Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

More or Less Vulnerable?

Variation in the Extent to Which Mainstream Political Parties’ Voters Consider Voting for Radical Right Populist Parties

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Continuity and Change of Party Democracies in Europe

Part of the book series: Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderhefte ((PVS))

Abstract

West European party systems have undergone profound changes, one of the most obvious being a marked decrease in vote share going to the mainstream parties whose domination of electoral politics used to be taken for granted, along with an increase in votes going to more radical, populist contenders—most (but not all) of them on the anti-immigrant right. These two changes are widely assumed to be linked. Yet the potential impact of the populist radical right on the electoral performance of (western) Europe’s other party families may well be uneven. We use European Election Study survey data to explore which parties (and party families) might be most vulnerable to seeing their voters defect to the populist radical right. We find that, although it has become commonplace to observe that it is the social democratic centre-left which is most vulnerable in this respect, it is actually centre-right parties which, at this point anyway, would seem to have most to lose. But they are not alone: interestingly, the voters of radical left parties are also vulnerable to the appeal of the radical right.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akkerman, T., de Lange, S.L. and Rooduijn, M. (eds.). 2016. Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: into the mainstream? Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonucci, L., Horvath, L., Kutiyski, Y., & Krouwel, A. 2017. The malaise of the squeezed middle: Challenging the narrative of the ‘left behind’ Brexiter. Competition & Change, 1024529417704135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzheimer, K. 2009. Contextual factors and the extreme right vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 259–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arzheimer, K. and E. Carter. 2009. ‘Christian Religiosity and Voting for West European Radical Right Parties’, West European Politics, 32 (5): 985–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T., Green-Pedersen, C., Krouwel, A., Luther, K. R., & Sitter, N. 2010. If you can’t beat them, join them? Explaining social democratic responses to the challenge from the populist radical right in Western Europe. Political studies, 58(3), 410–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bale, T., & Krouwel, A. P. M. 2015. Down but not out: A comparison of Germany’s CDU/CSU with Christian democratic parties in Austria, Belgium, Italy and the Netherlands. In S. Green, & E. Turner (eds.). Understanding the Transformation of Germany’s CDU (pp. 16–45). (Association for the Study of German Politics). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betz, H-G. 2002. ‘Rechtspopulismus in Westeuropa: Aktuelle Entwicklungen und Politische Bedeutung’, Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 32 (3): 251–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berbuir, N., Lewandowsky, M., & Siri, J. 2015. The AfD and its sympathisers: finally a right-wing populist movement in Germany?. German Politics, 24(2), 154–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornschier, S. 2010. Cleavage Politics and the Populist Right: The New Cultural Conflict in Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, A. 2005. ‘Old Right or New Right? The Ideological Positioning of Parties of the Far Right’, European Journal of Political Research, 44 (2): 203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowley, P. and Kavanagh, D. 2018. The British General Election of 2017. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W.P. and Katz, R.S. (eds.). 2013. The challenges of intra-party democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T. & Bowler, S. 2018. ‘Donald Trump’s challenge to the study of elections, public opinion and parties.’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 28(2), 125–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downes, J. and Loveless, M. 2018. Centre right and radical right party competition in Europe: Strategic emphasis on immigration, anti-incumbency, and economic crisis, Electoral Studies, Volume 54, pp. 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. and Tilley, J. 2017. The New Politics of Class: The Political Exclusion of the British Working Class. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • García Agustín Ó. & Briziarelli M. (eds.). 2018. Podemos and the New Political Cycle. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giebler, H., & Regel, S. 2018. Who Votes Right-Wing Populist. Geographical and Individual Factors in Seven Ge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley. 2016. “Fleeing the centre: The rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis.” West European Politics 39 (5): 971–991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignazi, Piero. 2017. Party and Democracy: The Uneven Road to Party Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ivarsflaten, E., & Stubager, R. 2012. Voting for the populist radical right in Western Europe. Class Politics and the Radical Right, 122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hino, A. 2012. New challenger parties in Western Europe: a comparative analysis. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B. 2016. The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, P. and H. Margetts. 2009. ‘The Latent Support for the Extreme Right in British Politics’, West European Politics, 32 (3): 496–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair. 1995. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1 (1):5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. and McCrone, D. (eds.). 2013. The Crisis of Social Democracy in Europe. (Cambridge CUP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircheimer, Otto. 1954. Parteistruktur und Massendemokratie in Europa. Archiv de Öffentliches Rechts LXXIX: 301–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchheimer, Otto. 1965. Der Wandel des Westeuropäischen Parteisystems, Politische Vierteljahresschrift 6, no. 1: 20–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. The transformation of the Western European party systems. In Joseph La Palombara & Myron Weiner (eds.). Political parties and political development (pp. 177–200). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey. 2008. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., & Frey, T. 2008. The Netherlands: a challenge that was slow in coming. In Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier, and T. Frey (eds.) West European politics in the age of globalization, 154–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A. 2003. Otto Kirchheimer and the catch-all party. West European Politics, 26(2), 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A., Vitiello, T., & Wall, M. 2012. The practicalities of issuing vote advice: a new methodology for profiling and matching. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5(3–4), 223–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A. 2012. Party transformations in European democracies. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A. P. M., & Lucardie, P. 2008. Waiting in the wings: New parties in the Netherlands. Acta Politica, 43(2–3), 278–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krouwel, A., Kutiyski, Y., van Prooijen, J. W., Martinsson, J., & Markstedt, E. 2018. Does extreme political ideology predict conspiracy beliefs, economic evaluations and political trust? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(2), 435–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurer, T., & Palier, B. 2019. Shrinking and shouting: the political revolt of the declining middle in times of employment polarization. Research & Politics, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutiyski, Yordan, André Krouwel, and Jan-Willem van Prooijen. 2019. Political extremism and distrust. The Social Science Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2019.03.004.

  • Lilleker, D., & Scullion, R. 2008. The construction of the political consumer (or politics: what not to consume). Voters or consumers: Imagining the contemporary electorate. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbers, M., Gijsberts, M., & Scheepers, P. 2002. Extreme right wing voting in Western Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 41(3), 345–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. 2008. Electoral volatility and the Dutch party system: A comparative perspective. Acta Politica, 43(2–3), 235–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, L. 2011. Radical Left Parties in Europe. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesch, D. 2008. Explaining workers’ support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland. International Political Science Review, 29(3), 349–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otjes, S., & Krouwel, A. P. M. 2015. Two shades of Green? The electorates of GreenLeft and the Party for the Animals. Environmental Politics, 24(6), 991–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otjes, S. and Krouwel, A. 2017. The Rise of the New Cultural Dimension. Relações Internacionais.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otjes, S., & Krouwel, A. P. M. 2018. Old voters on new dimensions: Why do voters vote for pensioners’ parties? The case of the Netherlands. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 30(1), 24–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plasser, F., & Ulram, P. A. 2000. Rechtspopulistische Resonanzen: Die Wählerschaft der FPÖ. In F. Plasser, P. A. Ulram & F. Sommer. (eds.). Das Österreichische Wahlverhalten (pp. 225–241). Wien: Signum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelizzo, R. 2007. The cartel party and the rise of the new extreme right. Comparative European Politics, 5(2), 226–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (eds.). 2007. The presidentialization of politics: A comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford University Press on Demand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M. 2018. What unites the voter bases of populist parties? Comparing the electorates of 15 populist parties. European Political Science Review, 10(3), 351–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydgren, J. 2007. ‘The Sociology of the Radical Right’, Annual Review of Sociology, 33: 241–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydgren, J. 2012. Class politics and the radical right (Extremism and democracy). Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S., Webb, P. and Poguntke, T. (eds.). 2017. Organizing Political Parties Representation, Participation, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke, Oliver. 2016. The ‘Party for Immigrants’? Social Democrats’ Struggle with an Inconvenient Electoral Issue. German Politics 25 (3):398–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spierings, N., & Zaslove, A. 2017. Gender, populist attitudes, and voting: explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties. West European Politics, 40(4), 821–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spruyt, B., Keppens, G., & Van Droogenbroeck, F. 2016. Who supports populism and what attracts people to it? Political Research Quarterly, 69(2), 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W., & Schäfer, A. (eds.). 2013. Politics in the Age of Austerity. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O. 2014. The voter says no, but nobody listens: causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(10), 1541–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Brug, W., & Mughan, A. 2007. Charisma, leader effects and support for right-wing populist parties. Party Politics, 13(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Brug, W., M. Fennema, and J. Tillie. 2005a. ‘Why Some Anti-immigrant Parties Fail and Others Succeed: A Two-step Model of Electoral Support’, Comparative Political Studies, 38 (5): 537–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Brug, W., Fennema, M., and Tillie, J. 2005b. Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote? European Jorunal of Political Research, 37 (1):77–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C. 2002. “Design Issues in Electoral Research: Taking Care of (core) Business.” Electoral Studies, 21 (2): 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C., and Franklin, M. 1996. Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of the Union. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C., and Marsh, M. 2007. Don’t Expect Me to Vote for You Just Because I like You, Even If You Do Make Me Feel Warm inside: A Comparison of the Validity of Non-Ipsative Measures of Party Support. Presented at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, 29 August–1 September 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Eijk, C., W. Van der Brug, M. Kroh, and Franklin, M. 2006. “Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior: On the Measurement and Analysis of Electoral Utilities.” Electoral Studies 25 (3): 424–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Haute, E. and Gauja, A. (eds.). 2015. Party members and activists. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kessel, S. and A. Krouwel. 2011. ‘Van Vergankelijke Radicale Dissidenten tot Kwelgeesten van de Gevestigde Orde. Nieuwe Politieke Partijen in Nederland en de Toekomst van de Representatieve Democratie’. In: R. Andeweg and J. Thomassen (eds.) Democratie Doorgelicht. Het Functioneren van de Nederlandse Democratie. Leiden: Leiden University Press: 301–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Waal, J., P. Achterberg, and D. Houtman. 2007. ‘Class is Not Dead—It Has Been Buried Alive: Class Voting and Cultural Voting in Postwar Western Societies (1956–1990)’, Politics and Society, 35 (3): 403–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Prooijen, J. W., and André P. M. Krouwel. 2019. Psychological Features of Extreme Political Ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science 28 (2):159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vasilopoulou, S. and Halikiopoulou, D. 2015. the Golden dawn’s ‘nationalist solution’: explaining the rise of the far right in Greece. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitiello, T., Cautrès, B., Martigny, V., Strudel, S., & Krouwel, A. P. M. 2017. Dynamiques de campagne et choix des candidats: la primaire de la droite et du centre au miroir de la boussole présidentielle (2016–2017). Revue française de science politique, 67(6), 1131–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vos, D., & Van Aelst, P. 2017. Does the Political System Determine Media Visibility of Politicians? A Comparative Analysis of Political Functions in the News in Sixteen Countries. Political Communication, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, M., & Meyer, T. M. 2017. The radical right as niche parties? The ideological landscape of party systems in Western Europe, 1980–2014. Political Studies, 65(1_suppl), 84–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfsfeld, G. 2011. Making sense of media and politics: Five principles in political communication. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaslove, A. & Wolinetz, S. (eds.). 2018. Absorbing the Blow: Populist Parties and their Impact on Parties and Party Systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xenakis, Sappho 2012. A New Dawn? Change and Continuity in Political Violence in Greece. Terrorism and Political Violence, 24 (3): 437–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    André Krouwel

  2. Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

    Tim Bale

  3. Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands

    Lucas Tremlett

Authors
  1. André Krouwel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tim Bale
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lucas Tremlett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to André Krouwel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Politische Bildung Inland, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung, Berlin, Germany

    Sebastian Bukow

  2. Universität Trier, Trier, Germany

    Uwe Jun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Krouwel, A., Bale, T., Tremlett, L. (2020). More or Less Vulnerable?. In: Bukow, S., Jun, U. (eds) Continuity and Change of Party Democracies in Europe. Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderhefte. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28988-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation