Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Contextualizing Voice and Stakeholders: Researching Employment Relations, Immigration and Trade Unions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article aims to outline some of the ways in which issues of migration and employment relations have been studied in the European context, cross referencing recent interventions in the USA. The argument is a discussion of some of the different dimensions of migration and the way debates within Industrial Relations have been shaped. More specifically, the article will look at the way trade unions have made the ethical turn towards questions of migration and equality. The article will observe the way these issues have been academically framed and the manner in which the ‘problem’ of migration is conceptualized. It will attempt to provide a framework for discussing the way we have been analysing these issues and the ethical dimensions of these discussions. The relevance of the article is that institutionally responding to migration is not solely a question of adjusting employment relations or Industrial Relations institutions to various ‘new’ constituencies. The article will show that the topic raises issues as to how we actually understand what the study of employment and especially Industrial Relations are. The article also argues that there is a growing need for researchers to be aware of ethical issues when studying in the area of migration, and to be sensitive to competing voices and methodologies in this area. In particular we need approaches that are multidimensional and that emphasize the history and context of change in social constituencies, the new mechanisms of representation within communities, the role of the political in terms of discourses and resources, and the broad play and spaces of regulation and social policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Hyman (2001) has developed an Industrial Relations oriented version of this in terms of social-, class- and market-related identities within trade unions which would help us understand the way unions see, respond to and configure immigrant-related issues. Yet Penninx and Roosblad advise us not to read too much into any forms of categories as there may not be any clear link between any one factor and the character of union activity.

  2. Wrench (1996, 1999) draws attention to the question of employers and their roles in relation to immigration. These are part of the dilemmas facing trade unions as employers in many cases resist the equality agenda—and this frames the trade union response as it provides extra obstacles to overcome. Part of the problem appears to be that many studies on trade union responses fail to locate debates in terms of employer responses and their impact, although there are exemptions (Mackenzie and Forde 2008/2009).

  3. A brief citation exercise with the help of various dedicated search engines suggests that although highly respected this study is not actually quoted systematically within relevant Industrial Relations debates.

  4. Once more the gender debate has tackled these issues—albeit less so within the Industrial Relations arena. Tomlinson (2007) points to how different institutions mediate the question of work, and part time work especially, within the European Union in relation to women. She draws on Walby’s study (2004) which points to the different initiatives that exist and the varied institutions that intervene. The way these link together and address issues of exclusion coherently is itself a challenge. The purpose of various welfare and social services, and how are they constructed, links to the question of intersectionality and the way regulation appears to mirror social diversity and overlaps—consequently creating problems such as complexity and complimentarity.

References

  • Bacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P., & Sonnenstuhl, W. J. (2001). Mutual aid and union renewal: Cycles of logics of action. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourne, J., & Sivanandan, A. (1980). Cheerleaders and ombudsmen: The sociology of race relations. Race and Class, 21, 331–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, K., Friedman, S., Hurd, R. W., Oswald, R. A., & Seeber, R. L. (1998). Organizing to win. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D. (2000). Models of capitalism: Growth and stagnation in the modern era. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, M., MacKenzie, R., & Sullivan, R. (2006). Working against racism: The role of trade unions in Britain. TUC: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, J. (2006). Worker centres: Organizing communities at the edge of the dream. Cornell: Econcomic Policy Institute/Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, C., & Kelly, J. (2003). Union revitalization in comparative perspective. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 9(1), 7–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, C., & Kelly, J. (Eds.). (2004). Varieties of unionism: Strategies for union revitalization in a globalizing economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B. (2008). Putting emotion and reflexivity to work in researching migration. Sociology, 42(5), 935–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. R. (2002) Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunaratnam, Y. (2003). Researching race and ethnicity: Methods, knowledge and power. London: Sage Publications.

  • Healy, G., Bradley, H., & Mukherjee, N. (2004). Individualism and collectivism revisited: A study of black and minority ethnic women. Industrial Relations Journal, 35(5), 451–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heery, E. (2005). The British journal of industrial relations: Position and prospect. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 43(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heery, E., & Frege, C. (2006). New actors in industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(4), 601–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holgate, J. (2005). Organising migrant workers: A case study of working conditions and unionisation at a sandwich factory in London. Work Employment and Society, 19(3), 463–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European trade unionism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R., & Ferner, A. (1994). ‘Introduction’ new frontiers in European industrial relations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (1982). The capitalist state. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations: Mobilization, collectivism and long waves. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirton, G., & Greene, A. M. (2010). The dynamics of managing diversity: A critical approach. London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.

  • Lash, J., & Urry, J. (1987). The end of organised capitalism. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, R., & Thelen, K. (1995). Apples and oranges revisited: Contextualised comparisons and the study of comparative labor politics. Politics and Society, 23(3), 337–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorber, D. (1975). Women and medical sociology. In M. M. Milkman & R. M. Kanter (Eds.), Another voice: Feminist perspectives in social life and social science. New York: Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macewen, M. (1995). Tackling racism in Europe. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, R., & Forde, C. (2008/2009). Help wanted? Employer attitudes to employment agencies in the construction sector. Work, Employment and Society, 23, 142–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, R., & Martinez Lucio, M. (2005). The realities of regulatory change: Beyond the fetish of deregulation. Sociology, 39(3), 499–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Lucio, M., & Perrett, R. (2009). The diversity and politics of trade unions responses to minority ethnic and migrant workers: The context of the UK. Economic and Industrial Democ, 30, 324–347.

  • Meardi, G. (2007). The Polish plumber in the West Midlands: Theoretical and empirical issues. Review of Sociology, 13(2), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, R. (2000). Organizing immigrants: The challenges for unions in contemporary California. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, R. (2006). L.A. Story: Immigrant workers and the future of the US labour movement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, B., & Grenier, G. (2001). Union responses to mass migration: The case of Miami, USA. Antipode, 33(3), 567–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (1981). Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms? In H. Roberts (Ed.), Doing feminist research. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

  • Olesen, V. (1994). Feminism and models of social research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Theories of women’s studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penninx, R., & Roosblad, J. (Eds.). (2000). Trade Unions, immigration, and immigrants in Europe, 1960–1993. Oxford: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrett, R., & Martinez Lucio, M. (2009). Trade unions and relations with black and minority-ethnic community groups in the United Kingdom: The development of new alliances? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35(8), 1295–1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1973). On economic inequality. Norton: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, M. (2003). Union organizing in a not-for-profit organisation. In G. Gall (Ed.), Union organizing: Campaigning for trade union recognition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms, M. (2007). Interest formation in Greenfield organizing campaigns. Industrial Relations Journal, 38(5), 439–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, M. (2007). Introduction: The industrial relations of learning and training: A new consensus or a new politics? European Journal of Industrial Relations, 13(3), 269–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tattersall, A. (2006). There is power in coalition: A framework for analysing the practice of union-community coalitions. http://comm-org.wisc.edu/papers2006/tattersall.htm.

  • Tomlinson, J. (2007). Employment regulation, welfare and gender regimes: A comparative analysis of women’s working-time patterns and work-life balance in the UK and the US. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(3), 401–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (2006). Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13(3), 211–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (2004). The European Union and gender equality: Emergent varieties of gender regime. Social Politics, 11(1), 4–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wills, J. (2004). Organising the low paid: East London’s wage campaign as a vehicle for change. In E. Heery, P. Taylor, & W. Brown (Eds.), The future of worker representation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrench, J. (1996). Preventing racism at the workplace: A report on 16 European countries. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

  • Wrench, J. (2000). Combating employment discrimination in Europe: National variation and the dawn of ‘good practice’. In E. Appelt & M. Jarosch (Eds.), Combating racial discrimination: Affirmative action as a model for Europe. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrench, J. (2004). Trade union responses to immigrants and ethnic inequality in Denmark and the UK: The context of consensus and conflict. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 10(1), 7–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrench, J., Rea, A., & Ouali, N. (1999). Migrants, ethnic minorities and the labour market: Integration and exclusion in Europe. New Yok: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Martínez Lucio.

Additional information

The research for this paper was funded by the Leverhulme Trust in the form of a three year project: Social Inclusion, Unions and Migration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Martínez Lucio, M., Connolly, H. Contextualizing Voice and Stakeholders: Researching Employment Relations, Immigration and Trade Unions. J Bus Ethics 97 (Suppl 1), 19–29 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1076-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1076-6

Keywords

Navigation