Skip to main content

Loneliness During COVID-19 Influences Mind and Likeability Ratings in the Uncanny Valley

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Robotics (ICSR 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 13818))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

To combat the spread of the COVID-19 virus, countries enforced quarantines, physical and social restrictions on people. These restrictions left many feeling isolated and lonely due to prolonged quarantines and lockdowns. This raises questions about using robots as social support to alleviate these symptoms, while still complying with restrictions and regulations. Since acceptance of social robots as companions has traditionally been low, an event like COVID-19 could change acceptance of robots as social companions as loneliness can influence the likelihood of anthropomorphizing nonhuman agents. Here, we aimed to see if loneliness, due to COVID-19 restrictions, influence the Uncanny Valley pattern that prior work has shown. As such, participants saw robot images that varied in physical human-likeness and were asked to evaluate them regarding trustworthiness, mind perception and likability. The measurements were obtained once before COVID-19 (in 2016) and once at the peak of the pandemic in September 2020. Results show that ratings of mind perception and likability were significantly impacted by the pandemic, with less pronounced UV patterns for those who experienced the COVID-19 pandemic. However, no differences in the UV pattern was observed on trust. Post-hoc analyses also illustrated that people were more likely to judge machinelike robots negatively, which could be due to increased loneliness/anxiety. These data suggest that loneliness attenuates UV patterns that are observed in “Uncanny” robots and that people have more favorable attitudes towards humanlike robots when feeling lonely, which provides important considerations for the use of humanlike robots as social companions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ellis, K., Kao, K.-T., Pitman, T.: The pandemic preferred user. Fast Capital. 17(2) (September 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartoszek, A., Walkowiak, D., Bartoszek, A., Kardas, G.: Mental well-being (depression, loneliness, insomnia, daily life fatigue) during COVID-19 related home-confinement—a study from Poland. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17(20), 7417 (January 2020), Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, S.K., et al.: The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: rapid review of the evidence. Lancet 395(10227), 912–920 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Groarke, J.M., Berry, E., Graham-Wisener, L., McKenna-Plumley, P.E., McGlinchey, E., Armour, C.: Loneliness in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional results from the COVID-19 psychological wellbeing study. PLoS One. 15(9), e0239698 (September 2020). Publisher: Public Library of Science

    Google Scholar 

  5. Matias, T., Dominski, F.H., Marks, D.F.: Human needs in COVID-19 isolation. J. Health Psychol. 25(7), 871–882 (June 2020). Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  6. Saltzman, L.Y., Hansel, T.C., Bordnick, P.S.: Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health. Psychol. Trauma Theor. Res. Pract. Policy. 12(S1), S55–S57 (2020). Place: US Publisher: Educational Publishing Foundation

    Google Scholar 

  7. Odekerken-Schröder, G., Mele, C., Russo-Spena, T., Mahr, D., Ruggiero, A.: Mitigating loneliness with companion robots in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: an integrative framework and research agenda. J. Serv. Manage. 31(6), 1149–1162 (January 2020). Publisher: Emerald Publishing Limited

    Google Scholar 

  8. Murphy, R.R., Gandudi, V.B.M., Adams, J.: Applications of robots for COVID-19 response. (August 2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aymerich-Franch, L., Ferrer, I.: The implementation of social robots during the COVID-19 pandemic. arXiv:2007.03941 [cs] (January 2021)

  10. Wada, K., Shibata, T.: Living with seal robots—its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the older at a care house. IEEE Trans. Robot. 23(5), 972–980 (October 2007). Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Robotics

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tamura, T., et al.: Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of older people with severe dementia? J. Gerontol. Ser. A 59(1), M83–M85 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wada, K., Shibata, T., Saito, T., Tanie, K.: Effects of robot-assisted activity for older people and nurses at a day service center. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92(11), pp. 1780–1788 (November 2004). Conference Name: Proceedings of the IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  13. Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., Ghanbarzadeh, A., Moghadam, L.J., Ghanbarzadeh, A.: Impact of a social humanoid robot as a therapy assistant in children cancer treatment. In: Beetz, M., Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) Social Robotics, ser. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 11–22. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Libin, A., Libin, E.: Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists’ point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 92(11), pp. 1789–1803 (November 2004). Conference Name: Proceedings of the IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tapus, A., Ţăpuş, C., Matarić, M.J.: User—robot personality matching and assistive robot behavior adaptation for post-stroke rehabilitation therapy. Intel. Serv. Robotics. 1(2), 169 (February 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wiese, E., Metta, G., Wykowska, A.: Robots as intentional agents: using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Front. Psychol. 8 (October 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Frith, C.D., Frith, U.: The neural basis of mentalizing. Neuron 50(4), 531–534 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gray, H.M., Gray, K., Wegner, D.M.: Dimensions of mind perception. Science. 315(5812), 619 (February 2007). Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wiese, E., Wykowska, A., Zwickel, J., Müller, H.J.: I see what you mean: how attentional selection is shaped by ascribing intentions to others. PLoS One. 7(9), e45391 (September 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Looser, C.E., Wheatley, T.: The tipping point of animacy: how, when, and where we perceive life in a face. Psychol. Sci. 21(12), 1854–1862 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abubshait, A., Momen, A., Wiese, E.: Pre-exposure to ambiguous faces modulates top-down control of attentional orienting to counterpredictive gaze cues. Front. Psychol. 11(2234) (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02234

