Skip to main content

Causes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Amok at Schools

Abstract

In this chapter, personality traits of spree killers will be analysed in order to identify possible causes of school shootings. What do we know about the perpetrators? What characterises them? Can psychological disorders explain the occurrence of rampages? And can this identify potential spree killers in time to prevent future acts? An overview of research on the personality of spree killers and the challenges they face will first be presented. Subsequently, personality traits, clinical characteristics and social characteristics of spree killers are described and discussed as possible causes and influencing factors for their actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Adapted from: Robertz and Wickenhäuser (2011b). The crack in the chalkboard: rampage and serious violence in schools. Springer.

  2. 2.

    “It was unthinkable that these kids didn’t have a simple black and white reason for what they did. Therefore, a scapegoat was needed.” (translation by author).

References

References on Section 3.1

  • Agnich, L. E. (2015). A comparative analysis of attempted and completed school-based mass murder attacks. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-014-9239-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anhut, R. (2005). Die Konflikttheorie der Desintegrationstheorie. In T. Bonacker (Ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliche Konflikttheorien (pp. 381–407). VS Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-95688-0_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • APA (American Psychiatric Association). (2015). Diagnostisches und statistisches Manual psychischer Störungen DSM-5. Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asendorpf, J. (2015). Persönlichkeitspsychologie für Bachelor. (Springer-Lehrbuch 3., aktualisierte Auflage). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46454-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. L. (2003). The contribution of narcissism and peer rejection to the psychological internalization process of the classroom avenger. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boers, K., Reinecke, J., Bentrup, C., Daniel, A., & Kanz, K. M. (2014). Vom Jugend-zum frühen Erwachsenenalter: Delinquenzverläufe und Erklärungszusammenhänge in der Verlaufsstudie „Kriminalität in der modernen Stadt“. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrecht, 97(3), 183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondü, R. (2012a). School shootings in Deutschland. Internationaler Vergleich, Warnsignale, Risikofaktoren, Entwicklungsverläufe. Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2015). Narcissistic symptoms in German school shooters. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 59(14), 1520–1535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X14544155.

  • Cullen, D. (2009). Columbine. Hachette Book Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl, F. (2015a). Amoktat eines Schülers. Eine kriminologische Analyse (Gießener Schriften zum Strafrecht und zur Kriminologie) (Vol. vol. 48, 1st ed.). Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiJulio, J. (1995). The coming of the super-predators. The Weekly Standard, 1(11), 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fast, J. (2008). Ceremonial violence: A psychological explanation of school shootings. Overlook Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2015). Do angry birds make for angry children? A meta-analysis of video game influences on children’s and adolescents’ aggression, mental health, prosocial behavior, and academic performance. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10(5), 646–666. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691615592234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J. A. (1996). Trends in juvenile violence: A report to the United States Attorney General on current and future rates of juvenile offending. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/tjvfox.pdf.

  • Fox, J. A., & Levin, J. (2001). The will to kill. Making sense of senseless murder. Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerard, F. J., Whitfield, K. C., Porter, L. E., & Browne, K. D. (2016). Offender and offence characteristics of school shooting incidents. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 13(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heitmeyer, W., Böckler, N., & Seeger, T. (2013). Social disintegration, loss of control, and school shootings. In N. Böckler, T. Seeger, P. Sitzer, & W. Heitmeyer (Eds.), School shootings (pp. 27–54). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5526-4_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J. (2007). Tödliche Verzweiflung—Der Weg zu zielgerichteten Gewalttaten an Schulen. In J. Hoffmann & I. Wondrak (Eds.), Amok und zielgerichtete Gewalt an Schulen. Früherkennung/Risikomanagement/Kriseneinsatz/Nachbetreuung (pp. 25–33). Verlag für Polizeiwissenschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., Roshdi, K., & Robertz, F. J. (2009a). Zielgerichtete schwere Gewalt und Amok an Schulen. Eine empirische Studie zur Prävention schwerer Gewalttaten. Kriminalistik, 4, 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • InfoPlease. (2018). Timeline of worldwide school and mass shootings. Gun-related tragedies in the U.S. and around the world. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from https://www.infoplease.com/us/crime/timeline-worldwide-school-and-mass-shootings.

  • Kidd, S. T., & Meyer, C. L. (2002a). A comparison of fatal school shootings in rural communities. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, 5(1), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, M. S., & Mahler, M. (2003). Adolescent masculinity, homophobia, and violence. Random school shooting. American Behavioral Scientist, 46(10), 1439–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langman, P. (2008). The search for truth at Columbine. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from https://schoolshooters.info/sites/default/files/search_for_truth_at_columbine_2.2.pdf.

  • Langman, P. (2009a). Why kids kill. Inside the minds of school shooters. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langman, P. (2013). Thirty-five rampage school shooters. Trends, patterns, and typology. In N. Böckler, T. Seeger, P. Sitzer, & W. Heitmeyer (Eds.), School shootings (pp. 131–156). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5526-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Langman, P. (2015). The enigma of Adam Lanza’s mind and motivations for murder. The Journal of Campus Behavioral Intervention, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17732/jbit2015/1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. P., & DeBernardo, C. R. (1999a). The classroom avenger: A behavioral profile of school based shootings. The Forensic Examiner, 8(5–6), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, S. (2006). Murder on their minds. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from www.newsweek.com/murder-their-minds-112883.

  • Meloy, J. R., Hempel, A. G., Mohandie, K., Shiva, A. A., & Gray, B. T. (2001). Offender and offense characteristics of a nonrandom sample of adolescent mass murderers. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40(6), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200106000-00018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muschert, G. W. (2007a). Research in school shootings. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2007.00008.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, M. E. (1999). The school shooter. A threat assessment perspective. FBI Critical Incident Response Group. National Center for the Analysis of Violent Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertz, F. J., & Wickenhäuser, R. (2011a). Der Riss in der Tafel. Amoklauf und schwere Gewalt in der Schule (2nd Updated edn.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11310-9.

  • Rocque, M. (2012a). Exploring school rampage shootings. Research, theory, and policy. The Social Science Journal, 49(3), 304–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2011.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedensky, S. III. (2013). Report of the state’s attorney for the judicial district of Danbury on the shootings at Sandy Hook Elementary School and 36 Yogananda Street, Newtown, Connecticut on December 14, 2012. Office of the State’s Attorney Judicial District of Danbury. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from http://www.ct.gov/csao/lib/csao/Sandy_Hook_Final_Report.pdf.

  • Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2003). „Isn’t it fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve?“ Narcissism, social rejection, and aggression. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202239051.

  • Twenge, J. M., & Campbell, W. K. (2009). The narcissism epidemic. Living in the age of entitlement. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verlinden, S., Hersen, M., & Thomas, J. (2000a). Risk factors in school shootings. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(1), 3–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00055-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virginia Tech Review Panel. (2007). Report of the Virginia Tech Review Panel. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from https://governor.virginia.gov/media/3772/fullreport.pdf.

  • Vossekuil, B., Fein, R. A., Reddy, M., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2002a). The final report and findings of the safe school initiative. Implications for the prevention of school attacks in the United States. U.S. Secret Service & U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 5, 2018, from https://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/safety/preventingattacksreport.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1995). Crime and public policy. Crime, 489–507.

    Google Scholar 

References on Section 3.2

  • Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., & Waters, E. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation (p. 18). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannenberg, B. (2010). Amok: Ursachen erkennen—Warnsignale verstehen—Katastrophen verhindern. Gütersloher Verlagshaus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2008). Warning signs of school shootings and severe targeted school violence. Paper presented at the 18th World Meeting of the International Society for Research on Aggression, Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2009a). School shootings in Deutschland: Aktuelle Trends zur Prävention von schwerer, zielgerichteter Gewalt an deutschen Schulen. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 58(9), 685–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J., May, B. S., & Solomon, M. (1989). Attachment theory. Lifespan Learning Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, K., Schiraldi, V., & Ziedenberg, J. (2000). School House Hype. Justice Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. W., Garbarino, C., & Carlson, M. I. (2006). Pathological teasing and bullying turned deadly: Shooters and suicide. Victims and Offenders, 1(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein, E. P. (2000). Criminal and civil parental liability statutes: Would they have saved the 15 who died at Columbine. Cardozo Women’s LJ, 7, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N. (2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology, 51(1), 665–697.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fast, J. (2010). Ceremonial violence. Gerald Duckworth & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fein, R. A., & Vossekuil, B. (1998). Protective intelligence and threat assessment investigations: A guide for state and local law enforcement officials. U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanish, L. D., & Guerra, N. (2004). Aggressive victims, passive victims, and bullies: Developmental continuity or developmental change? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, T. B., Steenberg, L. M., Palic, S., & Elklit, A. (2012). A review of psychological factors related to bullying victimization in schools. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(4), 383–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilarski, C. (2004). How school environments contribute to violent behavior in youth. Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment, 9(1–2), 165–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). A control theory of delinquency. In Criminology theory: Selected classic readings (pp. 289–305). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., Roshdi, K., & Robertz, F. (2009b). Zielgerichtete schwere Gewalt und Amok an Schulen: Eine empirische Studie zur Prävention schwerer Gewalttaten. Kriminalistik, 4, 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, S. T., & Meyer, C. L. (2002b). Similarities of school shootings in rural and small town communities. Journal of Rural Community Psychology, E5, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langman, P. (2009b). Rampage school shooters: A typology. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(1), 79–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, R. W. (2009). The Columbine legacy: Rampage shootings as political acts. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1309–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M. R., Kowalski, R. M., Smith, L., & Phillips, S. (2003). Teasing, rejection, and violence: Case studies of the school shootings. Aggressive Behavior, 29(3), 202–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loesel, F., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), 8–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, G., & Leary, M. R. (2005). Why does social exclusion hurt? The relationship between social and physical pain. Psychological Bulletin, 131(2), 202–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McGee, J. P., & DeBernardo, C. R. (1999b). The classroom avenger: A behavioral profile of school based shootings. The Forensic Examiner, 8(5–6), 16–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelis, K. L. (2000). From injustice to indifference: The politics of school violence. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H., Petrie, C. V., Braga, A. A., & McLaughlin, B. L. (2003). Deadly lessons: Understanding lethal school violence. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K., & Fox, C. (2009). Repeat tragedy: Rampage shootings in American high school and college settings, 2002–2008. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(9), 1286–1308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, K., Fox, C., Harding, D. J., Mehta, J., & Roth, W. (2004). Rampage. The social roots of school shootings. Perseus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrini, A. D., Bartini, M., & Brooks, F. (1999). School bullies, victims, and aggressive victims: Factors relating to group affiliation and victimization in early adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertz, F. J., & Wickenhäuser, R. P. (2011b). Der Riss in der Tafel: Amoklauf und schwere Gewalt in der Schule. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheithauer, H., & Bondü, R. (2008a). Amoklauf: Wissen was stimmt. Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheithauer, H., Hayer, T., & Bull, H. D. (2007). Gewalt an Schulen am Beispiel von Bullying. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 38(3), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. A., & Fowler, M. G. (1994). Geographic mobility and children’s emotional/behavioral adjustment and school functioning. Pediatrics, 93, 303–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smokowski, P. R., & Kopasz, K. H. (2005). Bullying in school: An overview of types, effects, family characteristics, and intervention strategies. Children & Schools, 27(2), 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, S. A., Henly, S. J., Sieving, R. E., & Bolland, J. (2011). Social connections, trajectories of hopelessness, and serious violence in impoverished urban youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(3), 278–295.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, S. A., McMorris, B. J., & Sieving, R. E. (2011). Do social connections and hope matter in predicting early adolescent violence? American Journal of Community Psychology, 48(3–4), 247–256.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S., & Kyle, K. (2005). Understanding mass school shootings: Links between personhood and power in the competitive school environment. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(5), 419–438.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tittle, C. R. (1995). Control balance: Toward a general theory of deviance. Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ttofi, Farrington, & Lösel. (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  • Twemlow, S. W. (2003a). A crucible for murder: The social context of violent children and adolescents. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 72(3), 659–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., Sacco, F. C., O’Toole, M. E., Vernberg, E., & Jellinek, M. S. (2002). Premeditated mass shootings in schools: Threat assessment. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41(4), 475–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twenge, J. M., Baumeister, R. F., Tice, D. M., & Stucke, T. S. (2001). If you can’t join them, beat them: Effects of social exclusion on aggressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1058–1069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verlinden, S., Hersen, M., & Thomas, J. (2000b). Risk factors in school shootings. Clinical Psychology Review, 20(1), 3–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vossekuil, B., Fein, R. A., Reddy, M., Borum, R., & Modzeleski, W. (2002b). The final report and findings of the Safe School Initiative. US Secret Service and Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, P. (2004). Columbine, five years later. Salon.

    Google Scholar 

References on Section 3.3

  • Böckler, N., Seeger, T., Sitzer, P., & Heitmeyer, W. (Eds.). (2013b). School shootings. International research, case studies, and concepts for prevention. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bondü, R. (2012b). School shootings in Deutschland. Internationaler Vergleich, Warnsignale, Risikofaktoren, Entwicklungsverläufe. Dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin. Retrieved from http://www.diss.fuberlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000037683.

  • Bondü, R., & Scheithauer, H. (2009b). School shootings in Deutschland: Aktuelle Trends zur Prävention von schwerer, zielgerichteter Gewalt an deutschen Schulen. Praxis der Kinderpsychologie und Kinderpsychiatrie, 58(9), 685–701.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Apodaca, R. F., Brighton, L. M., Perkins, A. N., Jackson, K. N., & Steege, J. R. (2012). Characteristics of schools in which fatal shootings occur. Psychological Reports, 110(2), 363–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. B., & Smokowski, P. R. (2016). Theoretical explanations for bullying in school: How ecological processes propagate perpetration and victimization. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 33(4), 365–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C., & Harding, D. J. (2005). School shootings as organizational deviance. Sociology of Education, 78(1), 69–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gugel, G. (2010). Handbuch Gewaltprävention II Für die Sekundarstufen und die Arbeit mit Jugendlichen: Grundlagen-Lernfelder-Handlungsmöglichkeiten. Institut für Friedenspädagogik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heitmeier, W., Böckler, N., & Seeger, T. (2013). Loss of control and school shootings. In N. Böckler, T. Seeger, P. Sitzer, & W. Heitmeier (Eds.), School shootings. International research, case studies, and concepts for prevention. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, J., Roshdi, K., & Robertz, F. (2009c). Zielgerichtete schwere Gewalt und Amok an Schulen: Eine empirische Studie zur Prävention schwerer Gewalttaten. Kriminalistik, 4, 196–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant-Schaps, M. (2013). Schule: Schutzfaktor und Übungsraum. In C. Steinebach & K. Gharabaghi (Eds.), Resilienzförderung im Jugendalter. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klewin, G., Tillmann, K. J., & Weingart, G. (2002). Gewalt in der Schule. In W. Heitmeyer & J. Hagan (Eds.), Internationales Handbuch der Gewaltforschung. VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krumm, V., Lamberger-Baumann, B., & Haider, G. (1997). Gewalt in der Schule auch von Lehrern. Empirische Pädagogik, 11(2), 257–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muschert, G. W. (2007b). Research in school shootings. Sociology Compass, 1(1), 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertz, F., & Wickenhäuser, R. (2007). Der Riss in der Tafel. Amoklauf und schwere Gewalt in der Schule. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocque, M. (2012b). Exploring school rampage shootings: Research, theory, and policy. The Social Science Journal, 49(3), 304–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sendlak-Brandt, B. (2017). Klassenrat und Vollversammlung: Demokratie lernen und leben. [Electronic version]. Nds Die Zeitschrift der Bildungsgewerkschaft, 10, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffgen, G., Recchia, S., & Viechtbauer, W. (2013). The link between school climate and violence in school: A meta-analytic review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18(2), 300–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twemlow, S. W. (2003b). A crucible for murder: The social context of violent children and adolescents. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 72(3), 659–698.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wike, T. L., & Fraser, M. W. (2009). School shootings: Making sense of the senseless. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(3), 162–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References on Section 3.4

  • 3sat Mediathek. (2017). Die Macht der Deutung. [3sat]. Retrieved September 21, 2017, from https://www.3sat.de/mediathek/?mode=play&obj=68916.

  • Barbieri, N., & Connell, N. M. (2015). A cross-national assessment of media reactions and blame finding of student perpetrated school shootings. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(1), 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkland, T. A., & Lawrence, R. G. (2009). Media framing and policy change after Columbine. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(10), 1405–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K. O., Copeland, V. C., Grote, N. K., Koeske, G., Rosen, D., Reynolds, C. F., & Brown, C. (2010). Mental health treatment seeking among older adults with depression: The impact of stigma and race. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(6), 531–543.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DeFoster. (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geise, S., Lobinger, K., & Brantner, C. (2013). Fractured Paradigm? Theorien, Konzepte und Methoden der visuellen Framingforschung: Ergebnisse einer systematischen Literaturschau. In S. Geise & K. Lobinger (Eds.), Visual framing. Perspektiven und Herausforderungen der Visuellen Kommunikationsforschung (pp. 42–76). Herbert von Halem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawdon, J., Agnich, L. E., & Ryan, J. (2014). Media framing of a tragedy: A content analysis of print media coverage of the Virginia Tech tragedy. Traumatology, 20(3), 199–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jäckel, M. (2008). Medienwirkungen: Ein Studienbuch zur Einführung. VS-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulturstudio. (2017). Dr. Daniele Ganser—Propaganda in den Medien. Framing [YouTube]. Retrieved December 6, 2017, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G5i3dvuoHBU.

  • Lakoff, G., & Wehling, E. (2008). Auf leisen Sohlen ins Gehirn. Politische Sprache und ihre heimliche Macht. Auer-System-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., & Reichelmann, A. (2016). News aus Newtown?—Berichterstattung US-amerikanischer Massenmedien nach schweren Gewalttaten. In Die mediale Inszenierung von Amok und Terrorismus (pp. 95–105). Springer Fachmedien.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Liddle. (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindgren. (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, J. (2014). Framing. Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36(2), 176–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinty, E. E., Webster, D. W., & Barry, C. L. (2013). Effects of news media messages about mass shootings on attitudes toward persons with serious mental illness and public support for gun control policies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170(5), 494–501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mojtabai. (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muschert. (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Muschert, G. W. (2013). School shootings as mediatized violence. In N. Böckler, T. Seeger, P. Sitzer, & W. Heitmeyer (Eds.), School shootings (pp. 265–281). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Muschert, G. W., & Sumiala, J. (Eds.). (2012). School shootings: Mediatized violence in a global age (Vol. 7). Emerald Group Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paese, P. W. (1995). Effects of framing on actual time allocation decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61(1), 67–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips. (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Law. (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertz, F. J., & Wickenhäuser, R. (2010). Der Riss in der Tafel. Amoklauf und schwere Gewalt in der Schule (2nd ed.). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, D. (2012). Zündstoff für den „Columbine-Effekt“?: Die Berichterstattung über School Shootings in deutschen Print-und Online-Medien (Vol. 30). LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sirey, J. A., Bruce, M. L., Alexopoulos, G. S., Perlick, D. A., Friedman, S. J., & Meyers, B. S. (2001). Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Perceived stigma and patient-rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence. Psychiatric Services, 52(12), 1615–1620.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurich, E. (2011). Pocket Politik. Demokratie in Deutschland (4th ed.). Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gorp, B. (2010). Strategies to take subjectivity out of framing analysis. In P. D’Angelo & J. Kuypers (Eds.), Doing news framing analysis: Empirical and theoretical perspectives (pp. 84–109). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhovnik, M. (2014). Eingebrannte Bilder. Die Problematik medialer Bildberichterstattung am Beispiel von School Shootings. Communicatio Socialis, 47(4), 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

References on Section 3.5

References on Section 3.6

  • Allen, V. L., & Greenberger, D. B. (1978). An aesthetic theory of vandalism. Crime & Delinquency, 24(3), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1979a). Aggression. Eine sozial-lerntheoretische Analyse. Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1979b). Sozial-kognitive Lerntheorie. Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büttner, C. (2000). Gewaltzensur und Lust an der Gewalt. tv diskurs. Verantwortung in audiovisuellen Medien, 14(4), 60–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnagey, N. L., & Anderson, C. A. (2005). The effects of reward and punishment in violent video games on aggressive affect, cognition, and behavior. Psychological Science, 16(11), 882–889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feierabend, S., Plankenhorn, T., & Rathgeb, T. (2015). JIM-Studie 2015. Jugend, Information, (Multi-)Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feierabend, S., Plankenhorn, T., & Rathgeb, T. (2017). JIM-Studie 2017. Jugend, Information, (Multi-)Media. Basisstudie zum Medienumgang 12- bis 19-Jähriger in Deutschland. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J. (2008). The school shooting/violent video game link: Causal relationship or moral panic? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 5(1–2), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, C. J., Cruz, A. M., Martinez, D., Rueda, S. M., Ferguson, D. E., & Negy, C. (2008). Personality, parental, and media influences on aggressive personality and violent crime in young adults. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 17(4), 395–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Früh, W. (2001). Gewaltpotentiale des Fernsehangebots. Programmangebot und zielgruppenspezifische Interpretation. Westdeutscher.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, K., & Krcmar, M. (2005). Predicting exposure to and liking of media violence: A uses and gratifications approach. Communication Studies, 56(1), 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, D. N. (2007). Are female action heroes risky role models? Character identification, idealization, and viewer aggression. Sex Roles, 57(9–10), 725–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., Davies, M. N., & Chappell, D. (2004). Online computer gaming: A comparison of adolescent and adult gamers. Journal of Adolescence, 27(1), 87–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, J. (1999). Fernsehgewalt. Zuwendungsattraktivität, Erregungsverläufe, sozialer Effekt. In Zur Begründung und praktischen Anwendung eines kognitiv-physiologischen Ansatzes der Medienrezeptionsforschung am Beispiel von Gewaltdarstellungen. Westdeutscher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannak-Meinke, M. (2016). Computerspiele. 20 Fragen und Antworten zu gesetzlichen Regelungen und zur Medienerziehung. : Bundesprüfstelle für jugendgefährdende Medien (BPjM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, T., & Klimmt, C. (2006). Gender and computer games: Exploring females’ dislikes. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 910–931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, F. A. (1986). The use and abuse of social science. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffner, C. A., & Levine, K. J. (2005). Enjoyment of mediated fright and violence: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 7(2), 207–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffner, C. A., & Levine, K. J. (2007). Enjoyment of mediated fright and violence: A meta-analysis. In R. W. Preiss, B. M. Gayle, N. Burell, M. Allen, & J. Bryant (Eds.), Mass media effects research. Advances through meta-analysis (pp. 215–244). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogben, M. (1998). Factors moderating the effect of televised aggression on viewer behavior. Communication Research, 25(2), 220–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdampf-Wendel, A., Shahd, M., & Hampe, K. (2014). Jung und vernetzt. Kinder und Jugendliche in der digitalen Gesellschaft. Bundesverband Informationswirtschaft, Telekommunikation und neue Medien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopf, W. H. (2004). Mediengewalt, Lebenswelt und Persönlichkeit—Eine Problemgruppenanalyse bei Jugendlichen. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 16(3), 99–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Höynck, T., Mößle, T., Kleimann, M., Pfeiffer, C., & Rehbein, F. (2007). Jugendmedienschutz bei gewalthaltigen Spielen. In Eine Analyse der USK-Alterseinstufungen (Forschungsbericht 101). Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huesmann, L. R., Moise-Titus, J., Podolski, C. L., & Eron, L. D. (2003). Longitudinal relations between children’s exposure to TV violence and their aggressive and violent behavior in young adulthood: 1977–1992. Developmental Psychology, 39(2), 201–221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ivory, J. D., Williams, D., Martins, N., & Consalvo, M. (2009). Good clean fun? A content analysis of profanity in video games and its prevalence across game systems and ratings. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 457–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansz, J. (2005). The emotional appeal of violent video games for adolescent males. Communication Theory, 15(3), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepplinger, H. M., & Dahlem, S. (1990). Medieninhalte und Gewaltanwendung. In H. D. Schwind (Ed.), Ursache, Prävention und Kontrolle von Gewalt: Analysen und Vorschläge der Unabhängigen Regierungskommission zur Verhinderung und Bekämpfung von Gewalt (Gewaltkommission) (Vol. vol. 3, pp. 381–396). Sondergutachten (Auslandsgutachten und Inlandsgutachten).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunczik, M. (2017). Medien und Gewalt: Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Forschung und der Theoriediskussion. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kunczik, M., & Zipfel, A. (2004). Medien und Gewalt. Befunde der Forschung seit 1998. Projektbericht für das Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. Retrieved from https://www.bmfsfj.de/blob/94294/fffc44cf4772413da5bd7637262eeaa8/medien-und-gewalt-befunde-der-forschung-langfassung-data.pdf.

  • Kunczik, M., & Zipfel, A. (2006). Gewalt und Medien. Ein Studienhandbuch (5th revised edition). Böhlau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunczik, M., & Zipfel, A. (2010). Medien und Gewalt. Befunde der Forschung 2004–2009. Bericht für das Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend. Retrieved from https://www.bmfsfj.de/blob/94294/fffc44cf4772413da5bd7637262eeaa8/medien-und-gewalt-befunde-der-forschung-langfassung-data.pdf.

  • Lachlan, K. A., & Maloney, E. K. (2008). Game player characteristics and interactive content: Exploring the role of personality and telepresence in video game violence. Communication Quarterly, 56(3), 284–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachlan, K. A., Smith, S. L., & Tamborini, R. (2005). Models for aggressive behavior: The attributes of violent characters in popular video games. Communication Studies, 56(4), 313–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmens, J. S., Bushman, B. J., & Konijn, E. A. (2006). The appeal of violent video games to lower educated aggressive adolescent boys from two countries. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 9(5), 638–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson, M. (1999). Columbine: Whose fault is it? Rolling Stone. Retrieved from https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/news/columbine-whose-fault-is-it-19990624

  • Meister, D. M., Sander, U., Treumann, K. P., Burkatzki, E., Hagedorn, J., Kämmerer, M., et al. (2008). Mediale Gewalt: Ihre Rezeption, Wahrnehmung und Bewertung durch Jugendliche. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohler, P., & Nieding, G. (2006). Why play? An evolutionary perspective. In P. Vorderer & J. Bryant (Eds.), Playing video games. Motives, responses, and consequences (pp. 101–114). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B. (2000). The respondent gender gap. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment. The psychology of its appeal (pp. 215–234). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheithauer, H., & Bondü, R. (2008b). Amoklauf: Wissen was stimmt. Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigurdsson, J. F., Gudjonsson, G. H., Bragason, A. V., Kristjansdottir, E., & Sigfusdottir, I. D. (2006). The role of violent cognition in the relationship between personality and the involvement in violent films and computer games. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(2), 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, M. D., Henry, K. L., Swaim, R. C., & Anderson, L. L. (2003). Violent media content and aggressiveness in adolescents: A downward spiral model. Communication Research, 30(6), 713–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater, M. D., Henry, K. L., Swaim, R. C., & Cardador, J. M. (2004). Vulnerable teens, vulnerable times: How sensation seeking, alienation, and victimization moderate the violent media content–aggressiveness relation. Communication Research, 31(6), 642–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. L., Lachlan, K., Pieper, K. M., Boyson, A. R., Wilson, B. J., Tamborini, R., & Weber, R. (2004). Brandishing guns in American media: Two studies examining how often and in what context firearms appear on television and in popular video games. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 48(4), 584–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, G. G., & Sparks, C. W. (2000). Violence, mayhem, and horror. In D. Zillmann & P. Vorderer (Eds.), Media entertainment. The psychology of its appeal (pp. 73–91). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelgesang, W. (2002). Publikumskulturen. Medienkompetenz von unten. In T. Hausmanninger & T. Bohrmann (Eds.), Mediale Gewalt. Interdisziplinäre und ethische Perspektiven (pp. 177–191). UTB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R., Behr, K. M., Tamborini, R., Ritterfeld, U., & Mathiak, K. (2009). What do we really know about first-person-shooter games? An event-related, high-resolution content analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1016–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D. (2009). The effects of frustration, violence, and trait hostility after playing a video game. Mass Communication and Society, 12(3), 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1983). Transfer of excitation in emotional behaviour. In J. T. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology. A sourcebook (pp. 215–240). The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D. (1988). Mood management: Using entertainment to full advantage. In L. Donohew, H. E. Sypher, & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Communication, social cognition, and affect (pp. 147–171). Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Cantor, J. R. (1977). Affective responses to the emotions of a protagonist. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 155–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zillmann, D., & Weaver, J. B. (1996). Gender-socialization theory of reactions to horror. In J. B. Weaver & R. Tamborini (Eds.), Horror films: Current research on audience preferences and reactions (pp. 81–101). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bock, C., Buderus, P., Pereira, AS., Gonçalves, K., Münch, E.E. (2023). Causes. In: Böhmer, M. (eds) Amok at Schools. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-38859-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics