Abstract
At some point in America in the 1940s, T. D. Lysenko’s neo-Lamarckian hereditary theories transformed from a set of disputed doctrines into a prime exemplar of “pseudoscience.” This paper explores the context in which this theory acquired this pejorative status by examining American efforts to refute Lysenkoism both before and after the famous August 1948 endorsement of Lysenko’s doctrines by the Stalinist state, with particular attention to the translation efforts of Theodosius Dobzhansky. After enumerating numerous tactics for combating perceived pseudoscience, the Lysenko case is then juxtaposed with another American case of alleged pseudoscience: the notorious 1950 scandal surrounding Immanuel Velikovsky’s Worlds in Collision (1950, Worlds in Collision. New York: Macmillan). On several levels, the characterization of Lysenkoism as pseudoscientific served as a template for casting other rejected theories, including Velikovsky’s, in the same light.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleksandrov, V. Ia. 1992. Trudnye gody sovetskoi biologii: Zapiski sovremennika. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
Bauer, Henry H. 1984. Beyond Velikovsky: The History of a Public Controversy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Condon, Edward U. 1950. “Velikovsky’s Catastrophe.” New Republic 122(17) (24 April): 23–24.
Degen, Ion. 1997. Immanuil Velikovskii: Rasskaz o zamechatel’nom cheloveke. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks.
De Grazia, Alfred, et al. 1966. The Velikovsky Affair: The Warfare of Science and Scientism. New Hyde Park, NY: University Books.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1946. “Lysenko’s ‘Genetics’.” Journal of Heredity 37: 5–9.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1949a. “Marxist Biology, French Style.” Journal of Heredity 40: 78–79.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1949b. “The Suppression of a Science.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5(May): 144–146.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1952a. “Lysenko’s ‘Michurinist’ Genetics.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 8(February): 40–44.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1952b. “Two Recent Versions of Eugenics.” American Naturalist 86(January–February): 61–62.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1953. “Lysenko Progresses Backward.” Journal of Heredity 44: 20–22.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1955. “The Crisis of Soviet Biology.” Ernest J Simmons (ed.), Continuity and Change in Russian and Soviet Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 329–346.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1956. The Biological Basis of Human Freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1958. “Lysenko at Bay.” Journal of Heredity 49: 15–17.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1962–1965. Reminiscences. Oral History Research Office, Butler Library, Columbia University, New York City, New York.
Dobzhansky, Theodosius. 1964. Heredity and the Nature of Man. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Dunn, L.C. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Science 103(8): 180–181.
Dunn, L.C. and Dobzhansky, Th. 1946. Heredity Race, and Society. New York: Penguin Books.
Dunn, L.C. and Dobzhansky, Th. 1952. Heredity, Race and Society, rev. ed. New York: Mentor.
Ellenberger, Leroy. 1979. “A Point of View: The Cold War, McCarthy and Velikovsky.” S.I.S. Workshop 1(5): 5–6.
Gaisinovich, A.E. 1988. Zarozhdenie i razvitie genetiki. Moscow: Nauka.
Gardner, Martin. 1950. “The Hermit Scientist.” Antioch Review 10(4): 447–457.
Geison, Gerald L. 1995. The Private Science of Louis Pasteur. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Gieryn, Thomas F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glass, Bentley. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Quarterly Review of Biology 21: 279.
Goldschmidt, Richard B. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Physiological Zoology 19: 332–334.
Goldschmidt, Richard B. 1949. “Research and Politics.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5(May): 150–155.
Gordon, Theodore J. 1966. Ideas in Conflict. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Gormley, Melinda. 2006. Geneticist L. C. Dunn: Politics, Activism, and Community. Ph.D. Dissertation, Oregon State University.
Graham, Loren R. 1987. Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union. New York: Columbia University Press.
Haldane, J.B.S. 1950. “St. Quetzalcoatl and St. Fenris.” New Statesman and Nation 1(11 November): 432–433.
Harman, Oren Solomon. 2003. “C. D. Darlington and the British and American Reaction to Lysenko and the Soviet Conception of Science.” Journal of the History of Biology 35: 309–352.
Herget, Paul. 1950. “It is Just as Barnum Said.” Cincinnati Enquirer (1 April): 7.
Hudson, P.S. and Richens, R.H. 1946. The New Genetics in the Soviet Union. Cambridge: Imperial Bureau of Plant Breeding and Genetics.
Joravsky, David. 1970. The Lysenko Affair. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kaftanov, S. 1949. “In Support of Michurin’s Biological Theory in Higher Institutions of Learning.” Science 109(28 January): 90–92.
Kolchinskii, E.I. 2007. Biologiia Germanii i Rossii-SSSR v usloviiakh sotsial’no-politi- cheskikh krizisov pervoi poloviny XX veka (mezhdu liberalizmom, kommunizmom i natsional-sotsializmom). St. Petersburg: Nestor-Istoriia.
Krementsov, Nikolai. 1996. “A “Second Front” in Soviet Genetics: The International Dimension of the Lysenko Controversy.” Journal of the History of Biology 29: 229–250.
Krementsov, Nikolai. 1997. Stalinist Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Laptev, I. 1947. “Antipatrioticheskie postupki pod flagom ‘nauchnoi’ kritiki.” Pravda 230(10621): 2.
Larrabee, Eric. 1950. “The Day the Sun Stood Still.” Harper’s Magazine (January): 19–26.
Lash, Joseph P. 1949. “Russian Science and Heresy.” New Republic (3 January): 11–13.
Laudan, Larry. 2009 [1983]. “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem.” Robert T. Pennock and Michael Ruse (eds.), But Is It Science?: The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy, updated edition. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, pp. 312–330.
Lysenko, T.D. 1946. Heredity and Its Variability, trans. Theodosius Dobzhansky. New York: King’s Crown Press.
Lysenko, T.D. 1951a. Heredity and Its Variability. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
Lysenko, T.D. 1951b. New Developments in the Science of Biological Species. Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House.
McAulay, Robert E. 1975. Substantive and Ideological Aspects of Science: An Analysis of the Velikovsky Controversy. M.A. Thesis, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Medvedev, Zhores A. 1987. Soviet Agriculture. New York: W. W. Norton.
Medvedev, Zhores A. 1969. The Rise and Fall of T. D. Lysenko, trans. I. Michael Lerner. New York: Columbia University Press.
Paul, Diane B. 1983. “A War on Two Fronts: J.B.S. Haldane and the Response to Lysenkoism in Britain.” Journal of the History of Biology 16: 1–37.
Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia. 1950a. “Worlds in Collision.” Popular Astronomy 58(6): 278–286.
Payne-Gaposchkin, Cecilia. 1950b. “Nonsense, Dr. Velikovsky!” The Reporter 2(6): 37–40.
Pigliucci, Massimo. 2010. Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Polanyi, Michael. 1967. “The Growth of Science in Society.” Minerva 5: 533–545.
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1985a. “A New Perspective on Lysenko?” Annals of Science 42: 261–278.
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1985b. “Genetics Under Stalin.” Science 227: 1329.
Roll-Hansen, Nils. 1989. “The Practice Criterion and the Rise of Lysenkoism.” Science Studies 1: 3–16.
Sax, Karl. 1944. “Soviet Biology.” Science 99: 298–299.
Schrecker, Ellen. 1998. Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sharon, Ruth Velikovsky. 1995. Aba: The Glory and the Torment: The Life of Dr. Immanuel Velikovsky. Dubuque, IA: Times Mirror Higher Education Group.
Simpson, Robert. 1946. Science, Totalitarian Model. Saturday Review of Literature (9 March): 28–32.
Soyfer, Valery. 1994. Lysenko and the Tragedy of Soviet Science, trans. Leo Gruliow and Rebecca Gruliow. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Stern, Curt. 1946. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” American Naturalist 80: 241–243.
Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1950. Worlds in Collision. New York: Macmillan.
Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1951. “Answer to My Critics.” Harper’s Magazine 202 (June): 51–57.
Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1955. Earth in Upheaval. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Velikovsky, Immanuel. 1982. Mankind in Amnesia. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Voorhees, Duane Leroy. 1990. The “Jewish Science” of Immanuel Velikovsky: Culture and Biography as Ideational Determinants. Ph.D. Dissertation, Bowling Green State University.
Wang, Jessica. 1999. American Science in an Age of Anxiety: Scientists, Anticommunism, and the Cold War. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Zhebrak, Anton. 1945. “Soviet Biology.” Science 102(5 October): 357–358.
Zirkle, Conway. 1947. “Review of Lysenko’s Heredity and Its Variability.” Isis 37: 108.
Zirkle, Conway. 1949. Death of a Science in Russia: The Fate of Genetics as Described in Pravda and Elsewhere. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Zirkle, Conway. 1959. Evolution, Marxian Biology, and the Social Scene. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gordin, M.D. How Lysenkoism Became Pseudoscience: Dobzhansky to Velikovsky. J Hist Biol 45, 443–468 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9287-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-011-9287-3