Abstract
This chapter examines in four ways the potential for a greater role to be played by psychologists in the formulation of policies that help realise the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). First, this chapter considers the primacy of Behavioural Economics as the main social science contributing to policy formation generally and addresses some of the difficulties psychology thus has in inserting itself more centrally into policymaking around the SDGs. Second, it makes a case that standard models of policymaking are insufficient for the SDGs and that variants of the models within the deliberative democracy school present themselves as candidate models in this space. Third, it gives an outline on some relatively new ways to access public opinion as a direct input for policymaking; a critical consideration here is that any one method has to take account of the need to make participants more aware of the consequences of their opinions within any deliberative democracy exercise, with potential lessons included from futurology and gaming. Fourth, it argues that psychologists need to be prepared to adapt to newer modes of policymaking for SDGs, where non-statutory actors such as social entrepreneurs or philanthropists are likely to play bigger roles.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Butz, W. P., & Torrey, B. B. (2006). Some frontiers in social science. Science, 312(5782), 1898–1900.
Camerer, C. F., Loewenstein, G., & Rabin, M. (2004). Advances in behavioral economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and the Russell Sage Foundation.
Crouch, C. (2000). Coping with post-democracy. London: Fabian Society.
Dörner, R., Göbel, S., Effelsberg, W., & Wiemeyer, J. (2016). Serious games: Foundations, concepts, and practice. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Elster, J. (2007). Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fehr, E. & Gachter, S. (1999). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Institute for empirical research in economics working paper No. 10; CESifo Working Paper Series No. 183. doi: https://ssrn.com/abstract=203194.
Foa, R. S., & Mounk, Y. (2016). The danger of deconsolidation: The democratic disconnect. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 5–17.
Green Climate Fund. (2019). Strategic programming for the green climate fund first replenishment. https://www.greenclimate.fund/documents/20182/1424894/GCF_B.22_Inf.12_-_Strategic_Programming_for_the_Green_Climate_Fund_First_Replenishment.pdf/9933d93d-2673-022c-8c1b-cd5213973674.
Greer, S., & Bryant, C. A. (2005). Social marketing in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26, 319–339.
Heckman, J., & Vytlacil, E. (2007). Econometric evaluation of social programs, part I: Causal models, structural models, and econometric policy evaluation. In J. Heckman & E. Leamer (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. 6B). New York: Elsevier.
Huss, T., & MacLachlan, M. (2016). Equity and inclusion in policy processes (EquIPP): A framework to support equity and inclusion in the process of policy development, implementation and evaluation. Dublin, Ireland: Global Health Press. Retrieved from https://www.tcd.ie/medicine/global-health/assets/doc/The%20EquIPP%20manual%2013th%20April%202016.pdf.
Interview with Jacques Julliard. (2019). Ce Président ne Comprend que le Rapport de Force. L’Express, 3555, August 21–27, 21–23.
Lewin, S., & Glenton, C. (2018). Are we entering a new era for qualitative research? Using qualitative evidence to support guidance and guideline development by the World Health Organization. International Journal for Equity in Health, 17, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-018-0841-x
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
MacLachlan, M. (2014). Macropsychology, policy and global health. American Psychologist, 69, 851–863.
MacLachlan, M., Mannan, H., Huss, T., & Scholl, M. (2019). Macropsychology: Challenging and changing social structures and systems. In D. Hoggets & K. O’Doherty (Eds.), Handbook of applied social psychology (pp. 116–182). London: Sage.
Marshall, G. (2014). Don’t even think about it: Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. London: Bloomsbury.
Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51(13), 1667–1693.
Neuman, W. R. (1986). The paradox of mass politics: Knowledge and opinion in the American electorate. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Nichols, T. (2017). The death of expertise: The campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
Przeworski, A. (2010). Democracy and the limits of self-government. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rueschemeyer, D. (2009). Usable theory: Analytic tools for social and political research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Smith, G., & Wales, C. (1999). The theory and practice of citizens’ juries. Policy and Politics, 27(3), 295–308.
Suiter, J., Farrell, D., & O’Malley, E. (2014). When do deliberative citizens change their opinions? Evidence from the Irish citizens’ assembly. International Political Science Review, 37(2), 198–212.
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
The Sustainable Development Goals Knowledge Platform. (2016). Mainstreaming SDGs into national policies, plans and strategies and integrating the three dimensions of sustainable development. Retrieved from: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/index.php?page=view&type=20000&nr=312&menu=2993.
Tonn, M. B. (2005). Taking conversation, dialogue, and therapy public. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 8(3), 405–430.
Voss, J. P., & Amelung, N. (2016). Innovating public participation methods: Technoscientization and reflexive engagement. Social Studies of Science, 46(5), 749–772.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
McKenzie, K. (2021). How to Increase the Likelihood of Making the Sustainable Development Goals a Reality: An Enhanced Model of Deliberative Democracy and the Role for Psychologists Within It. In: MacLachlan, M., McVeigh, J. (eds) Macropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50176-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50176-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50175-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50176-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)