  22. Wiese, E., Buzzell, G.A., Abubshait, A., Beatty, P.J.: Seeing minds in others: mind perception modulates low-level social-cognitive performance and relates to ventromedial prefrontal structures. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 18(5), 837–856 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0608-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 114(4), 864–886 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Martini, M.C., Gonzalez, C.A., Wiese, E.: Seeing minds in others - can agents with robotic appearance have human-like preferences? PLoS ONE 11(1), 1–23 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mathur, M.B., Reichling, D.B.: Navigating a social world with robot partners: a quantitative cartography of the Uncanny Valley. Cognition. 146, 22–32 (2016). Publisher: Elsevier B.V

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pak, R., Fink, N., Price, M., Bass, B., Sturre, L.: Decision support aids with anthropomorphic characteristics influence trust and performance in younger and older adults. Ergonomics 55(9), 1059–1072 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lusk, M., Atkinson, R.: Animated pedagogical agents: does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples?. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 21(December 2006), 747–764 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Roesler, E., Manzey, D., Onnasch, L.: A meta-analysis on the effectiveness of anthropomorphism in human-robot interaction. Sci. Robot. 6(58), eabj5425 (September 2021). Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wiese, E., Mandell, A., Shaw, T., Smith, M.: Implicit mind perception alters vigilance performance because of cognitive conflict processing. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 25(1), 25–40 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Weis, P., Wiese, E.: Cognitive Conflict as Possible Origin of the Uncanny Valley. (October 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mori, M.: The uncanny valley: The original essay by masahiro mori, pp. 33–35 (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kätsyri, J., Förger, K., Mäkäräinen, M., Takala, T.: A review of empirical evidence on different uncanny valley hypotheses: support for perceptual mismatch as one road to the valley of eeriness. Front. Psychol. 6(MAR), 1–16 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gray, K., Wegner, D.M.: Feeling robots and human zombies: mind perception and the uncanny valley. Cognition 125(1), 125–130 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Abubshait, A., Momen, A., Wiese, E.: Seeing human: do individual differences modulate the Uncanny Valley? Proc. Hum. Fact. Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 61(1), 870–874 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Cheetham, M., Suter, P., Jancke, L.: Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the Uncanny Valley: more like a ‘Happy Valley’. Front. Psychol. 5(OCT), 1–15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Thompson, J.C., Trafton, J.G., McKnight, P.: The perception of humanness from the movements of synthetic agents. Perception 40(6), 695–704 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. MacDorman, K.F., Entezari, S.O.: Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interact. Stud. 16(2), 141–172 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Akalis, S., Cacioppo, J.T.: When we need a human: motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Soc. Cogn. 26(2), 143–155 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Eyssel, F., Reich, N.: Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots) — on the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: 2013 8th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 121–122 (March 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Bartz, J.A., Tchalova, K., Fenerci, C.: Reminders of social connection can attenuate anthropomorphism: a replication and extension of Epley, Akalis, Waytz, and Cacioppo (2008). Psychol. Sci. 27(12), 1644–1650 (December 2016). Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hackel, L.M., Looser, C.E., Van Bavel, J.J.: Group membership alters the threshold for mind perception: the role of social identity, collective identification, and intergroup threat. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 52, 15–23 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Russell, D., Peplau, L.A., Cutrona, C.E.: The revised UCLA loneliness scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 39(3), 472–480 (1980). Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association

    Google Scholar 

  43. Russell, D.W.: UCLA loneliness scale (version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. J. Personal. Assess. 66(1), 20–40 (February 1996). Publisher: Routledgr

    Google Scholar 

  44. MacDorman, K.F., Entezari, S.O.: Individual differences predict sensitivity to the uncanny valley. Interact. Stud. 16(2), 141–172 (January 2015). Publisher: John Benjamins

    Google Scholar 

  45. de Melo, C.M., Gratch, J., Krueger, F.: Heuristic thinking and altruism toward machines in people impacted by COVID-19. iScience. 24(3), 102228 (March 2021)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulaziz Abubshait .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Abubshait, A., Xie, Y., Lin, JK., Toma, M., Wiese, E. (2022). Loneliness During COVID-19 Influences Mind and Likeability Ratings in the Uncanny Valley. In: Cavallo, F., et al. Social Robotics. ICSR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 13818. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24670-8_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-24669-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-24670-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics