 × 10−1 2.0 × 10−2 98.16 Althaus et al., 2000
48 Bi × ad nd nd nd nd nd 2.3 × 10−1 8.9 × 10−1 2.7 × 10−1 99.00 Althaus et al., 2000
49 Bi × ad nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd Althaus et al., 2000
50 Tusnad Nagy nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd Althaus et al., 2000
51 Balvanyos Carpatii nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd Althaus et al., 2000
52 Gyógyvizek nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd nd Unpublished data
53 Bancu nd nd nd nd 1.0 × 10−5 7.0 × 10−1 2.4E+00 2.0 × 10−1 95.88 Unpublished data
54 Lazaresti nd nd nd nd nd 8.5 × 10−1 2.0E+00 1.8 × 10−1 96.4 Unpublished data
  • Note. nd = not determined.
Table 3. Isotopic Composition of the Gas Samples
No. Site Campaign Laboratory R/Ra measured R/Ra corrected 4He/20Ne δ13C–CO2 δ18O–CO2 CO2/3He Source
1 Torjai Stinky Cave 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.67 2.69 18.07 −3.24 −6.74 3.29E+10 This work
2nd Campaign Palermo 3.01 3.01 955.55 −3.09 nd 3.24E+10 This work
2 Timsós Cave 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.71 2.73 23.83 −3.36 −6.08 3.17E+10 This work
2nd Campaign Palermo 2.90 2.95 13.20 −3.47 nd 3.69E+10 This work
3 Gyilkos Cave 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.12 2.40 1.40 −3.22 −6.63 nd This work
4 Buffogó peat bog pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.86 2.86 758.43 −2.70 −9.00 2.45E+10 This work
2nd Campaign Palermo 2.27 2.95 0.90 −3.15 nd 3.27E+10 This work
5 Buffogó peat bog 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.78 1.78 477.09 nd nd nd This work
6 Várpad-Ibolya pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.49 2.43 0.44 −3.13 nd 3.81E+11 This work
7a Bálványos mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.13 1.13 456.45 nd nd nd This work
7b Bálványos mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.06 2.19 2.62 −4.20 nd 6.71E+10 This work
2nd Campaign Palermo 2.06 2.15 4.0 −17.20 nd nd This work
8 Bálványos pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.14 2.17 9.75 −2.84 nd 1.26E+10 This work
9 Csiszárfürdő-Iker pool white 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.43 2.44 127.86 −3.06 −7.44 nd This work
2nd Campaign Palermo 2.81 2.82 90.4 nd nd 2.53E+10 This work
10 Csiszárfürdő-Hammas pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.97 1.97 1695.21 −3.59 −8.40 3.23E+10 This work
10 2nd Campaign Palermo 2.90 2.90 123.8 −3.20 nd 3.43E+10 This work
11 Csiszárfürdő-Timsós pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.46 3.09 0.95 −2.47 nd 2.33E+09 This work
12 Csiszárfürdő-Csokoládés pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.44 2.90 1.21 −3.40 nd 2.37E+10 This work
12 2nd Campaign Palermo 2.90 2.91 55.00 −2.60 nd 2.68E+10 This work
13 Mikesfürdő-Vallató pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.72 2.73 52.98 −2.28 −6.87 2.42E+10 This work
13 2nd Campaign Palermo 2.55 2.57 31.4 −2.30 nd 6.18E+10 This work
14 Mikesfürdő-Vallató mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.21 2.25 7.43 −2.45 −6.37 9.87E+10 This work
15 Mikesfürdő-Hammas pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.74 2.74 266.70 −3.35 −7.09 3.19E+10 This work
15 l 2nd Campaign Palermo 3.02 3.03 74.0 −2.90 nd 3.85E+10 This work
16 Mikesfürdő-Bükkös pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.46 2.93 1.19 −2.65 nd 2.52E+10 This work
16 2nd Campaign Palermo 1.98 2.16 2.0 −3.20 nd 3.64E+10 This work
17 Apor lányok feredeje-Small pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.99 1.99 233.48 −3.09 −5.13 1.81E+10 This work
17 2nd Campaign Palermo 2.81 2.86 12.8 nd nd 2.95E+10 This work
18 Apor lányok feredeje-spring on fault 2 1st Campaign Debrecen 3.10 3.15 11.80 −3.85 nd 2.87E+10 This work
18 2nd Campaign Palermo 2.90 2.90 836.3 −4.00 nd 3.68E+10 This work
19 Apor lányok feredeje-Szemvíz 4 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.85 1.85 425.84 −3.52 −2.79 1.20E+10 This work
19 2nd Campaign Palermo 1.34 1.50 1.00 −2.60 nd nd This work
20 Gyógyvizek 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.73 2.73 497.01 −3.42 −4.58 3.17E+10 This work
20 2nd Campaign Palermo 1.46 1.73 0.9 −3.30 nd 4.37E+10 This work
21 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 1 1st Campaign Debrecen 0.78 0.27 0.41 −4.61 −5.44 8.13E+11 This work
22 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 2 1st Campaign Debrecen 0.82 0.72 0.82 −4.37 −5.30 1.82E+11 This work
23 Bálványos Sósmező drilling 3 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.43 2.83 1.32 −3.92 nd nd This work
24 St Anna crater rim 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.99 2.58 0.78 −2.80 −9.05 7.78E+09 This work
25 Jajdon pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.30 2.83 0.99 −3.41 nd 5.02E+09 This work
26 Jajdon mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.45 3.25 0.36 −3.96 nd 4.51E+09 This work
27 Băile Tușnad mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen 2.02 2.32 1.28 −1.50 nd 7.48E+10 This work
28 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.43 1.45 6.50 −2.08 nd 3.84E+11 This work
29 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.11 1.46 0.38 −1.40 nd 1.24E+11 This work
29 2nd Campaign Palermo 1.01 1.01 40.2 −1.50 nd 6.45E+11 This work
30 Lăzărești Nyírfürdő pool 2 1st Campaign Debrecen 1.30 1.32 4.69 −1.91 nd 4.13E+11 This work
31 Ciucsângeorgiu mofetta 1st Campaign Debrecen 0.77 0.14 0.39 −2.95 nd 5.50E+10 This work
32 Csiszárfürdő Băile Reci 0.796 0.796 0.99 nd nd 3.89E+10 Frunzeti, 2013
33 Gyógyvizek Izvoarele Tămăduitoare 2.302 2.302 766.09 −3.25 −7.43 8.62E+09 Frunzeti, 2013
34 Apor lányok feredeje 2.438 2.438 2686.92 −3.72 −4.92 8.17E+09 Frunzeti, 2013
35 Torjai Büdös Cave (Stinky Cave) 2.199 2.199 583.84 −3.15 −7.48 1.17E+10 Frunzeti, 2013
36 Mikesfürdő−Hammas 2.242 2.242 656.89 −3.16 −9.87 9.47E+09 Frunzeti, 2013
37 Buffogó peat bog 2.274 2.274 2711.03 −2.77 −9.21 8.31E+09 Frunzeti, 2013
38 Tusnad 0.724 0.724 9.79 −4.7 −8.2 1.79E+12 Frunzeti, 2013
39 Tusnad Nadas 1.66 1.66 1.28 −4.42 nd 7.19E+12 Vaselli et al., 2002
40 Lăzărești Nyir 2.95 2.95 7.7 nd nd 2.79E+10 Vaselli et al., 2002
41 Sf Anna 3.18 3.18 25 nd nd 3.20E+10 Vaselli et al., 2002
42 Puturosul 2.29 2.29 10.11 nd nd 7.53E+10 Vaselli et al., 2002
43 Puturosul Sud nd nd nd −4.7 nd nd Vaselli et al., 2002
44 Bálványos 4.48 4.48 163 nd nd 2.52E+10 Vaselli et al., 2002
45 Torjai Büdös Cave (Stinky Cave) 3.1 3.100 47.3 nd nd 2.07E+10 Althaus et al., 2000
46 Apor lányok feredeje-Upper pool 3.12 3.120 151 nd nd 1.72E+10 Althaus et al., 2000
47 Apor lányok feredeje-Lower pool 3.19 3.190 712 nd nd 1.70E+10 Althaus et al., 2000
48 Bixad 1.47 1.470 0.67 nd nd nd Althaus et al., 2000
49 Bixad 0.8 0.8 1.3 nd nd nd Althaus et al., 2000
50 Tusnad Nagy 1.2 1.2 6.44 nd nd nd Althaus et al., 2000
51 Balvanyos Carpatii 3.04 3.04 1.06 nd nd nd Althaus et al., 2000
  • Note. 3He/4He ratios are normalized to the atmosphere and listed as R/Ra values corrected for the atmospheric He contamination (R/Rac) considering the 4He/20Ne ratio; δ13C–CO2 and δ18O–CO2 are expressed in permil versus Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite. nd = not determined.
Table 4. Isotopic Composition of Persani Clinopyroxene
Sample He (mol/g) Ne (mol/g) He/Ar 4He/20Ne R/Ra R/Rac
Cpx xenolith 4.06E-12 2.00E-15 0.92 2030.46 5.96 5.96
Cpx xenolith 2 3.81E-12 2.74E-15 0.91 1389.41 5.94 5.94
  • Note. 3He/4He ratios are normalized to the atmosphere and listed as R/Ra values (R = 3He/4He isotopic ratio of the sample, Ra = atmospheric 3He/4He = 1.382 × 10−6) and corrected for the atmospheric helium contamination (R/Rac) considering the 4He/20Ne ratio.

4.1 Chemical and Isotopic Composition of Gases

The CO2 concentration in the collected gases ranges from 6.40% to 98.36%. Besides CO2, H2S (2.7 × 10−4 to 1.72 × 10−1%), He (5.91 × 10−5 to 1.66 × 10−2%), Ne (6.39 × 10−7 to 5.80x10−3%), H2 (1 × 10−5 to 2.3 × 10−1%) CO (6 × 10−5 to 5 × 10−4%), CH4 (3.5 × 10−2 to 1.69%), N2 (1.5 × 10−1 to 74.5%), and O2 (2 × 10−3 to 18.99) are present in the gas samples. The ternary diagram CO2/50–N2–O2 (Figure 3) shows a progressive enrichment in N2 and O2 of the samples, indicating a variable amount of air.

Details are in the caption following the image
CO2/50–O2–N2 triangular diagram showing the relative contents of components. The samples distribution highlights mixing between CO2 and atmospheric gas species. Literature data from Ciomadul area are represented by data from Althaus et al., 2000, Frunzeti, 2013, and Vaselli et al., 2002).

The 3He/4He ratios range between 0.77 and 3.10 Ra and the 4He/20Ne ratios from 0.36 to 1,700, which show that some of the collected gases are affected by air contamination (Table 3). The 3He/4He ratios after corrections for the air contamination (R/Rac) are up to 3.25. The δ13CCO2 ranges between −1.40‰ and −17.2‰ versus VPDB (Table 3).

4.2 Noble Gas Ratios of Fluid Inclusions From Persani Clinopyroxenes

Helium content in the fluid inclusions in clinopyroxenes ranged between 4.06 × 10–12 and 3.81 × 10–12 mol/g and Ne content between 2 × 10–15 and 2.74 × 10–15 mol/g, so the He/Ne ratios ranged between 1,390 and 2,030. The He isotopic signature in fluid inclusions was 5.95 Ra ± 0.01 (Table 4).

5 Discussion

5.1 Crustal Assimilation Versus Mantle Metasomatism

Helium comes from three different sources (mantle, crust, and air), which can be readily distinguished based on their characteristic isotopic ratios (Sano & Wakita, 1985). Helium isotopes are useful tracers for detecting deep fluids and their possible origin (crust, mantle, or atmosphere; Ozima & Podosek, 2002). It has been demonstrated that in the case of quiescent volcanoes, the active degassing of deep volatiles can occur for a long time after the last volcanic activity (Caracausi et al., 2009, 2015; Carapezza & Tarchini, 2007; Tassi et al., 2013).

The last eruption in Ciomadul occurred 30 ka (Harangi et al., 2010; Harangi, Lukács, et al., 2015; Molnár et al., 2019), yet there is an intense CO2 degassing with a minimum flux of 8.7 × 103 t/year (Kis et al., 2017), which is comparable to other dormant volcanic areas such as Panarea (1.72 × 104 t/year) and Roccamonfina (7.48 × 103 t/year) from Italy or Jefferson (7.92 × 103 t/year) from the United States.

In addition, previous investigations (Althaus et al., 2000; Vaselli et al., 2002; Túri et al., 2016) highlighted the outgassing of mantle-derived volatiles at Ciomadul volcano. He isotopic ratios in the fluids collected in this study are up to 3.1 Ra similar to those obtained from previous studies (Figure 4 and Table 3). These values are higher than those obtained from the surrounding areas such as in the Carpathian Foredeep and the Transylvanian Basin where He isotopic ratios are between 0.02 and 0.03 Ra (Baciu et al., 2017; Italiano et al., 2017; Vaselli et al., 2002, Figure 4). These latter values are typical of crustal fluids dominated by 4He produced by decay of U and Th (e.g., Ozima & Podosek, 2002). The higher Ra values measured at Ciomadul could imply a higher contribution of magmatic He. Nevertheless, the 3.1 Ra value is significantly lower than the MORB and subcontinental lithospheric mantle (SCLM) value (Sano & Marty, 1995) requiring addition of radiogenic 4He that decreased the pristine isotopic signature.

Details are in the caption following the image
Helium isotopic ratios (R/Ra values) and 4He/20Ne relationships. The theoretical lines represent binary mixings of atmospheric He with mantle-originated and crustal He (Pik & Marty, 2008). The assumed end members for He-isotopic ratios and 4He/20Ne ratios are ATM (1 Ra, He/Ne = 0.318, Sano & Wakita, 1985); subcontinental European mantle is 6.1 ± 0.9 Ra and 4He/20Ne ratio = 1,000 (Gautheron & Moreira, 2002); typical crustal end member is 0.02 Ra and 4He/20Ne ratio = 1,000 (Sano & Marty, 1995). Literature data for comparison: data after Althaus et al. (2000), Baciu et al. (2007, 2017), Frunzeti (2013), and Vaselli et al. (2002). SCLM = subcontinental lithospheric mantle.

The mantle xenoliths of the Perşani volcanic field (approximately 40 km from the Ciomadul area) could provide the He isotopic signature of the lithospheric mantle beneath the region. The He isotopic ratios in fluid inclusions of the Persani clinopyroxenes are 5.95 ± 0.01 (Table 4), and these are lower than those of of previous measurements, from 6.5 to 7.3 Ra, obtained by Althaust et al. (1998) but consistent with the values of the SCLM (R/Ra = 6.1 ± 0.9 Ra, Gautheron & Moreira, 2002). The continental crust (R/Ra = 0.02, Ozima & Podosek, 2002) and atmosphere (R/Ra = 1) have distinct isotopic values, and 4He/20Ne can be used to infer how mixing between the three possible end members can support the He isotopic signature of the fluids that outgass in the Ciomadul region (Figure 4). Most Ciomadul samples indicate a possible trend between air and a magmatic source, where the He ratio of the magmatic end member (3.1 Ra) is lower than that of the ECLM and the Perşani clinopyroxene. This is also supported by the trend line in the 3He–CO24He ternary diagram (Figure 5), where the Ciomadul samples are along a trend showing variable amounts of CO2 and R/Rac values between 2 and 3. This trend reflects the dominance of radiogenic He in the fluids outgassing from the Ciomadul volcano. We have now to assess the possible processes that can add the radiogenic He component to the mantle component.

Details are in the caption following the image
Ternary CO23He–4He diagram of Ciomadul gas samples. Ciomadul literature data after Althaus et al. (2000), Frunzeti (2013) and Vaselli et al. (2002). For reference, we have plotted the MORB (Marty & Jambon, 1987) and SCLM values (Gautheron & Moreira, 2002). SCLM = subcontinental lithospheric mantle.

Such a relatively low He isotope ratio of the magma source is not uncommon in volcanic arc settings (e.g., Hilton et al., 1992; Allard et al., 1997; Martelli et al., 2004) and can be due to several processes involving the addition of radiogenically produced 4He, such as magma aging, crustal assimilation, mixing between mantle, and crustal-derived fluids (Kennedy & van Soest, 2006; Torgersen et al., 1995). Unfortunately, there are no undifferentiated mantle-derived mafic rocks in the region of the Ciomadul volcano, so we cannot investigate the He isotope composition of the mantle directly below the volcano. In Ciomadul, only high-K dacitic volcanic products are found (Mason et al., 1996; Molnár et al., 2018, 2019; Vinkler et al., 2007), although occurrence of high-Mg minerals such as olivine and clinopyroxene in the dacites suggest involvement of primitive mafic magmas in the magma evolution of Ciomadul (Kiss et al., 2014; Vinkler et al., 2007).

Magma aging and crustal assimilation are two mechanisms that could account for the addition of the radiogenic He component to the mantle-derived melts. Both these processes have been invoked to explain low He isotopic ratios (<MORB and SCLM) in different volcanic regions, worldwide, such as Aeolian Island, Italy (Mandarano et al., 2016), and Iceland (Condomines et al., 1983). The magma-aging mechanism considers an addition of 4He by radiogenic decay in the magma itself. In constrast, crustal assimilation furnishes 4He by interaction between magma and the whole rock. First, we investigated the likelihood that the magma aging model can interpret the low He isotopic signature in the fluids that outgas at Ciomadul volcano.

The 3He/4He ratio of the fluid inclusions of the Persani clinoproxene (5.95 Ra ± 0.01) can be assumed to represent the mantle end member value beneath of the region. Thus, the primary magmas of Ciomadul could be also characterized by such isotope ratio. The Ciomadul dacites have U and Th concentrations of 3 and 15 ppm, respectively (Molnár et al., 2018, 2019; Vinkler et al., 2007). Using these data, the magma-aging model calculation yield 3He/4He ratio around 4.65 Ra after 30 kyr (Figure 6). Thus, this process alone cannot be responsible for the low He (approximately 3.1 Ra) isotopic signature of the Ciomadul fluids. Furthermore, if we assume the U (1.5 ppm) and Th (5.5 ppm) contents of the Persani basalts (Harangi et al., 2013), the magma-aging model is still not a viable process to provide the required 4He addition and generate the low 3He/4He for Ciomadul gases.

Details are in the caption following the image
Magma aging evolution over time of the He isotopic signature (as R/Ra). The green bar is the range of the subcontinental lithospheric mantle He isotopic ratio (6.1 ± 0.9; Gautheron & Moreira, 2002). The red circle is the value or the 3He/4He (4.65 Ra) at 30 ka for the magma aging evolution. 3He/4He = 3.2 is at 100 ka (yellow square).

The relatively low He isotopic ratio can also be explained by high-level crustal assimilation (e.g., van Soest et al., 2002), which has to also be evaluated. Assuming the U and Th amount of the typical upper crust, 2.7 and 10.5 ppm, respectively (Rudnick & Gao, 2003), and an age of 5 Ma, 3% of crustal assimilation could be sufficient to achieve the observed low He isotopic ratios. The Sr–Nd–O isotope compositions of the erupted magmas sensitively reflect such a process. Mason et al. (1996) published isotopic data for three samples of the Ciomadul volcanic system. They have distinct isotopic features compared to the calc-alkaline volcanic suite of the Calimani-Gurghiu-Harghita chain. Although the Sr–Nd isotopic data could suggest an assimilation and fractional crystallization process with 10–35% assimilation of flysch sediment, such a high crustal contamination is not feasible, based on the fairly low δ18O values (6.3–7.1‰) of the phenocrysts from the dacites (Mason et al., 1996). Instead, they suggested that these isotopic characteristics could also be explained by source contamination from subduction-related fluids. In fact, the bulk-rock composition of the Ciomadul dacites has unique characteristics with high Sr, Ba (both showing typically >1,000 ppm), and high K compositions and low concentrations of heavy rare Earth elements (Molnár et al., 2018, 2019; Seghedi et al., 1987; Vinkler et al., 2007). Furthermore, the high-Mg pargasitic amphiboles thought to have derived from the less differentiated magmas have also relatively high Ba content (Kiss et al., 2014). Thus, these peculiar compositional characters can be due to the nature of the magma source rather than magma differentiation processes. The elevated K, Sr, and Ba contents of the assumed mantle source of the Ciomadul primary magmas can be due to metasomatism, and this is in contrast what the peridotite xenoliths from the Persani volcanic field show (Vaselli et al., 1995). In fact, the He signature of the outgassed volatiles at Ciomadul resembles the values in fluids from other subduction-related volcanic systems (i.e., Italy, and Indonesia; Hilton et al., 1992; Martelli et al., 2004), where the mantle source regions seem to be contaminated by crustal material that added radiogenic 4He and decreased the pristine He isotopic signature (Hilton et al., 2002).

Such a small-scale spatial heterogenity of the lithospheric mantle beneath this area can be explained by the closer location of Ciomadul to the collision front, where subduction is expected to have occurred during the Miocene up to around 11 Ma (Cloetingh et al., 2004; Mațenco et al., 2007; Royden et al., 1982; Seghedi et al., 2011). Such a scenario is not unique; Martelli et al. (2004) suggested that the relatively low He isotopic ratio in the volcanic rocks of Central Italy can be explained by magma source features (i.e., contribution of radiogenic He from metasomatic, subduction-related fluids and ingrowth of 4He in the lithospheric mantle). We note that the 87Sr/86Sr isotopic ratio of the Ciomadul dacites and the highest 3He/4He isotopic values of the emitted gases plot into the same trend (Figure 5 in Martelli et al., 2004) what the Central Italian volcanic areas form.

In summary, considering the petrology of the Ciomadul volcanic products, the relatively low He isotope magmatic end member of the Ciomadul gases can be interpreted as due to magma-source characteristics, where the radiogenic He was added via subduction-related fluids and increased radioactive ingrowth following the metasomatism. However, a mixing between mantle-derived fluids with and SCLM He isotopic signature and 4He-rich crustal fluids coming from shallow crustal layers should still be further explored as a possible process responsible of the low He isotopic ratios in the Ciomadul fluids. This likelihood will be discussed in the next section.

5.2 Sources and Origin of Carbon Dioxide

The carbon isotopic composition of CO213CCO2) from the studied fluids range between –1.40‰ and –4.61‰ versus VPDB, consistent with previous measurements in the area (–2.77‰ to –4.70‰; Frunzeti, 2013; Sarbu et al., 2018; Vaselli et al., 2002). In the Pannonian Basin (Central Europe), the carbon isotopic composition of CO2 gases shows values in a narrow range between –3‰ and –7‰ with an average value of –5‰ VPDB based on hundreds of measurements (Bräuer et al., 2016; Cornides, 1993; Palcsu et al., 2014; Sherwood-Lollar et al., 1997). These values are consistent with a mantle origin. In contrast, crustal-derived CO2 is characterized by a δ13C of about –25‰ in case of biogenic sedimentary source and around 0‰ considering thermometamorphism of limestone (Sano & Marty, 1995 and references therein). The Ciomadul gases overlap the range of mantle composition, even if some samples have more positive values that cannot be explained by the addition of a crustal biogenic component (Table 3 and Figures 7 and 8). To constrain the origin of CO2 in the fluids emitted by the Ciomadul volcano, we used the relationship between the elemental ratio CO2/3He and the isotopic signature δ13CCO2 (Sano & Marty, 1995; Figure 7).

Details are in the caption following the image
Correlation diagram of Sano & Marty (1995) plotting CO2/3He versus 13CCO2 (VPDB) of Ciomadul gas emissions. Lines show the theoretical mixing between a mantle end member and a crustal end member represented by marine limestone and organic sediment carbon. Ciomadul samples are showing a trend of mixing between fluids of mantle origin and fluids originating from limestone. Literature data for comparison: data after Althaus et al. (2000), Baciu et al. (2007, 2017), and Frunzeti et al. (2013) and Vaselli et al. (2002). Data on individual volcanoes worldwide are based on the compilation of Mason et al. (2017), by Allard (1983), Marty and Giggenbach (1990), Poorter et al. (1991), Varekamp et al. (1992), Sturchio et al. (1993), Sano et al. (1994), Sano and Marty (1995), Tedesco et al. (1995), Hilton (1996), Sano and Williams (1996), Allard et al. (1997), Fischer et al. (1998), van Soest et al. (1998), Pedroni et al. (1999), Lewicki et al. (2000), Parello et al. (2000), Favara et al. (2001), Snyder et al. (2001), Shaw et al. (2003), Symonds et al. (2003), Jaffe et al. (2004), Capasso et al. (2005), Carapezza et al. (2007), de Leeuw et al. (2007), Werner et al. (2009), Capaccioni et al. (2011), Tassi et al. (2011), Aguilera et al. (2012), Melián et al. (2012), and Caracausi et al. (2013).
Details are in the caption following the image
(a, b) Correlation diagram (Ciotoli et al., 2013) plotting He isotopic ratios (R/Ra) versus 13CCO2 (VPDB) of Ciomadul gas emissions. Lines show the theoretical mixing between a mantle end member (MORB) and a crustal end member represented by marine limestone and organic sediment carbon (Sano & Marty, 1995, Sherwood-Lollar et al., 1997). Literature data for comparison: data after Althaus et al. (2000), Vaselli et al. (2002), Baciu et al. (2007, 2017), Frunzeti et al. (2013). Data on individual volcanoes worldwide are based on the compilation of Mason et al. (2017) from the data presented by Allard (1983), Marty and Giggenbach (1990), Poorter et al. (1991), Varekamp et al. (1992), Sturchio et al. (1993), Sano et al. (1994), Sano and Marty (1995), Tedesco et al. (1995), Hilton (1996), Sano and Williams (1996), Allard et al. (1997), Fischer et al. (1998), van Soest et al. (1998), Pedroni et al. (1999), Lewicki et al. (2000), Parello et al. (2000), Favara et al. (2001), Snyder et al. (2001), Shaw et al. (2003), Symonds et al. (2003), Jaffe et al. (2004), Capasso et al. (2005), Carapezza et al. (2007), de Leeuw et al. (2007), Werner et al. (2009), Capaccioni et al. (2011), Tassi et al. (2011), Aguilera et al. (2012), Melián et al. (2012), and Caracausi et al., 2013.

The CO2/3He ratios of the Ciomadul gases are higher than 2 × 109, the expected mantle ratio (Marty & Jambon, 1987) and which suggests an addition of a crustal component. It is interesting that these ratios fall into the same trend as shown by volcanic and fumarolic gases measured at volcanic arcs, worldwide (Mason et al., 2017; Figures 8a and 8b). Almost all the Ciomadul samples fall close the mixing line between a mantle component and a limestone end member suggesting that mixing of the two sources could be the main process that controls the CO23He systematics in these fluids. In contrast, CO2 fluids in the Transylvanian Basin, (Baciu et al., 2007, 2017) west of the volcano have distinct character and fall closer to the mantle-organic sediment mixing line. Rayleigh-type fractionation due to gas exsolution from water is not a plausible process to produce the carbon isotopic signature and the CO2/3He of the studied fluids (Figure 7; Holland & Gilfillan, 2013; Roulleau et al., 2015). However, the 13CCO2 values of most of the samples fall in the narrow range of −2‰ and −5‰, which is a typical signature for mantle-derived carbon. We obtain the same trend in the He isotopic ratios (R/Ra) versus 13CCO2 (VPDB) plot (Figures 8a and 8b), where the Ciomadul samples clearly approach the mantle end member and overlap the isotopic values of many other volcanic systems related to subduction areas. Remarkably the Ciomadul samples show similarities in He–C isotopic composition with active and dormant volcanic regions (e.g., Italy and Indonesia).

The involvement of carbonatic component can be explained by mixing with fluids derived from thermometamorphic decomposition of carbonates in the flysch sedimentary pile or by mantle source contamination via subducted carbonatic material. The mantle source of the Ciomadul magmas is considered to be a metasomatic lithospheric mantle based on the compositional features of the dacitic rocks. The relatively low He isotopic ratio can be due to these source characteristics, whereas metasomatism was the result of slab-derived fluids during the Miocene subduction along the Eastern Carpathians followed by ingrowth of radiogenic He by radioactive decay. The Sr–Nd–O isotope data of the volcanic rocks do not support significant upper-level crustal contamination but rather crustal component addition to the source region via slab-derived fluid metasomatism (Mason et al., 1996). The combination of He and C isotopic data suggests that this crustal component consisted of decomposed subducted carbonate material as suggested also for the volcanic rocks in Italy, although addition of fluids from carbonate decomposition at shallow crustal level cannot be unambiguously excluded.

5.3 Relationship With the Deep Magmatic System

Dormant volcanoes pose a particular hazard to society since there is much less awareness about a possible eruption event. However, the scientific community is giving increased attention to these volcanoes and the surrounding areas that are generally characterized by intense gas emissions (Burton et al., 2013, and references therein). Recent investigations highlighted the presence of an active plumbing system even below volcanoes which last erupted >10 kyr (e.g., Colli Albani, Italy; Trasatti et al., 2018; Uturuncu, Bolivia; Sparks et al., 2008; Comeau et al., 2015; Tatun, Taiwan; Konstantinou et al., 2007; Lin & Pu, 2016). Harangi, Novák, et al. (2015) suggested the term PAMS volcano, that is, volcano with potentially active magma storage for these long-dormant volcanoes, which have clear implication for a subvolcanic melt-bearing magma plumbing system. Ciomadul belongs to this category, since there are a number of observations suggesting that a melt-bearing magma body could still exist beneath it (Harangi, Novák, et al., 2015; Popa et al., 2012; Szakács & Seghedi, 2013). The isotopic composition of the emitted gases coupled to the high localized heat flow in the area of the Ciomadul vocano gives additional support to this interpretation.

This involves the similarities in the isotope composition of CO2 and He of the gases emitted at the Ciomadul with those found in other active and dormant volcanic arc systems worldwide and their proposed high magmatic component. Furthermore, the Ciomadul volcanic system is characterized by relatively high CO2 gas fluxes (Kis et al., 2017). This is consistent with the presence of a still-degassing magma below the Ciomadul system as inferred by geophysical investigations that recognized a low-resistivity and low-velocity anomaly in the crust, below the volcano (Harangi, Novák, et al., 2015; Popa et al., 2012) as well as petrologic observations suggesting the involvement of a mafic magma in the petrogenesis of the erupted dacite (Kiss et al., 2014). The measurements of U–Th and U–Pb spot ages on zircons suggest a long-standing magma storage that could go back as far as about 350 ka (Harangi, Lukács, et al., 2015; Lukács et al., 2018). Molnár et al. (2018, 2019) presented a detailed eruption chronology for the Ciomadul lava dome field involving the Ciomadul volcanic complex and emphasized that volcanic activity could be renewed even after long (>100 kyr) repose times. Several tens-of-kiloyears quiescence periods between the active phases have also been pointed out also during the evolution of the Ciomadul volcanic complex (Harangi, Lukács, et al., 2015; Molnár et al., 2019). However, the zircon U–Th and U–Pb ages suggest that crystallization was ongoing also during the long quiescence periods, that is, there was an active magma storage beneath the apparently inactive volcano This suggests a long-standing felsic upper-crustal crystal mush system underlain by a mafic hot zone in the lower crust, as has already been suggested by petrologic interpretations (Kiss et al., 2014). The diverse amphibole compositions in the dacites are consistent with a polybaric magma evolution, that is, with transcrustal magma storage (Cashman et al., 2017; Sparks & Cashman, 2017) comprising ephemeral melt-dominated bodies, that is, magma chambers at various depths. In addition, fluid-gas accumulation zones can also have developed within this magma storage (Christopher et al., 2015; Sparks & Cashman, 2017). Thus, a possible source of the CO2 gases could be these fluid entrapment zones within the crystal mush during quiescent period. However, gas emission is more common around the Ciomadul volcanic complex and significantly lower within the volcano itself (Kis et al., 2017). Allard et al. (1991), and Edmonds (2008) pointed out that stronger degassing around the volcanic edifice is not uncommon in volcanic regions. An alternative source of the CO2 gases could be mafic magma residing at deeper level, possibly at the lower crust. Indeed, the occurrence of high-Mg minerals, such as olivine, clinopyroxene, and orthopyroxene in the dacites (Kiss et al., 2014; Vinkler et al., 2007) suggests that mafic magma also played an important role in the magma evolution. Harangi, Novák, et al. (2015) detected a lower crustal low resistivity anomaly, which might represent the mafic magma accumulation. Thus, we propose that most of the CO2 gases could come directly from the presumed mafic-magma accumulation zone at the lower crust through fractures (Kis et al., 2017), whereas only limited amount of gases is derived from the mushy magma storage.

Vaselli et al. (2002) already suggested that the emitted gases in Southern Harghita could have a magmatic component. Based on our new measurements, we support this interpretation, particularly in the area of Ciomadul volcano. Assuming that a deep-seated mafic magma body can be the main source of the CO2 gases and considering that it is characterized by relatively low 3He/4He isotope signature (3.1 Ra) inherited by the mantle source region, we can use this value to calculate the relative magmatic component of the emitted gases (Sano & Wakita, 1985). If no interaction with crustal fluids occurred, the magmatic component in the gases could exceed even the 80%. Remarkably, we obtained such high values for the areas having a larger diffusive CO2 flux. This high magmatic He content of the gases is not unique and resembles what Trasatti et al. (2018) proposed for Colli Albani volcanic complex, another long-dormant volcanic field, where they assumed more than 80% mantle-derived component in the emitted CO2 gases. However, the magmatic component can be lower, if interaction between the ascending gases with crustal gases occurred at shallow crustal depth, a possibility what we cannot test at this stage but requires further studies.

6 Conclusions

We investigated 31 gas emissions at the Ciomadul volcano, a long-dormant PAMS volcano in Eastern-Central Europe, to constrain the origin of the emitted volatiles and the possible processes that modify their chemistry during the transfer of these fluids toward the surface. The carbon and helium isotopic compositions provide evidence for a significant magmatic component. Our study shows a clear magmatic component in the emitted fluids and the highest values correspond to the area characterized by the highest CO2 flux from soil, so the high fluxes can be associated with the highest contribution of volatiles derived from a magma body.

The relatively large CO2 gas emission and significant magmatic component of the gases are consistent with geophysical and petrologic models (Harangi, Lukács, et al., 2015; Harangi, Novák, et al., 2015; Popa et al., 2012), that a degassing magmatic intrusion could still exist beneath Ciomadul. A long-standing silicic crystal mush body should be developed in the shallow crust, while a mafic magma accumulation zone is inferred at the lower crustal level. The magmatic gases could be derived either from a deep mafic magma and/or from the volatile accumulation zones developed in the shallow crustal felsic-crystal mush body. Petrology and geochemistry of the erupted dacitic magma imply that upper crustal contamination played no or subordinate role and the primary magmas could have derived from a mantle source contaminated by subduction-related fluids that is consistent with the He and C isotope composition of the gases emitted at Ciomadul volcano. Thus, a magma source with relatively low He isotope value (3.10 Ra), similar to what was proposed for volcanic systems in central Italy seems to be viable beneath Ciomadul. This differs from the SCLM value detected at the nearby Persani volcanic field (Althaust et al., 1998; this study) and also in the Pannonian basin (Bräuer et al., 2016; Cornides, 1993; Palcsu et al., 2014) and requires a spatially variable modified lithospheric mantle even a small scale. The isotopic composition (He and CO2) of the emitted volatiles implies interaction of crustal gases to varying degrees, although some of them could reach the surface without major modification.

Acknowledgments

Information regarding the support of the conclusions of this work can be found in the tables and within the text. This research on the Ciomadul volcano was initiated during the MTA Postdoctoral Fellowship of Boglárka-Mercedesz Kis and belongs to the scientific project supported by the OTKA (Hungarian National Research Fund) K116528. The research was also supported by the European Union and the State of Hungary, cofinanced by the European Regional Development Fund in the project of GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00009 “ICER,” and we acknowledge the support of the Deep Energy Community and Reservoirs and Fluxes Community of the Deep Carbon Observatory. Thorough reviews and constructive comments provided by Emilie Roulleau and Daniele Pinti helped considerably to clarify the ideas described in the paper. We thank Timothy Jull who provided a final polishing of the English of the manuscript.