Abstract
It would seem that European Politics are currently enrolled in a constant flux of uncertainty and anxiousness. The Institutional Matrix and Community of states that make up the Union seemingly cannot catch a break as they meander through a succession of crises and challenges. These are taking their toll on the EU, its unity in decision making, and countries’ commitment to ever closer Union. The sovereign debt crisis and so-called Greek Euro Crisis shook the tacit belief in the current economic architecture of the bloc and questioned the belief in intra-European solidarity. Shortly thereafter, the refugee crisis saw European States adopt ad hoc and sometimes contradictory measures for border control which peaked with the bringing into question of the current Schengen architecture and the long-held commitment to open borders on the continent. Then came the long and convoluted saga of Brexit. With its continuous series of negotiations, exit treaties, and successions of Governments, it reached its conclusion with the exit of UK from the bloc—the first secession in the history of the EU. With the decade coming to a close, European society assumed and hoped that that would constitute the final stress test of 2010s, only for the global pandemic to wreak havoc to the economy that was recovering from the financial crisis’ fallout. The EU’s Covid rescue package negotiations led to renewed souring of relations among the member states as the prospect of wealth transfers and Eurobonds irked nationalist politicians in many member states. Against the background of increasing politicization of Europeanization and polarization of European society (Goldberg, van Elsas, & de Vreese, 2020), Europe’s political systems brace themselves for further success by Eurosceptic parties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Across the period described by the CHES, including the late 1980s and early 1990s.
- 2.
In combination with the depoliticized character of integration, especially in the pre-Maastricht period.
- 3.
- 4.
Especially in light of the growing politicization of the European question.
References
Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Niche party success and mainstream party policy shifts—How green and radical right parties differ in their impact. British Journal of Political Science, 46(02), 417–436.
Adams, J., Ezrow, L., & Leiter, D. (2012). Partisan sorting and niche parties in Europe. West European Politics, 35(6), 1272–1294.
André, A., Depauw, S., & Beyens, S. (2015). Party loyalty and electoral dealignment. Party Politics, 21(6), 970–981.
Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2009). Revisiting the nature of the beast—Politicization, European identity, and postfunctionalism: A comment on Hooghe and Marks. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 217–220.
Buti, M. (2019). Renewing the (damaged) social contract. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/economy-finance/mb-dahrendorf_forum_v3.pdf.
Buti, M., & Pichelmann, K. (2017). European integration and populism: Addressing Dahrendorf’s quandary. http://sep.luiss.it/sites/sep.luiss.it/files/Buti_PB_01302017.pdf.
Costello, R., Thomassen, J., & Rosema, M. (2012). European parliament elections and political representation: Policy congruence between voters and parties. West European Politics, 35(6), 1226–1248.
Dahrendorf, R. (1995). Economic Opportunity, Civil Society and Political Liberty, UNRISD Discussion Paper 58.
de Lange, S. L. (2007). A new winning formula?: The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics, 13(4), 411–435.
de Vries, C. E. (2007). Sleeping giant: Fact or fairytale?: How European integration affects national elections. European Union Politics, 8(3), 363–385.
de Vries, C. E., & Edwards, E. E. (2009). Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public euroscepticism. Party Politics, 15(1), 5–28.
de Wilde, P., & Trenz, H.-J. (2012). Denouncing European Integration: Euroscepticism as Polity Contestation. European Journal of Social Theory, 15(4), 537–554.
Downs, W. M. (2002). How effective is the cordon sanitaire? Lessons from efforts to contain the far right in Belgium, France, Denmark and Norway. Journal Fur Konflikt- Und Gewaltforschung, 4, 32–51.
Ezrow, L., De Vries, C., Steenbergen, M., & Edwards, E. (2011). Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: Do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters? Party Politics, 17(3), 275–301.
Goldberg, A. C., van Elsas, E. J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2020). Mismatch? Comparing elite and citizen polarisation on EU issues across four countries. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(2), 310–328.
Grande, E. (2012). Conclusion: How much change can we observe and what does it mean? In H. Kriesi, E. Grande, M. Dolezal, M. Helbling, D. Hoeglinger, S. Hutter, & B. Wuest (Eds.), Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gustavsson, S. (2014). The need for legitimate opposition and protectionism. In O. Cramme & S. Hobolt (Eds.), Democratic politics in a European Union under stress. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gustavsson, S., Karlsson, C., & Persson, T. (2009). Taking accountability seriously. The illusion of accountability in the European Union. London: Routledge.
Hobolt, S. B., & de Vries, C. E. (2015). Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies, 48(9), 1159–1185.
Hooghe, L. (2003). Europe divided?: Elites vs. public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics, 4(3), 281–304.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(01), 1–23.
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135.
Katz, R. S., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28.
Kirchheimer, O. (1957). The waning of opposition in parliamentary regimes. Social Research, 24(2), 127–156.
Kriesi, H. (2009). Rejoinder to Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks, ‘A postfunctional theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus’. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 221–224.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S., & Wüest, B. (2012). Political conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2008). West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krouwel, A. (2003). Otto Kirchheimer and the catch-all party. West European Politics, 26(2), 23–40.
Lachat, R., & Kriesi, H. (2008). Supply side: The positioning of the political parties in a restructuring space. In H. Kriesi et al. (Eds.), West European politics in the age of globalization (pp. 267–295). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lindberg, L., & Scheingold, S. (1970). Europe’s would-be polity. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Loveless, M., & Rohrschneider, R. (2008). Public perceptions of the EU as a system of governance. Living Reviews in European Governance, 3(1), [Online Article]: http://www.livingreviews.org/lreg-2008-1.
Mair, P. (2007). Political opposition and the European Union. Government and Opposition, 42(1), 1–17.
Manow, P., Palier, B., & Schwander, H. (Eds.). (2018). Welfare democracies and party politics: Explaining electoral dynamics in times of changing welfare capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2000). The past in the present: A cleavage theory of party response to European integration. British Journal of Political Science, 30(03), 433–459.
Marquand, D. (1979). Parliament for Europe. Cape.
Meguid, B. M. (2008). Party competition between unequals: Strategies and electoral fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Meguid, B. M. (2005). Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 347–359.
Meijers, M. J. (2015). Contagious Euroscepticism: The impact of Eurosceptic support on mainstream party positions on European integration. Party Politics.
Merler, S. (2018). Europeans and globalization: Does the EU square the circle? In P. Diamond (Ed.), The crisis of globalization: Democracy, globalization, and inequality in the twenty-first century. London: I.B. Tauris.
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563.
Mudde, C. (2012). The comparative study of party-based Euroscepticism: The Sussex versus the North Carolina School. East European Politics, 28(2), 193–202.
Norris, P. (2005). Radical right: Voters and parties in the electoral market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O’Rourke Kevin, H. (2014). A tale of two trilemmas. In L. Brennan (Ed.), Enacting globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rodrik, D. (2011). The globalization paradox: Why global markets, states, and democracy can’t coexist. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Rydgren, J. (2004). Explaining the emergence of radical right-wing populist parties: The case of Denmark. West European Politics, 27(3), 474–502.
Rydgren, J. (2005). Is extreme right-wing populism contagious? Explaining the emergence of a new party family. European Journal of Political Research, 44(3), 413–437.
Schmitter, P. C. (2009). On the way to a post-functionalist theory of European integration. British Journal of Political Science, 39, 211–215.
Schumacher, G., & van Kersbergen, K. (2014). Do mainstream parties adapt to the welfare chauvinism of populist parties? Party Politics, 22, 300–312.
Somer-Topcu, Z. (2009). Timely decisions: The effects of past National Elections on Party Policy change. The Journal of Politics, 71(01), 238–248.
Spies, D. (2013). Explaining working-class support for extreme right parties: A party competition approach. Acta Politica, 48(3), 296–325.
Spies, D., & Franzmann Simon, T. (2011). A two-dimensional approach to the political opportunity structure of extreme right parties in Western Europe. West European Politics, 34(5), 1044–1069.
Spoon, J.-J., Hobolt, S. B., & de Vries, C. E. (2014). Going green: Explaining issue competition on the environment. European Journal of Political Research, 53(2), 363–380.
Streeck, W. (2018). Norbert Lechner lecture on globalization and the transformation of the international state system. Diego Portales University: November 14, 2018. https://wolfgangstreeck.com/2019/01/21/globalization-and-the-transformation-of-the-international-state-system/.
Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2008). Opposing Europe?: The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism (Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives) (Vol. 2). Oxford: OUP.
van Biezen, I. (2004). Political parties as public utilities. Party Politics, 10(6), 701–722.
Van der Eijk, C., & Franklin, M. (2004). Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In G. Marks & M. R. Steenbergen (Eds.), European integration and political conflict (p. 33e50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Spanje, J. (2010). Contagious parties: Anti-immigration parties and their impact on other parties immigration stances in contemporary Western Europe. Party Politics, 16(5), 563–586.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Filip, A. (2021). Conclusion and Discussion. In: Eurosceptic Contagion. Springer Series in Electoral Politics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69036-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69036-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69035-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69036-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)