Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Parteien

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Sozialpolitik

Zusammenfassung

Politische Parteien gelten als zentral für die Ausgestaltung des Wohlfahrtsstaates. Dieser Aufsatz diskutiert die theoretische Herleitung von Parteiendifferenzen über die Interessen der Wähler einerseits, über die Überzeugungen der Parteien selbst andererseits und diskutiert, in welcher Weise der Wettbewerb um Wählerstimmen und Regierungsbeteiligung Parteiendifferenzen entgegenwirkt und inwieweit Parteieneffekte durch Globalisierung und Institutionen konditioniert werden. Anschließend wird ein Überblick über den Forschungsstand zu Parteieneffekten auf die Sozialpolitik in den entwickelten Demokratien gegeben. Dabei zeigt sich, dass Parteieneffekte im Zeitverlauf etwas abgenommen haben, allerdings bei der Analyse der wohlfahrtsstaatlichen Generosität und bei arbeitsmarktnahen Sozialleistungen besonders deutlich erkennbar sind.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Allan, James P. und Lyle Scruggs. 2004. Political partisanship and welfare state reform in advanced industrial societies. American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 496 – 512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus und Nathalie Giger. 2008. Conditional punishment: A comparative analysis of the electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment in OECD nations, 1980 – 2003. West European Politics 31(3): 558 – 580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armingeon, Klaus, Kai Guthmann und David Weisstanner. 2016. Choosing the path of austerity: How parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. West European Politics 39(4): 628 – 647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandau, Frank. 2015. Wohlfahrtsstaatliche Strukturen und Parteieneffekte. Eine vergleichende Analyse sozialpolitischer Konfliktmuster in Großbritannien, Schweden und Deutschland. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandau, Frank. 2017. The impact of partisanship in the era of retrenchment: Insights from quantitative welfare state research. SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2969792.

  • Beyme, Klaus von. 2000. Parteien im Wandel. Von den Volksparteien zu den professionalisierten Wählerparteien. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, Clem und Jeff Manza. 2007. Why welfare states persist. The importance of public opinion in democracies. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, Ian, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Andrea Volkens, Judith Bara und Eric Tanenbaum. 2001. Mapping policy preferences. Estimates for parties, electors, and governments 1945 – 1998. Oxford u. a.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis G. 2008. What welfare states do: A disaggregated expenditure approach. Journal of Social Policy 38(1): 45 – 62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmenegger, Patrick. 2007. Parteien und Opportunitätsstrukturen: Die parteipolitischen Determinanten der Staats- und Sozialausgaben, 1980 – 2000. Zeitschrift für Sozialreform 53(1): 79 – 102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta.1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Geoffrey. 1998. Partisan politics in the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Geoffrey und Deborah Mitchell. 2001. Globalization, government spending and taxation in the OECD. European Journal of Political Research 39(2): 145 – 177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garritzmann, Julian L. 2016. The political economy of higher education finance. The politics of tuition fees and subsidies in OECD countries, 1945 – 2015. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giger, Nathalie. 2012. Wie reagieren Wähler auf Sparpolitik? Eine theoretische und empirische Annäherung an die elektoralen Kosten von Sparpolitik. der moderne staat 5(2): 291 – 312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giger, Nathalie und Moira Nelson. 2011. The electoral consequences of welfare state retrenchment: Blame avoidance or credit claiming in the era of permanent austerity? European Journal of Political Research 50(1): 1 – 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gingrich, Jane und Silja Häusermann. 2015. The decline of the working-class vote, the reconfiguration of the welfare support coalition and consequences for the welfare state. Journal of European Social Policy 25(1): 50 – 75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2001. Welfare-state retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands, 1982 – 1998. The role of party competition and party consensus. Comparative Political Studies 34(9): 963 – 985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, Christoffer. 2002. The politics of justification. Party competition and welfare-state retrenchment in Denmark and the Netherlands from 1982 to 1998. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Häusermann, Silja und Hanspeter Kriesi. 2015. What do voters want? Dimensions and configurations in individual-level preferences and party choice. In The politics of advanced capitalism, Hrsg. Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt und Hanspeter Kriesi, 202 – 230. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, Douglas A. 1977. Political parties and macroeconomic policy. American Political Science Review 71(4): 1467 – 1487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, Alexander M. und Duane H. Swank. 1992. Politics, institutions, and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960 – 82. American Political Science Review 86(3): 658 – 674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillen, Sven. 2017. „Nur wer wählt, zählt“? Eine Analyse des Zusammenhangs von Wahlbeteiligung und arbeitsmarktbezogenen sozialen Leistungen linker Parteien in OECD-Ländern. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 58(4): 533 – 559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Alexander. 2017. Government ideology, economic pressure and risk privatization. How economic worldviews shape social policy choices in times of crisis. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, Alexander und Carsten Jensen. 2017. When and why politicians do not keep their welfare promises. European Journal of Political Research 56(2): 381 – 400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne, Charles Ragin und John D. Stephens. 1993. Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional Structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology 99(3): 711 – 749.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne und John D. Stephens. 2001. Development and crisis of the welfare State. Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahn, Detlef. 2006. Globalization as ‚Galton’s problem‘: The missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development. International Organization 60(2): 401 – 431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten. 2010. Issue compensation and right-wing government social spending. European Journal of Political Research 49(2): 282 – 299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten. 2011. Catching up by transition: Globalization as a generator of convergence in social spending. Journal of European Public Policy 18(1): 106 – 121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten. 2012. Labour market- vs. life course-related social policies: Understanding cross-programme differences. Journal of European Public Policy 19(2): 275 – 291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten, Christoph Arndt, Seonghui Lee und Georg Wenzelburger. 2017. Policy instruments and welfare state reform. Journal of European Social Policy (i. E.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Carsten und Henrik B. Seeberg. 2015. The power of talk and the welfare state: Evidence from 23 Countries on an asymmetric opposition-government response Mechanism. Socio-Economic Review 13(2): 215 – 233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, Stathis N. und van Kersbergen, Kees. 2010. Christian democracy. Annual Review of Political Science 13: 183 – 209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Richard S. und Peter Mair. 1995. Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1(1): 5 – 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kersbergen, Kees van. 1995. Social capitalism. A study of Christian democracy and the welfare state. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert. 2001. Partisan competition and welfare state retrenchment. When do politicians choose unpopular policies? In The new politics of the welfare state, Hrsg. Paul Pierson, 265 – 302. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert und Philipp Rehm. 2014. Occupations as a site of political preference formation. Comparative Political Studies 47(12): 1670 – 1706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, Herbert und Philipp Rehm. 2015. Party alignments: Change and continuity. In The politics of advanced capitalism, Hrsg. Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann, Herbert Kitschelt und Hanspeter Kriesi, 179 – 201. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittel, Bernhard und Herbert Obinger. 2003. Political parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. Journal of European Public Policy 10(1): 20 – 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Markus. 2006. Partizipation in politischen Parteien. Eine empirische Analyse des Mobilisierungspotenzials politischer Parteien sowie der Struktur innerparteilicher Partizipation in Deutschland. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 47(1): 35 – 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, Michael Baggesen und Christian Elmelund-Præstekær. 2013. Partisan effects on welfare state retrenchment: Empirical evidence from a measurement of government intentions. Social Policy and Administration 47(1): 50 – 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klitgaard, Michael Baggesen, Gijs Schumacher und Menno Soentke. 2015. The partisan politics of institutional welfare state reform. Journal of European Public Policy 22(7): 948 – 966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korpi, Walter und Joakim Palme. 2003. New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975 – 1995. American Political Science Review 97(3): 425 – 446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwon, Hyeok Yong und Jonas Pontusson. 2010. Globalization, labour power and partisan politics revisited. Socio-Economic Review 8(2): 251 – 281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, Anders. 2007. Obfuscating retrenchment: Swedish welfare policy in the 1990s. Journal of Public Policy 27(2): 129 – 150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesch, Daniel. 2015. Occupational structure and labor market change in Western Europe since 1990. In The politics of advanced capitalism, Hrsg. Pablo Beramendi, Silja Häusermann,

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbert Kitschelt und Hanspeter Kriesi, 112 – 132. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1996. The new politics of the welfare state. World Politics 48(2): 143 – 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 2001. Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. In The new politics of the welfare state, Hrsg. Paul Pierson, 80 – 104. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontusson, Jonas und David Rueda. 2010. The politics of inequality: Voter mobilization and left parties in advanced industrial states. Comparative Political Studies 43(6): 675 – 705.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke, Niklas. 2009. Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice 140(1): 105 – 124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potrafke, Niklas. 2017. Partisan politics: The empirical evidence from OECD panel studies. Journal of Comparative Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2016.12.004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, Philipp. 2011. Social policy by popular demand. World Politics 63(2): 271 – 299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Fiona. 2000. „Beyond left and right“: The new partisan politics of welfare. Governance 13(2): 155 – 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, David. 2005. Insider-outsider politics in industrialized democracies: The challenge to social democratic parties. American Political Science Review 99(1): 61 – 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 1996. When parties matter: A review of the possibilities and limits of partisan influence on public policy. European Journal of Political Research 30(2): 155 – 183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, Manfred G. 2005. Sozialpolitik in Deutschland. Historische Entwicklung und internationaler Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, Carina und Reimut Zohlnhöfer. 2017. Partisan differences and the interventionist state in advanced democracies, Socio-Economic Review online first (https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwx055).

  • Schumacher, Gijs, Barbara Vis und Kees van Kersbergen. 2013. Political parties’ welfare image, electoral punishment and welfare state retrenchment. Comparative European Politics 11(1): 1 – 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, Stuart N. und Christopher Wlezien. 2010. Degrees of democracy. Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1995. The limits of politics. Government and Opposition 30(3): 291 – 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swank, Duane. 2013. Party government, institutions, and social protection in the age of austerity. In Staatstätigkeiten, Parteien und Demokratie. Festschrift für Manfred G. Schmidt, Hrsg. Klaus Armingeon, 307 – 330. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto players. How political institutions work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vis, Barbara. 2016. Taking stock of the comparative literature on the role of blame avoidance strategies in social policy reform. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 18(2): 122 – 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Stefanie. 2017. Globalization and the demand-side of Politics: How globalization shapes labor market risk perceptions and policy preferences. Political Science Research and Methods 5(1): 55 – 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, R. Kent. 1986. The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6(4): 371 – 398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, Georg. 2011. Political strategies and fiscal retrenchment: Evidence from four countries. West European Politics 34(6): 1151 – 1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, Georg. 2014. Blame avoidance, electoral punishment and the perceptions of risk. Journal of European Social Policy 24(1): 80 – 91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzelburger, Georg und Felix Hörisch. 2016. Framing effects and comparative social policy reform: Comparing blame avoidance evidence from two experiments. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 18(2): 157 – 175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2007. The politics of budget consolidation in Britain and Germany: The impact of blame avoidance opportunities. West European Politics 30(5): 1120 – 1138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2009. How politics matter when policies change: Understanding policy change as a political problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 11(1): 97 – 115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2012. Machen Parteiensysteme einen Unterschied? Die Struktur des Parteienwettbewerbs und die Kürzung von Sozialausgaben in Westeuropa. der moderne staat 5(2): 341 – 360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut. 2017. Zum Einfluss des Parteienwettbewerbs auf politische Entscheidungen. In Parteien unter Wettbewerbsdruck, Hrsg. Sebastian Bukow und Uwe Jun, 15 – 37. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, Fabian Engler und Kathrin Dümig. 2018. The retreat of the interventionist state in advanced democracies (Review Article). British Journal of Political Science 48(2): 535 – 562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohlnhöfer, Reimut, Frieder Wolf und Georg Wenzelburger. 2012. Parteien und die Generosität von Altersrenten in Zeiten permanenter Austerität. Swiss Political Science Review 18(1): 28 – 53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Reimut Zohlnhöfer

Authors
  1. Reimut Zohlnhöfer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Reimut Zohlnhöfer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Bremen Socium, Bremen, Germany

    Herbert Obinger

  2. Universität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

    Manfred G. Schmidt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zohlnhöfer, R. (2019). Parteien. In: Obinger, H., Schmidt, M. (eds) Handbuch Sozialpolitik. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-22803-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-22802-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-22803-3

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation