Skip to main content

Conclusion: Terror, the Polis and political religion

  • Chapter
Sacred Violence

Part of the book series: Rethinking Political Violence series ((RPV))

  • 233 Accesses

Abstract

Eric Voegelin, the Austrian philosopher who fled the Third Reich in the wake of the Anschluss in 1938, argued that the ideological fanaticism of the Nazis was not only a moral and political mistake, but also a spiritual perversion. More precisely, so far as the political religions of the twentieth century, Fascism, Stalinism, Maoism and Islamism are concerned, the meaning or substance of religious phenomena moved from a spiritual concern with transcending the mundane world towards the realization of imaginary fantasies of immanent apocalypse and the fashioning of this worldly utopias. These fantasies, as Barry Cooper observes, are not “always recognized for what they are because the image of an earthly condition of perfected humanity” was, in Europe before 1990, expressed in scientific, or more accurately, “scientistic” language.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Barry Cooper, Eric Voegelin and the Foundations of Modern Political Science (Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press, 1999), p. 4s.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ernest Sternberg, “Purifying the World: What the New Radical Ideology Stands for,” Orbis (Winter 2010), p. 64.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Emilio Gentile, “The Sacralization of Politics: Definitions, Interpretations and Reflections on the Question of Secular Religion and Totalitarianism,” Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 1(1) (2000), pp. 18–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York, Houghton: Mifflin Harcourt, 1951), pp. 472–479.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Eric Voegelin, Political Religions and The Ecumenic Age, vol. 4 in Order and History, 5 vols. (Baton Rouge: Louisiana University Press, 1974), p. 268

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norman Cohn, The Pursuit of the Millennium (London: Palladin, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Roger Griffin, The Nature of Fascism (London: Pinter, 1991), p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guy Standing, The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class (London: Bloomsbury, 2011), pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andrew Macdonald (a.k.a. William Luther Pierce), The Turner Diaries (Hillsboro, West Virginia: National Vanguard Books, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Louis Beam, “tLeaderless Resistance,” The Seditionist, 12 (January 1992), p. 1. Beam first promulgated the notion in 1983 to the Ku Klux Klan. See also Southern Poverty Law Center, “Louis Beam,” at spl.org and George Michael Lone Wolf Terror and the Rise of Leaderless Resistance (Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press, 1995), pp. 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Alexander Meleagrou-Hitchens and Hans Brun, A Neo-Nationalist Network: The English Defence League and the European Counter Jihad Movement (London: International Centre for the Study of Radicalization and Political Violence, 2013), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ye’or Bat (a.k.a. Litman, Giselle), Eurabia the Euro-Arab Axis (New Jersey: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bernard-Henri Levy, Left in Dark Times: A Stand Against the New Barbarism (New York: Random House, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  14. John Fonte, “Liberal Democracy versus Transnational Progressivism: The Future of the Ideological Civil War Within the West,” Orbis (Summer 2002), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noam Chomsky, Hegemony and Survival: America’s Quest for Global Dominance (London: Penguin, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Alexander Del Valle, I Rossi Neri, Verdi: la convergenza degli Estremi opposti. Islamismo, comunismo, neona-zismo (Torino: Lindau, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nick Cohen, What’s Left? How the Left Lost Its Way (London: Harper, 2007), pp. 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leo Strauss, The City and Man (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kenneth R. Minogue, Politics: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), p. vii.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bernard Crick, In Defence of Politics (1962) (London: Continuum, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Michael Oakeshott, Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays (London: Methuen, 1962)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hannah Arendt, Between Past and Future (1954) (London: Penguin, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hannah Arendt, The Promise of Politics (New York: Random House, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leo Strauss and Joseph Cropsey, History of Political Philosophy (1963) (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Aristotle, The Politics (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Steven Pinker, The Better Angels of our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined (London: Penguin, 2011), p. xxvi

    Google Scholar 

  28. See J.H. Hexter, The Vision of Politics on the Eve of the Reformation (New York, Basic Books, 1973), p. 168. Harro Hopfl also explores the ambiguities of reason of state thinking and its relationship to Jesuit and politique political thinking. See Harro Hopfl, Jesuit Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), pp. 106–112.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Richard S. Katz and Peter Mair, “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party,” Party Politics, 1(1) (1995), pp. 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Peter Oborne, The Triumph of the Political Class (London: Pocket Books, 2007), p. xviii.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Peter Mair, Ruling the Void: The Hollowing out of Western Democracy (London: Verso, 2013), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. David Runciman, The Confidence Trap: A History of Democracy in Crisis from World War I to the Present (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013), p. 265.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hew Strachan, The Direction of War Contemporary Strategy in Historical Perspective (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014), p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 David Martin Jones and M. L. R. Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, D.M., Smith, M.L.R. (2014). Conclusion: Terror, the Polis and political religion. In: Sacred Violence. Rethinking Political Violence series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137328069_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics