Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Beyond Meat? Taking Violence Against Non-human Animals Seriously as a Form of Social Harm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Social Harm

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology ((PSVV))

Abstract

This chapter offers an overview of non-speciesist approaches to harm, arguing that violence against non-human animals constitutes a form of social harm. Non-human animals are part of the social world, and violence against non-human animals is socially harmful in its individual and institutional forms, to human and non-human animals alike, and to the environment. Central to this is an acknowledgement of the interconnectedness of capitalism, violence and other forms of oppression, such as patriarchy and colonialism. To conclude, the chapter identifies potential positive actions that can be taken to address this violence, for example, including green criminology and critical animal studies in the curriculum, lending practical support to environmental and vegan causes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    ‘Charismatic megafauna’ are species of animals who have symbolic or cultural significance or who are broadly liked by humans (such as Giant Pandas and Humpback Whales), and therefore more likely to valued and seen as worthy of human interest, respect and protection.

References

  • Adams, C. (1990). The Sexual Politics of Meat. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anomaly, J. (2009). Harm to Others: The Social Cost of Antibiotics in Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,22(5), 423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arroyo-Quiroz, I., & Wyatt, T. (2019). Wildlife Trafficking Between the European Union and Mexico. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy,8(3), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascione, F. R. (1998). Battered Women’s Reports of Their Partners’ and Their Children’s Cruelty to Animals. Journal of Emotional Abuse,1(1), 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Radke, H. R. (2012). Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,38(2), 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (1999). Towards a Non-Speciesist Criminology. Criminology,37(1), 117–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (2018). Murdering Animals: Writings on Theriocide, Homicide and Non-Speciesist Criminology. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Best, S. (2009). The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: Putting Theory into Action and Animal Liberation into Higher Education. Journal for Critical Animal Studies,7(1), 9–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, S., Nocella, A. J., Kahn, R., Gigliotti, C., & Kemmerer, L. (2007). Introducing Critical Animal Studies. Journal for Critical Animal Studies,5(1), 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogueva, D., Marinova, D., & Raphaely, T. (2017). Reducing Meat Consumption: The Case for Social Marketing. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics,29(3), 477–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratanova, B., Loughnan, S., & Bastian, B. (2011). The Effect of Categorization as Food on the Perceived Moral Standing of Animals. Appetite,57(1), 193–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buttlar, B., & Walther, E. (2018). Measuring the Meat Paradox: How Ambivalence Towards Meat Influences Moral Disengagement. Appetite,128, 152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. D. D., & Morgan, K. (2011). Vegaphobia: Derogatory Discourses of Veganism and the Reproduction of Speciesism in UK National Newspapers. The British Journal of Sociology,62(1), 134–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Stewart, K. (2014). Our Children and Other Animals. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colling, S., Parson, S., & Arrigoni, A. (2014). Until All Are Free: Total Liberation Through Revolutionary Decolonization, Groundless Solidarity, and a Relationship Framework. In A. J. Nocella II, J. Sorenson, K. Socha, & A. Matsuoka (Eds.), Defining Critical Animal Studies—An Intersectional Social Justice Approach for Liberation (pp. 51–73). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compassion in World Farming. (2012). The Life Of: Dairy Cows. Compassion in World Farming. Available at: https://www.ciwf.org.uk/media/5235185/the-life-of-dairy-cows.pdf. Accessed 29 October 2019.

  • Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum (Vol. 1989). Article 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cudworth, E. (2015). Killing Animals: Sociology, Species Relations and Institutionalized Violence. The Sociological Review,63, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, F. (1968). The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. CA: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, A. J., Kalof, L., & Dietz, T. (2009). Slaughterhouses and Increased Crime Rates. Organization and Environment,22(2), 158–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, M., & Hall, M. (2017). The Case for a Victimology of Nonhuman Animal Harms. Contemporary Justice Review,20(3), 299–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, A. F., & Broom, D. M. (1990). Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare (3rd ed.). London: Bailliere Tindall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambert, I., & Linné, T. (2018). From Rice Eaters to Soy Boys: Race, Gender, and Tropes of ‘Plant Food Masculinity’. Animal Studies Journal,7(2), 129–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, D. (2015). Review of Evidence on Antimicrobial Resistance and Animal Agriculture in Developing Countries. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI)/Evidence on Demand Report. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a0897e40f0b649740000e0/EoD_Consultancy_June15_Ag_Related_AMR.pdf. Accessed 10 October 2019.

  • Groot, M. J., & van’t Hooft, K. E. (2016). The Hidden Effects of Dairy Farming on Public and Environmental Health in the Netherlands, India, Ethiopia, and Uganda, Considering the Use of Antibiotics and Other Agro-Chemicals. Frontiers in Public Health, 4, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossi, G., Goglio, P., Vitali, A., & Williams, A. G. (2019). Livestock and Climate Change: Impact of Livestock on Climate and Mitigation Strategies. Animal Frontiers,9(1), 69–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guetiya Wadoum, R. E., Zambou, N. F., Anyangwe, F. F., Njimou, J. R., Coman, M. M., Verdenelli, M. C., et al. (2016). Abusive Use of Antibiotics in Poultry Farming in Cameroon and the Public Health Implications. British Poultry Science,57(4), 483–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, A. B. (Ed.). (2010). Sistah Vegan: Black Female Vegans Speak on Food, Identity, Health and Society. New York: Lantern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, H. (2010). Some We Love, Some We Hate, Some We Eat. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuchan, C. L. (2015). Veganism Has a Serious Race Problem. Media Diversifed. Available at: https://mediadiversified.org/2015/12/16/veganism-has-a-serious-raceproblem. Accessed 2 November 2016.

  • Higgins, P. (2010). Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and Governance to Prevent the Destruction of Our Planet. London: Shepheard-Walwyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, P. (2012). Earth Is Our Business: Changing the Rules of the Game. London: Shepheard-Walwyn Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, P., Pantazis, C., Tombs, S., & Gordon, D. (Eds.). (2004). Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillyard, P., & Tombs, S. (2004). Beyond Criminology? In P. Hillyard, C. Pantazis, S. Tombs, & D. Gordon (Eds.), Beyond Criminology: Taking Harm Seriously (pp. 10–29). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, C., & Shearing, C. (Eds.). (2017). Criminology and the Anthropocene. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2019). Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse gas fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2019/08/Edited-SPM_Approved_Microsite_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 17 September 2019.

  • Jones, L. (2018, June 18). Veganism: Why Is It On the Up? BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-44488051. Accessed 28 October 2019.

  • Joy, M. (2010). Why We Love Dogs, Eat Pigs And Wear Cows: An Introduction to Carnism. San Fransisco, CA: Conari Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Caulfield, L. E., Garcia-Larsen, V., Steffen, L. M., Coresh, J., & Rebholz, C. M. (2019). Plant-Based Diets Are Associated With a Lower Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Disease Mortality, and All-Cause Mortality in a General Population of Middle-Aged Adults. Journal of the American Heart Association,8(16),

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, B. (2013). How Animals Grieve. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lapiņa, L., & Leer, J. (2016). Carnivorous Heterotopias: Gender, Nostalgia and Hipsterness in the Copenhagen Meat Scene. NORMA,11(2), 89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losasso, C., Di Cesare, A., Mastrorilli, E., Patuzzi, I., Cibin, V., Eckert, E. M., et al. (2018). Assessing Antimicrobial Resistance Gene Load in Vegan, Vegetarian and Omnivore Human Gut Microbiota. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents,52(5), 702–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loughnan, S., Haslam, N., & Bastian, B. (2010). The Role of Meat Consumption in the Denial of Moral Status and Mind to Meat Animals. Appetite,55(1), 156–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, J. M. (1963). The Threat to Kill. American Journal of Psychiatry,120(2), 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2015). It Ain’t Easy Eating Greens: Evidence of Bias Toward Vegetarians and Vegans from Both Source and Target. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marino, L., & Allen, K. (2017). The Psychology of Cows. Animal Behavior and Cognition,4(4), 474–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuoka, A., & Sorenson, J. (2018). Critical Animal Studies: Towards a Trans-Species Social Justice. London: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milman, O. (2018, December 6). The ‘Great Dying’: Rapid Warming Caused Largest Extinction Event Ever, Report Says. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/dec/06/global-warming-extinction-report-the-great-dying. Accessed 15 September 2019.

  • Milmo, C., Heal, A., & Wasley, A. (2018, July 29). Revealed: Heavy Toll of Injury Suffered by Slaughter Workers in Britain’s £8bn Meat Industry. INews. Available at: https://inews.co.uk/news/uk/revealed-heavy-toll-of-injury-suffered-by-slaughter-workers-in-britains-ps8bn-meat-industry-540909. Accessed 2 September 2019.

  • Mintel. (2019). #Veganuary: UK Overtakes Germany as World’s Leader for Vegan Food Launches. Mintel. Available at: https://www.mintel.com/press-centre/food-and-drink/veganuary-uk-overtakes-germany-as-worlds-leader-for-vegan-food-launches. Accessed 29 October 2019.

  • Mitchell, L. (2011). Moral Disengagement and Support for Nonhuman Animal Farming. Society & Animals, 19, 38–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Nor, N., Steeneveld, W., & Hogeveen, H. (2013). The Average Culling Rate of Dutch Dairy Herds Over the Years 2007 to 2010 and Its Association with Herd Reproduction Performance and Health. Journal of Dairy Research,81(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (1994). Rationality and Nature: A Sociological Inquiry into a Changing Relationship. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagesh, A. (2015, June 14). Vegans Need to Stop Comparing the Treatment of Animals to Slavery. Independent. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/meat-free-monday-vegans-need-to-stop-comparing-the-treatment-of-animals-to-american-slavery-10319301.html. Accessed 6 December 2017.

  • NetPol. (2019). Domestic Extremism Definition. The Network for Police Monitoring. Available at: https://netpol.org/domestic-extremism/defining-domestic-extremism/. Accessed 29 October 2019.

  • Nibert, D. (2002). Animal Rights/Human Rights: Entanglements of Oppression and Liberation. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nibert, D. (2017). Animal Oppression and Capitalism (2 Vols.). ABC-CLIO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nocella, A. J., II, Sorenson, J., Socha, K., & Matsuoka, A. (Eds.). (2014). Defining Critical Animal Studies—An Intersectional Social Justice Approach for Liberation. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noske, B. (1989). Humans and Other Animals: Beyond the Boundaries of Anthropology. Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, A. (2011). Policing Wildlife: Perspectives on Criminality in Wildlife Crime. Papers from the British Criminology Conference, 11, 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, A. (2013). Animal Harm: Perspectives On Why People Harm and Kill Animals. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurse, A. (2016). An Introduction to Green Criminology and Environmental Justice. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peggs, K. (2013). The ‘Animal-Advocacy Agenda’: Exploring Sociology for Non-human Animals. The Sociological Review,61, 591–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piazzaa, J., Ruby, M. B., Loughnan, S., Luong, M., Kulik, J., Watkins, H. M., et al. (2015). Rationalizing Meat Consumption. The 4Ns. Appetite,91(1), 114–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, F., Liu, G., Hu, F. B., Bhupathiraju, S. N., & Sun, Q. (2019). Association Between Plant-Based Dietary Patterns and Risk of Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Internal Medicine,179(10), 1335–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (1983). The Case for Animal Rights. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Regan, T. (2005). Empty Cages. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripple, W. J., Wolf, C., Newsome, T. M., Galetti, M., Alamgir, M., Crist, E., et al. (2017). World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity: A Second Notice. BioScience,67, 1026–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. (1989). Animal Revolution: Changing Attitudes Towards Speciesism. London: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. (1998). The Political Animal: The Conquest of Speciesism. London: McFarland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryder, R. (2000). Animal Revolution: Changing Attitudes Towards Speciesism. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salleh, A. (1989). Stirrings of a New Renaissance. Island Magazine,8, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, B. (2018). Global Animal Slaughter Statistics and Charts. Faunalytics. Available at: https://faunalytics.org/global-animal-slaughter-statistics-and-charts/. Accessed 29 October 2019.

  • Schlembach, R. (2018). Undercover Policing and the Spectre of ‘Domestic Extremism’: The Covert Surveillance of Environmental Activism in Britain. Social Movement Studies,17(5), 491–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P. (1975). Animal Liberation. New York: Review Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobal, J. (2005). Men, Meat, And Marriage: Models of Masculinity. Food and Foodways, 13(1–2), 135–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springmann, M., Godfray, H. C. J., Rayner, M., & Scarborough, P. (2016). Analysis and Valuation of the Health and Climate Change Cobenefits of Dietary Change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,113(15), 4146–4151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanko, E. (2001). The Day to Count: Reflections on a Methodology to Raise Awareness About the Impact of Domestic Violence in the UK. Criminology and Criminal Justice,1, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens Griffin, N. D., & Griffin, N. C. (2019). A Millennial Methodology? Autoethnographic Research in Do-It-Yourself (DIY) Punk and Activist Communities. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 20(3), Art. 3 [47 paragraphs].

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens-Griffin, N. D. (2017). Understanding Veganism: Biography and Identity. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N., & Fitzgerald, A. (2018). Understanding Animal (Ab)Use: Green Criminological Contributions, Missed Opportunities and a Way Forward. Theoretical Criminology,22(3), 402–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N., & Twine, R. (2015). The Rise of Critical Animal Studies: From the Margins to the Centre. Oxford: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tombs, S. (2007). Violence, Safety Crimes and Criminology. British Journal of Criminology,47(4), 531–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, B. (2007). Making a Killing: The Political Economy of Animal Rights. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tovey, H. (2003). Theorising Nature and Society in Sociology: The Invisibility of Animals. Sociologia Ruralis,43(3), 196–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twine, R. (2012). Revealing the ‘Animal-Industrial Complex’—A Concept and Method for Critical Animal Studies? Journal for Critical Animal Studies,10(1), 12–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twine, R., & Taylor, N. (Eds.). (2014). The Rise of Critical Animal Studies From the Margins to the Centre. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vegan Society. (2019a, March 8). Influential Women in the Vegan Movement. Vegan Society Website. Available at: https://www.vegansociety.com/whats-new/blog/influential-women-vegan-movement. Accessed 28 October 2019.

  • Vegan Society. (2019b). Statistics on Veganism. Vegan Society Website. Available at: https://www.vegansociety.com/news/media/statistics. Accessed 28 October 2019.

  • Viva! (2019). The Slaughter of Farmed Animals in the UK. Viva International Voice for Animals Website. Available at: https://www.viva.org.uk/what-we-do/slaughter/slaughter-farmed-animals-uk. Accessed 28 October 2019.

  • Walker, A. (2019, August 12). Goldsmiths Bans Beef from University Cafes to Tackle Climate Crisis. The Guardian. Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/aug/12/goldsmiths-bans-beef-from-university-cafes-to-tackle-climate-crisis. Accessed 18 August 2019.

  • White, R. (2013). Environmental Harm: An Eco-Justice Perspective. Bristol: Pluto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, R., & Heckenberg, D. (2014). Green Criminology: An Introduction to the Study of Environmental Harm. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, E. E., & DeMello, M. (2007). Why Animals Matter: The Case for Animal Protection. Amhurst, NY: Prometheus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Cancer Research Fund. (2016, March 3). New Research Shows Vegan Diets Could Lower Prostate Cancer Risk. World Cancer Research Fund UK. Available at: https://www.wcrf-uk.org/uk/media-centre/press-releases/new-research-shows-vegan-diets-could-lower-prostate-cancer-risk. Accessed 3 September 2019.

  • World Health Organisation (WHO). (2017, November). Implementation of the Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. WHO GAP AMR Newsletter No. 32. Available at: https://www.who.int/antimicrobial-resistance/news/WHO-GAP-AMR-Newsletter-No-32-Nov-2017.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 10 October 2019.

  • World Health Organisation (WHO). (2019). A Healthy Lifestyle. World Health Organisation Europe. Available at: http://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle. Accessed 4 September 2019.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Nathan Stephens Griffin

  2. Durham University, Durham, UK

    Naomi Griffin

Authors
  1. Nathan Stephens Griffin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Naomi Griffin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nathan Stephens Griffin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Pamela Davies

  2. Department of Sociology, Anthropology & Criminology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI, USA

    Paul Leighton

  3. Department of Social Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

    Tanya Wyatt

Further Reading

Further Reading

  • Adams, C. (1990). The Sexual Politics of Meat. New York: Continuum.

    This hugely influential text provides a feminist analysis of the links between patriarchy and animal abuse, arguing that feminist analysis logically contains a critique of human/animal relationships. The text illustrates how hierarchies of species, which nurture the oppression of other animals and allow meat consumption are interconnected with hierarchies of race, class and gender within patriarchal societies.

  • Nocella, A., Sorenson, J., Socha, K., & Matsuoko, A. (2014). Defining Critical Animal Studies: An Intersectional Social Justice Approach for Liberation. New York: Peter Lang.

    This edited volume collects a number of essays broadly united under the heading ‘Critical Animal Studies’. It provides a very useful introduction to this diverse, interdisciplinary field, and includes chapters focusing on total liberation, the relationship between academia and activism, critical animal studies pedagogy, and more.

  • Piers Beirne. (2018). Murdering Animals: Writings on Theriocide, Homicide and Non-Speciesist Criminology. London: Palgrave.

    This text introduces the concept of ‘theriocide’ to describe the death of animals as a result of human actions. This new way of conceptualising harm to animals has had profound impact on enhancing interest in species justice within and beyond the discipline of criminology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stephens Griffin, N., Griffin, N. (2021). Beyond Meat? Taking Violence Against Non-human Animals Seriously as a Form of Social Harm. In: Davies, P., Leighton, P., Wyatt, T. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Social Harm. Palgrave Studies in Victims and Victimology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72408-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72408-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72407-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72408-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation