Published Online:https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2021.0388

Stigmatization is pervasive in society. Stigma may arise from the core attributes of a social group, such as race, nationality, religion, class, sexuality, and disability, which can induce significant negative impacts on group members. While scholars have documented how stigmatized groups can organize to challenge the prejudice they face, research has been slow to account for the rise of social media—a digital disruption that characterizes a critical feature of the “new normal.” Yet, the emergence of social media technology has transformed the cultural potential of relationship building within and across social groups. In this paper, we examine anti-stigma organizing in the age of social media. We theorize how social movement organizations use social media to enact three audience-focused anti-stigma framing processes. These processes structure three distinct types of social bond, and, when iterated over time, shape three corresponding types of solidarity that support the social inclusion of stigmatized groups and reduce group stigma. Through our framework, we contribute to research on stigma and social movements by conceptualizing the role of social media in anti-stigma organizing, and by building new theory about the relationship between solidarity and stigma reduction.

REFERENCES

  • Almeida, Paul D. 2019. Social movements: The structure of collective mobilization. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar
  • Altman, D., Aggleton, P., Williams, M., Kong, T., Reddy, V., Harrad, D., Reis, T., & Parker, R. 2012. Men who have sex with men: stigma and discrimination. Lancet, 380: 439–445. Google Scholar
  • Aranda, A. M., Helms, W. S., Patterson, K. D. W., Roulet, T. J., & Hudson, B. A. 2023. Standing on the shoulders of Goffman: Advancing a relational research agenda on stigma. Business & Society, 62: 1339–1377. Google Scholar
  • Ashforth, B. E., & Kreiner, G. E. 1999. How can you do it?: Dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24: 413–434.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Banting, K. G., & Kymlicka, W. 2006. Multiculturalism and the welfare state: Recognition and redistribution in contemporary democracies. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (Eds.). 2017. The strains of commitment: The political sources of solidarity in diverse societies. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Bauer, J. A., & Spector, P. E. 2015. Discrete negative emotions and counterproductive work behavior. Human Performance, 28: 307–331. Google Scholar
  • Benford, R. D. 1997. Social movements. Sociological Inquiry, 67: 409–430. Google Scholar
  • Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. 2000. Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 611–639. Google Scholar
  • Bhuiyan, J. 2022, March 14. A U.S. surveillance program tracks nearly 200,000 immigrants. What happens to their data? Guardian. Google Scholar
  • Bhuiyan, J., & Levin, S. 2021, November 17. Revealed: The software that studies your Facebook friends to predict who may commit a crime. Guardian. Google Scholar
  • Binder, W., & Jaworski, B. N. 2018. Refugees as icons: Culture and iconic representation. Sociology Compass, 12: e12568. Google Scholar
  • Blanc, E. 2022. How digitized strategy impacts movement outcomes: Social media, mobilizing, and organizing in the 2018 teachers’ strikes. Politics & Society, 50: 485–518. Google Scholar
  • Block, M. 2022, May 11. LGBTQ advocates fight the homophobic “grooming” narrative. Retrieved from https://www.npr.org/2022/05/11/1096623939/accusations-grooming-political-attack-homophobic-origins Google Scholar
  • Bossetta, M. 2018. The digital architectures of social media: Comparing political campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95: 471–496. Google Scholar
  • Branch, T. 1988. Parting the waters: America in the king years, 1954–1963. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster. Google Scholar
  • Brandon, J. 2022, December 12. I asked ChatGPT to write a bunch of social media posts. The results were astounding. Forbes. Google Scholar
  • Bridoux, F., Bundy, J., Gond, J.-P., Haack, P., Petriglieri, J., Stephens, J. P., & Sutcliffe, K. (Eds.) 2021. Call for papers: Academy of Management Review special topic forum. The new normal: Positive organizational impact in an age of disruption. Retrieved from https://aom.org/events/event-detail/2021/09/01/higher-logic-calendar/the-new-normal-positive-organizational-impact-in-an-age-of-disruption Google Scholar
  • Campana, M., Duffy, K., & Micheli, M. R. 2022. “We’re all born naked and the rest is drag”: Spectacularization of core stigma in RuPaul’s Drag Race. Journal of Management Studies, 59: 1950–1986. Google Scholar
  • Caren, N., Andrews, K., & Lu, T. 2020. Contemporary social movements in a hybrid media environment. Annual Review of Sociology, 46: 443–465. Google Scholar
  • Carlson, B. L., Jones, L. V., Harris, M., Quezada, N., & Frazer, R. 2017. Trauma, shared recognition and Indigenous resistance on social media. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 21: 1570. Google Scholar
  • Charmaz, K. 2020. Experiencing stigma and exclusion: The influence of neoliberal perspectives, practices, and policies on living with chronic illness and disability. Symbolic Interaction, 43: 21–45. Google Scholar
  • Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. 2007. Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10: 103–126. Google Scholar
  • Chrispal, S., Bapuji, H., & Zietsma, C. 2021. Caste and organization studies: Our silence makes us complicit. Organization Studies, 42: 1501–1515. Google Scholar
  • Clair, M., Daniel, C., & Lamont, M. 2016. Destigmatization and health: Cultural constructions and the long-term reduction of stigma. Social Science & Medicine, 165: 223–232. Google Scholar
  • Clemente, M., & Roulet, R. 2014. Public opinion as a source of deinstitutionalization: A “spiral of silence” approach. Academy of Management Review, 40: 96–114. Google Scholar
  • Cooley, C. H. 2017. Looking-glass self . In J. O’Brien (Ed.), The production of reality: Essays and readings on social interaction (6th ed.): 126–128. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. (Original work published 1902) Google Scholar
  • Cornelissen, J. P., & Werner, M. D. 2014. Putting framing in perspective: A review of framing and frame analysis across the management and organizational literature. Academy of Management Annals, 8: 181–235.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Corrigan, P. W. 2016. Resolving mental illness stigma: Should we seek normalcy or solidarity? British Journal of Psychiatry, 208: 314–315. Google Scholar
  • Courpasson, D., Younes, D., & Reed, M. 2021. Durkheim in the neoliberal organization: Taking resistance and solidarity seriously. Organization Theory, 2: 2631787720982619. Google Scholar
  • Craviolini, C., Van Wezemael, J., & Wirth, F. 2011. The spatiality of control: Intertwining ICT and physical space in social protest. Journal of Critical Studies in Business & Society, 4: 95–115. Google Scholar
  • Creed, W. D., Hudson, B. A., Okhuysen, G. A., & Smith-Crowe, K. 2014. Swimming in a sea of shame: Incorporating emotion into explanations of institutional reproduction and change. Academy of Management Review, 39: 275–301. Google Scholar
  • Creed, W. D., Hudson, B. A., Okhuysen, G. A., & Smith-Crowe, K. 2022. A place in the world: Vulnerability, well-being, and the ubiquitous evaluation that animates participation in institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 47: 358–381.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Davey, M. 2016, August 7. #IndigenousDads and their children take to Twitter over Bill Leak cartoon. Guardian. Google Scholar
  • Davidson, O. G. 1996. The best of enemies: Race and redemption in the New South. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press. Google Scholar
  • Deacon, H. 2006. Towards a sustainable theory of health-related stigma: Lessons from the HIV/AIDS literature. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16: 418–425. Google Scholar
  • DeJordy, R. 2008. Just passing through: Stigma, passing, and identity decoupling in the work place. Group & Organization Management, 33: 504–531. Google Scholar
  • Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. 2008. Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 32: 575–600. Google Scholar
  • Derous, E., Ryan, A. M., & Nguyen, H. H. D. 2012. Multiple categorization in resume screening: Examining effects on hiring discrimination against Arab applicants in field and lab settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33: 544–570. Google Scholar
  • Dorsch, I., Zimmer, F., & Stock, W. G. 2017. Image indexing through hashtags in Instagram. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 54: 658–659. Google Scholar
  • Dovidio, J. F., Major, B., & Crocker, J. 2000. Stigma: Introduction and overview . In T. F. HeathertonR. E. KleckM. R. HeblJ. G. Hull (Eds.), The social psychology of stigma: 1–28. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
  • Durkheim, E. 1997. The division of labor in society. New York, NY: The Free Press. (Original work published 1893) Google Scholar
  • Earl, J. 2015. The future of social movement organizations: The waning dominance of SMOs online. American Behavioral Scientist, 59: 35–52. Google Scholar
  • Earl, J., & Garrett, R. K. 2017. The new information frontier: Toward a more nuanced view of social movement communication. Social Movement Studies, 16: 479–493. Google Scholar
  • Earl, J., & Kimport, K. 2011. Digitally enabled social change: Activism in the Internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  • Earl, J., Maher, T. V., & Pan, J. 2022. The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism: A synthetic review. Science Advances, 8: eabl8198. Google Scholar
  • Ebel, F. 2021, December 10. Tunisia: LGBT activist’s assault by police seen as a pattern. Retrieved from https://-apnews.com/article/coronavirus-pandemic-business-health-africa-tunisia-f3d0629969ed647f9eab2b-4465f14d70 Google Scholar
  • Eismann, K., Posegga, O., & Fischbach, K. 2021. Opening organizational learning in crisis management: On the affordances of social media. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30: 101692. Google Scholar
  • Elliott, T., & Earl, J. 2018. Organizing the next generation: Youth engagement with activism inside and outside of organizations. Social Media + Society, 4: 1–18. Google Scholar
  • Evans, N. 2022. Coping with gendered welfare stigma: Exploring everyday accounts of stigma and resistance strategies among mothers who claim social security benefits. Social Policy and Society, 21: 690–700. Google Scholar
  • Fehrenbach, H., & Rodogno, D. 2015. “A horrific photo of a drowned Syrian child”: Humanitarian photography and NGO media strategies in historical perspective. International Review of the Red Cross, 97: 1121–1155. Google Scholar
  • Fisher, R., Gee, G., & Looney, A. 2018. Same-sex married tax filers after Windsor and Obergefell. Demography, 55: 1423–1446. Google Scholar
  • Galinsky, A. D., Wang, C. S., Whitson, J. A., Anicich, E. M., Hugenberg, K., & Bodenhausen, G. V. 2013. The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: The reciprocal relationship between power and self-labeling. Psychological Science, 24: 2020–2029. Google Scholar
  • Gamson, W. A. 1992. Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Goffman, E. 1963. Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Hoboken, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  • Goffman, E. 1983. The interaction order: American Sociological Association, 1982 presidential address. American Sociological Review, 48: 1–17. Google Scholar
  • Gray, B., Johnson, T., Kish-Gephart, J., & Tilton, J. 2018. Identity work by first-generation college students to counteract class-based microaggressions. Organization Studies, 39: 1227–1250. Google Scholar
  • Gray, H. M., Shaffer, P. M., Nelson, S. E., & Shaffer, H. J. 2016. Changing social networks among homeless individuals: A prospective evaluation of a job-and life-skills training program. Community Mental Health Journal, 52: 799–808. Google Scholar
  • Griffin, P. 2019. #MeToo, white feminism and taking everyday politics seriously in the global political economy. Australian Journal of Political Science, 54: 556–572. Google Scholar
  • Ha, L., Ray, R., Chen, P., & Guo, K. 2022. U.S. public opinion on China and the United States during the U.S.–China trade dispute: The role of audience framing and partisan media use. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 99: 930–954. Google Scholar
  • Harris, A., & Karimshah, A. 2019. Young Muslims, stigma and the work of normality. Sociology, 53: 617–633. Google Scholar
  • Hashmi, F. K., Iqbal, Q., Haque, N., & Saleem, F. 2020. Religious cliché and stigma: A brief response to overlooked barriers in COVID-19 management. Journal of Religion and Health, 59: 2697–2700. Google Scholar
  • Hayden, M. E., Gais, H., Miller, C., Squire, M., & Wilcox, J. 2022, August 11. “Unite the Right” 5 years later: Where are they now? Retrieved from https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2022/08/11/unite-right-5-years-later-where-are-they-now Google Scholar
  • Haydu, J. 2020. Adding time to social movement diffusion. Social Movement Studies, 19: 625–639. Google Scholar
  • Heatherton, T. F., & Nichols, P. A. 1994. Personal accounts of successful versus failed attempts at life change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20: 664–675. Google Scholar
  • Helms, W. S., & Patterson, K. D. 2014. Eliciting acceptance for “illicit” organizations: The positive implications of stigma for MMA organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 1453–1484.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Hensby, A., Sibthorpe, J., & Driver, S. 2012. Resisting the “protest business”: Bureaucracy, post-bureaucracy and active membership in social movement organizations. Organization, 19: 809–823. Google Scholar
  • Herek, G. M. 2015. Beyond “homophobia”: Thinking more clearly about stigma, prejudice, and sexual orientation. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85: 29–37. Google Scholar
  • Hudson, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. 2009. Not with a ten-foot pole: Core stigma, stigma transfer, and improbable persistence of men’s bathhouses. Organization Science, 20: 134–153. Google Scholar
  • Hudson, B. A., Patterson, K. D., Roulet, T. J., Helms, W. S., & Elsbach, K. 2022. Organizational stigma: Taking stock and opening new areas for research. Journal of Management Studies, 59: 1899–1914. Google Scholar
  • Isaac, L., & Christiansen, L. 2002. How the civil rights movement revitalized labor militancy. American Sociological Review, 67: 722–746. Google Scholar
  • Jackson, S. J., & Foucault Welles, B. 2015. Hijacking #myNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication, 65: 932–952. Google Scholar
  • Jasper, J. M. 2011. Emotions and social movements: Twenty years of theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 37: 285–303. Google Scholar
  • Jasper, J. M. 2017. The doors that culture opened: Parallels between social movement studies and social psychology. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20: 285–302. Google Scholar
  • Jennings, G. 2022. “Filthy lefties!”: The humorous stigmatization of left-handers in historical European martial arts. STAPS, 136: 17–36. Google Scholar
  • Johnson, A. 2016, November 16. “Post-truth” is Oxford Dictionaries’ Word of the Year for 2016. Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/post-truth-oxford-dictionaries-word-year-2016-n685081 Google Scholar
  • Johnson, M. 2019, June 28. Woman who snapped photo of man sleeping in McDonald’s meets him to apologize. Retrieved from https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/woman-who-snapped-photo-of-man-sleeping-in-mcdonalds-meets-him-to-apologize/962472936 Google Scholar
  • Kaufman, J. M., & Johnson, C. 2004. Stigmatized individuals and the process of identity. Sociological Quarterly, 45: 807–833. Google Scholar
  • Khazzoom, A. 2003. The great chain of orientalism: Jewish identity, stigma management, and ethnic exclusion in Israel. American Sociological Review, 68: 481–510. Google Scholar
  • Klein, J., & Amis, J. M. 2021. The dynamics of framing: Image, emotion, and the European migration crisis. Academy of Management Journal, 64: 1324–1354.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Kuipers, S. 2019. Decolonizing social movement theory? Social Movement Studies, 18: 324–345. Google Scholar
  • Lambert, R. D. 2002. Reclaiming the ancestral past: Narrative, rhetoric and the “convict stain.” Journal of Sociology, 38: 111–127. Google Scholar
  • Lamont, M. 2000. The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
  • Lamont, M. 2018. Addressing recognition gaps: Destigmatization and the reduction of inequality. American Sociological Review, 83: 419–444. Google Scholar
  • Larson, J., & Lizardo, O. 2019. Institutional movement logics and the changing shape of the U.S. social movement field, 1960–1995. Social Forces, 97: 1389–1422. Google Scholar
  • Lee, S. K., Kramer, M. W., & Guo, Y. 2019. Social media affordances in entry‐level employees’ socialization: employee agency in the management of their professional impressions and vulnerability during early stages of socialization. New Technology, Work and Employment, 34: 244–261. Google Scholar
  • Leonardi, P. M., & Treem, J. W. 2020. Behavioral visibility: A new paradigm for organization studies in the age of digitization, digitalization, and datafication. Organization Studies, 41: 1601–1625. Google Scholar
  • Leonardi, P. M., Huysman, M., & Steinfield, C. 2013. Enterprise social media: Definition, history, and prospects for the study of social technologies in organizations. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19: 1–19. Google Scholar
  • Leonardi, P. M., & Vaast, E. 2017. Social media and their affordances for organizing: A review and agenda for research. Academy of Management Annals, 11: 150–188.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Levkoe, C. Z. 2015. Strategies for forging and sustaining social movement networks: A case study of provincial food networking organizations in Canada. Geoforum, 58: 174–183. Google Scholar
  • Lickel, B., Kushlev, K., Savalei, V., Matta, S., & Schmader, T. 2014. Shame and the motivation to change the self. Emotion, 14: 1049–1061. Google Scholar
  • Lieberman, A., & Schroeder, J. 2020. Two social lives: How differences between online and offline interaction influence social outcomes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 31: 16–21. Google Scholar
  • Link, B. G., & Phelan, J. C. 2001. Conceptualizing stigma. Annual Review of Sociology, 27: 363–385. Google Scholar
  • Lizzio-Wilson, M., Mirnajafi, Z., & Louis, W. R. 2022. Who we are and who we choose to help (or not): An introduction to social identity theory . In M. A. YerkesM. Bal (Eds.), Solidarity and social justice in contemporary societies: An interdisciplinary approach to understanding inequalities: 17–28. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar
  • Lopez, M. H., Gonzales-Barrera, A., & Lopez, G. 2017, December 20. Hispanic identity fades across generations as immigrant connections fall away. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/-hispanic/2017/12/20/hispanic-identity-fades-across-generations-as-immigrant-connections-fall-away Google Scholar
  • Mahin, S. L., & Ekstrand, V. S. 2021. Old law, new tech, and citizen-created hashtags: #BlackLivesMatter and the case for provisional hashtag marks. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98: 13–36. Google Scholar
  • Majchrzak, A., Faraj, S., Kane, G. C., & Azad, B. 2013. The contradictory influence of social media affordances on online communal knowledge sharing. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19: 38–55. Google Scholar
  • Mayer, F. A. 2017. From stigma to empowerment: A journey to reframe disability . In S. HalderL. Assaf (Eds.), Inclusion, disability and culture: 97–106. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. Google Scholar
  • McKenna, S. 2013. “The meth factor”: Group membership, information management, and the navigation of stigma. Contemporary Drug Problems, 40: 351–385. Google Scholar
  • Milan, S. 2015. From social movements to cloud protesting: The evolution of collective identity. Information Communication and Society, 18: 887–900. Google Scholar
  • Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. 2012. Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37: 616–640.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Miller, G. H., Marquez-Velarde, G., Williams, A. A., & Keith, V. 2021. Discrimination and Black social media use: Sites of oppression and expression. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 7: 247–263. Google Scholar
  • Mondal, M., Correa, D., & Benevenuto, F. 2020. Anonymity effects: A large-scale dataset from an anonymous social media platform . In A. SalterJ. F. Barber (Chairs), Proceedings of the 31st ACM conference on hypertext and social media: 69–74. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. Google Scholar
  • Moon, D. 2012. Who am I and who are we? Conflicting narratives of collective selfhood in stigmatized groups. American Journal of Sociology, 117: 1336–1379. Google Scholar
  • Muir, S., Roberts, L. D., & Sheridan, L. P. 2021. The portrayal of online shaming in contemporary online news media: A media framing analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 3: 10051. Google Scholar
  • Nazir, F., Ghazanfar, M., Maqsood, M., Aadil, F., Rho, S., & Mehmood, I. 2019. Social media signal detection using tweets volume, hashtag, and sentiment analysis. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 78: 3553–3586. Google Scholar
  • Nussbaum, M. C. 2001. Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  • Olesen, T. 2018. Memetic protest and the dramatic diffusion of Alan Kurdi. Media Culture & Society, 40: 656–672. Google Scholar
  • Omvedt, G. 2003. Buddhism in India: Challenging Brahmanism and caste. New Delhi, India: SAGE. Google Scholar
  • Pescosolido, B. A., & Martin, J. K. 2015. The stigma complex. Annual Review of Sociology, 41: 87–116. Google Scholar
  • Phelan, J. C., Link, B. G., & Dovidio, J. F. 2008. Stigma and prejudice: One animal or two? Social Science & Medicine, 67: 358–367. Google Scholar
  • Phuong, P. Q. 2022. From “social evils” to “human beings”: Vietnam’s LGBT movement and the politics of recognition. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41: 422–439. Google Scholar
  • Pineda, E. R. 2021. Seeing like an activist: Civil disobedience and the civil rights movement. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  • Pollock, T. G., Lashley, K., Rindova, V. P., & Han, J. H. 2019. Which of these things are not like the others? Comparing the rational, emotional, and moral aspects of reputation, status, celebrity, and stigma. Academy of Management Annals, 13: 444–478.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Prakasam, N., & Huxtable-Thomas, L. 2021. Reddit: Affordances as an enabler for shifting loyalties. Information Systems Frontiers, 23: 723–751. Google Scholar
  • Rhoades, G. F. 2010. Trauma psychology . In I. B. WeinerW. E. Craighead (Eds.), The Corsini encyclopedia of psychology: 1803–1804. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Google Scholar
  • Ruiu, M. L., & Ragnedda, M. 2022. Between online and offline solidarity: Lessons learned from the Coronavirus outbreak in Italy. American Behavioral Scientist. Forthcoming. Google Scholar
  • Rumens, N., & Kerfoot, D. 2009. Gay men at work: (Re)constructing the self as professional. Human Relations, 62: 763–786. Google Scholar
  • Russell-Brown, K. 2017. Critical Black protectionism, Black Lives Matter, and social media: Building a bridge to social justice. Howard Law Journal, 60: 367–412. Google Scholar
  • Sajir, Z., & Aouragh, M. 2019. Solidarity, social media, and the” refugee crisis”: Engagement beyond affect. International Journal of Communication, 13: 28. Google Scholar
  • Scheff, T. J. 1990. Microsociology: Discourse, emotion, and social structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Google Scholar
  • Scheff, T. J. 2000. Shame and the social bond: A sociological theory. Sociological Theory, 18: 84–99. Google Scholar
  • Schneider, A., Conrad, D., Pfeiffer, A., Elbert, T., Kolassa, I. T., & Wilker, S. 2018. Stigmatization is associated with increased PTSD risk after traumatic stress and diminished likelihood of spontaneous remission–A study with east-African conflict survivors. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9: 423. Google Scholar
  • Selvanathan, H. P., Lickel, B., & Dasgupta, N. 2020. An integrative framework on the impact of allies: How identity-based needs influence intergroup solidarity and social movements. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50: 1344–1361. Google Scholar
  • Sheikh, S., & Janoff-Bulman, R. 2010. The “shoulds” and “should nots” of moral emotions: A self-regulatory perspective on shame and guilt. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36: 213–224. Google Scholar
  • Smith, R. J. 2011. Goffman’s interaction order at the margins: Stigma, role, and normalization in the outreach encounter. Symbolic Interaction, 34: 357–376. Google Scholar
  • Snell, G. 2022, August 22. Vietnam says homosexuality “not a disease” in win for gay rights. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2022/8/22/vietnam-says-homosexuality-not-a-disease-in-major-win-for-lgbtq Google Scholar
  • Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. 1988. Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. International Social Movement Research, 1: 197–217. Google Scholar
  • Snow, D., Benford, R., McCammon, H., Hewitt, L., & Fitzgerald, S. 2014. The emergence, development, and future of the framing perspective: 25+ years since” frame alignment. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 19: 23–46. Google Scholar
  • Snow, D. A., & Soule, S. A. 2010. A primer on social movements. New York, NY: W. W. Norton. Google Scholar
  • Soini, A., & Eräranta, K. 2023. Collaborative construction of the closet (in and out): The affordance of interactivity and gay and lesbian employees’ identity work online. Organization, 30: 21–41. Google Scholar
  • Soni-Sinha, U., & Yates, C. A. B. 2013. “Dirty work?”: Gender, race and the union in industrial cleaning. Gender, Work and Organization, 20: 737–751. Google Scholar
  • Stein, L. 2009. Social movement web use in theory and practice: A content analysis of U.S. movement websites. New Media & Society, 11: 749–771. Google Scholar
  • Stewart, M. M., & Shapiro, D. L. 2000. Selection based on merit versus demography: Implications across race and gender lines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 219–231. Google Scholar
  • Sturgess, C. M., & Stinson, D. A. 2022. Fat embodiment for resistance and healing from weight stigma. Body Image, 41: 52–57. Google Scholar
  • Sznaider, N. 2001. The compassionate temperament: Care and cruelty in modern society. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Google Scholar
  • Tangney, J. P. 1995. Recent advances in the empirical study of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientist, 38: 1132–1145. Google Scholar
  • Taylor, V. 1989. Social movement continuity: The women’s movement in abeyance. American Sociological Review, 54: 761–775. Google Scholar
  • Tilly, C. 2004. Social movements, 1768–2004. London, U.K.: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Toubiana, M., & Zietsma, C. 2017. The message is on the wall? Emotions, social media and the dynamics of institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 60: 922–953.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. 2013. Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36: 143–189. Google Scholar
  • Trepte, S. 2021. The social media privacy model: Privacy and communication in the light of social media affordances. Communication Theory, 31: 549–570. Google Scholar
  • Trevisan, F. 2017. Crowd-sourced advocacy: Promoting disability rights through online storytelling. Public Relations Inquiry, 6: 191–208. Google Scholar
  • United Nations Alliance of Civilizations . 2022. About UNAOC. Retrieved from http://about.unaoc.org Google Scholar
  • Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L., & Negoita, B. 2017. Social media affordances for connective action. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 41: 1179–1206. Google Scholar
  • Van Hulst, M., & Yanow, D. 2016. From policy “frames” to “framing”: Theorizing a more dynamic, political approach. American Review of Public Administration, 46: 92–112. Google Scholar
  • Van Laer, J., & Van Aelst, P. 2010. Internet and social movement action repertoires: Opportunities and limitations. Information Communication and Society, 13: 1146–1171. Google Scholar
  • Vazquez, M., & Klein, B. 2020, March 17. Trump again defends use of the term “China virus.” Retrieved from https://www.cnn.com/2020/03/17/politics/trump-china-coronavirus/index.html Google Scholar
  • Volkow, N. D. 2020. Stigma and the toll of addiction. New England Journal of Medicine, 382: 1289–1290. Google Scholar
  • Walder, A. 2009. Political sociology and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 35: 393–412. Google Scholar
  • Walther, J. B. 2022. Social media and online hate. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45: 101298. Google Scholar
  • Wang, X., Reger, R. K., & Pfarrer, M. D. 2021. Faster, hotter, and more linked in: Managing social disapproval in the social media era. Academy of Management Review, 46: 275–298.LinkGoogle Scholar
  • Whitesel, J. 2021. Review of scholarship on fat-gay men . In C. PauseS. Renee Taylor (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of fat studies: 217–236. London, U.K.: Routledge. Google Scholar
  • Whitesel, J., & Shuman, A. 2013. Normalizing desire: Stigma and the carnivalesque in gay bigmen’s cultural practices. Men and Masculinities, 16: 478–496. Google Scholar
  • Wilde, L. 2007. The concept of solidarity: Emerging from the theoretical shadows? British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9: 171–181. Google Scholar
  • Wimmer, A. 1997. Explaining xenophobia and racism: A critical review of current research approaches. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 20: 17–41. Google Scholar
  • Winder, T. J. 2023. Unspoiling identity: An intersectional expansion of stigma response strategies. Sociology of Race and Ethnicity, 9: 195–207. Google Scholar
  • Witte, N. 2018. Responses to stigmatisation and boundary making: Destigmatisation strategies of Turks in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44: 1425–1443. Google Scholar
  • Wortham, J. 2019, March 7. Jenna Wortham on the exhilarating work that leaves her “naked and shivering.” Interview by Lara Takenaga. New York Times. Google Scholar
  • Zald, M. N., & Ash, R. 1966. Social movement organizations: Growth, decay and change. Social Forces, 44: 327–341. Google Scholar
  • Zhang, R., Wang, M. S., Toubiana, M., & Greenwood, R. 2021. Stigma beyond levels: Advancing research on stigmatization. Academy of Management Annals, 15: 188–222.LinkGoogle Scholar
Academy of Management
  Academy of Management
  100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
  Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
  Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
  Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900