Effect of Increasing the Intensity of Implementing Pneumonia Guidelines: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Publication: Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 143, Number 12
Abstract
Background:
Despite the development of evidence-based pneumonia guidelines, limited data exist on the most effective means to implement guideline recommendations into clinical practice.
Objective:
To compare the effectiveness and safety of 3 guideline implementation strategies.
Design:
Cluster-randomized, controlled trial.
Setting:
32 emergency departments in Pennsylvania and Connecticut.
Patients:
3219 patients with a clinical and radiographic diagnosis of pneumonia.
Interventions:
The authors implemented a project-developed guideline for the initial site of treatment based on the Pneumonia Severity Index and performance of evidence-based processes of care at the emergency department level. Guideline implementation strategies were defined as low (n = 8), moderate (n = 12), and high intensity (n = 12).
Measurements:
Effectiveness outcomes were the rate at which low-risk patients were treated on an outpatient basis and the performance of recommended processes of care. Safety outcomes included death, subsequent hospitalization for outpatients, and medical complications for inpatients.
Results:
More low-risk patients (n = 1901) were treated as outpatients in the moderate-intensity and high-intensity groups than in the low-intensity group (high-intensity group, 61.9%; moderate-intensity group, 61.0%; low-intensity group, 37.5%; P = 0.004). More outpatients (n = 1125) in the high-intensity group received all 4 recommended processes of care (high-intensity group, 60.9%; moderate-intensity group, 28.3%; low-intensity group, 25.3%; P < 0.001); more inpatients (n = 2076) in the high-intensity group received all 4 recommended processes of care (high-intensity group, 44.3%; moderate-intensity group, 30.1%; low-intensity group, 23.0%; P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences in safety outcomes were observed across interventions.
Limitations:
Twenty percent of eligible patients were not enrolled, and data on effectiveness outcomes were not collected before the trial.
Conclusions:
Both moderate-intensity and high-intensity guideline implementation strategies safely increased the proportion of low-risk patients with pneumonia who were treated as outpatients. The high-intensity strategy was most effective for increasing the performance of the recommended processes of care for outpatients and inpatients.
*For the names of individuals who served as project coordinators, local study investigators, research staff, and study research nurses, see the Appendix.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
References
1.
Fine MJ, Hough LJ, Medsger AR, Li YH, Ricci EM, Singer DE, et al. The hospital admission decision for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Results from the pneumonia Patient Outcomes Research Team cohort study. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:36-44. [PMID: 8996039]
2.
Coley CM, Li YH, Medsger AR, Marrie TJ, Fine MJ, Kapoor WN, et al. Preferences for home vs hospital care among low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156:1565-71. [PMID: 8687265]
3.
Lave JR, Lin CCJ, Fine MJ, Hughes-Cromwick P. The cost of treating patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Sem Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;20:189-97.
4.
Fine MJ, Auble TE, Yealy DM, Hanusa BH, Weissfeld LA, Singer DE, et al. A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:243-50. [PMID: 8995086]
5.
Atlas SJ, Benzer TI, Borowsky LH, Chang Y, Burnham DC, Metlay JP, et al. Safely increasing the proportion of patients with community-acquired pneumonia treated as outpatients: an interventional trial. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:1350-6. [PMID: 9645830]
6.
Marrie TJ, Lau CY, Wheeler SL, Wong CJ, Vandervoort MK, Feagan BG. A controlled trial of a critical pathway for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. CAPITAL Study Investigators. Community-Acquired Pneumonia Intervention Trial Assessing Levofloxacin. JAMA. 2000;283:749-55. [PMID: 10683053]
7.
Carratala J, Fernandez-Sabe N, Ortega L, Castellsague X, Roson B, Dorca J, et al. Outpatient care compared with hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial in low-risk patients. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:165-72. [PMID: 15684204]
8.
McGarvey RN, Harper JJ. Pneumonia mortality reduction and quality improvement in a community hospital. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1993;19:124-30. [PMID: 8493027]
9.
Meehan TP, Fine MJ, Krumholz HM, Scinto JD, Galusha DH, Mockalis JT, et al. Quality of care, process, and outcomes in elderly patients with pneumonia. JAMA. 1997;278:2080-4. [PMID: 9403422]
10.
Houck PM, Bratzler DW, Nsa W, Ma A, Bartlett JG. Timing of antibiotic administration and outcomes for Medicare patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:637-44. [PMID: 15037492]
11.
Houck PM, MacLehose RF, Niederman MS, Lowery JK. Empiric antibiotic therapy and mortality among Medicare pneumonia inpatients in 10 western states: 1993, 1995, and 1997. Chest. 2001;119:1420-6. [PMID: 11348948]
12.
Gleason PP, Meehan TP, Fine JM, Galusha DH, Fine MJ. Associations between initial antimicrobial therapy and medical outcomes for hospitalized elderly patients with pneumonia. Arch Intern Med. 1999;159:2562-72. [PMID: 10573046]
13.
Levin KP, Hanusa BH, Rotondi A, Singer DE, Coley CM, Marrie TJ, et al. Arterial blood gas and pulse oximetry in initial management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:590-8. [PMID: 11556939]
14.
Niederman MS, Mandell LA, Anzueto A, Bass JB, Broughton WA, Campbell GD, et al. Guidelines for the management of adults with community-acquired pneumonia. Diagnosis, assessment of severity, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;163:1730-54. [PMID: 11401897]
15.
Mandell LA, Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Whitney C. Update of practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1405-33. [PMID: 14614663]
16.
Mandell LA, Marrie TJ, Grossman RF, Chow AW, Hyland RH. Canadian guidelines for the initial management of community-acquired pneumonia: an evidence-based update by the Canadian Infectious Diseases Society and the Canadian Thoracic Society. The Canadian Community-Acquired Pneumonia Working Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:383-421. [PMID: 10987698]
17.
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. National Pneumonia Medicare Quality Improvement Project: Pneumonia Collaborative Framework. Accessed at www.medqic.org/dcs/ContentServer?cid=1116947498569&pagename=Medqic%2FMQTools%2FToolTemplate&c=MQTools on 30 June 2005.
18.
Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations. Overview of the community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) core measure set (3/22/02). Accessed at www.jcaho.org/pms/core+measures/cap_overview.htm on 30 June 2005.
19.
McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey J, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635-45. [PMID: 12826639]
20.
Chu LA, Bratzler DW, Lewis RJ, Murray C, Moore L, Shook C, et al. Improving the quality of care for patients with pneumonia in very small hospitals. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:326-32. [PMID: 12578513]
21.
Suchyta MR, Dean NC, Narus S, Hadlock CJ. Effects of a practice guideline for community-acquired pneumonia in an outpatient setting. Am J Med. 2001;110:306-9. [PMID: 11239849]
22.
Halm EA, Horowitz C, Silver A, Fein A, Dlugacz YD, Hirsch B, et al. Limited impact of a multicenter intervention to improve the quality and efficiency of pneumonia care. Chest. 2004;126:100-7. [PMID: 15249449]
23.
Yealy DM, Auble TE, Stone RA, Lave JR, Meehan TP, Graff LG, et al. The emergency department community-acquired pneumonia trial: methodology of a quality improvement intervention. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;43:770-82. [PMID: 15159711]
24.
Davis DA, Taylor-Vaisey A. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines. CMAJ. 1997;157:408-16. [PMID: 9275952]
25.
Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA. Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ. 1998;317:465-8. [PMID: 9703533]
26.
Berwick DM. Developing and testing changes in delivery of care. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:651-6. [PMID: 9537939]
27.
Murrey KO, Gottlieb LK, Schoenbaum SC. Implementing clinical guidelines: a quality management approach to reminder systems. QRB Qual Rev Bull. 1992;18:423-33. [PMID: 1287524]
28.
Thomson O'Brien MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA, Haynes RB, Freemantle N, Harvey EL. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;:CD000259. [PMID: 10796520]
29.
Donner A, Klar N. Pitfalls of and controversies in cluster randomization trials. Am J Public Health. 2004;94:416-22. [PMID: 14998805]
30.
Dedier J, Singer DE, Chang Y, Moore M, Atlas SJ. Processes of care, illness severity, and outcomes in the management of community-acquired pneumonia at academic hospitals. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:2099-104. [PMID: 11570938]
31.
Rice N. Binomial Regression. In: Leyland AH, Goldstein H, eds. Multilevel Modelling of Health Statistics. Hoboken, NJ: J Wiley; 2001:27-43.
32.
Browne WJ. MCMC Estimation in MLwiN, version 2.0. London: Univ of London; 2003.
33.
Metlay JP, Fine MJ. Testing strategies in the initial management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:109-18. [PMID: 12529093]
34.
Halm EA, Teirstein AS. Clinical practice. Management of community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:2039-45. [PMID: 12490686]
35.
Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, Mandell LA, File TM Jr, Musher DM, Fine MJ. Practice guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia in adults. Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:347-82. [PMID: 10987697]
Information & Authors
Information
Published In
Annals of Internal Medicine
Volume 143 • Number 12 • 20 December 2005
Pages: 881 - 894
History
Published online: 20 December 2005
Published in issue: 20 December 2005
Keywords
Copyright
© 2005 American College of Physicians.
Authors
Metrics & Citations
Metrics
Citations
If you have the appropriate software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice. For an editable text file, please select Medlars format which will download as a .txt file. Simply select your manager software from the list below and click Download.
For more information or tips please see 'Downloading to a citation manager' in the Help menu.
Download article citation data for:
Effect of Increasing the Intensity of Implementing Pneumonia Guidelines: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med.2005;143:881-894. [Epub 20 December 2005]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-12-200512200-00006
Effect of Increasing the Intensity of Implementing Pneumonia Guidelines: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Ann Intern Med.2005;143:881-894. [Epub 20 December 2005]. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-12-200512200-00006
View More
Get Access
Login Options:
Purchase
You will be redirected to acponline.org to sign-in to Annals to complete your purchase.
Create your Free Account
You will be redirected to acponline.org to create an account that will provide access to Annals.
Submit a Comment
Contributors must reveal any conflict of interest. Comments are moderated. Please see our information for authorsregarding comments on an Annals publication.