Abstract
To combat the spread of the COVID-19 virus, countries enforced quarantines, physical and social restrictions on people. These restrictions left many feeling isolated and lonely due to prolonged quarantines and lockdowns. This raises questions about using robots as social support to alleviate these symptoms, while still complying with restrictions and regulations. Since acceptance of social robots as companions has traditionally been low, an event like COVID-19 could change acceptance of robots as social companions as loneliness can influence the likelihood of anthropomorphizing nonhuman agents. Here, we aimed to see if loneliness, due to COVID-19 restrictions, influence the Uncanny Valley pattern that prior work has shown. As such, participants saw robot images that varied in physical human-likeness and were asked to evaluate them regarding trustworthiness, mind perception and likability. The measurements were obtained once before COVID-19 (in 2016) and once at the peak of the pandemic in September 2020. Results show that ratings of mind perception and likability were significantly impacted by the pandemic, with less pronounced UV patterns for those who experienced the COVID-19 pandemic. However, no differences in the UV pattern was observed on trust. Post-hoc analyses also illustrated that people were more likely to judge machinelike robots negatively, which could be due to increased loneliness/anxiety. These data suggest that loneliness attenuates UV patterns that are observed in “Uncanny” robots and that people have more favorable attitudes towards humanlike robots when feeling lonely, which provides important considerations for the use of humanlike robots as social companions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ellis, K., Kao, K.-T., Pitman, T.: The pandemic preferred user. Fast Capital. 17(2) (September 2020)
Bartoszek, A., Walkowiak, D., Bartoszek, A., Kardas, G.: Mental well-being (depression, loneliness, insomnia, daily life fatigue) during COVID-19 related home-confinement—a study from Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17(20), 7417 (January 2020), Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
Brooks, S.K., et al.: The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 395(10227), 912–920 (2020)
Groarke, J.M., Berry, E., Graham-Wisener, L., McKenna-Plumley, P.E., McGlinchey, E., Armour, C.: Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 psychological wellbeing study. PLoS One. 15(9), e0239698 (September 2020). Publisher: Public Library of Science
Matias, T., Dominski, F.H., Marks, D.F.: Human needs in COVID-19 isolation. J. Health Psychol. 25(7), 871–882 (June 2020). Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd
Saltzman, L.Y., Hansel, T.C., Bordnick, P.S.: Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health. Psychol. Trauma Theor. Res. Pract. Policy. 12(S1), S55–S57 (2020). Place: US Publisher: Educational Publishing Foundation
Odekerken-Schröder, G., Mele, C., Russo-Spena, T., Mahr, D., Ruggiero, A.: Mitigating loneliness with companion robots in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: an integrative framework and research agenda. J. Serv. Manage. 31(6), 1149–1162 (January 2020). Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited
Murphy, R.R., Gandudi, V.B.M., Adams, J.: Applications of robots for COVID-19 response. (August 2020)
Aymerich-Franch, L., Ferrer, I.: The implementation of social robots during the COVID-19 pandemic. arXiv:2007.03941 [cs] (January 2021)
Wada, K., Shibata, T.: Living with seal robots—its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the older at a care house. IEEE Trans. Robot. 23(5), 972–980 (October 2007). Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Robotics
Tamura, T., et al.: Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of older people with severe dementia? J. Gerontol. Ser. A 59(1), M83–M85 (2004)
Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Tanie, K.: Effects of robot-assisted activity for older people and nurses at a day service center. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92(11), pp. 1780–1788 (November 2004). Conference Name: Proceedings of the IEEE
Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., Ghanbarzadeh, A., Moghadam, L.J., Ghanbarzadeh, A.: Impact of a social humanoid robot as a therapy assistant in children cancer treatment. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) Social Robotics, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 11–22. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014)
Libin, A., Libin, E.: Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists’ point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92(11), pp. 1789–1803 (November 2004). Conference Name: Proceedings of the IEEE
Tapus, A., Ţăpuş, C., Matarić, M.J.: User—robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intel. Serv. Robotics. 1(2), 169 (February 2008)
Wiese, E., Metta, G., Wykowska, A.: Robots as intentional agents: using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Front. Psychol. 8 (October 2017)
Frith, C.D., Frith, U.: The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4), 531–534 (2006)
Gray, H.M., Gray, K., Wegner, D.M.: Dimensions of mind perception. Science. 315(5812), 619 (February 2007). Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Zwickel, J., Müller, H.J.: I see what you mean: how attentional selection is shaped by ascribing intentions to others. PLoS One. 7(9), e45391 (September 2012)
Looser, C.E., Wheatley, T.: The tipping point of animacy: how, when, and where we perceive life in a face. Psychol. Sci. 21(12), 1854–1862 (2010)
Abubshait, A., Momen, A., Wiese, E.: Pre-exposure to ambiguous faces modulates top-down control of attentional orienting to counterpredictive gaze cues. Front. Psychol. 11(2234) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02234
Wiese, E., Buzzell, G.A., Abubshait, A., Beatty, P.J.: Seeing minds in others: mind perception modulates low-level social-cognitive performance and relates to ventromedial prefrontal structures. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 18(5), 837–856 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0608-2
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114(4), 864–886 (2007)
Martini, M.C., Gonzalez, C.A., Wiese, E.: Seeing minds in others - can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PLoS ONE 11(1), 1–23 (2016)
Mathur, M.B., Reichling, D.B.: Navigating a social world with robot partners: a quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley. Cognition. 146, 22–32 (2016). Publisher: Elsevier B.V
Pak, R., Fink, N., Price, M., Bass, B., Sturre, L.: Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults. Ergonomics 55(9), 1059–1072 (2012)
Lusk, M., Atkinson, R.: Animated pedagogical agents: does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples?. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 21(December 2006), 747–764 (2007)
Roesler, E., Manzey, D., Onnasch, L.: A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Sci. Robot. 6(58), eabj5425 (September 2021). Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science
Wiese, E., Mandell, A., Shaw, T., Smith, M.: Implicit mind perception alters vigilance performance because of cognitive conflict processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 25(1), 25–40 (2019)
Weis, P., Wiese, E.: Cognitive Conflict as Possible Origin of the Uncanny Valley. (October 2017)
Mori, M.: The uncanny valley: The original essay by masahiro mori, pp. 33–35 (1970)
Kätsyri, J., Förger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., Takala, T.: A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Front. Psychol. 6(MAR), 1–16 (2015)
Gray, K., Wegner, D.M.: Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125(1), 125–130 (2012)
Abubshait, A., Momen, A., Wiese, E.: Seeing human: do individual differences modulate the Uncanny Valley? Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 61(1), 870–874 (2017)
Cheetham, M., Suter, P., Jancke, L.: Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the Uncanny Valley: more like a ‘Happy Valley’. Front. Psychol. 5(OCT), 1–15 (2014)
Thompson, J.C., Trafton, J.G., McKnight, P.: The perception of humanness from the movements of synthetic agents. Perception 40(6), 695–704 (2011)
MacDorman, K.F., Entezari, S.O.: Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interact. Stud. 16(2), 141–172 (2015)
Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., Cacioppo, J.T.: When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Soc. Cogn. 26(2), 143–155 (2008)
Eyssel, F., Reich, N.: Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots) — on the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 121–122 (March 2013)
Bartz, J.A., Tchalova, K., Fenerci, C.: Reminders of social connection can attenuate anthropomorphism: a replication and extension of Epley, Akalis, Waytz, and Cacioppo (2008). Psychol. Sci. 27(12), 1644–1650 (December 2016). Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc
Hackel, L.M., Looser, C.E., Van Bavel, J.J.: Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: the role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, 15–23 (2015)
Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., Cutrona, C.E.: The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39(3), 472–480 (1980). Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association
Russell, D.W.: UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J. Personal. Assess. 66(1), 20–40 (February 1996). Publisher: Routledgr
MacDorman, K.F., Entezari, S.O.: Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interact. Stud. 16(2), 141–172 (January 2015). Publisher: John Benjamins
de Melo, C.M., Gratch, J., Krueger, F.: Heuristic thinking and altruism toward machines in people impacted by COVID-19. iScience. 24(3), 102228 (March 2021)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abubshait, A., Xie, Y., Lin, JK., Toma, M., Wiese, E. (2022). Loneliness During COVID-19 Influences Mind and Likeability Ratings in the Uncanny Valley. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24669-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24670-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)