Zusammenfassung
Die kritische Rahmenanalyse hat gezeigt, dass Konzepte selbst dann verschiedene Bedeutungen haben können, wenn sie mit denselben Worten beschrieben werden (Verloo 2007). Intersektionalität ist einer dieser umstrittenen Begriffe innerhalb des feministischen Denkens. In diesem Beitrag versuche ich zu klären, was Feministinnen eigentlich meinen, wenn von Intersektionalität die Rede ist.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Sowohl der englische Ausdruck framework wie der deutsche Ausdruck Rahmenwerk bedeuten wörtlich ‚Gerüst‘ sowie im abstrakten Sinn ‚Rahmenbedingungen‘.
- 2.
Anspielung auf das in den USA geläufige „Thomas-Theorem“ („If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences.“) (A. d. Ü.).
Literatur
Bacchi, Carol (1999): Women, Politics and Policies: The Construction of Policy Problems. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.
Benford, Robert (1997): An Insider’s Critique of the Social Movement Framing Perspective. In: Sociological Inquiry 67(4), 409 – 430.
Benford, Robert und David A. Snow (2000): Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment. In: Annual Review of Sociology 26, 611 – 639.
Brah, Avtar und Ann Phoenix (2004): Ain’t I A Woman? Revisiting Intersectionality. In: Journal of International Women’s Studies 5(3), 75 – 87.
Brown, Jessica A. und Myra M. Ferree (2005): Close Your Eyes and Think of England: Pronatalism in the British Print Media. In: Gender & Society 19(1), 5 – 24.
Crenshaw, Kimberlé W. (1989): Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics. In: University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139 – 167.
Edelman, Lauren B., Riggs Fuller, Sally and Mara-Drita, Iona (2001): Diversity Rhetoric and the Managerialization of Law. American Journal of Sociology 106(6), 1589 – 1641.
Espeland, Wendy N. und Michael Sauder M. (2007): Rankings and Reactivity: How Public Measures Recreate Social Worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 1 – 40.
Ferree, Myra M. (2003): Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Abortion Discourses in Germany and the United States. In: American Journal of Sociology 109(2), 304 – 344.
Ferree, Myra M. (2008): Framing Equality: The Politics of Race, Class, Gender in the US, Germany, and the Expanding European Union. In. Roth, S. (Hrsg.): The Gender Politics of the European Union. New York: Berghahn Publishers, 237 – 255.
Foucault, Michael (1977): Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. (Übersetzt aus dem Französischen von Alan Sheridan) New York: Pantheon Books.
Giddens, Anthony (1990): The consequences of modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Glenn, Evelyn N. (2002): Unequal Labor: How Race and Gender shaped American Citizenship and Labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Goffman, Erwin (1974): Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.
Hancock, Ange-Marie (2007): When Multiplication Doesn’t Equal Quick Addition: Examining Intersectionality as a Research Paradigm. In: Perspectives on Politics 5(1), 63 – 79.
Hellgren, Zenia und Hobson, Barbara (2008): Gender and Ethnic Minority Claims in Swedish and EU Frames: Sites of Multi-level Political Opportunities and Boundary Making. In: Roth, Silke (Hrsg.): Gender Politics and Women’s Movements in the Expanding European Union. New York: Berghahn Books, 211 – 233.
Hull, Gloria, Scott, Patricia B. und Barbara Smith (1982): All the Women are White, All the Blacks are Men, but Some of Us are Brave: Black Women’s Studies. Old Westbury NY: Feminist Press.
Hull, Kathleen E. (1997): The Political Limits of the Rights Frame: The Case of Same-Sex Marriage in Hawaii. In: Sociological Perspectives 44(2), 207 – 232.
Knapp, Gudrun-Axeli (2005): Race, Class, Gender: Reclaiming Baggage in Fast-Travelling Theories. In: European Journal of Women’s Studies 12(3), 249 – 265.
Lombardo, Emanuela; Meier, Petra und Mieke Verloo (Hrsg.) (2009): The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policy-making. London: Routledge.
Mansbridge, Jane (1986): Why we lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mathews, Donald und Jane S. DeHart (1990): Sex, Gender and the Politics of the ERA: A state and the Nation. New York: Oxford University Press.
McCall, Leslie (2005): The Complexity of Intersectionality. In: Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 30(3), 1771 – 1880.
Pedriana, Nicholas (2006): From Protective to Equal Treatment: Legal Framing Processes and Transformation of the Women’s Movement in the 1960s. American Journal of Sociology 111(6), 1718 – 1761.
Prins, Baukje (2006): Narrative Accounts of Origins: A Blind Spot in the Intersectional Approach? In: European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3), 277 – 290.
Rottmann, Susan B. und Myra M. Ferree (2008): Citizenship and Intersectionality: German Feminist Debates about Headscarf and Anti-discrimination Laws. In: Social Politics 15(4), 481 – 513.
Skrentny, John (2006): Policy-Elite Perceptions and Social Movement Success: Understanding Variations in Group Inclusion in Affirmative Action. In: American Journal of Sociology 111(6), 1762 – 1815.
Snow, David A. (2004): Framing Processes, Ideology, and Discursive Fields. In: Snow, D. A.; Soule, S. A. und H. Kriese (Hrsg.): The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 380 – 412.
Stone, Deborah A. (1988): Policy Paradox and Political Reason. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
Verloo, Mieke (2006): Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union. In: European Journal of Women’s Studies 13(3), 211 – 228.
Verloo, Mieke (Hrsg.) (2007): Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe. Budapest: CPS Books.
Walby, Sylvia (2007): Complexity Theory, Systems Theory, and Multiple Intersecting Social Inequalities. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37(4), 449 – 470.
Yuval-Davis, Nira (1990): Gender and Nation. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage Publications.
Zerilli, Linda (2005): Feminism and the Abyss of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zippel, Kathrin (2006): The Politics of Sexual Harassment: A Comparative Study of the United States, the European Union, and Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferree, M.M. (2013). Die diskursiven Politiken feministischer Intersektionalität. In: Lutz, H., Vivar, M.T.H., Supik, L. (eds) Fokus Intersektionalität. Geschlecht und Gesellschaft, vol 47. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19550-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-19550-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-19549-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-531-19550-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)