Skip to main content

Digital Divide and Youth Development in the Early Twenty-First Century

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems

Abstract

This chapter examines the persistence of the digital divide and its impact on youth development in the first two decades of the twenty-first century. As a global problem, the digital divide is neither an isolated phenomenon nor does it homogeneously affect communities. On the one hand, digital divide is an effect of social inequalities, and on the other hand, it deepens inequalities across geographies and socioeconomic categories. This chapter shows that research on the digital divide towards the end of the twentieth century exclusively emphasized economic inequality among users. But recent work in the twenty-first century increasingly focuses on the intersectional dimensions, studying the effects of other inequalities such as race, gender, ethnicity, geography, migration, and age on digital access, use, and outcomes. The youth is typically identified as a digitally inclined population. In the information society, their education and overall development depends on digital use and access. But among them, too, intersectional positionality determines the quantity and quality of digital access and opportunities of empowerment. Current literature on youth and the digital divide also reveals how digital access, use, and outcomes are intersectionally determined for parents, families, educators, and communities, whose support remains crucial for youth development. Further, the review suggests that online education in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic creates new challenges for the underprivileged youth by intensifying the intersectional aspects of digital divide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alegria, S. (2019). Escalator or step stool? Gendered labor and token processes in tech work. Gender & Society, 33(5), 722–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243219835737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonio, A., & Tuffley, D. (2014). The gender digital divide in developing countries. Future Internet, 6(4), 673–687. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6040673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P. A. (2001). The first and second digital divides. Sociology of Education, 74(3), 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attewell, P. A., & Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azevedo, J. P., Hasan, A., Goldemberg, D., Iqbal, S. A., & Geven, K. (2020). Simulating the potential impacts of COVID-19 school closures on schooling and learning outcomes: A set of global estimates (Policy Research Working Papers). The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azubuike, O. B., Adegboye, O., & Quadri, H. (2021). Who gets to learn in a pandemic? Exploring the digital divide in remote learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Research, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100022

  • Beaunoyer, E., Dup’er’e, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 111, 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1998). The forms of capital. In A. H. Halsy, H. Lauder, P. Brown, & A. S. Wells (Eds.), Education, culture, economy, society (pp. 47–56). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, A., Kvasny, L., & Hales, K. (2010). Cultural appropriations of technical capital. Information, Communication & Society, 13(7), 1040–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2010.498897

  • Buckingham, D. (2006). Is there a digital deneration? In D. Buckingham & R. Willet (Eds.), Digital generations. Children, young people, and new media (pp. 1–19). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büchi, M., Just, N., & Latzer. M. (2016). Modeling the second-level digital divide: a five-country study of social differences in internet use. New Media & Society, 18(11):2703–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815604154.

  • Carpenter, B. D., & Buday, S. (2007). Computer use among older adults in a naturally occurring retirement community. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 3012–3024.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S., Chang, A., Day, L., Fazlullah, A., Liu, J., McBride, L., et al. (2020). Closing the K-12 digital divide in the age of distance learning. Common Sense Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, N. G., & DiNitto, D. M. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5). https://www.jmir.org/2013/5/e93/

  • Chun, J. J., Lipsitz, G., & Shin, Y. (2013). Intersectionality as a social movement strategy: Asian immigrant women advocates. Signs, 38(4), 917–940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christian, M., & Namagada, A. (2018). Transnational intersectionality and domestic work: The production of Ugandan intersectional racialized and gendered domestic worker regimes. International Sociology, 33(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10117/0268580918764059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2020). Intersectionality as critical inquiry. In N. A. Naples (Ed.), Companion to feminist studies (pp. 105–128). Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa, T. (2015). The power of youth: How the bottom-up technology transmission from children to parents is related to digital (in)equality. Journal of Communication, 9, 1163–1186. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correa, T. (2016). Digital skills and social media use: How internet skills are related to different types of Facebook use among ‘digital natives’. Information, Communication & Society, 19(8), 1095–1107. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1084023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cottom, T. M. (2020). Where platform capitalism and racial capitalism meet: The sociology of race and racism in the digital society. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 6(4), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332649220949473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deer, S. (2015). Knowing through numbers? In The beginning and end of rape: Confronting sexual violence in native America. University of Minnesota Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ignazio, C., & Klein, L. F. (2020). Data feminism. The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, P. (2019). To count of not to count: Queering measurement and the transgender community. In A. Ghaziani & M. Brim (Eds.), Imagining queer methods (pp. 121–142). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhamoon, R. (2015). A feminist approach to decolonizing anti-racism: Rethinking transnationalism, intersectionality, and settler colonialism. Feral Feminisms, 4, 20–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dholakia, R. R., & Chiang, K. P. (2003). Shoppers in cyberspace: Are they from Venus or Mars and does it matter? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1–2), 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘digital divide’ to ‘digital inequality’: Studying Internet use as penetration increases. Princeton: Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Woodrow Wilson School. Princeton University. 4(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drouin, M., McDaniel, B. T., Pater, J., & Toscos, T. (2020). How parents and their children used social media and technology at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and associations with anxiety. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 23(11), 727–736. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, P. (2020). Helping teachers adapt to remote teaching – 3 Cambridge trainers tell their stories. Cambridge Assessment-International Education. https://blog.cambridgeinternational.org/helping-teachers-adapt-to-remote-teaching/

  • Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world: IEA international computer and information literacy study 2018 international report. IEA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., & Horak, E. (2008). Africa and the digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 25(2), 99–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandolfi, E., Ferdig, R. E., & Kratcoski, A. (2021). A new educational normal an intersectionality-led exploration of education, learning technologies, and diversity during COVID-19. Technology in Society, 66(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gitlow, L. (2014). Technology use by older adults and barriers to using technology. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Geriatrics, 32(3), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedhart, N. S., Broerse, J. E. W., Kattouw, R., & Dedding, C. (2019). ‘Just having a computer doesn’t make sense’: The digital divide from the perspective of mothers with a low socio-economic position. New Media & Society, 21(11–12), 2347–2365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819846059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G. (2013). Youth culture and mobiles. Mobile Media & Communication, 1(1), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050157912464489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goggin, G. (2018). Disability and digital inequalities. Rethinking digital divides with disability theory. In M. Ragnedda & G. W. Muschert (Eds.), Theorizing digital divides (pp. 63–74). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, A. E., Black, K. A., Manley, M. H., & Frost, R. (2017). ‘We told them that we are both really involved parents’: Sexual minority and heterosexual adoptive parents’ engagement in school communities. Gender and Education, 29(5), 614–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez, D. C. (2019). Technological capital and digital divide among young people: An intersectional approach. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(7), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2018.1559283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, A. L. (2016). The contemporary US digital divide: From initial access to technology maintenance. Information, Communication & Society, 19(2), 234–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, K., Ward, P., & Newman, L. (2010). Use of information and communication technology to provide health information: What do older migrants know, and what do they need to know. Quality in Primary Care, 18(1), 27–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, M. P., Thanvi, J., & Padhi, S. R. (2021). Impact of online learning in India: A survey of university students during the COVID-19 crisis. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 9(4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.15206/ajpor.2021.9.4.331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, M. (2011). Time machines and virtual portals: The spatialities of the digital divide. Progress in Development Studies, 11(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Thrift, N. (2007). Out of order: Understanding repair and maintenance. Theory, Culture, & Society, 24(3), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S., & Li, J. (1995). Engendering reproductive policy and practice in peasant China: For a feminist demography of reproduction. Signs, 20(3), 601–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2002). Second-level digital divide: Differences in people’s online skills. First Monday, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E., & Kim, S. J. (2010). The prevalence of smartphone use among a wired group of young adults. Institute for Policy Research Northwestern University Working Paper WP-11-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heeks, R. (2022). Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: Conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the Global South. Information Technology for Development, 28(4), 688–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253–1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, M. (2011). Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies and statistics. Women’s Studies International Forum, 34, 479–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, S. T., & Tilahun, M. (2021). Mobile phones, leadership and gender in rural business groups. World Development Perspectives, 24(100370), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100370

  • Howe, N., & William, S. (2000). Millennials rising: the next great generation. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L., Von Pape, T., & Karnowski, V. (2013). Evolving mobile media: Uses and conceptualizations of the mobile internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18(4), 491–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Shao, B. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: Implications for higher education. York. http://oro.open.ac.uk/30014/

  • Katz, V. S., Jordan, A. B., & Ognyanova, K. (2021). Digital inequality, faculty communication, and remote learning experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey of U.S. undergraduates. PLoS One, 16(2), e0246641. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis Ellison, T., & Solomon, M. (2019). Counter-storytelling vs. deficit thinking methods around African American children and families, digital literacies, race, and the digital divide. Research in the Teaching of English, 53(3), 223–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, K.-H., & Lundquist, J. (2013). Mate selection in cyberspace: The intersection of race, gender, and Education. American Journal of Sociology, 119(1), 183–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Literat, I. (2021). “Teachers act like we’re robots”: TikTok as a window into youth experiences of online learning during COVID-19. AERA Open, 7(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S., & Helsper, E. J. (2007). Gradations in digital inclusion: Children, young people and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 9(4), 671–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, J. K., & Cheng, S. (2022). Adolescent well-being and ICT use in education: Social and policy implications. Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mariën, I., & Prodnik, J. A. (2014). Digital inclusion and user (dis)empowerment: A critical perspective. Info, 16(6), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/info-07-2014-0030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), 1771–1800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCashin, D., & Murphy, C. M. (2022). Using TikTok for public and youth mental health: A systematic review and content analysis. Clinical Child Psychology 28(1): 279–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mihelj, S., Leguina, A., & Downey, J. (2019). Culture is digital: Cultural participation, diversity and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 21(7), 1465–1485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinck, S., Fraillon, J., & Strietholt, R. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on education: International evidence from the responses to educational disruption survey. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380398

    Google Scholar 

  • Merino Malillos, L. (2010). Nativos Digitales: Una Aproximación a La Socialización Tecnológica de Los Jóvenes. Instituto de la Juventud. http://www.injuve.es/sites/default/files/nativosdigitales_0.pdf

  • Metzger, M. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(13), 2078–2091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, K. C. (2009). Generation digital: Politics, commerce, and childhood in the age of the Internet. MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J., & Hamilton, A. (2012). Broadband adoption|measuring digital citizenship: Mobile access and broadband. International Journal of Communication, 6, 2492–2528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2017). PIRLS 2016: International results in reading. In International association for the evaluation of educational achievement. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED580353

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, H. C., Chen, M. M., & Cossutta, M. (2016). An investigation of multiple devices and information sources used in the hotel booking process. Tourism Management, 52, 44–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. M., & Obar, J. A. (2014). The emerging mobile internet underclass: A critique of mobile internet access. The Information Society, 30(5), 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, P. M., & Obar, J. A. (2017). Second class netizens: Race and the emerging mobile internet underclass. In R. A. Lind (Ed.), Race and gender in electronic media: Content, context, culture (pp. 293–311). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. C. (2008). Re-thinking intersectionality. Feminist Review, 89(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielson, J. (2006). Digital divide: The three stages. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/digital-divide-the-three-stages/

  • Odaci, H., & Kalkan, M. (2010). Problematic internet use, loneliness and dating anxiety among young adult university students. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1091–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD Education & Skills TopClass Podcast. (2020). Episode 25: Will the coronavirus crisis lead to a fundamental change in education? https://www.listennotes.com/podcasts/oecd-education/episode-25-will-the-rn_0e-qcQwf/

  • OECD. (2018). Bridging the digital gender divide: Include, upskill, innovate. https://www.oecd.org/digital/bridging-the-digital-gender-divide.pdf

  • OECD. (2021). 21st-century readers: Developing literacy skills in a digital world, PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a83d84cb-en

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2008). Immigrants, English ability and the digital divide. Social Forces, 86(4), 1455–1479. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20430817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, G., & Stegbauer, S. (2005). Is the digital divide between young and elderly people increasing? First Monday, 10(10). https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1286/1206

  • Patil, V. (2013). From patriarchy to intersectionality: A transnational feminist assessment of how far we’ve really come. Signs, 38(4), 847–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, K. E., & Rice, R. E. (2013). Digital divides from access to activities: Comparing mobile and personal computer internet users. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 721–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purkayastha, B. (2012). Intersectionality in a transnational world. Gender & Society, 26(1), 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rafalow, M. H. (2018). Disciplining play: Digital youth culture as capital at school. American Journal of Sociology, 123(5), 1416–1452. https://doi.org/10.1086/695766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragnedda, M. (2017). The third digital divide: A Weberian approach to digital inequalities. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ragnedda, Massimo, and Glenn W. Muschert, eds. (2013). The digital divide: the internet and social inequality in international perspective. Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajam, V., Reddy, A. B., & Banerjee, S. (2021). Explaining caste-based digital divide in India. Telematics and Informatics, 65(101719), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2021.101719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, C. (2022). Negotiating digital marginalization: Immigrants, computers, and the adult learning classroom. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 30(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2020.1786385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieh, S. (2004). On the web at home. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(8), 743–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. (2009). A taste for the necessary: A Bourdieuian approach to digital inequality. Information, Communication, & Society, 12(4), 488–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, L. (2013). Freeways, detours, and dead ends: Search journeys among disadvantaged youth. New Media & Society, 16(2), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813481197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, R. (2021). Precarious privilege: Globalism, digital biopolitics and tech-workers’ movements in India. The European Legacy, 26(7–8), 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/10848770.2021.1962641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salem, S. (2018). Intersectionality and its discontents: Intersectionality as traveling theory. The European Journal of Women’s Studies, 25(4), 403–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savolainen, R. (2008). Everyday information practices: A social phenomenological perspective. Scarecrow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheerder, A., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2017). Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8), 1607–1624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schradie, J. (2019). The revolution that wasn’t: How digital activism favors conservatives. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2004). Reconsidering political and popular understandings of the digital divide. New Media & Society, 6(3), 341–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444804042519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native: Myth and reality. ASLIB Proceedings, 61(4), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sime, D., Fassetta, G., & McClung, M. (2018). ‘It’s good enough that children are accepted’: Roma migrant mothers’ views of their children’s education post-migration. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(3), 316–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y., Qian, C., & Pickard, S. (2021). Age-related digital divide during COVID-19 pandemic in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(11285), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital. The rise of the net generation. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terriquez, V., Brenes, T., & Lopez, A. (2018). Intersectionality as a multipurpose collective action frame: The case of the undocumented youth movement. Ethnicities, 18(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796817752558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tirado-Morueta, R., Hernando-Gómez, Á., & Aguaded-Gomez, J. I. (2016). The capacity of elderly citizens to access digital media in Andalusia (Spain). Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1427–1444. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1111401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-UIS. (2020). UIS COVID-19 response: Data to inform policies that mitigate setbacks in education gains. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. http://uis.unesco.org/en/news/uis-covid-19-response-data-inform-policies-mitigate-setbacks-education-gains

  • Vincent, C., Rollock, N., Ball, S., & Gillborn, D. (2012). Intersectional work and precarious positionings: Black middle-class parents and their encounters with schools in England. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 22(3), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Helsper, E. J. (2015). A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use among the elderly. European Journal of Communication, 30(2), 171–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & Van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2011). Internet skills and the digital divide. New Media & Society, 13(6), 893–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2013). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Deursen, A. J. A. M., & van Dijk, J. A. G. M. (2019). The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society, 21(2), 354–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818797082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van de Werfhorst, H., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2020). The digital divide in online education. Inequality in Digital Preparedness of Students and Schools before the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/58d6p/

  • van Dijk, Jan A. G. M. 2005. The deepening divide: inequality in the information society. SAGE Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & Alexander J. v. D. (2014). Solutions: Learning Digital Skills. In: J. A. G. M. van Dijk and A. J. van Deursen (Eds.), Digital skills: Unlocking the information society. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning (pp. 113–38). New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vegas, E. (2020). School closures, government responses, and learning inequality around the world during COVID-19. The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/research/school-closures-government-responses-and-learning-inequality-around-the-world-during-covid-19/

  • Warschauer, M. (2007). The paradoxical future of digital learning. Learning Inquiry, 1(1), 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, K. K., Teo, H. H., Chan, H. C., et al. (2011). Conceptualizing and testing a social cognitive model of the digital divide. Information Systems Research, 22(1), 170–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M. M. (2005). Finding a place in cyberspace: Black women, technology and identity. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 26(1), 48–59. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4137433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, J. (2020). Covid-19 and the challenges of remote teaching in China. Cambridge Assessment-International Education. https://blog.cambridgeinternational.org/covid-19-and-the-challenges-of-remote-teaching-in-china/

  • Zulli, D., & Zulli, D. J. (2020). Extending the internet meme: Conceptualizing technological mimesis and imitation publics on the TikTok platform. New Media & Society, 24(8), 1872–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rianka Roy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Roy, R., Kuo-Hsun, J., Cheng, S. (2023). Digital Divide and Youth Development in the Early Twenty-First Century. In: The Palgrave Handbook of Global Social Problems. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_239-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68127-2_239-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68127-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics