Abstract
This article reviews the edited volume “Evolvability: A Unifying Concept in Evolutionary Biology?” through biological and philosophical lenses. The book provides diverse angles on evolvability, which is affected by various hierarchical levels, timescales, and types of variation, thus moving beyond a purely genomics perspective. Evolvability is important to biosemiotics because understanding the dynamics of topological genotype spaces could help one better comprehend the phenotypic spaces of meaning, as developmental codes and interrelations can influence the emergence of biological novelty over time. This book is successful in provoking thought on evolvability's role as both a product and a driver of evolutionary innovations and explores the philosophical implications of how evolution has the capacity to generate novel forms of meaning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data sharing was not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed in this essay.
References
Brown, R. L. (2014). What evolvability really is. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65(3), 549–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axt014
Brun-Usan, M., Zimm, R., & Uller, T. (2022). Beyond genotype-phenotype maps: Toward a phenotype-centered perspective on evolution. BioEssays, 44(9), 2100225. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.202100225
Cochrane, T., & Maclaurin, J. (2012). Evolvability and progress in evolutionary economics. Journal of Bioeconomics, 14, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-011-9116-y
Conrad, M. (1983). Adaptability: The significance of variability from molecule to ecosystem. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-8327-1
Crother, B. I., & Murray, C. M. (2019). Early usage and meaning of evolvability. Ecology and Evolution, 9(7), 3784–3793. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.5002
de la Rosa, L. N., & Villegas, C. (2022). Chances and propensities in evo-devo. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 73(2), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/10.1093/bjps/axz048
Deacon, T. W. (2010). A role for relaxed selection in the evolution of the language capacity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(supplement_2), 9000–9006. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914624107
Dennett, D., & McKay, R. (2006). A continuum of mindfulness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(4), 353–354. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X06299084
DiFrisco, J., & Jaeger, J. (2019). Beyond networks: Mechanism and process in evo-devo. Biology & Philosophy, 34, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-019-9716-9
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.
Favareau, D., Kull, K., Ostdiek, G., Maran, T., Westling, L., Cobley, P., Stjernfelt, F., Anderson, M., Tønnessen, M., & Wheeler, W. (2017). How Can the Study of the Humanities Inform the Study of Biosemiotics? Biosemiotics, 10(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-017-9287-6
Hansen, T. F., & Pélabon, C. (2021). Evolvability: A quantitative-genetics perspective. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 52, 153–175. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011121-021241
Hansen, T. F., Houle, D., Pavlicev, M., & Pélabon, C. (Eds.). (2023). Evolvability: A Unifying Concept in Evolutionary Biology? MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/14126.001.0001
Hendlin, Y. H. (2021). Expanding the Reach of Biosemiotics. Biosemiotics, 14(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09425-z
Hoffmeyer, J. (2008). Introduction: Bateson the Precursor. In J. Hoffmeyer (Ed.), A Legacy for Living Systems Biosemiotics 2. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6706-8_1
Jablonski, D. (2022). Evolvability and macroevolution: Overview and synthesis. Evolutionary Biology, 49(3), 265–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-022-09570-4
Janković, S., & Ćirković, M. M. (2016). Evolvability is an evolved ability: The coding concept as the arch-unit of natural selection. Origins of Life and Evolution of Biospheres, 46, 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11084-015-9464-z
Kull, K. (2023). Choices by organisms: On the role of freedom in behaviour and evolution. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 139(4), 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blac077
Lacková, Ľ. (2018). A biosemiotic encyclopedia: An encyclopedic model for evolution. Biosemiotics, 11(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-018-9325-z
Li, D. C. Y. (2023). The semantics of stability: Evolutionarily stable strategy in biology and economics literature. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 11, 1229093. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2023.1229093
Nowak, M. A. (2006). Evolutionary dynamics: Exploring the equations of life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjghw98
Payne, J. L., & Wagner, A. (2019). The causes of evolvability and their evolution. Nature Reviews Genetics, 20(1), 24–38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41576-018-0069-z
Racine, T. P. (2022). Clarifying the use of Theodosius Dobzhansky’s and EO Wilson’s evolutionary maxims: A guide for psychologists. New Ideas in Psychology, 65, 100920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100920
Schnell, A. K., Amodio, P., Boeckle, M., & Clayton, N. S. (2021). How intelligent is a cephalopod? Lessons from Comparative Cognition. Biological Reviews, 96(1), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12651
Sharov, A. A., & Tønnessen, M. (2021). Semiotic agency: Science beyond mechanism. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89484-9_8
Sharov, A. A. (2021). Towards a biosemiotic theory of evolution. Biosemiotics, 14(1), 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-021-09414-2
Takamatsu, Y., Ho, G., & Hashimoto, M. (2020). Amyloid Evolvability and Cancer. Trends in Cancer, 6(8), 624–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2020.04.001
Ulanowicz, R. E. (2002). The balance between adaptability and adaptation. Bio Systems, 64(1–3), 13–22.
Watanabe, J. (2023). Exact expressions and numerical evaluation of average evolvability measures for characterizing and comparing G matrices. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 86(6), 95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-023-01930-8
Winter, B. (2014). Spoken language achieves robustness and evolvability by exploiting degeneracy and neutrality. BioEssays, 36(10), 960–967. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201400028
Acknowledgements
The author wishes to acknowledge the reviewer of this article, whose valuable comments significantly improved the quality of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This article did not involve any human participants or animals.
Conflict of Interest
The author has no conflict of interest to declare.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Li, D.C.Y. Navigating the Evolvability Landscape — Essay Review of Hansen T.F., Houle, D., Pavlicev, M., & Pelabon, C. (Eds.). (2023). Evolvability: A Unifying Concept in Evolutionary Biology? MIT Press. Biosemiotics 17, 257–263 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09552-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-024-09552-3