Volume 30, Issue 2 p. 277-295
Research Article

When Sadness Comes Alive, Will It Be Less Painful? The Effects of Anthropomorphic Thinking on Sadness Regulation and Consumption

Fangyuan Chen

Fangyuan Chen

Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Search for more papers by this author
Rocky Peng Chen

Rocky Peng Chen

Hong Kong Baptist University

Search for more papers by this author
Li Yang

Corresponding Author

Li Yang

The University of Texas at Austin

Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Li Yang, McCombs School of Business, University of Texas at Austin, 2110 Speedway, Austin, TX 78712, USA. Electronic mail may be sent to [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 September 2019
Citations: 16
The three authors contributed equally and share the first authorship. The author order is alphabetical.Inquires can be sent to anyone of the three authors. The authors thank the editor, associate editor, and three anonymous reviewers for their excellent guidance throughout the review process. In addition, the authors thank Bob Wyer and Gerry Gorn for their valuable comments on the early version of this manuscript. Financial support to the first author from the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (Project ID P0000497 and P0008682) and to the second author from the Hong Kong Baptist University (FRG2/17-18/083) is gratefully acknowledged.
Accepted by S. Christian Wheeler, Editor; Associate Editor, Derek Rucker

Abstract

Prior consumer research has studied the impact of anthropomorphism on product perception and evaluation. This research explores how anthropomorphic thinking influences people's experience of emotions and subsequent consumption behavior. Based on research on emotion regulation and the psychological process of detachment, we show that individuals instructed to anthropomorphize sadness (i.e., think of sadness as a person) report less experienced sadness afterward (Studies 1 and 2A). The same result is observed for its opposite, happiness, such that anthropomorphic thinking dilutes happiness (Study 2B). We argue that this reduction of emotion occurs because anthropomorphic thinking increases the perceived distance between the self and the anthropomorphized emotion, thereby creating a feeling of detachment. Evidence for a detachment process is found via measurement (Studies 3 and 4) and a theory-guided moderation, with the effect lessening when sadness is seen as a dependent (vs. independent) person (Study 3). These findings have implications for consumer behavior. When sadness is ameliorated by anthropomorphic thinking, people tend to display better self-control in subsequent consumption, as manifested by a greater likelihood of choosing a healthier or more practical product (Studies 4 and 5).