Volume 908, Issue 1 p. 244-254

Inflamm-aging: An Evolutionary Perspective on Immunosenescence

CLAUDIO FRANCESCHI

Corresponding Author

CLAUDIO FRANCESCHI

Department of Experimental Pathology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Department of Gerontological Research, Italian National Research Center on Aging (INRCA), Ancona, Italy

Address for correspondence: Claudio Franceschi, Department of Experimental Pathology, University of Bologna, Via s. Giacomo 12, 40126 Bologna, Italy. Phone: 0039 051 209 4730 or 0039 051 209 4747. [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
MASSIMILIANO BONAFÈ

MASSIMILIANO BONAFÈ

Department of Experimental Pathology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
SILVANA VALENSIN

SILVANA VALENSIN

Department of Experimental Pathology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
FABIOLA OLIVIERI

FABIOLA OLIVIERI

Department of Gerontological Research, Italian National Research Center on Aging (INRCA), Ancona, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
MARIA DE LUCA

MARIA DE LUCA

Department of Cell Biology, University of Calabria, Calabria, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
ENZO OTTAVIANI

ENZO OTTAVIANI

Department of Animal Biology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
GIOVANNA DE BENEDICTIS

GIOVANNA DE BENEDICTIS

Department of Cell Biology, University of Calabria, Calabria, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 January 2006
Citations: 3,446

Abstract

Abstract: In this paper we extend the “network theory of aging,” and we argue that a global reduction in the capacity to cope with a variety of stressors and a concomitant progressive increase in proinflammatory status are major characteristics of the aging process. This phenomenon, which we will refer to as “inflamm-aging,” is provoked by a continuous antigenic load and stress. On the basis of evolutionary studies, we also argue that the immune and the stress responses are equivalent and that antigens are nothing other than particular types of stressors. We also propose to return macrophage to its rightful place as central actor not only in the inflammatory response and immunity, but also in the stress response. The rate of reaching the threshold of proinflammatory status over which diseases/disabilities ensue and the individual capacity to cope with and adapt to stressors are assumed to be complex traits with a genetic component. Finally, we argue that the persistence of inflammatory stimuli over time represents the biologic background (first hit) favoring the susceptibility to age-related diseases/disabilities. A second hit (absence of robust gene variants and/or presence of frail gene variants) is likely necessary to develop overt organ-specific age-related diseases having an inflammatory pathogenesis, such as atherosclerosis, Alzheimer's disease, osteoporosis, and diabetes. Following this perspective, several paradoxes of healthy centenarians (increase of plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines, acute phase proteins, and coagulation factors) are illustrated and explained. In conclusion, the beneficial effects of inflammation devoted to the neutralization of dangerous/harmful agents early in life and in adulthood become detrimental late in life in a period largely not foreseen by evolution, according to the antagonistic pleiotropy theory of aging.