Volume 35, Issue 1 p. 107-125
Research Article

Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives

Flore Bridoux

Corresponding Author

Flore Bridoux

Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Correspondence to: Flore Bridoux, Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Plantage Muidergracht 12, 1018TV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
J. W. Stoelhorst

J. W. Stoelhorst

Amsterdam Business School, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 February 2013
Citations: 278

Abstract

Instrumental stakeholder theory proposes a positive relationship between fairness toward stakeholders and firm performance. Yet, some firms are successful with an arms-length approach to stakeholder management, based on bargaining power rather than fairness. We address this puzzle by relaxing the assumption that all stakeholders care about fairness. Empirical evidence from behavioral economics and social psychology suggests that firms face a population of potential stakeholders that consists not only of so-called ‘reciprocators,’ who do care about fairness, but also of self-regarding stakeholders, who do not. We propose that a fairness approach is more effective in attracting, retaining, and motivating reciprocal stakeholders to create value, while an arms-length approach is more effective in motivating self-regarding stakeholders and in attracting and retaining self-regarding stakeholders with high bargaining power. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.