Party Thresholds for Registration and Resources—Mechanical Hurdles or Promoting Genuine Political Discourse
Abstract
Minimum membership thresholds are commonly used in democracies as a criterion for political party registration. These thresholds can have the empowering quality of showing a specified level of popular support for a party and/or its ideology, policies, or leader, but are often a simple mathematical test for a new party, without requirements for political activism or internal party democracy. Thresholds for registration, and/or for access to state resources, impact on the style and scope of political discourse in a democracy, and can also be used as a mechanism to limit political competition.
This article provides an international focus centering on three countries. Two countries, Australia and New Zealand, are developed democracies with well-established regulatory regimes. The third country, Papua New Guinea, provides a contrast as a developing democracy attempting to strengthen its party system through regulation. The article provides a comparative analysis of the mechanical nature of membership thresholds, and of further thresholds that impact on parties' ability to be part of the national political narrative.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
Australian Electoral Commission (AEC). 2013. “2013 Party Registration Decisions and Changes.” <http://aec.gov.au/Parties_and_Representatives/party_registration/Registration_Decisions/2013/index.htm>.
Australian Government. 2009. Electoral Reform Green Paper: Strengthening Australia's Democracy. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
Bennett S. 2002. Australia's Political Parties: More Regulation? Research Paper No.
21, Department of the Parliamentary Library, Parliament of Australia: Canberra.
Bracks S., Faulkner J., and Carr B. 2010. 2010 National Review: Report to the ALP National Executive. Australian Labor Party (ALP): Canberra.
Elections NZ. 2014. “Decision of the Electoral Commission on the Allocation of Time and Money to Eligible Political Parties for the Broadcasting of Election Programmes for the 2014 General Election,” June 6. <http://www.elections.org.nz/sites/default/files/bulk-upload/documents/final_2014_broadcasting_allocation_decision.pdf>.
Elections NZ. 2104a. “Variation of the Decision of the Electoral Commission on the Allocation of Time and Money to Eligible Political Parties for the Broadcasting of Election Programmes for the 2014 General Election,” August 29. <http://www.elections.org.nz/sites/default/files/bulk-upload/documents/29_august_2014_variation_of_allocation_decision.pdf>.
Enyedi Z. 2014. “The Discreet Charm of Political Parties,” Party Politics 20(2): 194–204.
Fearon J. D. 2003. “Ethnic and Cultural Diversity by Country,” Journal of Economic Growth 8(2): 195–222.
Gauja A. 2010. Political Parties and Elections: Legislating for Representative Democracy. Ashgate: Farnham, UK.
Gauja A. 2012. “The ‘Push’ for Primaries: What Drives Party Organisational Reform in Australia and the United Kingdom?,” Australian Journal of Political Science 47(4): 641–658.
Geddis A. 2007. Electoral Law in New Zealand: Practice and Policy. LexisNexis: Wellington, NZ.
Gelu A. 2005. “The Failure of the Organic Law on the Integrity of Political Parties and Candidates (OLIPPAC),” Pacific Economic Bulletin 20(1): 83–97.
Green A. 2003. Prospects for the 2003 Legislative Council Election. Background Paper No. 3/03, NSW Parliamentary Library Research Service. Parliament of New South Wales: Sydney.
Jaensch D., Brent P., and Bowden B. 2004. Australian Political Parties in the Spotlight. Democratic Audit of Australia, Australian National University: Canberra.
Janda K. 2005. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives: Adopting Party Law. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs: Washington, DC.
Joint Select Committee on Electoral Reform. 1983. First Report. Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
JSCEM [Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters]. 2000. The 1998 Federal Election: Report of the Inquiry into the Conduct of the 1998 Federal Election and Matters Related Thereto. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
JSCEM [Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters]. 2005. The 2004 Federal Election: Report of the Inquiry into the Conduct of the 2004 Federal Election and Matters Related Thereto. Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
JSCEM [Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters]. 2014. Interim Report on the Inquiry into the Conduct of the 2013 Federal Election: Senate Voting Practices. Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia: Canberra.
Katz R.S. and Mair P. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy.” Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.
Kelly N. 2012. Directions in Australian Electoral Reform: Professionalism and Partisanship in Electoral Management. ANU E Press: Canberra.
Kelly N. and Ashiagbor S. 2011. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives: Parliamentary Groups. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs: Washington, DC.
McGrath L. 2011. Law Reform and Political Party Registration Case Study—Democratic Labor Party (DLP). <http://aceproject.org/ero-en/regions/pacific/AU/law-reform-and-political-party-registration-case> (accessed March 23, 2014).
Minter Ellison Consulting. 2003. Independent Review of the Northern Territory Electoral System: Final Report and Recommendations. Minter Ellison Consulting: Canberra.
Norris P. 2004. Building Political Parties: Reforming Legal Regulations and Internal Rules. International IDEA: Stockholm.
Orr G. 2001. “Overseeing the Gatekeepers: Should the Preselection of Political Candidates be Regulated?,” Public Law Review 12: 89–94.
Orr G. 2010. The Law of Politics: Elections, Parties and Money in Australia. Federation Press: Sydney.
Orr G., Mercurio B., and Williams G. (eds). 2003. Realising Democracy: Electoral Law in Australia. Federation Press: Sydney.
Plasser F. and Plasser G. 2002. Global Political Campaigning: A Worldwide Analysis of Campaign Professionals and Their Practices. Praeger: Westport, CT.
Reilly B., Nordlund P., and Newman E. 2008. Political Parties in Conflict-Prone Societies: Encouraging Inclusive Politics and Democratic Development. Policy Brief No. 2. United Nations University: Tokyo.
Scarrow S. 2005. Political Parties and Democracy in Theoretical and Practical Perspectives: Implementing Intra-Party Democracy. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs: Washington, DC.
Van Biezen I. and Poguntke T. 2014. “The Decline of Membership-based Politics,” Party Politics 20(2): 205–216.
Eijk Van der C. and Franklin M. N. 2009. Elections and Voters. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, UK.
Young S. and Tham J-C. 2006. Political Finance in Australia: A Skewed and Secret System. Democratic Audit of Australia, Australian National University: Canberra.
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Election Law Journal
Volume 15 • Issue Number 1 • March 2016
Pages: 48 - 57
Copyright
Copyright 2016, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
History
Published online: 4 March 2016
Published in print: March 2016
Published ahead of print: 14 December 2015
Topics
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
Export Citation
Export citation
Select the format you want to export the citations of this publication.
View Options
Get Access
Access content
To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.⚠ Society Access
If you are a member of a society that has access to this content please log in via your society website and then return to this publication.