Skip to main content

Anthropomorphism and the Abattoir

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reading Slaughter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter in part bridges the two previous chapters, which provide some historical and theoretical background, with the subsequent chapters that focus more closely on readings of specific primary texts in particular contexts. Hence, this chapter attempts to do both, as it proceeds from a general discussion of anthropomorphism as a literary technique, placed in the specific context of slaughterhouse fictions, on to readings of two specific texts, which both overtly employ so-called anthropomorphic characters in the form of speaking nonhuman animals. Through discussion and readings of James Agee’s short story ‘A Mother’s Tale’ (1952) and Neil Astley’s postmodern eco-fable The End of My Tether (2002), and their slaughterhouse depictions specifically, the chapter argues for what rich literary uses of anthropomorphism can do for nonhuman animals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the present discussion, I will stick to using the terms ‘anthropomorphism’, for the projection of human characteristics onto other animals (or the representation of other animals as having such characteristics), and ‘zoomorphism’, for the projection of other species’ characteristics onto humans (or the representation of human characters as having particular features of other species). Yet it is worth noting that even these terms are used differently in current debates and that, indeed, the line between the two is often blurry or dependent on perspective.

  2. 2.

    One might of course argue that Cartesian dogma about animals as automata without thoughts similarly overreaches beyond the realistic in the opposite direction.

  3. 3.

    It is worth noting, though, that Spiegelman’s use of animal allegory is complex and has numerous effects, not all of which necessarily defamiliarize, and his narrative at times draws explicit attention to ways in which the form can be problematized (see, e.g. Baker 2001, 139–49; Gavrilă 2017, 69–72; Herman 2011, 168–69; McGlothlin 2003, 183). In the 2011 book MetaMaus, Spiegelman discusses the animal metaphors at length, including how they ‘allowed for a distancing from the horrors described’ (149).

  4. 4.

    For a more elaborate analysis of the animal politics in Babe , which discusses the film in the context of meat and positions it in relation to other works, see McHugh 2011, 186–201 (see also Fudge 2002, 85–92; Mizelle 2011, 152–54; Stewart and Cole 2009, 469–72).

  5. 5.

    It should be noted that even when there is significant merit or historical evidence that lend authority to allegorical or metaphorical readings of animal stories, it is hardly the case that these texts do not (also) tell us something about nonhuman animals (see, for example, discussions on Animal Farm in McHugh 2011, 181–85 and Asker 1996, 60–70). Helen Tiffin, for instance, points out how ‘allegories depend on the constant interplay of difference and similarity for their effect’, for which reason animal allegories—including Animal Farm —rely on particular assumptions about ‘the species boundary’ that should not be overlooked when reading them (2007b, 252–53).

  6. 6.

    I return to both these novels in Chap. 7.

  7. 7.

    The novel displays a consciousness of the universality of such tropes through a number of direct and indirect intertextual references. At one point, for instance, a character reads a few lines from Wilfred Owen’s poem ‘Anthem for Doomed Youth’ (1917), in which soldiers ‘die as cattle’ (Astley 2002, 98).

  8. 8.

    Leading ecocritic Greg Garrard defines the concept of allomorphism as an ‘avowal of the wondrous strangeness of animals’ and a difference perceived as ‘a kind of superiority’ (see Garrard 2012, 154, 167), in which sense the superiority of nonhuman animals in The End of My Tether arguably makes them allomorphic rather than anthropomorphic. However, this inversion of hierarchical structures is only gradually revealed to the reader. In this discussion, I will continue to consider the animals as anthropomorphic insofar as they share abilities of speech and thought with human characters.

  9. 9.

    The Morrigan is a female figure, who is originally from Irish mythology, in which she is typically associated with war and fate, but also often with the land and animals, especially livestock. In the words of one study, the Morrigan ‘oversees the land, its stock and its society. Her shape-shifting is an expression of her affinity with the whole living universe of creatures, bird, animal and human’ (Herbert 1996, 145).

  10. 10.

    Although he considers it only briefly, and does not consider any of its slaughterhouse scenes, Neil Cornwell places Astley’s novel firmly within the absurdist in his study of The Absurd in Literature (2006, 286–7).

  11. 11.

    I discuss the theme of rurality in relation to slaughterhouse fictions in further detail in Chap. 5.

Works Cited

  • Agee, James. 1968 [1952]. A Mother’s Tale. In The Collected Short Prose of James Agee, ed. Robert Fitzgerald, 221–243. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbruster, Karla. 2013. What Do We Want from Talking Animals? Reflections on Literary Representations of Animal Voices and Minds. In Speaking for Animals: Animal Autobiographical Writing, ed. Margo DeMello, 17–33. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asker, D.B.D. 1996. The Modern Bestiary: Animals in English Fiction, 1880–1945. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astley, Neil. 2002. The End of My Tether. London: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Steve. 2001. Picturing the Beast: Animals, Identity, and Representation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, Brock, Steve Loughnan, Nick Haslam, and Helena R.M. Radke. 2012. Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38 (2): 247–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jill. 2005. Empathic Vision: Affect, Trauma, and Contemporary Art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, John. 2009. Why Look at Animals? London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkfelt, Sune, Sara Kondrup, Helena Röcklinsberg, Kristian Bjørkdahl, and Mickey Gjerris. 2015. Closer to Nature? A Critical Discussion of the Marketing of “Ethical” Animal Products. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 28 (6): 1053–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, Brian. 2007. Tails Within Tales. In Knowing Animals, ed. Laurence Simmons and Philip Armstrong, 217–243. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadman, Sam. 2016. Reflections on Anthropocentrism, Anthropomorphism and Impossible Fiction: Towards a Typological Spectrum of Fictional Animals. Animal Studies Journal 5 (2): 161–182. http://ro.uow.edu.au/asj/vol5/iss2/8

  • Cornwell, Neil. 2006. The Absurd in Literature. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cosslett, Tess. 2006. Talking Animals in British Children’s Fiction, 1786–1914. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, Roald. 1984. Dirty Beasts. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daston, Lorraine, and Gregg Mitman, eds. 2005. Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, Frans. 1999. Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial: Consistency in Our Thinking About Humans and Other Animals. Philosophical Topics 27 (1): 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Ed. Marie-Louise Mallet, trans. David Wills. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, Vinciane. 2016. What Would Animals Say If We Asked the Right Questions? Trans. Brett Buchanan. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, Erica. 2002. Animal. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrard, Greg. 2012. Ecocriticism. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavrilă, Ana-Maria. 2017. Holocaust Representation and Graphical Strangeness in Art Spiegelman’s Maus: A Survivor’s Tale: “Funny Animals,” Constellations, and Traumatic Memory. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Communicatio 4 (1): 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbert, Máire. 1996. Transmutations of an Irish Goddess. In The Concept of the Goddess, ed. Sandra Billington and Miranda Green, 141–151. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David. 2011. Storyworld/Umwelt: Nonhuman Experiences in Graphic Narratives. SubStance 40 (1): 156–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Alexandra C., and Marc Bekoff. 2007. Naturalizing Anthropomorphism: Behavioral Prompts to Our Humanizing of Animals. Anthrozoös 20 (1): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoult-Saros, Stacy. 2016. The Mythology of the Animal Farm in Children’s Literature: Over the Fence. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, John S. 1992. The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • King-Smith, Dick. 1985. The Sheep-Pig. Harmondsworth: Puffin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, Victor A. 1975. James Agee. Boston: Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Erling. 1971. James Agee. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitsberger, Madelaine, Judith Benz-Schwarzburg, and Herwig Grimm. 2016. A Speaking Piglet Advertises Beef: An Ethical Analysis on Objectification and Anthropomorphism. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 29 (6): 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePan, Don. 2010. Animals: A Novel. New York: Soft Skull Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, Peter, and Nick Park. 2000. Chicken Run. DVD. Universal City: Dreamworks Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGlothlin, Erin. 2003. No Time Like the Present: Narrative and Time in Art Spiegelman’s Maus. Narrative 11 (2): 177–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, Susan. 2011. Animal Stories: Narrating across Species Lines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Robert. 2016. James Agee’s “A Mother’s Tale” and the Biopolitics of Animal Life and Death in Postwar America. In Against Life, ed. Alastair Hunt and Stephanie Youngblood, 143–159. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley, Mary. 2002. Beast and Man: The Roots of Human Nature. Rev. ed. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milton, Kay. 2005. Anthropomorphism or Egomorphism? The Perception of Non-Human Persons by Human Ones. In Animals in Person: Cultural Perspectives on Human-Animal Intimacy, ed. John Knight, 255–271. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Robert W., and Mark Hamm. 1997. The Interpretation of Animal Psychology: Anthropomorphism or Behavior Reading. Behaviour 134 (3/4): 173–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizelle, Brett. 2011. Pig. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Thomas. 1974. What Is It Like to Be a Bat? The Philosophical Review 83 (4): 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehrlich, Brigitte. 2004. War on Foot and Mouth Disease in the UK, 2001: Towards a Cultural Understanding of Agriculture. Agriculture and Human Values 21 (1): 15–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohrnberg, James. 1998. Allegory Deveiled: A New Theory for Construing Allegory’s Two Bodies. Modern Philology 96 (2): 188–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, Chris. 1995. Babe. DVD. Universal City: Universal Pictures.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, George. 1951 [1945]. Animal Farm. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozeki, Ruth L. 1998. My Year of Meats. New York: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Sowon S. 2013. “Who Are These People?”: Anthropomorphism, Dehumanization and the Question of the Other. Arcadia 48 (1): 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, Elisabeth S. 1996. The Representation of Animals in Children’s Television. Anthrozoös 9 (4): 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, Kathryn. 2004. Unpicking the Seam: Talking Animals and Reader Pleasure in Early Modern Satire. In Renaissance Beasts: Of Animals, Humans, and Other Wonderful Creatures, ed. Erica Fudge, 19–36. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. 2011. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Adam. 2014. Bête. London: Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serpell, James A. 2005. People in Disguise: Anthropomorphism and the Human-Pet Relationship. In Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism, ed. Lorraine Daston and Gregg Mitman, 121–136. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewell, Anna. 1994 [1877]. Black Beauty. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons, John. 2002. Animal Rights and the Politics of Literary Representation. Houndmills: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, Upton. 1962. The Autobiography of Upton Sinclair. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985 [1906]. The Jungle. Ed. Ronald Gottesman. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Bill. 2012. The Ethics and Aesthetics of Formalism: Shklovsky and Agee. Lit: Literature Interpretation Theory 23 (1): 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper, Kate. 2005. The Beast in Literature: Some Initial Thoughts. Comparative Critical Studies 2 (3): 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelman, Art. 2003. The Complete Maus. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. MetaMAUS. London: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Kate, and Matthew Cole. 2009. The Conceptual Separation of Food and Animals in Childhood. Food, Culture & Society 12 (4): 457–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, Matthew. 2015 [1997]. Cows. N.p.: Matthew Stokoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Nik. 2011. Anthropomorphism and the Animal Subject. In Anthropocentrism: Humans, Animals, Environments, ed. Rob Boddice, 265–279. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teittinen, Jouni. 2016. Passing the Cattle Car: Anthropomorphism, Animal Suffering, and James Agee’s “A Mother’s Tale”. In Affect, Space and Animals, ed. Jopi Nyman and Nora Schuurman, 151–162. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin, Helen. 2007a. Foot in Mouth: Animals, Disease, and the Cannibal Complex. Mosaic: An Interdisciplinary Critical Journal 40 (1): 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007b. Pigs, People and Pigoons. In Knowing Animals, ed. Laurence Simmons and Philip Armstrong, 244–265. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, Tom. 2003. If Horses Had Hands…. Society & Animals 11 (3): 267–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varsava, Nina. 2014. The Problem of Anthropomorphous Animals: Toward a Posthumanist Ethics. Society & Animals 22 (5): 520–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vint, Sherryl. 2010. Animal Alterity: Science Fiction and the Question of the Animal. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Washer, Peter. 2006. Representations of Mad Cow Disease. Social Science & Medicine 62 (2): 457–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weil, Kari. 2012. Thinking Animals—Why Animal Studies Now? New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, E.B. 1963 [1952]. Charlotte’s Web. Harmondsworth: Puffin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Conrad. 2007. The Scalding Rooms. Hornsea: PS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witek, Joseph. 1989. Comic Books as History: The Narrative Art of Jack Jackson, Art Spiegelman, and Harvey Pekar. Jackson: University Press of Mississippi.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sune Borkfelt .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Borkfelt, S. (2022). Anthropomorphism and the Abattoir. In: Reading Slaughter. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98915-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics