Skip to main content
Log in

The changing face of party policy selection in post-devolution Northern Ireland

  • Original Article
  • Published:
British Politics Aims and scope

Abstract

This article provides a comparative and longitudinal analysis of the policy selection methods adopted by Northern Ireland’s five main parties. Drawing on data from multiple sources, it sheds light on an important element of intra-party democracy and party organisation in the region. Accounting for instances of reform, this article reveals the extent to which the parties have altered their procedures following the introduction of devolved power-sharing in 1998. Policy development is revealed to be primarily top-down in nature, with a clear professionalisation of the process in recent times. In a concurrent development, parties have also adopted a more proactive and, typically, consultative approach to policy development, affording ordinary members greater opportunities to register their views. However, such consultation also privileges several actors outside the parties’ boundaries, a finding which raises questions concerning both their organisational integrity and the nature and meaning of conventional party membership in Northern Ireland.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The survey was conducted in 2011 as part of the UK module of the Comparative Candidate Survey project. The combined response rate for the five parties in this study was 35.4 per cent. For further information see: http://ls-ewdsdnn.ces.strath.ac.uk/ukec/2011.aspx.

  2. Other accounts of the internal dynamics of the DUP have shown Special Advisors to play an active and influential (and primarily informal) role in the party’s policy-making process (see Tonge et al. 2014). These actors are employed as aides to DUP ministers and several former advisors have moved directly into electoral politics. They could, therefore, be justifiably regarded as another strand of the DUP parliamentary party.

  3. At the time of the survey, Alliance’s parliamentary ‘team’ consisted of just one MP.

  4. The running order of conference, including the motions to be debated, is determined by the party executive (Ard Chomhairle).

  5. Specially convened conferences have been called to consider the party’s support of the Good Friday Agreement (May 1998) and Policing and Justice in Northern Ireland (January 2007).

  6. Sinn Féin interviewees explained that focus groups are not conducted for purely policy development purposes. Focus groups are, however, used by the party’s ‘Elections Department’ during campaigns.

  7. Author’s calculation based on several sources. Membership figures are generally not disclosed by the political parties.

References

  • Allern, E.H., and K. Pedersen. 2007. The Impact of Party Organisational Changes on Democracy. West European Politics 30 (1): 68–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, R. 2007. The IRA and Armed Struggle. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • APNI. 2004. Statement of Accounts. Belfast: Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • APNI. 2013. Alliance Party of Northern Ireland Constitution and Rules. Alliance: Belfast.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäck, H. 2008. Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Formation. Party Politics 14(1): 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bean, K. 2007. The New Politics of Sinn Féin. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolleyer, N. 2009. Inside the Cartel Party: Party Organisation in Government and Opposition. Political Studies 57(3): 559–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, K.J. 2005. Organic Intellectuals and the Committed Community: Irish Republicanism and Sinn Féin in the North. Irish Political Studies 20(3): 341–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross, W.P., and R.S. Katz. 2013. The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy. In The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy, ed. W.P. Cross, and R.S. Katz, 1–11. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, R.J., D. Farrell, and I. McAllister. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denham, A., and M. Garnett. 1999. Influence Without Responsibility? Think Tanks in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs 52(1): 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, J. 2008. Republican Policies in Practical Politics: Placing Sinn Féin in a European Context. In Republicanism in Ireland: Confronting Theory and Practice, ed. I. Honohan, 131–146. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUP. 2013. The Constitution and Rules of the Democratic Unionist Party. DUP: Belfast.

    Google Scholar 

  • DUP. 2014 Get Involved. Webpage, http://www.mydup.com/get-involved, accessed 3 August 2014.

  • Elias, A. 2012. The Policy-Making Capacity of the Political Parties in Wales. Paper presented at The United Kingdom: A Changing Union conference, September 2012.

  • Farren, S. 2010. The SDLP: The Struggle for Agreement in Northern Ireland, 1970–2000. Dublin: Four Courts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, C. 2006. Unionism and the Peace Process in Northern Ireland. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faucher-King, F. 2005. Changing Parties: An Anthropology of British Political Party Conferences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frampton, M. 2009. The Long March: The Political Strategy of Sinn Féin, 1981–2007. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M., M. Laver, and P. Mair. 2001. Representative Government in Modern Europe: Institutions, Parties, and Governments. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauja, A. 2013a. The Politics of Party Policy: From Members to Legislators. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gauja, A. 2013b. Policy Development and Intra-Party Democracy. In The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy, ed. W.P. Cross, and R.S. Katz, 116–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., and S. Ward. 1998. UK Political Parties and the Internet. The Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 3(3): 14–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidar, K., and J. Saglie. 2003. Predestined Parties? Organizational Change in Norwegian Political Parties. Party Politics 9(2): 219–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S. 1997. Democracy and Elections. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S. 2001. The Problem of Candidate Selection and Models of Party Democracy. Party Politics 7(3): 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S., and P. Mair. 1995. Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R.S., and P. Mair. 2002. The Ascendancy of the Party in Public Office: Party Organizational Change in Twentieth-Century Democracies. In Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges, ed. R. Gunther, J. Ramon-Montero, and J.J. Linz, 113–135. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Koelble, T.A. 1989. Party Structures and Democracy: Michels, McKenzie, and Duverger Revisited via the Examples of the West German Green Party and the British Social Democratic Party. Comparative Political Studies 22(2): 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. 1977. Democracy in Plural Societies; A Comparative Exploration. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker, D.G. 2005. The Impact of Political Marketing on Internal Party Democracy. Parliamentary Affairs 58(3): 570–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luther, K.R. 1999. A Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Political Parties and Party Systems in Consociational Democracy. In Party Elites in Divided Societies: Political Parties in Consociational Democracy, ed. K.R. Luther, and K. Deschouwer, 3–19. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luther, K.R., and K. Deschouwer (eds.). 1999. Party Elites in Divided Societies: Political Parties in Consociational Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maillot, A. 2005. New Sinn Féin: Irish Republicanism in the Twenty-First Century. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Margetts, H. 2006. Cyber Parties. In Handbook of Party Politics, ed. R.S. Katz, and W. Crotty. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAllister, I. 1977. The Northern Ireland Social Democratic and Labour Party. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, P. 1991. Conflict Regulation and Party Competition in Northern Ireland. European Journal of Political Research 20(1): 67–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W. 1994. The Development of Austrian Party Organizations in the Postwar Period. In How Parties Organize: Change and Adaptation in Party Organizations in Western Democracies, ed. R.S. Katz, and P. Mair, 51–79. London: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nordlinger, E. 1972. Conflict Regulation in Divided Societies. Cambridge: Harvard.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, B. 2005. Debating Consociational Politics: Normative and Explanatory Arguments. In From Power Sharing to Democracy: Post-Conflict Institutions in Ethnically Divided Societies, ed. S. Noel, 3–43. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, H.H. 2010. How Intra-Party Power Relations Affect the Coalition Behaviour of Political Parties. Party Politics 16(6): 737–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poguntke, T. (2001) Green Parties in National Governments: From Protest to Acquiescence? KEPRU Working Paper. Newcastle: Keele University.

  • Scarrow, S. 2014. Beyond Party Members: Changing Approaches to Partisan Mobilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scarrow, S.E., P. Webb, and D.M. Farrell. 2000. From Social Integration to Electoral Contestation: The Changing Distribution of Power Within Political Parties. In Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. R.J. Dalton, and M.P. Wattenberg, 129–153. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener, U. 2002. Making Power-Sharing Work: Lessons from Successes and Failures in Ethnic Conflict Regulation. Journal of Peace Research 39(2): 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SDLP. 2004. SDLP Report and Financial Statements. Belfast: SDLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDLP. 2010. Report of the Policy Committee. Belfast: SDLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDLP. 2011. Report of the Policy Committee. Belfast: SDLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDLP. 2012. Social Democratic and Labour Party Constitution. Belfast: SDLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDLP. 2013. Report of the Policy Committee. Belfast: SDLP.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDLP (2014) About Us: Policy Forum. Webpage, http://www.sdlp.ie/about/policy-forum/, accessed 3 August.

  • Seyd, P. 1999. New Parties/New Politics? A Case Study of the British Labour Party. Party Politics 5(3): 383–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinn Féin. 2013. Constitution and Rules. Dublin: Sinn Féin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinn Féin (2014) Get Involved. Webpage. http://www.sinnfein.ie/get-involved, accessed 28 September.

  • Spencer, G. 2006. Sinn Féin and the Media in Northern Ireland: The New Terrain of Policy Articulation. Irish Political Studies 21(3): 355–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonge, J., M. Braniff, T. Hennessey, J.W. McAuley, and S. Whiting. 2014. The Democratic Unionist Party: From Protest to Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. 1990. Elite Interaction and Constitution Building in Consociational Democracies. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2(1): 5–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UUP. 2007. The Constitution, Rules and Standing Orders of the Ulster Unionist Party. Belfast: UUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UUP. 2014a. Ulster Unionist Party: Membership Form. Belfast: UUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UUP (2014b) Stay Informed. Webpage. http://www.uup.org/, accessed 3 February.

  • Webb, P. 2002. Political Parties in Britain: Secular Decline or Adaptive Resilience? In Political Parties in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. P. Webb, D. Farrell, and I. Holliday. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Young, L. 2013. Party Members and Intra-Party Democracy. In The Challenges of Intra-Party Democracy, ed. W.P. Cross, and R.S. Katz. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Matthews.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matthews, N. The changing face of party policy selection in post-devolution Northern Ireland. Br Polit 12, 361–385 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-017-0047-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-017-0047-7

Keywords

Navigation