Threatened humanity in a tight world: Cultural tightness results in self-objectification
Abstract
Self-objectification can be considered as a specific kind of self-dehumanization that consists of a perception of oneself as more instrument-like than human-like and a decreased self-attribution of mental states. Self-objectification is commonly observed, and its contributing factors need to be better understood. In the present research, we examined whether cultural tightness, which entails strong social norms and punishments for deviant behaviors, is an antecedent to self-objectification. Our hypotheses were confirmed by four studies, involving quasi-experiments and fully controlled experiments (N = 2,693). In particular, Chinese college students living in a region with a tight culture (compared to a loose culture, Study 1), American employees working in an industry with a tight corporate culture (compared to a loose culture, Study 2), American participants who were induced to support cultural tightness (vs. cultural looseness, Study 3), and those who were situated in a simulated tight culture (vs. a loose culture, Study 4) all showed increased levels of self-objectification. As such, they acknowledged their personhood less and focused more on their instrumentality. Implications are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
Adler N. E., Epel E. S., Castellazzo G., Ickovics J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: Preliminary data in healthy, White women. Health Psychology, 19, 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.6.586
Baldissarri C., Andrighetto L., Gabbiadini A., Volpato C. (2017). Work and freedom? Working self-objectification and belief in personal free will. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 250–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12172
Baldissarri C., Andrighetto L., Volpato C. (2021). The longstanding view of workers as objects: Antecedents and consequences of working objectification. European Review of Social Psychology, 33, 81–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1956778
Bastian B., Jetten J., Chen H., Radke H. R., Harding J. F., Fasoli F. (2013). Losing our humanity: The self-dehumanizing consequences of social ostracism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39, 156–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212471205
Baumeister R. F., Monroe A. E. (2014). Recent research on free will: Conceptualizations, beliefs, and processes. In Olson J. M., Zanna M. P. (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 50, pp. 1–52). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1037/e308482004-009
Bem D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In Berkowitz L. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 6, pp. 1–62). Academic Press.
Berry J. W. (1967). Independence and conformity in subsistence-level societies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 415–418. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025231
Boldt E. D. (1978). Structural tightness and cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 9, 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/002202217892003
Bostyn D. H., Roets A., van Hiel A. (2016). Right-wing attitudes and moral cognition: Are right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation related to utilitarian judgment? Personality and Individual Differences, 96, 164–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.03.006
Calogero R. M., Jost J. T. (2011). Self-subjugation among women: Exposure to sexist ideology, self-objectification, and the protective function of the need to avoid closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021864
Calogero R. M., Tantleff-Dunn S. E., Thompson J. (2011). Self-objectification in women: Causes, consequences, and counteractions. American Psychological Association.
Carpenter S. (2000). Effects of cultural tightness and collectivism on self-concept and causal attributions. Cross-Cultural Research, 34, 38–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939710003400103
Chen H., Wang X., Zang H., Guinote A. (2021). Being a tough person in a tight world: Cultural tightness leads to a desire for muscularity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 96, Article 104183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2021.104183
Cheng L., Li Z., Hao M., Zhu X., Wang F. (2021). Objectification limits authenticity: Exploring the relations between objectification, perceived authenticity, and subjective well-being. British Journal of Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12500
Chua R. Y., Huang K. G., Jin M. (2019). Mapping cultural tightness and its links to innovation, urbanization, and happiness across 31 provinces in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 116, 6720–6725. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1815723116
Cuddy A. J., Fiske S. T., Kwan V. S., Glick P., Demoulin S., Leyens J.-P., Bond M. H., Croizet J.-C., Ellemers N., Sleebos E., Htun T. T., Kim H.-J., Maio G., Perry J., Petkova K., Todorov V., Rodríguez-Bailón R., Morales E., Moya M., . . . Ziegler R. (2009). Stereotype content model across cultures: Towards universal similarities and some differences. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466608x314935
Dong D., Chen Z., Zong M., Zhang P., Gu W., Feng Y., Qiao Z. (2021). What protects us against the COVID-19 threat? Cultural tightness matters. BMC Public Health, 21, Article 2139. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12161-1
Dufner M., Gebauer J. E., Sedikides C., Denissen J. J. (2019). Self-enhancement and psychological adjustment: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 23, 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868318756467
Dvir M., Kelly J. R., Tyler J. M., Williams K. D. (2020). I’m up here! Sexual objectification leads to feeling ostracized. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000328
Eagly A. H. (2003). Few women at the top: How role incongruity produces prejudice and the glass ceiling. In van Knippenberg D., Hogg M. A. (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 79–93). SAGE.
Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G., Buchner A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146
Ferguson C. J. (2018). The devil wears stata: Thin-ideal media’s minimal contribution to our understanding of body dissatisfaction and eating disorders. Archives of Scientific Psychology, 6, 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/arc0000044
Festinger L. (1962). Cognitive dissonance. Scientific American, 207, 93–107.
Fowers B. J. (2010). Instrumentalism and psychology: Beyond using and being used. Theory & Psychology, 20, 102–124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959354309346080
Fredrickson B. L., Roberts T. A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 173–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
Fredrickson B. L., Roberts T. A., Noll S. M., Quinn D. M., Twenge J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex differences in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269
Gelfand M. J., Harrington J. R., Jackson J. C. (2017). The strength of social norms across human groups. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 800–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708631
Gelfand M. J., Jackson J. C. (2016). From one mind to many: The emerging science of cultural norms. Current Opinion in Psychology, 8, 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.11.002
Gelfand M. J., Jackson J. C., Pan X., Nau D., Pieper D., Denison E., Dagher M., van Lange P. A. M., Chiu C.-Y., Wang M. (2021). The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: A global analysis. The Lancet Planetary Health, 5, E135–E144. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6
Gelfand M. J., Nishii L. H., Raver J. L. (2006). On the nature and importance of cultural tightness–looseness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1225–1244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1225
Gelfand M. J., Raver J. L., Nishii L., Leslie L. A., Lun J., Lim B. C., Duan L., Almaliach A., Ang S., Arnadottir J., Aycan Z., Boehnke K., Boski P., Cabecinhas R., Chan D., Chhokar J., D’Amato A., Ferrer M., Fischlmayr I. C., . . . Yamaguchi S. (2011). Differences between tight and loose cultures: A 33-nation study. Science, 332, 1100–1104. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1197754
Gelfand M. J., Roos P., Nau D., Harrington J., Mu Y., Jackson J. (2016). Societal threat as a moderator of cultural group selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 39, e38. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x15000114
Gergen K. J. (2011). The self as social construction. Psychological Studies, 56, 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-011-0066-1
Gervais S. J., Vescio T. K., Allen J. (2011). When what you see is what you get: The consequences of the objectifying gaze for women and men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310386121
Gharawi M. A., Pardo T. A., Guerrero S. (2009). Issues and strategies for conducting cross-national e-government comparative research. In Janowski T., Davies J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 163–170). ACM.
Gruenfeld D. H., Inesi M. E., Magee J. C., Galinsky A. D. (2008). Power and the objectification of social targets. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.1.111
Guinote A. (2017). How power affects people: Activating, wanting, and goal seeking. Annual Review of Psychology, 68, 353–381. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044153
Gwinn J. D., Judd C. M., Park B. (2013). Less power = less human? Effects of power differentials on dehumanization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 464–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.01.005
Harrington J. R., Gelfand M. J. (2014). Tightness–looseness across the 50 united states. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 111, 7990–7995. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317937111
Heflick N. A., Goldenberg J. L. (2009). Objectifying Sarah Palin: Evidence that objectification causes women to be perceived as less competent and less fully human. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008
Holland E., Haslam N. (2013). Worth the weight: The objectification of overweight versus thin targets. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.02.008
Inesi M. E., Lee S. Y., Rios K. (2014). Objects of desire: Subordinate ingratiation triggers self-objectification among powerful. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.010
Jackson J. C., Caluori N., Abrams S., Beckman E., Gelfand M. J., Gray K. (2021). Tight cultures and vengeful gods: How culture shapes religious belief. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150, 2057–2077. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001033
Jackson J. C., Gelfand M., De S., Fox A. (2019). The loosening of American culture over 200 years is associated with a creativity–order trade-off. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0516-z
Jackson J. C., Gelfand M. J., Ember C. R. (2020). The cultural evolutionary trade-off of ritualistic synchrony. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 287. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1036
Jackson J. C., van Egmond M., Choi V. K., Ember C. R., Halberstadt J., Balanovic J., Basker I. N., Boehnke K., Buki N., Fischer R., Fulop M., Fulmer A., Homan A. C., van Kleef G. A., Kreemers L., Schei V., Szabo E., Ward C., Gelfand M. J. (2019). Ecological and cultural factors underlying the global distribution of prejudice. PLoS One, 14, Article e0221953. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221953
Jetten J., Hornsey M. (2014). Deviance and dissent in groups. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 461–485. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115151
Kaasa A., Vadi M., Varblane U. (2014). Regional cultural differences within European countries: Evidence from multi-country surveys. Management International Review, 54, 825–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-014-0223-6
Kasser T., Ryan R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: Correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.410
Kitayama S., Markus H. R., Matsumoto H., Norasakkunkit V. (1997). Individual and collective processes in the construction of the self: Self-enhancement in the United States and self-criticism in Japan. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1245–1267. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.72.6.1245
Kouchaki M., Dobson K. S., Waytz A., Kteily N. S. (2018). The link between self-dehumanization and immoral behavior. Psychological Science, 29, 1234–1246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760784
LaCroix J. M., Pratto F. (2015). Instrumentality and the denial of personhood: The social psychology of objectifying others. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale, 28, 183–211. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-30812-008
Leung A. K. Y., Cohen D. (2011). Within- and between-culture variation: Individual differences and the cultural logics of honor, face, and dignity cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 507–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022151
Loughnan S., Kuppens P., Allik J., Balazs K., de Lemus S., Dumont K., Gargurevich R., Hidegkuti I., Leidner B., Matos L., Park J., Realo A., Shi J., Sojo V. E., Tong Y.-y., Vaes J., Verduyn P., Yeung V., Haslam N. (2011). Economic inequality is linked to biased self-perception. Psychological Science, 22, 1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417003
Loughnan S., Leidner B., Doron G., Haslam N., Kashima Y., Tong J., Yeung V. (2010). Universal biases in self-perception: Better and more human than average. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 627–636. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466610x487779
Madan S., Basu S., Ng S., Ching Lim E. A. (2018). Impact of culture on the pursuit of beauty: Evidence from five countries. Journal of International Marketing, 26, 54–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X18805493
Moradi B., Huang Y. P. (2008). Objectification theory and psychology of women: A decade of advances and future directions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.00452.x
Mu Y., Kitayama S., Han S., Gelfand M. J. (2015). How culture gets embrained: Cultural differences in event-related potentials of social norm violations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 112, 15348–15353. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1509839112
Ng J.-H., Tan E.-K. (2021). COVID-19 vaccination and cultural tightness. Psychological Medicine. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291721001823
Nussbaum M. C. (1995). Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 24, 249–291. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1995.tb00032.x
Orehek E., Weaverling C. G. (2017). On the nature of objectification: Implications of considering people as means to goals. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 719–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617691138
Ozeren E., Ozmen O. N. T., Appolloni A. (2013). The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and organizational innovativeness: A comparative research into the Turkish and Italian marble industries. Transition Studies Review, 19, 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11300-013-0262-x
Pelto P. J. (1968). The differences between “tight” and “loose” societies. Transaction, 5, 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03180447
Quinn D. M., Kallen R. W., Twenge J. M., Fredrickson B. L. (2006). The disruptive effect of self-objectification on performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 30, 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00262.x
Roos P., Gelfand M., Nau D., Lun J. (2015). Societal threat and cultural variation in the strength of social norms: An evolutionary basis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2006.00262.x
Ruttan R. L., Lucas B. J. (2018). Cogs in the machine: The prioritization of money and self-dehumanization. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 149, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.08.007
Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Publications.
Singh J. (1995). Measurement issues in cross-national research. Journal of International Business Studies, 26, 597–619. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490188
Stamkou E., van Kleef G. A., Homan A. C., Gelfand M. J., van de Vijver F. J. R., van Egmond M. C., Boer D., Phiri N., Ayub N., Kinias Z., Cantarero K., Treister D. E., Figueiredo A., Hashimoto H., Hofmann E. B., Lima R. P., Lee I.-C. (2019). Cultural collectivism and tightness moderate responses to norm violators: Effects on power perception, moral emotions, and leader support. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 45, 947–964. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218802832
Teng F., Chen Z., Poon K. T., Zhang D., Jiang Y. (2016). Money and relationships: When and why thinking about money leads people to approach others. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.08.002
Toh S. M., Leonardelli G. J. (2012). Cultural constraints on the emergence of women as leaders. Journal of World Business, 47, 604–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.013
Toh S. M., Leonardelli G. J. (2013). Cultural constraints on the emergence of women leaders: How global leaders can promote women in different cultures. Organizational Dynamics, 42, 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2013.06.004
Turchin P. (2016). Ultrasociety: How 10,000 years of war made humans the greatest cooperators on earth. Beresta Books.
Üstün F., Kılıç K. C. (2017). The effects of tightness–looseness in organizational culture on corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: A regional study in Turkey. Journal of Human Sciences, 14, 3866–3878. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v14i4.4933
Vaes J., Loughnan S., Puvia E. (2014). The inhuman body: When sexual objectification becomes dehumanizing. In Bain P., Vaes J., Leyens J. P. (Eds.), Humanness and dehumanization (pp. 186–204). Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203110539-17
Volpato C., Andrighetto L., Baldissarri C. (2017). Perceptions of low-status workers and the maintenance of the social class status quo. Journal of Social Issues, 73, 192–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12211
Wang Q. (2017). Why should we all be cultural psychologists? Lessons from the study of social cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11, 583–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616645552
Wang X., Chen H., Chen Z., Yang Y. (2021). Women’s intrasexual competition results in beautification. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12, 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620933403
Wang X., Chen Z., Krumhuber E. G., Chen H. (2021). Money and flexible generosity. British Journal of Social Psychology, 60, 1262–1278. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12450
Wang X., Krumhuber E. G. (2017). The love of money results in objectification. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56, 354–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12158
Wellington S., Kropf M. B., Gerkovich P. R. (2003, June). What’s holding women back? Harvard Business Review, 81. https://hbr.org/2003/06/whats-holding-women-back#:~:text=Our%20survey%20did%20show%20that,women%20and%2090%25%20of%20CEOs
Zhang H., Chan D. K. S., Cao Q. (2014). Deliberating on social targets’ goal instrumentality leads to dehumanization: An experimental investigation. Social Cognition, 32, 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2014.32.2.181
Zurbriggen E. L., Ramsey L. R., Jaworski B. K. (2011). Self- and partner-objectification in romantic relationships: Associations with media consumption and relationship satisfaction. Sex Roles, 64, 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-9933-4
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: December 20, 2022
Issue published: December 2022
Keywords
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 560
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 5 view articles Opens in new tab
Crossref: 0
-
We Need Tough Brothers and Sisters in a Tight World: Cultural Tightnes...
-
Introduction to the Special Issue of Group Processes & Intergroup Rela...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
