skip to main content
research-article

Rewriting sexual violence prevention: a comparative rhetorical analysis of online prevention courses in the United States and New Zealand

Published:19 January 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As part of a larger research project on the rhetoric of sexual violence prevention in online university courses, the researcher conducted rhetorical analyses of two prevention courses from the United States and New Zealand. This study analyzed the rhetorical strategies used in two courses with attention to five subcategories: content genres, ways the content addresses the audience, messaging strategies, levels of prevention, and sentence-level choices. From the analyses, the researcher recommends rhetorical considerations for prevention courses. While the New Zealand course had more effective language choices, the US course had a better overall narrative structure.

References

  1. Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, L. A., & Whiston, S. C. (2005). Sexual assault education programs: A meta-analytic examination of their effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29(4), 374--388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Baker, K., Henriquez, S. & Hostler, M.J. (2018). Where we're going and where we've been: Making the case for preventing sexual violence. Reliance and Berkeley Media Studies Group.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Breitenbecher, K.H. and Scarce, M. (2001). An evaluation of the effectiveness of a sexual assault education program Focusing on psychological barriers to resistance. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16(5), 387--407. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Choate, L. H., et. al (2003). Sexual assault prevention programs for college men: An exploratory evaluation of the men against violence model. Journal of College Counseling, 6(2), 166--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Croom, K., et. al (2009). Impact of an online alcohol education course on behavior and harm for incoming first-year college students: Short-term evaluation of a randomized trial. Journal of American College Health, 57(4), 445--454. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Dills J.K. & Brown P. (2019). Continuing the dialogue: Learning from the past and looking to the future of intimate partner violence and sexual violence prevention. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Edenfield, A. C. (2019). Queering consent: Design and sexual consent messaging. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 7(2), 50--63. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gold, J., Lim, M. S., Hellard, M. E., Hocking, J. S., & Keogh, L. (2010). What's in a message? Delivering sexual health promotion to young people in Australia via text messaging. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jaggars, S. S., & Xu, D. (2016). How do online course design features influence student performance? Computers & Eductation, 95, 270--284.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Julich, S. J., Oak, E., Terrell, J., & Good, G. (2015). The sustainable delivery of sexual violence prevention education in schools. Massey University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kleinsasser, A., Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., & Rosenfield, D. (2015). An online bystander intervention program for the prevention of sexual violence. Psychology of violence, 5(3), 227.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Potts, L. (2009). Using Actor Network Theory to trace and improve multimodal communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 18(3), 281--301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Orchowski, L. M., Berkowitz, A., Boggis, J., & Oesterle, D. (2016). Bystander intervention among college men: The role of alcohol and correlates of sexual aggression. Journal of interpersonal violence, 31(17), 2824--2846. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rich, M. D., et al. (2010). I'd rather be doing something else: Male resistance to rape prevention programs. The Journal of Men's Studies, 18(3), 268--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Salvo, M. J. (2001). Ethics of engagement: User-centered design and rhetorical methodology. Technical Communication Quarterly, 10(3), 273--290. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Svejkar, D., et al. (2019). Using design to generate change: Harnessing the student voice to prevent sexual assault and sexual harassment. Journal of the Australian and New Zealand Student Services Association, 27(1), 29--44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Vladutiu, C. J., Martin, S. L., & Macy, R. J. (2011). College-or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: A review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 12(2), 67--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Rewriting sexual violence prevention: a comparative rhetorical analysis of online prevention courses in the United States and New Zealand

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Communication Design Quarterly
      Communication Design Quarterly  Volume 9, Issue 3
      September 2021
      33 pages
      EISSN:2166-1642
      DOI:10.1145/3468859
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2022 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 January 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader