Book contents
-
The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
-
The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
-
Copyright page
-
Contents
-
Contributors
-
Acknowledgments
-
Introduction
- Part I
Labor and Democracy: Theory and Practice
- 1
A New Labor Law for Deep Democracy
- 2
Labor and Democracy
- 3
Labor’s Obstacles and Democracy’s Demise
- 4
Right-Wing Populism, Illiberal Democracy, Trade Unions, and Workers’ Rights
- Part II
History, Politics, and Law
- Part III
Labor, Diversity, and Democracy
- Part IV
Country and Regional Perspectives
- Part V
Labor and Democracy Sectoral Case Studies: Platform Workers, Higher Education, and the Care Industry
-
Index
- References
2 - Labor and Democracy
Constructing, Deepening, and Defending Citizenship Rights
from Part I - Labor and Democracy: Theory and Practice
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 January 2022
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Labor and Democracy: Theory and Practice
- 1 A New Labor Law for Deep Democracy
- 2 Labor and Democracy
- 3 Labor’s Obstacles and Democracy’s Demise
- 4 Right-Wing Populism, Illiberal Democracy, Trade Unions, and Workers’ Rights
- Part II History, Politics, and Law
- Part III Labor, Diversity, and Democracy
- Part IV Country and Regional Perspectives
- Part V Labor and Democracy Sectoral Case Studies: Platform Workers, Higher Education, and the Care Industry
- Index
- References
Summary
Recent patterns of democratic “backsliding” around the world have followed in the wake of a generalized weakening of organized labor under the modern, globalized variant of capitalism. Scholars have long debated whether and how labor contributes to the construction of democratic regimes and the expansion of social citizenship rights, but the current period makes it abundantly clear that democratic advances are always subject to reversal. As such, it is imperative to interrogate labor’s role in the defense of democratic rights and liberties, and not merely the introduction or expansion of those rights.These questions call for a multi-dimensional approach to the study of labor’s relationship to democracy, one that explores labor’s role in (1) constructing democratic regimes, (2) “deepening” democracy by expanding social citizenship rights, and (3) defending democracy against its adversaries and authoritarian currents in society.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
-
The Cambridge Handbook of Labor and Democracy , pp. 36 - 48Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
Bartolini, Stefano. 2000. The Political Mobilization of the European Left, 1860–1980: The Class Cleavage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bartolini, Stefano, and Peter, Mair. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bellin, Eva. 2000. “Contingent Democrats: Industrialists, Labor, and Democratization in Late-Developing Countries,” World Politics 52, 2: 175–2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berman, Sheri. 2019. “Populism Is a Symptom Rather than a Cause: Democratic Disconnect, the Decline of the Center-Left, and the Rise of Populism in Western Europe,” Polity 51, 4: 654–667.Google Scholar
Bishara, Dina. 2018. Contesting Authoritarianism: Labor Challenges to the State in Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bratton, Michael, and Walle, Nicolas Van de. 1994. “Neopatrimonial Regimes and Political Transitions in Africa,” World Politics 46, 4 (July): 453–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, Paul G., and Nicollos, Kate. 2003. “Labour Politics and Democratic Transition in South Korea and Taiwan,” Government and Opposition 38, 2: 203–237.Google Scholar
Bunce, Valerie. 2003. “Rethinking Democratization: Lessons from the Postcommunist Experience,” World Politics 55, 2: 167–192.Google Scholar
Castles, Francis. 1978. The Social-Democratic Image of Society. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins. 1999. Paths toward Democracy: The Working Class and Elites in Western Europe and South America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1979. “Inducements versus Constraints: Disaggregating Corporatism,” American Political Science Review 73, 4 (December): 967–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, Ruth Berins, and Collier, David. 1991. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cook, María Lorena. 1996. Organizing Dissent: Unions, the State, and the Democratic Teachers’ Movement in Mexico. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2000. Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry. 2019. Ill Winds: Saving Democracy from Russian Rage, Chinese Ambition, and American Complacency. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
Drake, Paul W. 1996. Labor Movements and Dictatorships: The Southern Cone in Comparative Perspective. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Frymer, Paul, and Grumbach, Jacob M.. 2021. “Labor Unions and White Racial Politics,” American Journal of Political Science 65, 1: 225–240.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gidron, Noam, and Hall, Peter A..2019. 2020. “Populism as a Problem of Social Integration,” Comparative Political Studies 53, 7 (June): 1027–1059.Google Scholar
Gilens, Martin. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2012. “Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule,” American Political Science Review 106, 3 (August): 495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Soskice, David, eds. 1991. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Harteveld, Eelco. 2016. “Winning the ‘Losers’ but Losing the ‘Winners’? The Electoral Consequences of the Radical Right Moving to the Economic Left,” Electoral Studies 44: 225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houtman, Dick. 2003. “Lipset and ‘Working-Class’ Authoritarianism,” The American Sociologist 34, 1: 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2001. Development and the Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, and Stephens, John D.. 2012. Democracy and the Left: Social Policy and Inequality in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Richard S., and Mair, Peter. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party,” Party Politics 1, 1: 5–31.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret. 1992. The Workers’ Party and Democratization in Brazil. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Kerrissey, Jasmine, and Schofer, Evan. 2013. “Union Membership and Political Participation in the United States,” Social Forces 91, 3: 895–928.Google Scholar
Kirchheimer, Otto. 1966. “The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems,” in LaPalombara, Joseph and Weiner, Myron, eds. Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 177–200.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert, and McGann, Anthony J.. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Kriesi, Hanspeter. 2008. “Contexts of Party Mobilization,” in Hanspeter Kriesi, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey, eds. West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–52.Google Scholar
LeBas, Adrienne. 2011. From Protest to Parties: Party-Building and Democratization in Africa. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmbruch, Gehard, and Schmitter, Philippe C., eds. 1982. Patterns of Corporatist Policy-Making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Mainwaring, Scott. 2006. “Organized Labor and Democracy in Latin America,” Comparative Politics 39, 1: 21–42.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Ziblatt, Daniel. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York: Crown Publishers.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1960. Political Man: The Social Bases of Politics. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Rokkan, Stein. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction,” in Lipset, Seymour Martin and Rokkan, Stein, eds. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Luebbert, Gregory M. 1991. Liberalism, Fascism, or Social Democracy: Social Classes and the Political Origins of Regimes in Interwar Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mair, Peter. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class, republished in T. H. Marshall and Tom Bottomore, Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto 1992.Google Scholar
Mudde, Cas, and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira. 2013. “Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America,” Government and Opposition 48, 2: 147–174.Google Scholar
Murillo, M. Victoria, and Schrank, Andrew. 2005. “With a Little Help from My Friends: Partisan Politics, Transnational Alliances, and Labor Rights in Latin America,” Comparative Political Studies 38, 8: 971–999.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, Kevin. 1995. The Paradox of Revolution: Labor, the State, and Authoritarianism in Mexico. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, Barrington. 1966. Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy: Lord and Peasant in the Making of the Modern World. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Mosimann, Nadja, Line, Rennwald, and Zimmermann, Adrian. 2019. “The Radical Right, the Labor Movement, and the Competition for the Workers’ Vote,” Economic and Industrial Democracy 40, 1: 65–90.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1973. Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Guillermo, and Schmitter, Philippe C.. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Oesch, Daniel, and Rennwald, Line. 2018. “Electoral Competition in Europe’s New Tripolar Political Space: Class Voting for the Left, Center-Right, and Radical Right,” European Journal of Political Research 57, 4: 783–807.Google Scholar
Ost, David. 1990. Solidarity and the Politics of Anti-Politics: Opposition and Reform in Poland Since 1968. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Panebianco, Angelo. 1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2013. Welfare and Party Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1985. Capitalism and Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, Rachel Beatty. 2016. Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 1998. Deepening Democracy? The Modern Left and Social Movements in Chile and Peru. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Kenneth M. 2014. Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rossi, Federico M. 2017. The Poor’s Struggle for Political Incorporation: The Piquetero Movement in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, Stephens, Evelyne Huber, and Stephens, John D.. 1992. Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. 2001. “Parties Are Not What They Once Were,” in Diamond, Larry and Gunther, Richard, eds. Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 67–89.Google Scholar
Seidman, Gay W. 1994. Manufacturing Militance: Workers’ Movements in Brazil and South America, 1970–1985. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Therborn, Göran. 1977. “The Rule of Capital and the Rise of Democracy,” 103 (May–June): 71–109.Google Scholar
Vieta, Marcelo. 2020. Workers’ Self-Management in Argentina: Contesting Neo-Liberalism by Occupying Companies, Creating Cooperatives, and Recuperating Autogestión. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Yashar, Deborah. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ziblatt, Daniel. 2017. Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar