Skip to main content

How to Increase the Likelihood of Making the Sustainable Development Goals a Reality: An Enhanced Model of Deliberative Democracy and the Role for Psychologists Within It

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Macropsychology

Abstract

This chapter examines in four ways the potential for a greater role to be played by psychologists in the formulation of policies that help realise the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). First, this chapter considers the primacy of Behavioural Economics as the main social science contributing to policy formation generally and addresses some of the difficulties psychology thus has in inserting itself more centrally into policymaking around the SDGs. Second, it makes a case that standard models of policymaking are insufficient for the SDGs and that variants of the models within the deliberative democracy school present themselves as candidate models in this space. Third, it gives an outline on some relatively new ways to access public opinion as a direct input for policymaking; a critical consideration here is that any one method has to take account of the need to make participants more aware of the consequences of their opinions within any deliberative democracy exercise, with potential lessons included from futurology and gaming. Fourth, it argues that psychologists need to be prepared to adapt to newer modes of policymaking for SDGs, where non-statutory actors such as social entrepreneurs or philanthropists are likely to play bigger roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Butz, W. P., & Torrey, B. B. (2006). Some frontiers in social science. Science, 312(5782), 1898–1900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (2004). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2000). Coping with post-democracy. London: Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörner, R., Göbel, S., Effelsberg, W., & Wiemeyer, J. (2016). Serious games: Foundations, concepts, and practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. (1999). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Institute for empirical research in economics working paper No. 10; CESifo Working Paper Series No. 183. doi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=203194.

  • Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green Climate Fund. (2019). Strategic programming for the green climate fund first replenishment. https://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/1424894/GCF_B.22_Inf.12_-_Strategic_Programming_for_the_Green_Climate_Fund_First_Replenishment.pdf/9933d93d-2673-022c-8c1b-cd5213973674.

  • Greer, S., & Bryant, C. A. (2005). Social marketing in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J., & Vytlacil, E. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, part I: Causal models, structural models, and econometric policy evaluation. In J. Heckman & E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 6B). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huss, T., & MacLachlan, M. (2016). Equity and inclusion in policy processes (EquIPP): A framework to support equity and inclusion in the process of policy development, implementation and evaluation. Dublin, Ireland: Global Health Press. Retrieved from https://www.tcd.ie/medicine/global-health/assets/doc/The%20EquIPP%20manual%2013th%20April%202016.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interview with Jacques Julliard. (2019). Ce Président ne Comprend que le Rapport de Force. L’Express, 3555, August 21–27, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, S., & Glenton, C. (2018). Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0841-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLachlan, M. (2014). Macropsychology, policy and global health. American Psychologist, 69, 851–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLachlan, M., Mannan, H., Huss, T., & Scholl, M. (2019). Macropsychology: Challenging and changing social structures and systems. In D. Hoggets & K. O’Doherty (Eds.), Handbook of applied social psychology (pp. 116–182). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G. (2014). Don’t even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (2010). Democracy and the limits of self-government. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rueschemeyer, D. (2009). Usable theory: Analytic tools for social and political research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G., & Wales, C. (1999). The theory and practice of citizens’ juries. Policy and Politics, 27(3), 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suiter, J., Farrell, D., & O’Malley, E. (2014). When do deliberative citizens change their opinions? Evidence from the Irish citizens’ assembly. International Political Science Review, 37(2), 198–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Platform. (2016). Mainstreaming SDGs into national policies, plans and strategies and integrating the three dimensions of sustainable development. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=20000&nr=312&menu=2993.

  • Tonn, M. B. (2005). Taking conversation, dialogue, and therapy public. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 8(3), 405–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voss, J. P., & Amelung, N. (2016). Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Social Studies of Science, 46(5), 749–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McKenzie, K. (2021). How to Increase the Likelihood of Making the Sustainable Development Goals a Reality: An Enhanced Model of Deliberative Democracy and the Role for Psychologists Within It. In: MacLachlan, M., McVeigh, J. (eds) Macropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50176-1_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics