Abstract
This chapter examines the queer temporalities of the internet. Our starting point is that space cannot be adequately theorised without reference to time. Geographers have theorised the spatial structure of internet infrastructures, but they have paid less attention to the temporal structure of these systems. Contemporary queer theory provides analyses of temporality as a critique of the heteronormative-reproductive times of state-capitalism, which also characterise imaginaries of digital systems. Instead of the internet as a necessarily futuristic invention, we demonstrate the necessity of thinking through the concrete histories and embodied presents of the internet. We first conceptualise internet infrastructures as historical anachronism—evidence of the continuing inequalities of colonialism. Then we examine how queer presence online can lend itself to a troubling of modern temporalities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We understand this failure in the sense that Jack Halberstam (2011) intends it, not in the language of digital media firms to “fail forward” in which failure is a kind of startup hazing strategy, but in the sense of a failure to adhere to the modes of subjectivity that characterise heteronormativity.
- 2.
It is interesting to observe that the term ‘Web 1.0’ is itself a retronym.
References
Abbate, J. (1999). Inventing the Internet. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Back, L., & Puwar, N. (2012). A manifesto for live methods: Provocations and capacities. The Sociological Review, 60(1_suppl), 6–17.
Barthes, R. (1968). The rustle of language. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Durham: Duke University Press.
Berlant, L. (2016). The commons: Infrastructure for troubling times. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 34(3), 393–419.
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble. London: Routledge.
Cascone, K. (2000). The aesthetics of failure: ‘Post-digital’ tendencies in contemporary computer music. Computer Music Journal, 24(4), 12–18.
Caserio, R., Edelman, L., Halberstam, J., Muñoz, J. E., & Dean, T. (2006). The antisocial thesis in queer theory. PMLA, 121(2), 819–828.
Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
Cockayne, D., & Richardson, L. (2017). Queering code/space: The co-production of socio-spatial codes and technology. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(11), 1642–1658.
Cowen, D. (2014). The deadly life of logistics: Mapping violence in global trade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Crang, M. (2007). Speed = distance / time: Chronotopographies of action. In R. Hassan & R. E. Purser (Eds.), 24/7: Time and temporality in the network society (pp. 62–88). Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
Crary, J. (1999). Suspensions of perception: Attention, spectacle, and modern culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Crary, J. (2013). 24/7: Late capitalism and the end of sleep. London: Verso.
Dinshaw, C., Edelman, L., Ferguson, R., Freccero, C., Freeman, E., Halberstam, J., et al. (2007). Theorizing queer temporalities: A roundtable discussion. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 13(2–3), 177–195.
Dodge, M., & Kitchin, R. (2005). Code and the transduction of space. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(1), 162–180.
Dyson, G. (2012). Turing’s cathedral: The origins of the digital universe. New York: Vintage.
Edelman, L. (2004). No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Durham: Duke University Press.
Freeman, E. (2010). Time binds: Queer temporalities, queer histories. Durham: Duke University Press.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2014). Rethinking the economy with thick description and weak theory. Cultural Anthropology, 55(S9), S147–S153.
Gieseking, J. (2017). Messing with the attractiveness algorithm: A response to queering code/space. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(11), 1659–1665.
Graham, S. (1998). The end of geography or the explosion of place? Conceptualizing space, place and information technology. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 165–185.
Graham, M. (2011). Time machines and virtual portals: The spatialities of the digital divide. Progress in Development Studies, 11(3), 211–227.
Graham, M. (2013). Geography/internet: Ethereal alternative dimensions of cyberspace or grounded augmented realities? The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 177–182.
Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Durham: Duke University Press.
Halley, J. E., & Parker, A. (2011). After sex?: On writing since queer theory. Durham: Duke University Press.
Halpern, O. (2014). Beautiful data: A history of vision and reason since 1945. Durham: Duke University Press.
Hassan, R. (2007). Network time. In R. Hassan & R. E. Purser (Eds.), 24/7: Time and temporality in the network society (pp. 37–61). Stanford: Stanford Business Books.
Jarvis, H., & Pratt, A. (2006). Bringing it all back home: The extensification and ‘overflowing’ of work. Geoforum, 37(3), 331–339.
Jenzen, O. (2017). Trans youth and social media: Moving between counterpublics and the wider web. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(11), 1626–1641.
Kane, C. L. (2016). Photo noise. History of Photography, 40(2), 129–145.
Kirsch, S. (1995). The incredible shrinking world? Technology and the production of space. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 13(5), 529–555.
Kitchin, R. (1998). Towards geographies of cyberspace. Progress in Human Geography, 22(3), 385–406.
Love, H. (2007). Feeling backwards: Loss and the politics of queer history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Massey, D. (2005). For space. London: Sage.
Muñoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York City: New York University Press.
Nunes, M. (2012). Seductive errors: A poetics of noise. In X. Burrough (Ed.), Net work: Case studies in web art and design (pp. 100–103). London: Routledge.
Paglen, T. (2010). Goatsucker: Toward a spatial theory of state secrecy. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(5), 759–771.
Sedgwick, E. (2003). Touching feeling: Affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham: Duke University Press.
Smith, N. (1992). History and philosophy of geography: Real wars, theory wars. Progress in Human Geography, 16(2), 257–271.
Southerton, D. (2003). ‘Squeezing time’: Allocating practices, coordinating networks and scheduling society. Time and Society, 12(1), 5–25.
Starosielski, N. (2015). The undersea network: Sign, storage, transmission. Durham: Duke University Press.
Turner, F. (2006). From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the whole earth network, and the rise of digital utopianism. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Virilio, P. (1998). Architecture in the age of its virtual disappearance. In J. Beckman (Ed.), The virtual dimension: Architecture, representation, and crash culture (pp. 178–187). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Wiegman, R., & Wilson, E. (2015). Antinormativity’s queer conventions. Differences, 26(1), 1–25.
Williams, R. (1974). Television: Technology and cultural form. London: Routledge Classics.
Zalnieriute, M. (2018). The anatomy of neoliberal internet governance: A queer critical political economy perspective. In D. Otto (Ed.), Queering international law: Possibilities, alliances, and risks (pp. 53–74). London: Routledge.
Zook, M. (2000). The web of production: The economic geography of commercial internet content production in the United States. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32(3), 411–426.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cockayne, D., Richardson, L. (2019). The Queer Times of Internet Infrastructure and Digital Systems. In: Nash, C.J., Gorman-Murray, A. (eds) The Geographies of Digital Sexuality. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6876-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6876-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6875-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6876-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)