Abstract
Dog whistling, a form of symbolic communication through seemingly innocuous terms is a common practice for members of far-right movements. This chapter examines how dog whistling was used on Twitter during the 2016 presidential election through a virtual ethnographic approach. Dog whistling serves to circumvent censorship by automated moderation, and adapts historical markers of the far-right as well as symbols used in other media to work within Twitter’s affordances. Thus, Twitter is employed as a channel to spread hate and signal belonging among far-right communities. In doing so, creative use is made of the platform’s technology, in the face of the site’s moderation techniques, to convey white supremacist ideas to a broader audience while staying under the radar of detection.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ADL. (n.d.). Hate on display: Hate symbols database. Retrieved from: https://www.adl.org/hate-symbols
Albertson, B. L. (2015). Dog-whistle politics: Multifocal communication and religious appeals. Political Behavior, 37(1), 3–26.
Amend, A. (2018, October, 28). Analyzing a terrorist’s social media manifesto: The Pittsburgh synagogue shooter’s posts on Gab. Retrieved from: https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2018/10/28/analyzing-terrorists-social-media-manifesto-pittsburgh-synagogue-shooters-posts-gab
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York: Verso books.
Apperly, E. (2019, June 15). Why Europe’s far right is targeting gender studies. The Atlantic. Retrieved from: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/06/europe-far-right-target-gender-studies/591208/
Arsenault, C. (2019, March 20). Why the accused New Zealand killer was fascinated with Serbia, Ottoman empire. CBC News. Retrieved from: https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/new-zealand-mosque-massacre-bosnia-serbia-ottomans-1.5062886
Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A., & Watts, D. J. (2011). Identifying influencers on twitter. In Fourth ACM international conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM). Hong Kong, China.
Beirich, H. (2019, February 20). The year in hate: Rage against change. Southern Poverty Law Center. Retrieved from: https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/intelligence-report/2019/year-hate-rage-against-change
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Bishop, R. (2017, April 24). The OK sign is becoming an alt-right symbol. The Outline. Retrieved from https://theoutline.com/post/1428/the-ok-sign-is-becoming-an-alt-right-symbol
Boellstorff, T., Nardi, B., Pearce, C., & Taylor, T. L. (2012). Ethnography and virtual worlds: A handbook of method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bossetta, M. (2018). The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 471–496.
Brumbaugh, A. M. (2002). Source and Nonsource Cues in Advertising and Their Effects on the Activation of Cultural and Subcultural Knowledge on the Route to Persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 258–269.
Burnap, P., & Williams, M. L. (2015). Cyber hate speech on twitter: An application of machine classification and statistical modeling for policy and decision making. Policy & Internet, 7(2), 223–242.
Caffier, J. (2017, February 6). Every insult the right uses to troll liberals, explained. Vice. Retrieved from: https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/mg9pvx/every-insult-the-right-uses-to-troll-liberals-explained
Calfano, B. R., & Djupe, P. A. (2009). God talk: Religious cues and electoral support. Political Research Quarterly, 62(2), 329–339.
Chau, M., & Xu, J. (2007). Mining communities and their relationships in blogs: A study of online hate groups. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(1), 57–70.
Crosset, V., Tanner, S., & Campana, A. (2018). Researching far right groups on Twitter: Methodological challenges 2.0. New Media & Society, 21(4), 939–961.
Daniels, J. (2017, October 19). Twitter and White Supremacy: A love story. Dame Magazine. Retrieved from: https://www.damemagazine.com/2017/10/19/twitter-and-white-supremacy-love-story/
Daniels, J. (2018). The algorithmic rise of the “alt-right”. Contexts, 17(1), 60–65.
Dreher, T., McCallum, K., & Waller, L. (2016). Indigenous voices and mediatized policy-making in the digital age. Information, Communication & Society, 19(1), 23–39.
Eddington, S. M. (2018). The communicative constitution of hate organizations online: A semantic network analysis of “Make America Great Again”. Social Media+ Society, 4(3), 1–12.
Feshami, K. A. (2018). Voices of white resistance: Democratic theory and the task of contending with white nationalist voice. Open Library of Humanities, 4(2), 39–44.
Freeman, A. (2013). The unbearable whiteness of milk: Food oppression and the USDA. UC Irvine Law Review, 3, 1251. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2338749.
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
Gerstenfeld, P. B., Grant, D. R., & Chiang, C. P. (2003). Hate online: A content analysis of extremist Internet sites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 29–44.
Graham, R. (2016). Inter-ideological mingling: White extremist ideology entering the mainstream on Twitter. Sociological Spectrum, 36(1), 24–36.
Heikkilä, N. (2017). Online antagonism of the Alt-Right in the 2016 Election. European Journal of American Studies, 12(12–2). https://doi.org/10.4000/ejas.12140.
Henderson, A. (2018, November 14). Inside the “soy boy” conspiracy theory: It combines misogyny and the warped world of pseudoscience. Salon. Retrieved from https://www.salon.com/2018/11/14/the-soy-boy-conspiracy-theory-alt-right-thinks-left-wing-has-it-out-for-them-with-soybeans_partner/
Hijmans, E. (1996). Logic for qualitative media content analysis: A typology. Communications, 21(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1515/comm.1996.21.1.93.
Hobsbawm, E., & Ranger, T. (1983). The invention of tradition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (2018). Strangers in their own land: Anger and mourning on the American right. New York: The New Press.
Hurwitz, J., & Peffley, M. (2005). Playing the race card in the post–Willie Horton era. The impact of racialized code words on support for punitive crime policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi004.
Kaiser, J., & Rauchfleisch, A. (2019). Integrating concepts of counter publics into generalized public sphere frameworks: Contemporary transformations in radical forms. Javnost-The Public, 26(3), 241–157.
Kanner, B. (2000). Hide in plain sight. Working Woman, 25(3), 14.
Kearney, M. W. (2018). rtweet: Collecting Twitter data. R package version 0.6.7. Retrieved from: https://cran.r-project.org/package=rtweet
Khoo, J. (2017). Code words in political discourse. Philosophical Topics, 45(2), 33–64.
Kim, D. (2019). White supremacists have weaponized an imaginary Viking past. It’s time to reclaim the real history. Time Magazine. Retrieved from: https://time.com/5569399/viking-history-white-nationalists/
Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Little, B. (2018, September 3). How hate groups are hijacking medieval symbols while ignoring the facts behind them. History. Retrieved from: https://www.history.com/news/how-hate-groups-are-hijacking-medieval-symbols-while-ignoring-the-facts-behind-them
López, I. H. (2015). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Lowery, W. (2014, March 18). Paul Ryan, poverty, dog whistles, and electoral politics. The Washington Post. Retrieved April 21, 2020, from: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/03/18/paul-ryanpoverty-dog-whistles-and-racism/.
Mac, R. (2019, July 9). Twitter says it has new rules to curb hate speech targeting religious groups. Buzzfeed. Retrieved from: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/ryanmac/twitter-hate-speech-religion-new-rules
Marwick, A., & Lewis, R. (2017). Media manipulation and disinformation online. New York: Data and Society.
Massanari, A. (2017). # GamerGate and the Fappening: How reddit’s algorithm, governance, and culture support toxic technocultures. New Media & Society, 19(3), 329–346.
McCutcheon, C., & Mark, D. (2014). Dog whistles, walk-backs, and Washington handshakes: Decoding the jargon, slang, and bluster of American political speech. University Press of New England.
Mendelberg, T. (2001). The race card: Campaign strategy. Implicit messages, and the norm of equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Morin, R. (1988, October 16). Behind the numbers: Confessions of a pollster. The Wall Street Journal.
Morozov, E. (2012). The net delusion: The dark side of Internet freedom. New York: Public Affairs.
Murthy, D. (2013). Twitter: Digital media and society series. Oxford, UK: Polity Books.
Olasov, I. (2016, November 6). Offensive political dog whistles: You know them when you hear them. Or do you? Vox. Retrieved from: https://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2016/11/7/13549154/dogwhistles-campaign-racism
Perry, B. (2003). Hate and bias crime: A reader. New York: Routledge.
Perry, D. M. (2017, September 6). What to do when Nazis are obsessed with your field. Pacific Standard. Retrieved November 8, 2019, from: https://psmag.com/education/nazis-love-taylor-swift-and-also-the-crusades
Pfeifle, M. (2009, July 6). A Nobel Peace Prize for Twitter? The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved from: https://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Opinion/2009/0706/p09s02-coop.html
Romo, V. (2017, September 6). “Ghost skins” and masculinity: Alt-Right terms, defined. NPR. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2017/09/06/548858850/-ghost-skins-and-masculinity-alt-right-terms
Roose, K. (2018, October 28). On Gab, an extremist friendly site, Pittsburgh shooting suspect aired his hatred in full. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/28/us/gab-robert-bowers-pittsburgh-synagogue-shootings.html
Rosenbaum, J. E. (2018). Constructing digital cultures: Tweets, trends, race, and gender. New York: Lexington Books.
Rosenbaum, J. E. (2019). Degrees of freedom: Exploring agency, narratives, and technological affordances in the #TakeAKnee controversy. Social Media+Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119826125.
Roy, J. (2016, November). “Cuck,” “snowflake,” “masculinist”: A guide to the language of the “alt-right.” Los Angeles Times. Retrieved from: https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-pol-alt-right-terminology-20161115-story.html
Sanchez, J. C. (2018). Trump, the KKK, and the versatility of white supremacy rhetoric. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 8(1), 45–56.
Saul, J. (2018). Dog whistles, political manipulation and philosophy of language. In D. Fogal, D. W. Harris, & M. Moss (Eds.), New work on speech acts (pp. 360–282). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Schreckinger, B. (2018, November/December). Trump’s culture warriors go home. Politico Magazine. Retrieved from: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2018/10/29/trump-cernovich-milo-yiannopoulos-richard-spencer-alt-right-2018-221916
Shafran, A. (2018, January 23). A Goy, a Yid: What’s in a name? Tablet Magazine. Retrieved from: https://www.tabletmag.com/scroll/253778/a-goy-a-yid-whats-in-a-name
Siapera, E., Moreo, E., & Zhou, J. (2018). HateTrack: Tracking and monitoring racist speech online. Retrieved from: https://www.ihrec.ie/documents/hatetrack-tracking-and-monitoring-racist-hate-speech-online/
Singh, S. (2018). Twitter’s latest transparency report sheds new light on content moderation, but more work remains to be done. New American. Retrieved from: https://www.newamerica.org/oti/blog/twitters-latest-transparency-report-sheds-new-light-on-content-moderation-but-more-work-remains-to-be-done/
Stack, L. (2016, November 14). Globalism: A far-right conspiracy theory buoyed by Trump. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/15/us/politics/globalism-right-trump.html
Sutton, M., & Wright, C. (2009). Finding the far right online: An exploratory study of white supremacist websites. Internet Journal of Criminology. 1–24.
Varis, P. (2018, October 23). What do real men eat? Online culture wars and the science of soy boys. Diggit Magazine. Retrieved from: https://www.diggitmagazine.com/column/soy-boys
Walsh, J. (2016, July 20). Islamophobes, white supremacists, and gays for Trump – The Alt-right arrives at the RNC. The Nation. Retrieved from: https://www.thenation.com/article/islamophobes-white-supremacists-and-gays-for-trump-the-alt-right-arrives-at-the-rnc/
Watts, D. J., & Dodds, P. S. (2007). Influentials, networks, and public opinion formation. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(4), 441–458.
Weber, S. (2018, February 1). White Supremacy’s old gods. Political Research Associates. Retrieved October 16, 2019, from https://www.politicalresearch.org/2018/02/01/white-supremacys-old-gods-the-far-right-and-neopaganism
White, I. K. (2007). When race matters and when it doesn’t: Racial group differences in response to racial cues. American Political Science Review, 101(2), 339–354.
Whitaker, M. (2014, March 3). Paul Ryan blames poverty on lack of work ethic in inner cities. MSNBC. Retrieved April 21, 2020, from: http://www.msnbc.com/politicsnation/ryan-generations-men-not-working#50873.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhat, P., Klein, O. (2020). Covert Hate Speech: White Nationalists and Dog Whistle Communication on Twitter. In: Bouvier, G., Rosenbaum, J.E. (eds) Twitter, the Public Sphere, and the Chaos of Online Deliberation. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-41420-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-41421-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)